Comparison of different heuristic and decomposition techniques for river stage modeling
- 81 Downloads
This paper proposes hybrid soft computing models for daily river stage modeling. The models combine variational mode decomposition (VMD) with different soft computing models, including artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and random forest (RF). The performances of VMD-based models (VMD-ANN, VMD-ANFIS, and VMD-RF) are assessed by model efficiency indices and graphical comparison, and compared with those of single models (ANN, ANFIS, and RF) and ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD)-based models (EEMD-ANN, EEMD-ANFIS, and EEMD-RF). Results show that VMD-ANN, VMD-ANFIS, and VMD-RF models are more efficient and accurate than ANN, ANFIS, and RF models, respectively, and slightly better than EEMD-ANN, EEMD-ANFIS, and EEMD-RF models, respectively. In terms of model efficiency and accuracy, the top five models are VMD-ANFIS, EEMD-ANFIS, VMD-ANN, VMD-RF, and ANFIS and the VMD-ANFIS model is the best. It is found that VMD can enhance the performance of conventional single soft computing models; VMD is more effective than EEMD for hybrid model development; and the ANFIS model combined with VMD and EEMD can yield better efficiency and accuracy than other models. Therefore, VMD-based hybrid modeling is a more effective method for reliable daily river stage modeling.
KeywordsVariational mode decomposition Ensemble empirical mode decomposition Heuristic techniques Artificial neural networks Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system Random forest
The second author, Professor Sungwon Kim, would like to appreciate the financial support from Dongyang University, South Korea. This study was supported by grant from Dongyang University in 2017.
- Adamowski, J., Chan, H. F., Prasher, S. O., Ozga-Zielinski, B., & Sliusarieva, A. (2012). Comparison of multiple linear and nonlinear regression, autoregressive integrated moving average, artificial neural network, and wavelet artificial neural network methods for urban water demand forecasting in Montreal, Canada. Water Resources Research, 48(1), W01528. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. (2000). Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(115).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bertsekas, D. P. (1996). Constrained optimization and Lagrange multiplier methods. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.Google Scholar
- Günther, F., & Fritsch, S. (2010). Neuralnet: training of neural networks. R J, 2(1), 30–38.Google Scholar
- Helske J, Luukko P (2016) Rlibeemd: ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and its complete variant (CEEMDAN). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rlibeemd/ Rlibeemd.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2017.
- Jang, J. S. R., Sun, C. T., & Mizutani, E. (1997). Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Kim, S., Seo, Y., & Singh, V. P. (2015). Assessment of pan evaporation modeling using bootstrap resampling and soft computing methods. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(5), 04014063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luenberger, D. G., & Ye, Y. (2008). Linear and nonlinear programming. 3rd edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- MathWorks (2017) Fuzzy logic toolbox: user’s guide. The MathWorks, Inc. http://www.mathworks.com/help/pdf_doc/fuzzy/fuzzy.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2017.
- Montgomery, D. C., & George, C. R. (2003). Applied statistics and probability for engineers (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Nguyen TT (2015) An L1-regression random forests method for forecasting of Hoa Binh reservoir’s incoming flow. In: Proceedings of 2015 Seventh International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, pp 360–364. doi: 10.1109/KSE.2015.52.Google Scholar
- Rajaee, T., Nourani, V., Mohammad, Z. K., & Kisi, O. (2011). River suspended sediment load prediction: application of ANN and wavelet conjunction model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16(8), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sumathi, S., & Paneerselvam, S. (2010). Computational intelligence paradigms: theory and applications using MATLAB. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Zell A, Mamier G, Mache MVN, Hübner R, Döring S, Herrmann K-U, Soyez T, Sommer MST, Hatzigeorgiou A, Schreiner DPT, Kett B, Wieland GCJ, Gatter J (1998) Stuttgart neural network simulator (SNNS) v. 4.2 user manual. http://www.ra.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/ downloads/SNNS/SNNSv4.2.Manual.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2018.