Abstract
Risk of gene flow from canola (Brassica napus) to species of wild relatives was used as an example to evaluate the risk of gene flow of transgenic crops. B. juncea and B. rapa were the most common weedy Brassica species in China, which were both sexually compatible with canola. Data on canola cultivation in China were collected and analyzed using geographic information system (GIS), and the distribution of its wild relatives was predicted by MaxEnt species distribution model. Based on biological and phenological evidence, our results showed that gene flow risk exists in most parts of the country, especially in places with higher richness of wild Brassica species. However, risk in dominant canola cultivation regions is relatively low owing to the reduced distribution density of wild species in these regions. Three regions of higher risk of gene flow had been identified. Risk of gene flow is relatively high in certain areas. China has been assumed to be the original center of B. juncea and B. rapa, and gene flow may lead to negative effects on the conservation of biodiversity of local species. Strategies had been proposed to reduce the possibility of gene flow either by monitoring introgression from crops to wild relatives in the areas of high adoption of the crop or by taking measures to limit the releasing of new crops or varieties in the areas with abundant wild relatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. P., Lew, D., & Peterson, A. T. (2003). Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: Criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecological Modelling, 162, 211–232.
Bing, D. J., Downey, R. K., & Rakow, G. F. W. (1996). Hybridizations among Brassica napus, B. rapa and B. juncea and their two weedy relatives B. nigra and Sinapis arvensis under open pollination conditions in the field. Plant Breeding, 115, 470–473.
Cardoza, V., & Stewart Jr., C. N. (2007). Rapeseed biotechnology. Advances in Botanical Research, 45, 435–449.
Davenport, I. J., Wilkinson, M. J., Mason, D. C., Charters, Y. M., Jones, A. E., Allainguillaume, J., Butler, H. T., & Raybould, A. F. (2000). Quantifying gene movement from oilseed rape to its wild relatives using remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 3567–3573.
Eastham, K., & Sweet, J. (2002). Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. Denmark: European Environment Agency Copenhagen.
Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P., et al. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129–151.
Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. R. (2009). Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677–697.
Ellstrand, N. C., Prentice, H. C., & Hancock, J. F. (1999). Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 30, 539–563.
Graham, M. H. (2003). Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multipie regression. Ecology, 84, 809–2815.
Guan, C. Y. (2005). Breeding of rapeseed by genetic transformation. Chinese Journal of Oilseed Crop Sciences, 27, 97–103 (in Chinese with English Abstract).
Gulden, R. H., Shirtliffe, S. J., & Thomas, A. G. (2003). Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Science, 51, 83–86.
Hüsken, A., & Dietz-Pfeilstetter, A. (2007). Pollen-mediated intraspecific gene flow from herbicide resistant oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Transgenic Research, 16, 557–569.
Hauser, T. P., & Shaw, R. G. (1998). Fitness of F1 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity, 81, 429–435.
Huangfu, C. H., Song, X. L., Qiang, S., & Zhang, H. J. (2007). Response of wild Brassica juncea populations to glyphosate. Pest Management Science, 63, 1133–1140.
Jørgensen, R., Andersen, B., Hauser, T. P., Landbo, L., Mikkelsen, T. R., & Østergård, H. (1998). Introgression of crop genes from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related wild species—an avenue for the escape of engineered genes. Acta Horticulturae, (459), 211–217.
Jørgensen, R. B., Ammitzbøll, H., Hansen, L. B., Johannessen, M., Andersen, B., & Hauser, T. P. (2004). Gene introgression and consequences in Brassica. In H. C. M. D. Nijs, D. Bartsch, & J. Sweet (Eds.), Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives (pp. 253–262). Cambridge: CABI Publishing.
James, C. (2016). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2016. ISAAA Brief No. 52. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.
Kerlan, M. C., Chèvre, A. M., Eber, F., Baranger, A., & Renard, M. (1992). Risk assessment of outcrossing of transgenic rapessed to related species. Euphytica, 62, 145–153.
Li, X., Pan, L. W., Li, J. Y., Lü, R., Zhang, S. Y., Liu, Y. M., & Gao, Q. (2011). Identification of imported genetically modified rapeseeds. Chinese Journal of Oilseed Crop Sciences, 33, 77–82 (in Chinese with English Abstract).
Liu, Y. B., Darmency, H., Stewart Jr., C. N., Wei, W., Tang, Z. X., & Ma, K. P. (2015). The effect of Bt-transgene introgression on plant growth and reproduction in wild Brassica juncea. Transgenic Research, 24, 537–547.
Liu, Y. B., Wei, W., Ma, K. P., Li, J. S., Liang, Y. Y., & Darmency, H. (2013). Consequences of gene flow between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and its relatives. Plant Science, 211, 42–51.
Metz, P. L. J., Jacobsen, E., Nap, J. P., Pereira, A., & Stiekema, W. J. (1997). The impact on biosafety of the phosphinothricin-tolerance transgene in inter-specific B. rapa × B. napus hybrids and their successive backcrosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 95, 442–450.
Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M., & Peterson, T. A. (2007). Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 102–117.
Pekrun, C., Hewitt, J. D. J., & Lutman, P. J. W. (1998). Cultural control of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, 130, 155–163.
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190, 231–259.
Raymer, P. L. (2002). Canola: An emerging oilseed crop. In J. Janick & A. Whipkey (Eds.), Trends in new crops and new uses: Strength in diversity (pp. 122–126). Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press.
Reddy, S., & Dávalos, L. M. (2003). Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 1719–1727.
Schafer, M. G., Ross, A. A., Londo, J. P., Burdick, C. A., Lee, E. H., Travers, S. E., van de Water, P. K., & Sagers, C. L. (2011). The establishment of genetically engineered canola populations in the U.S. PLoS One, 6, e25736.
Scheffler, J. A., & Dale, P. J. (1994). Opportunities for gene transfer from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related species. Transgenic Research, 3, 263–278.
Snow, A. A., Andersen, B., & Jørgensen, R. B. (1999). Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa. Molecular Ecology, 8, 605–615.
U. N. (1935). Genimic analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Journal of Japanese Botany, 7, 389–452.
Wang, J. L., Luan, Y. F., Daci, Z. G., & Chang, T. J. (2006). Geographical distribution and biological characters of wild rapeseed in Tibet. Chinese Journal of Oilseed Crop Sciences, 28, 134–137 (in Chinese with English Abstract).
Warwick, S. I., Légère, A., Simard, M. J., & James, T. (2008). Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population. Molecular Ecology, 17, 1387–1395.
Zhang, M. G., Zhou, Z. K., Chen, W. Y., Cannon, C. H., Raes, N., & Slik, J. (2013). Major declines of woody plant species ranges under climate change in Yunnan, China. Diversity and Distribution, 20, 405–415.
Zhu, Y. M., Li, Y. D., Colbach, N., Ma, K. P., Wei, W., & Mi, X. C. (2012). Seed losses at harvest and seed persistence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in different cultural conditions in Chinese farming systems. Weed Research, 52, 317–326.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by a National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant (31370357) and a Commonweal Scientific Programme of the Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (201109028).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
1. Published research literatures for wild Brassica species distribution data collection.
2. National and local floras for wild Brassica species distribution data collection.
3. Globcover 2009 Legend and Brassica habitat discrimination.
ESM 1
(PDF 67 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, Jj., Zhang, Mg., Wei, W. et al. GIS assessment of the risk of gene flow from Brassica napus to its wild relatives in China. Environ Monit Assess 190, 405 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6753-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6753-9