Advertisement

The impact of preload on the mobilisation of multivalent trace metals in pyrite-rich sediment

  • O. Karikari-Yeboah
  • W. Skinner
  • J. Addai-Mensah
Article
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Trace metals occur at various concentrations in all wetlands. Their proliferation, chemical speciation, mobility and bioavailability are dependent on the redox potential (Eh), pH and the presence of organic and inorganic adsorption surfaces and co-precipitating metals. Consequently, changes in these key parameters have the potential to alter the fate of the dominant trace metal species in the sediment. An imposition of preload surcharge is a technique use in geotechnical engineering to improve in the strength and load carrying capacity of waterlogged sediments. The soil strength improvement is effected through the expulsion of porewater from the sediment. The imposition of surcharge over wetland sediments has the potential to create oxygen-deficient condition within the sediment, and cause pH, temperature, redox, EC and salinity changes in the sediment, which would impact on the mobilisation, chemical speciation, mobility and bioavailability of dominant toxic trace metals and their toxicity in the sediment. In the present work, a case study of the impact of preload surcharge on the proliferation, chemical speciation, mobilisation, mobility and bioavailability of arsenic, chromium, cobalt, copper and zinc in a naturally occurring pyrite-rich sediment is presented. The imposition of preload surcharge over the pyrite-rich sediment was accompanied by changes in the redox dynamics of the sediment, with multi-facet impact on the concentration, mobilisation and bioavailability of toxic trace metals, their redox transformation between oxidation states and on the toxicity within and outside the sediment environment.

Keywords

Multivalent Trace metals Toxicity Bioavailability Preload surcharge Pyrite-rich sediment 

Notes

Funding information

This research was founded by the Maiden Geotechnics and Australian Commonwealth Scholarship awarded by the University of South Australia to the first author.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acharyya, S. K., & Shah, B. A. (2006). Arsenic-contaminated groundwater from parts of Damodar fan-delta and west of Bhagirathi River, West Bengal, India: influence of fluvial geomorphology and quaternary morphostratigraphy. Environmental Geology, 52, 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amery, F., Degryse, F., Cheyns, K., De Troyer, I., Mertens, J., Merckx, R., & Smolders, E. (2008). The UV- absorbance of dissolved organic matter predicts the fivefold variation in its affinity for mobilizing Cu in an agricultural soil horizon. European Journal of Soil Science, 59, 1087–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton, E. D., Bush, R. T., Johnston, S. G., Watling, K. M., Hocking, R. K., Sullivan, L. A., & Parker, G. K. (2009). Sorption of arsenic by iron-oxides and oxyhydroxides in soils. Environmental Science Technology, 43, 9202–9207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdhury, S. A., Yanful, E. K., & Pratt, A. R. (2011). Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by mixed magnetite-maghemite nanoparticles. Environmental Earth Science, 64, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clesceri, L. S., Greenberg, A. E. & Eaton, A. D. (eds.) 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA, AWWA, WEF.Google Scholar
  6. Fendorf, S. E. (1995). Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters. Geoderman, 67, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gál, J., Hursthouse, A., Tatner, P., Stewart, F., & Welton, R. (2008). Cobalt and secondary poisoning in the terrestrial food chain: data review and research gaps to support risk assessment. Environment International, 34, 821–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hughes, M., & Poole, R. (1991). Metal speciation and microbial growth-the hard (and soft) facts. Journal of General Microbiology, 137, 725–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacquat, O., Voegelin, A., & Kretzschmar, R. (2009a). Local coordination of Zn in hydroxy-interlayered minerals and implications for Zn retention in soils. Geochimica et Cosmochim. Acta, 73, 348–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacquat, O., Voegelin, A., & Kretzschmar, R. (2009b). Soil properties controlling Zn speciation and fractionation in contaminated soils. Geochimica et Cosmochim. Acta, 73, 5256–5272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, S. J. (1970). Foundation precompression with vertical sand drains. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division: American Society of Civil Engineers, 96, 145–174.Google Scholar
  12. Karikari-Yeboah, O., & Addai-Mensah, J. (2017). Assessing the impact of preload on pyrite-rich sediment and groundwater quality. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karikari-Yeboah, O. & Gyasi-Agyei, Y. (2000). Stability of slopes characterised by colluvium: investigation, analysis and stability. GeoEng2000. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Karikari-Yeboah, O., Skinner, W. & Addai-Mensah, J. (2016). The behaviour of reactive toxic solutes in naturally occurring pyrite-rich sediment under surface surcharge. Chemeca Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Keon, N. E., Swartz, C. H., Brabander, D. J., Harvey, C., & Hemond, H. F. (2001). Validation of an arsenic sequential extraction method for evaluating mobility in sediments. Environmental Science & Technology, 35, 2778–2784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kotas, J., & Stasicka, Z. (2000). Chromium occurrence in the environment and methods of its speciation. Environmental Pollution, 107, 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lengke, M. F., Sandawanitchakit, C., & Tempel, R. N. (2009). The oxidation and dissolution of arsenic-bearing sulfides. The Canadian Mineralogist, 47, 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, P., Qian, H., & Wu, J. (2014). Accelerated research on land creation. Nature, 510, 29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mclaren, R. G., & Crawford, D. V. (1973). Studies in soil copper. 1. Fractionation of copper in soils. Journal of Soil Science, 24, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mertens, J., & Smolders, E. (2013). Zinc. In B. J. Alloway (Ed.), Heavy metals in soils—trace metals and matalloids in soils and their bioavailability. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, S. D., Robertson, A., & Donohue, T. (1997). Advances in acid drainage prediction using the net acid generation (NAG) test. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, Vancouver, pp. 535–549.Google Scholar
  22. Muller, B., Axelsson, M. A., & Ohlander, B. (2002). Adsorption of trace elements on pyrite surfaces in sukfidic mine tailings from Krisineberg (Sweden) a few years after remediation. The Science of the Total Environment, 298, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagpal, N. K. 2004. Water quality guidelines for cobalt. . In: Water Protection Section, W., Air And Climate Change Branch, Victoria; BC (ed.). BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  24. Oorts, K. (2013). Copper. In B. J. Alloway (Ed.), Heavy metals in soils—trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Richard, F. C., & Bourg, A. C. M. (1991). Aqueous geochemistry of chromium: A review. Water Research, 25, 807–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stewart, W. A., Miller, S. D. & Smart, R. 2006. Advances in acid rock drainage (ARD) characterisation of mine wastes. In: (ED.), R. I. B. (ed.) 7th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD) St. Louis MO, 2006, 2098, 2119.Google Scholar
  27. Sullivan, L. A., & Bush, R. T. (1997). Quantitative microanalysis of rough soil surface in the scanning electron microscope using peak-to-background method. Soil Science, 162, 749–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. WHO (ed.) 2001. Environmental health criteria for arsenic and arsenic compounds—EHC 224, Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Karikari-Yeboah
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. Skinner
    • 1
  • J. Addai-Mensah
    • 1
  1. 1.Future Industries InstituteUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Maiden GeotechnicsNerang EastAustralia

Personalised recommendations