Skip to main content

Performance of biotic indices in comparison to chemical-based Water Quality Index (WQI) in evaluating the water quality of urban river

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment volume 190, Article number: 297 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

In order to evaluate the water quality of one of the most polluted urban river in Malaysia, the Penchala River, performance of eight biotic indices, Biomonitoring Working Party (BMWP), BMWPThai, BMWPViet, Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT), ASPTThai, BMWPViet, Family Biotic Index (FBI), and Singapore Biotic Index (SingScore), was compared. The water quality categorization based on these biotic indices was then compared with the categorization of Malaysian Water Quality Index (WQI) derived from measurements of six water physicochemical parameters (pH, BOD, COD, NH3-N, DO, and TSS). The river was divided into four sections: upstream section (recreational area), middle stream 1 (residential area), middle stream 2 (commercial area), and downstream. Abundance and diversity of the macroinvertebrates were the highest in the upstream section (407 individual and H′ = 1.56, respectively), followed by the middle stream 1 (356 individual and H′ = 0.82). The least abundance was recorded in the downstream section (214 individual). Among all biotic indices, BMWP was the most reliable in evaluating the water quality of this urban river as their classifications were comparable to the WQI. BMWPs in this study have strong relationships with dissolved oxygen (DO) content. Our results demonstrated that the biotic indices were more sensitive towards organic pollution than the WQI. BMWP indices especially BMWPViet were the most reliable and could be adopted along with the WQI for assessment of water quality in urban rivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Akmal, M., Mohammad, S. O., Ahmad Abas, K., & Mohamed Nor, M. D. (2013). Monitoring urban river water quality using macroinvertebrate and physico-chemical parameters: case study of Penchala River, Malaysia. Journal of Biological Sciences, 13(6), 474–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba-Tercedor, J. (1996). Aquatic macroinvertebrates and water quality of rivers. IV Simposio del Agua de Andalucía (SIAGA), 2, 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, D. A. (1995). Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shami, S., Che Salmah, M. R., Abu Hassan, A., Suhaila, A. H., & Siti Azizah, M. N. (2011). Influence of agricultural, industrial, and anthropogenic stresses on the distribution and diversity of macroinvertebrates in Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, 74, 1195–1202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shami, S., Che Salmah, M. R., Abu Hassan, A., & Siti Azizah, M. N. (2010). Distribution of Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) in polluted rivers of the Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Science, 22(11), 1718–1727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shami, S. A., Che Salmah, M. R., Abu Hassan, A., Madziatul Rosmahanie, M., Suhaila, A. H., Wan Mohd Hafezul, W. A. G., Al-Harbi, N. A., & Al-Mutairi K. A. (2017). Biodiversity patterns of aquatic macroinvertebrates in tropical forests streams as a response to logging activities and deforestation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 332–339.

  • Armitage, P. D., Moss, M., Wright, J. F., & Furse, M. T. (1983). The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running water sites. Water Research, 17(3), 333–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azrina, M. Z., Yap, C. K., Rahim Ismail, A., Ismail, A., & Tan, S. G. (2006). Anthropogenic impacts on the distribution and biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality of the Langat River, Peninsular Malaysia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 64(3), 337–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beavan, L., Sadler, J., & Pinder, C. (2001). The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river. Hydrobiologia, 445, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, T. J., Eikaas, H. S., & Harding, J. S. (2014). The Singscore: a macroinvertebrate biotic index for assessing the health of Singapore’s streams and canals. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 62, 540–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O., & Jamieson, B. G. M. (1971). Aquatic Oligochaeta of the world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capitulo, A. R., Tangorra, M., & Ocon, C. (2001). Use of benthic macroinvertebrates to assess the biological status of Pampean streams in Argentina. Aquatic Ecology, 35, 109–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Che Salmah, M. R., Abu Hassan, A., & Jongkar, G. (2007). Diversity of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera in various tributaries of Temenggor catchment, Perak, Malaysia. Wetland Science, 5(1), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessman, B. C. (2003). New sensitivity grades for Australian river macroinvertebrates. Marine and Freshwater Research, 54, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, M. D. (2017). River of life project now 67 pct complete. The News Strait Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/2017/04/227380/river-life-project-now-67-pct-complete. Accessed 1 July 2017.

  • Clifford, T., & Tariro, D. (2005). Land-use impacts on river water quality in lowveld sand river systems in south-east Zimbabwe. Land Use and Water Resources Research, 5, 3.1–3.10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, N. M., Crossland, M. R., & Pearson, R. G. (2004). Effect of low dissolved oxygen on survival, emergence, and drift of tropical stream macroinvertebrates. Journal of North American Benthological Society, 23(2), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniawska-Kusza, I. (2005). Comparing modified biological monitoring working party score system and several biological indices based on macroinvertebrates for water-quality assessment. Limnologica, 35, 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, N., & Vanhooren, G. (1983). Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia, 100, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOE. (1985). Development of Water Quality Criteria and Standards for Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrene, M., & Legendre, P. (1997). Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67, 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faridah, O., Alaa Eldin, M. E., & Ibrahim, M. (2012). Trend analysis of a tropical urban river water quality in Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14, 3164–3173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazleena, A. (2010). Sg Penchala picked for river rescue project. The Star. http://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2010/01/06/sg-penchala-picked-for-river-rescue-project/. Accessed July 2017.

  • GEC (2017). Sungai Penchala river education programme. http://www.gec.org.my/index.cfm?&menuid=298. Accessed 18 May 2017.

  • Gonçalves, F. B., & Menezes, M. S. (2011). A comparative analysis of biotic indices that use macroinvertebrates to assess water quality in a coastal river of Paraná state, southern Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 11, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, J., & Tsyrlin, E. (2002). The waterbug book. a guide to the freshwater macroinvertebrates of temperate Australia. Victoria: CSIRO Publishing.

  • Heino, H., Melo, A. S., Bini, L. M., Altermatt, F., Al-Shami, S. A., Angeler, D., Bonada, N., Brand, C., Callisto, M., Cottenie, K., Dangles, O., Dudgeon, D., Encalada, A., Göthe, E., Grönroos, M., Hamada, N., Jacobsen, D., Landeiro, V. L., Ligeiro, R., Martins, R. T., Miserendino, M. L., Md Rawi, C. S., Rodrigues, M., Roque, F. O., Sandin, L., Schmera, D., Sgarbi, L. F., Simaika, J., Siqueira, T., Thompson, R. M., & Townsend, C. R. (2015). A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect meta-communities at two spatial levels. Ecology and Evolution, 5, 1235–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenhoff, W. L. (1988). Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7(1), 65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, T. T. H. (2009). Monitoring and assessment of macroinvertebrates communities in support of river management in northern Vietnam. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. Ghent University, Belgium.

  • Hynes, H. B. N. (1970). The ecology of running waters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäch, M. A., & Ji, L. (2003). Water beetles of China (Vol. III). Vienna: Zoologisch-Botanische Gesellschaft & Wiener Coleopterologenverein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäch, M. A., & Ji, L. (1998). Water beetles of China (Vol. II). Vienna: Zoologisch-Botanische Gesellschaft & Wiener Coleopterologenverein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., Wen, F., Ma, Y. P., & Yan, Y. (2009). Community structure of macrozoobentos and bioassessment of water quality in Hujiaxi Stream of Qingjiang River Basin, Hubei Province. Journal of Lake Sciences, 21, 547–555. https://doi.org/10.18307/2009.0414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jian-Guo, J. (2006). Development of a new biotic index to assess freshwater pollution. Environmental Pollution, 139, 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, Y. K., Tortajada, C., & Biswas, A. K. (2012). Cleaning of the Singapore River and Kallang Basin in Singapore: human and environmental dimensions. Ambio, 41, 777–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyoncu, H., & Zeybek, M. (2011). An application of different biotic and diversity indices for assessing water quality: a case study in the Rivers Cukurca and Isparta (Turkey). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 19–27.

  • Koutsomitrou, D., Efthimiou, G., Detsis, V., & Economou-Amilli, A. (2014). Ecological assessment of the Kifisos River channel and the riparian forest vegetation. 2nd International Conference - Water resources and wetlands. https://www.limnology.ro/water2014/proceedings/11_Dimitra.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2017.

  • Lafont, M. (1984). Oligochaete communities as biological descriptors of pollution in the fine sediments of rivers. Hydrobiologia, 115(1), 127–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., & Penrose, D. L. (1996). History of the EPT taxa richness metric. Bulletin North American Benthological Society, 12(13), 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leunda, P. M., Oscoz, J., Miranda, R., & Ariño, A. H. (2009). Longitudinal and seasonal variation of the benthic macroinvertebrate community and biotic indices in an undisturbed Pyrenean river. Ecological Indicators, 9, 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke, S., Norris, R. H., Faith, D. P., & Stockwell, D. (2005). ANNA: a new prediction method for bioassessment programs. Freshwater Biology, 50, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, R. T., Stephan, N. N. C., & Alves, R. G. (2008). Tubificidae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) as an indicator of water quality in an urban stream in southeast Brazil. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 20(3), 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. L. (1989). Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe. Environmental Pollution, 60, 101–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W., Cummins, K. W., & Berg, M. B. (2008). An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America (4th ed.). Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • MMD (2007). Iklim Malaysia. Malaysia Meteorology Department, Malaysia. http://www.met.gov.my/web/metmalaysia/118. Accessed 18 March 2017.

  • Murphy, P. M. (1978). The temporal variability in biotic indices. Environment Pollution, 13, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustow, S. E. (2002). Biological monitoring of rivers in Thailand: use and adaptation of the BMWP score. Hydrobiologia, 479, 191–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustow, S. E. (1997). Aquatic macroinvertebrates and environmental quality of rivers in Northern Thailand. Unpublished PhD thesis, London University, London.

  • Nessimian, J. L., Venticinque, E. M., Zuanon, J., De Marco Jr., P., Gordo, M., Fidelis, L., Batista, J. D., & Juen, L. (2008). Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia, 614, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, X. Q., Mai, D. Y., Pinder, C., & Tilling, S. (2004). Biological surveillance of freshwaters: a practical manual and identification key for use in Vietnam. Hanoi: Vietnam National University Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normile, D. (2010). Restoration or devastation? Science, 327(5973), 1568–1570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, B. W. (1978). Freshwater invertebrate of the United States. New York: Litton Educational Publishing Inc.

  • Plafkin, J. L., Barbour, M. T., Porter, K., Gross, S., & Hughes, R. M. (1989). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. Washington, D.C.: EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravera, O. (2001). A comparison between diversity, similarity and biotic indices applied to the macroinvertebrate community of a small stream: the Ravella river (Como Province, Northern Italy). Aquatic Ecology, 35(2), 97–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossaro, B., Boggero, A., Lods Crozet, B., Free, G., Lencioni, V., & Marziali, L. (2011). A comparison of different biotic indices based on benthic macroinvertebrates in Italian lakes. Journal of Limnology, 70, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman, A. A., Che Salmah, M. R., Abu Hassan, A., Madziatul Rosemahanie, M., & Al Mutairi, K. (2014). Importance of regional diversity and environmental conditions on local species richness of aquatic macro-invertebrates in tropical forested streams. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 30(4), 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangpradup, N., & Boonsoong, B. (2006). Identification of freshwater invertebrates of the Mekong River and its tributaries. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenchenko, V. P., & Moroz, M. D. (2005). Comparative analysis of biotic indices in the monitoring system of running water in a biospheric reserve. Water Resources, 32, 200–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simić, V., & Simić, S. (1999). Use of the rivers macroinvertebrates of Serbia to formulate a biotic index. Hydrobiologia, 416, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. C., & Norris, R. H. (2000). Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In Wright J. F., Sutcliffe D. W., & Furse M. T. (Eds.), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques (pp. 125–142). United Kingdom: Freshwater Biological Association.

  • Suhaila, A. H., Che Salmah, M. R., & Nurul Huda, A. (2014). Seasonal abundance and diversity of aquatic insects in rivers in Gunung Jerai Forest Reserve, Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana, 43(5), 667–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, J. H., & Covich, A. P. (1991). Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. San Diego, California: Academic Press Inc.

  • Voelz, N. J., Zuellig, R. E., Shieh, S. H., & Ward, J. V. (2005). The effects of urban areas on benthic macroinvertebrates in two Colorado plains rivers. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101, 175–202.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., & Prusevich, A. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467(7315), 555–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. B., Grubaugh, J. W., & Whiles, M. R. (1996). Biotic indices and stream ecosystem processes: results from and experimental study. Ecological Applications, 6, 140–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan Mohd Hafezul, W. A. G., Che Salmah, M. R., Suhaila, A. H., Salman, A. A., Abu Hassan, A., & Ahmad Najmi, N. H. (2016). Variation in environmental conditions influences diversity and abundance of Ephemeroptera in forest streams of northern Peninsula Malaysia. Tropical Ecology, 57(3), 489–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F. (1995). Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20, 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule, C. M., & Yong, H. S. (2004). Freshwater invertebrates of the Malaysian regions. Kuala Lumpur: Academy of Sciences Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, Z. (2010). Benchmarking river water quality in Malaysia. Jurutera. http://irep.iium.edu.my/2954/1/Feature-BenchmarkingRiverWater3pp.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2017.

  • Zamora-Munõz, C., Sainz-Cantero, C. E., Sanchez-Ortega, A., & Alba-Tercedor, J. (1995). Are biological indices BMPW’ and ASPT’ and their significance regarding water quality seasonally dependent? Factors explaining their variations. Water Research, 29, 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora-Munõz, C., & Alba-Tercedor, J. (1996). Bioassessment of organically polluted Spanish rivers, using a biotic index and multivariate methods. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15, 332–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubaidah, I., Rahizah, S., & Ramlee, K. (2014). Evaluating trends of water quality index of selected Kelang river tributaries. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 13(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the School of Environmental Science and Natural Resources who provide the technical supports and laboratory to make this study possible.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support for this project provided by the Ministry of Higher Education under a Long-Term Research Grant Scheme (203/PKT/6720004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, Faculty Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

    Wan Mohd Hafezul Wan Abdul Ghani, Ahmad Abas Kutty & Mohd Akmal Mahazar

  2. Biology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, P. O. Box 741, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

    Salman Abdo Al-Shami

  3. School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Penang, Malaysia

    Suhaila Ab Hamid

Authors
  1. Wan Mohd Hafezul Wan Abdul Ghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmad Abas Kutty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohd Akmal Mahazar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salman Abdo Al-Shami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suhaila Ab Hamid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan Mohd Hafezul Wan Abdul Ghani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan Abdul Ghani, W.M.H., Abas Kutty, A., Mahazar, M.A. et al. Performance of biotic indices in comparison to chemical-based Water Quality Index (WQI) in evaluating the water quality of urban river. Environ Monit Assess 190, 297 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6675-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6675-6

Keywords

  • Biotic indices
  • River pollution
  • Urban river
  • Water quality assessment
  • WQI