Advertisement

A scientometric examination of the water quality research in India

  • P. Nishy
  • Renuka Saroja
Article

Abstract

Water quality has emerged as a fast-developing research area. Regular assessment of research activity is necessary for the successful R&D promotion. Water quality research work carried out in different countries increased over the years, and the USA ranked first in productivity while India stands in the seventh position in quantity and occupies the ninth position in quality of the research output. India observes a steady growth in the water quality research. Four thousand six hundred sixteen articles from India assessed from the aspect of citations received distributions of source countries, institutes, journals, impact factor, words in the title, author keywords. The qualitative and quantitative analysis identifies the contributions of the major institutions involved in research. Much of the country’s water quality research is carried out by universities, public research institutions and science councils, whereas the contribution from Ministry of water resources not so significant. A considerable portion of Indian research is communicated through foreign journals, and the most active one is Environmental Monitoring and Assessment journal. Twenty-one percent of work is reported in journals published from India and around 7% ages in open access journals. The study highlights that international collaborative research resulted in high-quality papers. The authors meticulously analyse the published research works to gain a deeper understanding of focus areas through word cluster analyses on title words and keywords. When many papers deal with ‘contamination’, ‘assessment’ and ‘treatment’, enough studies done on ‘water quality index’, ‘toxicity’, considerable work is carried out in environmental, agricultural, industrial and health problems related to water quality. This detailed scientometric study from 1,09,766 research works from SCI-E during 1986–2015 plots the trends and identifies research hotspots for the benefit to scientists in the subject area. This study comprehends the magnitude of water quality research also establishes future research directions using various scientometric indicators.

Keywords

Water quality Water contamination Water pollution India Scientometrics Relative citation impact Relative activity index eXergy 

References

  1. Banat, I. M., Nigam, P., Singh, D., & Marchant, R. (1996). Microbial decolorization of textile-dyecontaining effluents: a review. Bioresource Technology, 58(3), 217–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(96)00113-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. C. G. van Steen, J. (2007). Revised fields of science and technology (FOS) in the Frascati Manual. Ocde, (2006), 12. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/38235147.pdf
  3. Cherian, L., Raju, J., & Gupta, V. K. (1990). A simple extraction spectrophotometric method for the determination of arsenic in water and environmental-samples. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 67(6), 500–502.Google Scholar
  4. Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 73(1), 3–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-1523-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das, S., Santra, A., Lahiri, S., & Mazumder, D. N. G. (2005). Implications of oxidative stress and hepatic cytokine (TNF-alpha and IL-6) response in the pathogenesis of hepatic collagenesis in chronic arsenic toxicity. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 204(1), 18–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diodato, V. (1994). Dictionary of bibliometrics (2012th edn.). Binghamton: The Haworth Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Fu, H.-Z., Wang, M.-H., & Ho, Y.-S. (2013). Mapping of drinking water research: a bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992-2011. Science of the Total Environment, 443, 757–765.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao, W., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., & Guo, H. c. (2015). Scientometric analysis of phosphorus research in eutrophic lakes. Scientometrics, 102(3), 1951–1964.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1500-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haque, M. A. (1987). Contamination of soil, water and vegetation by copper, lead and zinc ore mining and smelting at Khetri and Zawar (India). Journal of the Geological Society of India, 30(5), 451–458.Google Scholar
  10. Islam, F., Gault, A., Boothman, C., PIslam, F., Gault, A., Boothman, C., et al. (2004). Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments. Nature, 430(6995), 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iyer, V. N., & Sarin, R. (1992). Chemical speciation and bioavailability of lead and cadmium in an aquatic system polluted by sewage discharges. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability, 4(4), 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs, I., Pouris, A., & Naidoo, D. (2014). A scientometric examination of the performance of water research in South Africa. Water SA, 40(4), 631–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jamil, K., & Jyothi, K. (1988). Enhanced reproductive potential of neochetina-bruchi hostache fed on water hyacinth plants from polluted water bodies. Current Scciencce, 57(4), 195–197 Retrieved from https://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=1&SID=E5NvdpqDqiPKHbaMVpJ&page=1&doc=1.
  14. Mahajan, C. J., & Juneja, C. L. (1980). Combined effect of simultaneous mercury pollution of diet and water on the fish Channa - (-ophiocephalus)-punctatus. Current Science, 49(18), 715–717.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Water Resources, G. of I. (2012). National Water Policy ( 2012 ). New Delhi.Google Scholar
  16. Nair, S., Jallan, G., & Pandey, G. (1990). Alum plant waste-application in treatment of Fluoride polluted water. Fluoride, 23(1), 35–236. Retrieved from https://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=4&SID=E5NvdpqDqiPKHbaMVpJ&page=1&doc=1Google Scholar
  17. Navaneethakrishnan, S., & Sivakumar, S.. (2015). Bibliometric-analysis-of-water-resource-development-and-utilization-based-research-studies-in-Sri-Lanka. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6(8), 1432–1439.Google Scholar
  18. Nishy, P., Parvatharajan, P., & Prathap, G. (2011). Where do Indian chemists publish their best research ? Current Science, 100(11), 10–11.Google Scholar
  19. Prathap, G. (2011). The Energy–Exergy–Entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87(3), 515–524.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0367-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramaswamy, P., & Krishnamurthy, V. (1980). Water pollution by tannery effluent. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 75(6), 200–210.Google Scholar
  21. Roads, J., Lawford, R., Bainto, E., Berbery, E., Chen, S., Fekete, B., et al. (2003). GCIP water and energy budget synthesis (WEBS). Journal of Geophysical Research -Atmospheres, 108(D16).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002583.
  22. Shanker, A. K., Cervantes, C., Loza-Tavera, H., & Avudainayagam, S. (2005). Chromium toxicity in plants. Environment International, 31(5), 739–753.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.02.003.
  23. Somavanshi, R., & Sinha, S. (1972). Quality of well waters of northern Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 42(11), 1007–1010.Google Scholar
  24. Srikanth, R., Rao, A. M., Kumar, C. S., & Khanum, A. (1993). Lead, cadmium, nickel, and zinc contamination of ground-water around Hussain Sagar lake, Hyderabad, India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 50(1), 138–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. TIFAC. (2015). Technology Vision 2035, 120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/0267084411Z.0000000007
  26. US EPA. (2004). Understanding the Safe Drinking Water Act—Role and responsibilities, 4. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/epa816f04030.pdf
  27. Wang, M.-H., Li, J., & Ho, Y.-S. (2011). Research articles published in water resources journals: a bibliometric analysis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 28(1–3), 353–365 https://doi.org/10/5004/dwt.2011.2412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xie, S., Zhang, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 113–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1928-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuan, J. P., Yue, W. P., Su, C., Wu, Z., Ma, Z., Pan, Y. T., … Wu, Y. S. (2010). Patent activity on water pollution and treatment in China-a scientometric perspective. Scientometrics, 83(3), 639–651. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0126-7.
  30. Yuh-Shan, Ho. (2008). Bibliometric analysis of biosorption technology in water treatment research from 1991 to 2004. International Journal of Environment & Pollution, 34(1–4), 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2008.020778.
  31. Zheng, T., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Nie, C., Smale, N., Shi, Z., & Wang, X. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of industrial wastewater research: current trends and future prospects. Scientometrics, 105(2), 863–882.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1736-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIR National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and TechnologyThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations