Determination of noise pollution on university campuses: a case study at Çukurova University campus in Turkey

  • Deniz Çolakkadıoğlu
  • Muzaffer Yücel
  • Barış Kahveci
  • Özüm Aydınol
Article
  • 382 Downloads

Abstract

The aims of this study are to identify via harnessing noise mapping the effects of noise pollution at Çukurova University campus on the academic setting and to reveal the obtained change values in noise pollution on the campus during the period 2010–2017. In line with these aims, the first step has been to map the highway-induced environmental noise on Çukurova University campus during daytime (07:00–19:00) and evening (19:00–23:00) hours by employing SoundPLAN 7.3 software. Traffic-induced noise distribution maps for years 2010 and 2017 on the campus were analyzed by threshold values stipulated by the Regulation on Environmental Noise Assessment and Management that is compliance with the European Union Directive on Environmental Noise (2002/49/EC) and after the conducted analyses, traffic-induced environmental noise measured on Çukurova University campus since the past to that date was identified in terms of spatial change. The Regulation defines threshold values, namely, (1) 65 dB(A) for daytime from 07:01 to 19:00, (2) 60 dB(A) for evening—from 19:01 to 23:00, (3) 55 dB(A) for night time—from 23:01 to 07:00. It was then identified in the research area that faculty buildings of Science and Letters, Engineering, Architecture, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Dentistry, Faculty of Law, and Communication devoid of any vegetation space to set a barrier between emission-source highway and front walls of buildings facing the roadside were the structures most severely exposed to the noise. In the research area, the comparison of year 2017 noise distribution with respect to year 2010 manifested that the regions exposed to noise value 35 dB(A) and below, 35–45 dB(A), and 45–55 dB(A) levels decreased while a proportional increase was detected in regions exposed to 60 dB(A) noise value that is close to the legal threshold value and noise level above 65 dB(A).

Keywords

Çukurova University campus Noise mapping Noise pollution Road traffic noise 

References

  1. Babisch, W., Beule, B., Schust, M., Kersten, N., & Ising, H. (2005). Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction. Epidemiology, 16(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basner, M., Babisch, W., Davis, A., Brink, M., Clark, C., Janssen, S., & Stansfeld, S. (2014). Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The Lancet, 383, 1325–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bıçakçı, T. (2011). Traffic-induced environmental noise maps and Çukurova University campus case. Çukurova University, Institute of Sciences, Department of Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis.Google Scholar
  4. Bluhm, G. L., Berglind, N., Nordling, E., & Rosenlund, M. (2007). Road traffic noise and hypertension. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 64, 122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brainard, J. S., Jones, A. P., Bateman, I. J., & Lowett, A. A. (2004). Exposure to environmental urban noise pollution in Birmingham. Urban Studies, 41, 2581–2600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, A. L., Banerjee, D., & Tomerini, D. (2012). Noise events in road traffic and sleep disturbance studies. 41st International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2012. InterNoise-2012, 12, 9910–9918.Google Scholar
  7. Calixto, A., Pulsides, C., & Zannin, P. H. T. (2008). Evaluation of transportation noise in urbanized areas. Archives of Acoustics, 33(2), 151–164.Google Scholar
  8. Colakkadioglu, D., & Yucel, M. (2017). Modeling of Tarsus-Adana-Gaziantep highway-induced noise pollution within the scope of Adana city and estimated the affected population. Applied Acoustics, 115, 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Counsel, B. D., Muer, T. D., Yperman, I., & Botteldooren, D. (2005). The influence of traffic dynamics on urban soundscapes. Applied Acoustics, 175, 66–194.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, O., & Murphy, E. (2016). Source-based subjective responses to sleep disturbance from transportation noise. Environmental International, 92, 450–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engel, M. S., Segundo, E. H. V., & Zannin, P. H. T. (2014). Statistical analysis of a combination of objective and subjective environmental data using factor analysis and multinomial logistic regression. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 28(2), 393–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0759-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erdogan, E., & Yazgan, E. M. (2007). Landscape architecture studies in reducing the traffic noise problem in urban areas: the case of Ankara. Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty Journal, 4(2), 201–210.Google Scholar
  13. Goswami, S. (2011). A study on traffic noise of two campuses of university, Balasore, India. Journal of Environmental Biology, 32, 105–109.Google Scholar
  14. Fang, C. F., & Ling, D. L. (2003). Investigation of noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fyhri, A., & Aasvang, G. M. (2010). Noise, sleep and poor health: modeling the relationship between road traffic noise and cardiovascular problems. Science of the Total Environment, 408(21), 4935–4942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halperin, D. (2014). Environmental noise and sleep disturbances: a threat to health? Sleep Science, 7(4), 209–2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurra, S. (1991). Noise, environmental problems in Turkey (pp. 447–484). Ankara: Turkey Environmental Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kuttruff, H. (2007). Acoustics: an introduction. Taylor & Francis Group, English Edition, 325-326, ISBN: -203-97089-6.Google Scholar
  19. La Torre, G., Moscato, U., La Torre, F., Ballini, P., Marchi, S., & Ricciardi, W. (2007). Environmental noise exposure and population health: a cross-sectional study in the province of Rome. Journal of Public Health, 15, 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lebiedowska, B. (2005). Acoustics background and transportation noise in urbanized areas: a note on the relative classification. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 341, 10–345.Google Scholar
  21. Miedema, M. E. (2003). Relationship between exposure to single or multiple transportation noise sources and noise annoyance. In World Health Organization and European Centre for Environment and Health Report on the Technical meeting of exposure–response relationships of noise on health. Bonn.Google Scholar
  22. Moudon, A. N. (2009). Real noise from the urban environment: how ambient community noise affects health and what can be done about it. Am J Prev Med, 37(2), 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy, E., King, E. A., & Rice, H. J. (2009). Estimating human exposure to transport noise in central Dublin, Ireland. Environment International, 35(2), 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohrstrom, E., & Skanberg, A. (2004). Sleep disturbances from road traffic and ventilation noise—laboratory and field experiments. Sound Vibration, 271, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Passchier-Vermeer, W., & Passchier, W. F. (2000). Noise exposure and public health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pheng, H. S., Yean, T. S., Lye, K. H., Ismail, A. I. M., Kassim, S. (2006). Modeling noise levels in USM penang campus. In Proceedings 2nd IMT-GT regional conference on mathematics, statistics & applications. University Sains Malaysia, Penang.Google Scholar
  27. Roswall, N., Nielsen, O. R., Ketzel, M., Gammelmark, A., Overvad, K., Olsen, A., & Sorensen, M. (2017). Long-term residential road traffic noise and NO2 exposure in relation to risk of incident myocardial infarction—a Danish cohort study. Environmental Research, 156, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Soares, F., Freitas, F., Cunha, C., Silva, C., Lamas, J., Mouta, S., & Santos, J. A. (2017). Traffic noise: annoyance assessment of real and virtual sounds based on close proximity measurements. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun, P., Fox, D., Campbell, K., & Qin, J. (2017). Auditory fatigue model applications to predict noise induced hearing loss in human and chinchilla. Applied Acoustics, 119, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thakur, G. S. (2006). A study of noise around an educational institutional area. Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering, 48, 35–38.Google Scholar
  31. Tzivian, L., Jakisch, M., Winkler, A., Weimar, C., Hennig, F., Sugiri, D., Soppa, V. J., Dragano, N., Erbel, R., Jöckel, K. H., & Moebus, S. (2017). Associations of long term exposure to air pollution and road traffic noise with cognitive function—an analysis of effect measure modification. Environmental International, 10, 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Urgenc, S. (1990). General plantation and afforestation technique. Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul University, Faculty of Forestry Publication No: 407.Google Scholar
  33. Vienneau, D., Schindler, C., Perez, L., Hensch, N. P., & Röösli, M. (2015). The relationship between transportation noise exposure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. Environmental Research, 138, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WHO (World Health Organization) 1995. Guidelines for Community Noise. http://stopstanstedexpansion.com/documents/SSE19_Appendix_6.pdf
  35. WHO (World Health Organization) 2011. Burden of disease from environmental noise: Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe, WHO Regional Office for Europe http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/136466/e94888.pdf.
  36. Xie, H., Kang, J., & Tompsett, R. (2011). The impacts of environmental noise on the academic achievements of secondary school students in Greater London. Applied Acoustics, 72, 551–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yücel, M., Say, N., Çolakkadıoğlu, D., Güzelmansur, A., Erzurumlu, G. (2011). Identifying the noise pollution and measurements to take in Çukurova University Campus. Çukurova University Scientific Researches Projects Final Report ZF 2009-BAP 28.Google Scholar
  38. Zannin, P. H. T., Diniz, F. B., Calixto, A., & Barbosa, W. (2002). Environmental noise pollution in the city of Curitiba, Brazil. Applied Acoustics, 63, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zannin, P. H., & Zwirtes, D. P. (2009). Evaluation of the acoustic performance of classrooms in public schools. Applied Acoustics, 70, 626–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zannin, P. H. T., & de Sant’Ana, D. Q. (2011). Noise mapping at different stages of a freeway redevelopment project—a case study in Brazil. Applied Acoustics, 72, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zannin, P. H. T., Engel, M. S., Fiedler, P. E. K., & Bunn, F. (2013). Characterization of environmental noise based on noise measurements, noise mapping and interviews: a case study at a university campus in Brazil. Cities, 31, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zannin, P. H. T., & Ferraz, F. (2016). Assessment of indoor and outdoor noise pollution at a university hospital based on acoustic measurements and noise mapping. Open Journal of Acoustics, 6, 71–85. ISSN Online: 2162–5794.  https://doi.org/10.4236/oja.2016.64006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deniz Çolakkadıoğlu
    • 1
  • Muzaffer Yücel
    • 1
  • Barış Kahveci
    • 1
  • Özüm Aydınol
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Natural and Applied SciencesUniversity of ÇukurovaAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations