Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How grazing affects soil quality of soils formed in the glaciated northeastern United States

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, much of the New England landscape was converted to pasture for grazing animals and harvesting hay. Both consumer demand for local sustainably produced food, and the number of small farms is increasing in RI, highlighting the importance of characterizing the effects livestock have on the quality of pasture soils. To assess how livestock affect pasture on Charlton and Canton soils series in RI, we examined soil quality in farms raising beef cattle (Bos taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), and horses (Equus ferus caballus), using hayed pastures as a control. We sampled three pastures per livestock type and three control hayed pastures in May, August, and October 2012. Hay fields and pastures grazed by sheep had statistically significant (P < 0.001) better soil quality than pastures grazed by beef cattle or horses. This was driven by parameters including penetration resistance, bulk density, aggregate stability, and infiltration rate. Hayfields also showed higher soil quality measures than grazed pastures for organic matter content and active C. In addition, significant differences in nitrate and phosphate concentrations were observed among livestock types. Respiration and infiltration rates, pH, and ammonium concentrations, on the other hand, did not differ significantly among pasture types. When all soil quality indicators in this study were weighed equally, soil quality scores followed the order: hay > sheep > beef cattle > horses. The results of our study provide baseline data on the effect different types of livestock have on pasture soil quality in RI, which may be useful in making sound land use and agricultural management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arshad, M. A., & Martin, S. (2002). Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 88(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00252-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharati, L., Lee, K. H., Isenhart, T. M., & Schultz, R. C. (2002). Soil-water infiltration under crops, pasture, and established riparian buffer in Midwestern USA. Agroforestry Systems, 56(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021344807285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhogal, A., Nicholson, F. A., Young, I., Sturrock, C., Whitmore, A. P., & Chambers, B. J. (2011). Effects of recent and accumulated livestock manure carbon additions on soil fertility and quality. European Journal of Soil Science, 62(1), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01319.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolan, N. S., Currie, L. D., & Baskaran, S. (1996). Assessment of the influence of phosphate fertilizers on the microbial activity of pasture soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 21(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, S. (2010). Commonly found weeds in Vermont pastures. University of Vermont. https://asci.uvm.edu/equine/commonly_found_weeds_in_vt_pastures.pdf. Acccessed 6 June 2010.

  • Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2016). The nature and properties of soils (15th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. D., & Stafford Smith, D. M. (2000). A synthesis of recent global change research on pasture and rangeland production: reduced uncertainties and their management implications. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 82(1–3), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00215-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattle, S. R., & Southorn, N. J. (2010). Macroporosity of pasture topsoils after three years of set-stocked and rotational grazing by sheep. Soil Research, 48(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR09004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. Y., Bowman, A., & Oates, A. (2001). Oxidizible organic carbon fractions and soil quality changes in an oxic paleustalf under different pasture leys. Soil Science, 166(1), 61–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, J. E., & Boone, R. D. (2000). Long-term impacts of agriculture on soil carbon and nitrogen in New England forests. Ecology, 81(8), 2314–2330. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2314:LTIOAO]2.0.CO;2.

  • Davidson, E., Verchot, L., Cattânio, J. H., Ackerman, I., & Carvalho, J. E. M. (2000). Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry, 48(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006204113917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di, H. J., & Cameron, K. C. (2002). Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 64(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021471531188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di, H. J., & Cameron, K. C. (2004). Treating grazed pasture soil with a nitrification inhibitor, eco-n™, to decrease nitrate leaching in a deep sandy soil under spray irrigation—a lysimeter study. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 47(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2004.9513604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di, H. J., Cameron, K. C., Milne, J., Drewry, J. J., Smith, N. P., Hendry, T., Moore, S., & Reijnen, B. (2001). A mechanical hoof for simulating animal treading under controlled conditions. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 44(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2001.9513465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewry, J. J. (2006). Natural recovery of soil physical properties from treading damage of pastoral soils in New Zealand and Australia: a review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114(2–4), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewry, J. J., & Paton, R. J. (2000). Effects of cattle treading and natural amelioration on soil physical properties and pasture under dairy farming in Southland. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 43(3), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2000.9513438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers, A. J., & Stuedemann, J. A. (2003). Bermudagrass management in the southern piedmont USA. III. Particulate and biologically active soil carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67(1), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers, A. J., Stuedemann, J. A., & Wilkinson, S. R. (2002). Bermudagrass management in the southern Piedmont USA. II. Soil phosphorus. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66(1), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.2910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gugino, B. K., Idowu, O. J., Schindelbeck, R. R., van Es, H. M., Wolfe, D. W., Moebius-Clune, B. N., Thies, J. W., & Abawi, G. S. (2009). Cornell soil health assessment training manual. Geneva: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L. B., & Gifford, R. M. (2002). Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 8(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, I., & Lipiec, J. (2000). A review of the usefulness of relative bulk density values in studies of soil structure and composition. Soil Tillage and Research, 53(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00095-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R. J., & Williams, P. H. (1999). Influence of stock camping behaviour on the soil microbiological and biochemical properties of grazed pastoral soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 28(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.R. (2003). Soil nitrate testing as a guide to nitrogen management for vegetable crops. Bulletin E285. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Cooperative Extension, N.J. Agricultural Experiment Station.

  • Hooda, P. S., Moynagh, M., Svoboda, I. F., Edwards, A. C., Anderson, H. A., & Sym, G. (1999). Phosphorus loss in drainflow from intensively managed grassland soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 28(4), 1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800040026x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn, C. J., Betteridge, K., Costall, D. A., & Ledgard, S. F. (2010). Nitrogen concentration in the urine of cattle, sheep and deer grazing a common ryegrass/cocksfoot/white clover pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 53(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2010.499899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, R., Vossbrink, J., & Becker, S. (2004). Modern forestry vehicles and their impacts on soil physical properties. Soil and Tillage Research, 79(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. K., Newton, G. L., & Hill, G. M. (2004). Water quality and the grazing animal. Journal of Animal Science, 82(13 suppl), E255–E263. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8213_supplE255x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., & Schuhman, G. E. (1997). Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010001x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, J.D., Miller, R.E., Anderson, H.W. & Tepp, J.S. (2003). Bulk density and soil resistance to penetration as affected by commercial thinning in northeastern Washington. PNW-RP-551, USDA Forest Service.

  • Larios, L. (2008). Microplate nutrient anaylsis. Berkely, California: Suding Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdoff, F., & van Es, H. (2000). Building soils for better crops. Beltsville: Sustainable Agriculture Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, J. T., Schuman, G. E., Reeder, J. D., & Hart, R. H. (1995). Rangeland soil carbon and nitrogen responses to grazing. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 50(3), 294–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martı́nez, L. J., & Zinck, J. A. (2004). Temporal variation of soil compaction and deterioration of soil quality in pasture areas of Colombian Amazonia. Soil and Tillage Research, 75(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2002.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, K. (2008). Identification of common, cool-season perennial pasture grasses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, E.S., Hart, J. & Stevens, R.G. (1999). Soil test interpretation guide. EC 1478. Corvallis: Oregon State University Extension Service.

  • McDowell, R. W., Drewry, J. J., & Paton, R. J. (2004). Effects of deer grazing and fence-line pacing on water and soil quality. Soil Use and Management, 20(3), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00374.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. (2012). New Jersey weed gallery. New Brunsiwck: Rutgers, State University of New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milchunas, D. G., & Lauenroth, W. K. (1993). Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecological Monographs, 63(4), 327–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Caselles, J., Moral, R., Perez-Murcia, M., Perez-Espinosa, A., & Rufete, B. (2002). Nutrient value of animal manures in front of environmental hazards. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33(15–18), 3023–3032. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120014499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., & Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P. C. D., Clark, H., Bell, C. C., Glasgow, E. M., Tate, K. R., Ross, D. J., Yeates, G. W., & Saggar, S. (1995). Plant growth and soil processes in temperate grassland communities at elevated CO2. Journal of Biogeography, 22(2/3), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oades, J. M. (1984). Soil organic matter and structural stability: mechanisms and implications for management. Plant and Soil, 76(1–3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6101-2_28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. G., & Troeh, F. R. (1995). Introductory soil science laboratory manual. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parés-Casanova, P. M., & Oosterlinck, M. (2012). Relation between hoof area and body mass in ungulates reared under semi-extensive conditions in the Spanish Pyrenees. Journal of Animal Science Advances, 2(4), 375–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possinger, A. R., & Amador, J. A. (2016). Preliminary evaluation of seaweed application effects on soil quality and yield of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 47(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1104338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, A. P. B., Bendotti, S., & McGarry, D. (1995). A comparison between continuous and controlled grazing on a red duplex soil. I. Effects on soil physical characteristics. Soil and Tillage Research, 35(4), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(95)00486-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raich, J., & Tufekciogul, A. (2000). Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry, 48(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006112000616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rector, D. D. (1981). Soil survey of Rhode Island. Kingston: USDA Soil Conservation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, D. W. (1997). The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 43(1–2), 131–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00038-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, R.V. & Beek, C. (1969). Chemical and physical properties of the Charlton, Sutton, Paxton and Woodbridge soil series. Technical Bulletin 34. Orono: Maine Agricultural Experiment Station.

  • Saggar, S., & Hedley, C. B. (2001). Estimating seasonal and annual carbon inputs, and root decomposition rates in a temperate pasture following field 14C pulse-labelling. Plant and Soil, 236(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011942619252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenau, J. J., & Karamanos, R. E. (1993). Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. G., Johnstone, P. D., Smith, L. C., Roberts, A. H. C., O'Connor, M. B., & Morton, J. D. (1997). Relationship between pasture dry matter yield and soil Olsen P from a series of long-term field trials. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 40(4), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1997.9513278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.-a). Official soil series descriptions. Available online: Accessed 2 August 2017.

  • Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.-b). Web soil survey. Available online: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed 2 Aug 2017.

  • Sparling, G. P., Schipper, L. A., Bettjeman, W., & Hill, R. (2004). Soil quality monitoring in New Zealand: practical lessons from a 6-year trial. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 104(3), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, B., Shooter, M., Conrad-Acuna, T., Wells, D., & Wood, R. (2009). Weed identification in pastures and hayfields. Danbury: NC Cooperative Extension.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavi, I., Lal, R., & Owens, L. B. (2011). Effects of cattle grazing during the dormant season on soil surface hydrology and physical quality in a moist-temperate region. Ecohydrology, 4(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia, D. M., Hartel, P. G., Fuhrman, J. J., & Zuberer, D. A. (2005). Principles and applications of soil microbiology. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teague, W. R., Dowhower, S. L., Baker, S. A., Haile, N., DeLaune, P. B., & Conover, D. M. (2011). Grazing management impacts on vegetation, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 141(3–4), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA. (2001). Soil quality test kit guide. Washington, DC: USDA NRCS Soil Quality Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. (2009). 2007 census of agriculture: United States summary and state data. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. (2016). Farms and land in farms 2015 summary. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherburn, M. W. (1967). Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry, 39, 971–974. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60252a045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, R. R., Islam, K. R., Stine, M. A., Gruver, J. B., & Samson-Liebig, S. E. (2003). Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 18(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1079/AJAA200228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wienhold, B. J., Andrews, S. S., & Karlen, D. L. (2004). Soil quality: a review of the science and experiences in the USA. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 26(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EGAH.0000039571.59640.3c.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank Mark Stolt, Rebecca Brown, Angela Possinger, Jennifer Cooper, Nathan Winkler, Abra Clawson, Kerstin Becker, Matthew Cox, and Mike Badzmierowski for their support and assistance during this project.

Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station funds, augmented by funds of the authors, were used to conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Rhode Island, Natural Resources Science, Kingston, RI, USA

    Alissa H. Cox & José A. Amador

Authors
  1. Alissa H. Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José A. Amador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alissa H. Cox.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 379 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cox, A.H., Amador, J.A. How grazing affects soil quality of soils formed in the glaciated northeastern United States. Environ Monit Assess 190, 159 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6550-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6550-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation