Advertisement

Geospatial distribution of metal(loid)s and human health risk assessment due to intake of contaminated groundwater around an industrial hub of northern India

  • Rachit Kashyap
  • K. S. Verma
  • Sanjay Kr. Uniyal
  • S. K. Bhardwaj
Article

Abstract

The study focused on analyzing concentrations of metal(loid)s, their geospatial distribution in groundwater around an industrial hub of northern India. Human health risk posed due to the intake of contaminated groundwater was also evaluated. For this, 240 samples were assayed using inductively coupled plasma emission spectrophotometer. For risk assessment, the methodology proposed by US Environmental Protection Agency was adopted. Geometric mean of Al, As, Mo, Cd, Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, and Zn was 193.13, 27.35, 4.22, 2.85, 92.81, 14.97, 271.78, 25.76, 54.75, 19.50, 16.94, and 1830.27 μg/l, respectively. Levels of Al (84%), As (63%), Ni (63%), Pb (49%), and Se (41%) exceeded the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Principal component analysis is accounted for ~ 88% of the total variance and reflected pollution loads of Al, As, Mo, Cr, Fe, Se, and Pb in the groundwater. Based on it, four sources of metal(loid)s, namely geogenic (34.55%), mixed (industrial and agricultural, 26.76%), waste dumping (15.31%), and industrial (11.25%) were identified. Semi-variogram mapping model demonstrated significant geospatial variations of the metal(loid)s. Hazard index (HI) suggested potential non-carcinogenic risks to the inhabitants due to As, Al, Ni, Se, and Pb, which were the largest contributors. Based on maximum concentrations of metal(loid)s, HI for child and adult was above unity. Arsenic was identified as the most hazardous pollutant that may have chronic carcinogenic health implications. At western side of study area, carcinogenic health risks exceeded critical threshold of 1 × 10−4, indicating that As posed health risks to residents by intake of groundwater.

Keywords

Industrial hub Metal(loid)s Health risk Groundwater Northern India 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author is thankful to the Director of research and faculty members of the Department of Environmental Science, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, for support and facilities. Authors are thankful to the Director CSIR-IHBT and members of High Altitude Biology Division of CSIR-IHBT for support and suggestions. Special thanks are due to Dr. M K Brahmi and Dr. J K Sharma of UHF, Nauni, for assistance in sample collection and metal(loid)s analysis. The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and editor for their constructive comments that helped in improving the manuscript. Part of the support for the work was provided by MoEF&CC via National Mission on Himalayan Studies Project GAP 0199.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10661_2018_6525_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. APHA (American Public Health Association). (2011). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  2. Bajaj, M., Eiche, E., Neumann, T., Winter, J., & Gallert, C. (2011). Hazardous concentration of selenium in soil and groundwater in North-West India. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189(3), 640–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhardwaj, V., & Singh, D. S. (2011). Surface and groundwater quality characterization of Deoria District, Ganga plain, India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 63, 383–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0709-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). (2012). Drinking water specifications, IS: 10500, 2nd revision. New Delhi. http://law.resource.org/ in/bis/S06/is.10500.2012.pdf. Accessed on 12 May 2017.
  5. CGWB (Central Ground Water Board). (2013). Ground water information booklet of Sirmaur District, Himachal Pradesh, Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of India. 1–23. http://www.cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/HP/Sirmaur.pdf Accessed on 27 June 2017.
  6. Chabukdhara, M., Kumar, S., Kotecha, Y., & Nema, A. K. (2017). Groundwater quality in Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh, India: multivariate and health risk assessment. Chemosphere, 179, 167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman, D. (1996). Water quality assessments—a guide to use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring. Cambridge ISBN 2:609: University Press.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203476710.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, P. M., Adams, W. J., Brooks, M., Delos, C. G., Luoma, S. N., Maher, W. A., Ohlendorf, H. M., Presser, T. S., & Shaw, P. (Eds.). (2010). Ecological assessment of selenium in the aquatic environment (pp. 1–293). Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board). (2009). Comprehensive environmental assessment of industrial clusters in India.1–32. http://cpcb.nic.in/divisionsofheadoffice/ess/NewItem_152_Final-Book_2.pdf. Accessed on 28 June 2017.
  10. Dang, H. S., Jaiswal, D. D., Parameswaran, M., & Krishnamony, S. (1994). Physical anatomical, physiological and metabolic data for reference Asian man—a proposal, BARC (Bhabha Atomic Research Centre), report no. BARC/1994/FE/043.Google Scholar
  11. Dang, H. S., Jaiswal, D. D., Parameswaran, M., Deodhar, K. P., & Krishnamony, S. (1996). Age dependent physical and anatomical Indian data for application in internal dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 63, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duruibe, J. O., Ogwuegbu, M. O. C., & Egwurugwu, J. N. (2007). Heavy metal pollution and human biotoxic effects. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 2, 112–118.Google Scholar
  13. Elumalai, V., Brindha, K., & Lakshmanan, E. (2017). Human exposure risk assessment due to heavy metals in groundwater by pollution index and multivariate statistical methods: case study from South Africa. Water, 9, 234.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w9040234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gadgil, A. (1998). Drinking water in developing countries. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 23(1), 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giri, S., & Singh, A. K. (2013). Risk assessment, statistical source identification and seasonal fluctuation of dissolved metals in the Subarnarekha River, India. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 265, 305–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giri, S., & Singh, A. K. (2015). Human health risk assessment via drinking water pathway due to metal contamination in the groundwater of Subarnarekha River Basin, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4265-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giri, S., & Singh, A. K. (2016). Spatial distribution of metalloids in groundwater of a mining dominated area: recognising metalloid sources and assessing carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic human health risk. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 96, 1313–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1255735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giri, S., & Singh, A. K. (2017). Assessment of human health risk for heavy metals in fish and shrimp collected from Subarnarekha River, India. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 3123, 0–449.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2013.857391.Google Scholar
  19. GSI (Geological Survey of India). (2012). Geology and mineral resources of Himachal Pradesh. http://www.indiawaterportal.org/sites/indiawaterportal.org/files/report_himachal_pradesh_state_geology_and_mineral_maps_geological_survey_of_india_0.pdf. Accessed on 15 May 2017.
  20. Gunduz, O. (2015). Water quality perspectives in a changing world. Water Quality Exposure and Health, 7, 1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-015-0161-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam, S. M. D., Majumder, R. K., Uddin, M. J., Khalil, M. I., & Alam, M. F. (2016). Hydro-chemical characteristics and quality assessment of groundwater in Patuakhali District, southern coastal region of Bangladesh. Exposure and Health, 9, 43–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0221-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jain, S. C., Mehta, S. C., Kumar, B., Reddy, A. R., & Nagaratnum, A. (1995). Formulation of the reference Indian adult: anatomical and physiological data. Health Physics, 68, 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kashyap, R., Verma, K. S., Bhardwaj, S. K., & Sharma, J. K. (2015a). Hydrochemistry of dissolved metals in Yamuna River around industrial hub of Himachal Pradesh, India. Applied Biological Research, 17, 288.  https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4517.2015.00041.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kashyap, R., Verma, K. S., & Bhardwaj, S. K. (2015b). Pollution potential assessment of Markanda River around Kala-Amb industrial town of Himachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Science and Nature, 6, 606–612.Google Scholar
  26. Kashyap, R., Verma, K. S., & Chand, H. (2015c). Heavy metal contamination and their seasonal variations in Rewalsar Lake of Himachal Pradesh, India. The Ecoscan, 9, 31–36.Google Scholar
  27. Kashyap, R., Verma, K. S., Bhardwaj, S. K., Mahajan, P. K., & Sharma, J. K. (2016). Water chemistry of Yamuna River along Pontasahib industrial hub of Himachal Pradesh, India. Research in Environment and Life Science, 9(3), 277–281.Google Scholar
  28. Khan, M. M. A., Umar, R., & Lateh, H. (2010). Study of trace elements in groundwater of Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Scientific Research and Essays, 5, 3175–3182.Google Scholar
  29. Kostic, A. Z., Pantelic, N. D., Kaluderovic, L. M., Jonas, J. P., Dojcinovic, B. P., & Djordjevic, J. B. P. (2016). Physicochemical properties of waters in southern Banat (Serbia); potential leaching of some trace elements from ground and human health risk. Exposure and Health, 8, 227–238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0197-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krewski, D., Yokel, R. A., Nieboer, E., Borchelt, D., Cohen, J., Harry, J., Kacew, S., Lindsay, J., Mahfouz, A. M., & Rondeau, V. (2011). Human health risk assessment for aluminium, aluminium oxide, and aluminium hydroxide: a review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 10, 1–269.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10937400701597766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar, P., Kumar, A., Kumar, C., & Chitresh, S. (2016). Hydro-geochemical evolution and appraisal of groundwater quality in Panna District, Central India. Exposure and Health, 8, 19–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-015-0179-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lei, G. J., Chen, Z. L., Liu, Q. J., Peng, X. C., Jiang, X. L., Ou, Y. J., Zhou, D., & Li, F. H. (2013). The assessments of polluted degree and potential ecological hazards of heavy metals in suburban soil of Guangzhou city. China Environmental Science, 33(11), 49–53.Google Scholar
  33. Leung, C. M., & Jiao, J. J. (2006). Heavy metal and trace element distributions in groundwater in natural slopes and highly urbanized spaces in mid-levels area, Hong Kong. Water Research, 40, 753–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li, P., Li, X., Meng, X., Li, M., & Yuting, M. Z. (2016). Appraising groundwater quality and health risks from contamination in a semiarid region of Northwest China. Exposure and Health, 8, 361–379.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0205-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Linhua, S., Herong, G., & Weihua, P. (2013). Heavy metals in groundwater from the coal bearing aquifer in northern Anhui Province, China: concentrations and usability. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 5, 1349–1353.Google Scholar
  36. Mahato, M. K., Singh, P. K., Tiwari, A. K., & Singh, A. K. (2016). Risk assessment due to intake of metals in groundwater of east Bokaro coalfield, Jharkhand, India. Exposure and Health, 8, 265–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0201-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miguel, E. D., Iribarren, I., Chacon, E., Ordonez, A., & Charlesworth, S. (2006). Risk based evaluation of exposure of children to trace elements in playgrounds in Madrid Spain. Chemosphere, 66, 505–513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Milivojevic, J., Krstic, D., Smit, B., & Djekic, V. (2016). Assessment of heavy metal contamination and calculation of its pollution index for Ugljesnica River, Serbia. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 97, 737–742.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1918-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MoEF&CC (Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change). (2013). Environment master plan for Himachal Pradesh, Government of Himachal Pradesh, India. 1–88. http://desthp.nic.in/publications/EMP_ES_A1b.pdf. Accessed on 20 June 2017.
  40. Momot, O., & Synzynys, B. (2005). Toxic aluminium and heavy metals in groundwater of middle Russia: health risk assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2, 214–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MSME (Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises India). (2015). State industrial profile of Himachal Pradesh, India. 1–66. http://dcmsme.gov.in/dips/state_wise dips/Himachal%20Pradesh.pdf. Accessed on 23 June 2017.
  42. Sahoo, M., Mahananda, M. R., & Seth, P. (2016). Physico-chemical analysis of ground water in Angul-Talcher region of Orissa, India. Journal of Geosciences and Environmental Protection, 4, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sam, N. B., Nakayama, S. M. M., Ikenaka, Y., Akoto, O., Baidoo, E., Mizukawa, H., & Ishizuka, M. (2015). Health risk assessment of heavy metals and metalloid in drinking water from communities near gold mines in Tarkwa, Ghana. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4630-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sargaonkar, A., & Deshpande, V. (2003). Development of an overall index of pollution for surface water based on a general classification scheme in Indian context. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 89, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha. (2014). Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a review of sources, prevalence, health risks, and strategies for mitigation. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/304524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singaraja, C., Chidambaram, S., Srinivasamoorthy, K., Anandhan, P., & Selvam, S. (2015). A study on assessment of credible sources of heavy metal pollution vulnerability in groundwater of Thoothukudi districts, Tamilnadu, India. Water Quality, Exposure and Health, 7, 459–467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-015-0162-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Suthar, S., Sharma, J., Chabukdhara, M., & Nema, A. K. (2010). Water quality assessment of river Hindon at Ghaziabad, India: impact of industrial and urban wastewater. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 165, 103–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0930-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tiwari, A. K., & De Maio, M. (2017). Assessment of risk to human health due to intake of chromium in the groundwater of the Aosta. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 0, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1308813.Google Scholar
  49. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1986). Guidelines for the health risk assessment of chemical mixtures. 51 Federal Register 34014 (September 24, 1986).Google Scholar
  50. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1989). Health effect assessments summary tables (HEAST) and user’s guide. Washington: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.Google Scholar
  51. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1991). Role of the baseline risk assessment in superfund remedy selection decisions (Memorandum from D. R. Clay, OSWER 9355.0–30, April 1991). Washington, DC, USA. www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessmen/baseline.htm. Accessed 29 Sep 2016.
  52. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1993). Carcinogenicity assessment. Washington: IRIS (Integrated Risk Information System) 2003.Google Scholar
  53. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2004) Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I: human health evaluation manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment) Final. EPA/540/R/99/005 OSWER 9285.7-02EP PB99-963312 July 2004, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  54. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2006). Edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  55. Vetrimurugan, E., Brindha, K., Elango, L., & Ndwandwe, O. M. (2016). Human exposure risk to heavy metals through groundwater used for drinking in an intensively irrigated river delta. Applied Water Science, 7, 3267–3280.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0472-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wayne, R. O. (1990). A physical explanation of lognormality of pollutant concentrations. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 32, 3581–3592.Google Scholar
  57. WHO (World Health Organization). (2006). Guidelines for drinking water quality (4th ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  58. Yadav, S. K., Singh, I., Singh, D., & Han, S. D. (2005). Selenium status in soils of northern districts of India. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(2), 129–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachit Kashyap
    • 1
  • K. S. Verma
    • 2
  • Sanjay Kr. Uniyal
    • 1
  • S. K. Bhardwaj
    • 2
  1. 1.High Altitude Biology DivisionCSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource TechnologyPalampurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ScienceDr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture, and ForestrySolanIndia

Personalised recommendations