Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A study on the use and modeling of geographical information system for combating forest crimes: an assessment of crimes in the eastern Mediterranean forests

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the geo-statistical assessment of spatial estimation models in forest crimes. Used widely in the assessment of crime and crime-dependent variables, geographic information system (GIS) helps the detection of forest crimes in rural regions. In this study, forest crimes (forest encroachment, illegal use, illegal timber logging, etc.) are assessed holistically and modeling was performed with ten different independent variables in GIS environment. The research areas are three Forest Enterprise Chiefs (Baskonus, Cinarpinar, and Hartlap) affiliated to Kahramanmaras Forest Regional Directorate in Kahramanmaras. An estimation model was designed using ordinary least squares (OLS) and geographically weighted regression (GWR) methods, which are often used in spatial association. Three different models were proposed in order to increase the accuracy of the estimation model. The use of variables with a variance inflation factor (VIF) value of lower than 7.5 in Model I and lower than 4 in Model II and dependent variables with significant robust probability values in Model III are associated with forest crimes. Afterwards, the model with the lowest corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc), and the highest R2 value was selected as the comparison criterion. Consequently, Model III proved to be more accurate compared to other models. For Model III, while AICc was 328,491 and R2was 0.634 for OLS-3 model, AICc was 318,489 and R2 was 0.741 for GWR-3 model. In this respect, the uses of GIS for combating forest crimes provide different scenarios and tangible information that will help take political and strategic measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, W. V. (1998). Socioeconomic correlates of increasing crime rates in smaller communities. The Professional Geographer, 50(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkan, S. (2014). The impacts of rural population changes on forests and forestry (a case study in Trabzon). Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 14(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.17475/kuofd.10351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpdemir, A. E. & Çabuk, A. (2005). GIS-based detection of crime source of Eskisehir province and planning with relating main variables. Chamber of survey and cadastre engineering, STB commission of engineering measurements, 2nd engineering measurement symposium, ITU, 23–25 Nov. 2005. Istanbul.

  • Anselin, L., Cohen, J., Cook, D., Gorr, W., & Tita, G. (2000). Spatial analyses of crime. Criminal justice, 4(2), 213–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1997). Mapping crime for analytic purposes: location quotients, counts, and rates. Crime mapping and crime prevention, 8, 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K. (1999). Exploring links between crime and disadvantage in north-west England: an analysis using geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Sciences, 13(2), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588199241409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, F. M., & Mulligan, F. G. (2003). The determinants of crime in Tucson, Arizona. Urban Geography, 24(7), 582–610. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.24.7.582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, M., & Mulligan, G. (2007). Using geographically weighted regression to explore local crime patterns. Social Sciences Computer Review, 25(2), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307298925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V., Haining, R., & Signoretta, P. (2002). Exploring offence statistics in Stockholm City using spatial analysis tools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chainey, S., & Ratcliffe, J. H. (2005). GIS and crime mapping. London: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118685181.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K. (2004). GIS models and modelling. Introduction to geographic information systems, Chapter fourteen. 400, p., McGraw Hill, New York.

  • Cliff, A. & Ord, J. (1981). Spatial processes: models & applications, 44, Pion, London.

  • Contreras-Hermosilla, A. (2002). Law compliance in the forestry sector: an overview. World Bank.

  • Curto, J. D., & Pinto, J. C. (2011). The corrected vif (cvif). Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(7), 1499–1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2010.505956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Bini, L. M., & Hawkins, B. A. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00322.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J., Chainey, S., Cameron, J. G., Leitner, M., & Wilson, R. E. (2005). Mapping crime: understanding hot spots. Washington: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2010). ArcGIS desktop help: an overview of the spatial statistics toolbox.

  • Fotheringham, A. S., Charlton, M., & Brunsdon, C. (1996). The geography of parameter space: an investigation of spatial non-stationarity. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 10(5), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/026937996137909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2003). Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships (p. 269). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foody, G. M. (2003). Geographical weighting as a further refinement to regression modelling: an example focused on the NDVI–rainfall relationship. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody, G. M. (2004). Spatial nonstationarity and scale-dependency in the relationship between species richness and environmental determinants for the sub-Saharan endemic avifauna. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13(4), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00097.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1986). Spatial autocorrelation. 57 pp., Geo Books, Norwich.

  • Goncalves, M. P., Panjer, M., Greenberg, T. S., & Magrath, W. B. (2012). Justice for forests: Improving criminal justice efforts to combat illegal logging. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8978-2.

  • Gruenewald, P. J., Freisthler, B., Remer, L., LaScala, E. A., & Treno, A. (2006). Ecological models of alcohol outlets and violent assaults: crime potentials and geospatial analysis. Addiction, 101(5), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01405.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülci, S., & Akay, A. E. (2015). Assessment of ecological passages along road networks within the Mediterranean forest using GIS-based multi criteria evaluation approach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(12), 779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5009-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gümüs, C. (1996). Possibilities of utilizing multidimensional methods in the development plans of forest villages (case of forest villages of Gümüshane province), 80 p., Ekspres Ofset, Istanbul. [Turkish].

  • Günes, Y., & Elvan, O. D. (2005). Illegal logging activities in Turkey. Environmental Management, 36(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0107-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. C. (1992). Regression with graphics: a second course in applied statistics (363 pp). Belmont: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., & Leung, Y. (2002). Analysing regional industrialisation in Jiangsu province using geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 4(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101090200081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C. L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/76.2.297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. B. (1990). Analyzing spatial and temporal phenomena using geographical information systems. Landscape Ecology, 4(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jou, Y. J., Huang, C. C. L., & Cho, H. J. (2014). A VIF-based optimization model to alleviate collinearity problems in multiple linear regression. Computational Statistics, 29(6), 1515–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-014-0504-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, N., & Belle, A. (2004). Does improved governance contribute to sustainable forest management? Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 19(1–3), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1300/J091v19n01_04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsias, N., Martínez-Fernández, J., & Allgöwer, B. (2010). Do factors causing wildfires vary in space? Evidence from geographically weighted regression. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 47(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.47.2.221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. (1993). Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74(6), 1659–1673. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J., & Poetz, A. (2005). Residential burglaries and neighborhood socioeconomic context in London, Ontario: global and local regression analysis. The Professional Geographer, 57(4), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2005.00496.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendry, J. E., & Eastman, J. R. (1991). Applications of GIS in Forestry: a review. www.nrac.wvu.edu/classes/for326/GISInForestryReviewPaper.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2015.

  • Mitchell, A. (2005). The ESRI guide to GIS: spatial measurement and statistics. ESRI Press.

  • Ogneva-Himmelberger, Y., Pearsall, H., & Rakshit, R. (2009). Concrete evidence & geographically weighted regression: a regional analysis of wealth and the land cover in Massachusetts. Applied Geography, 29(4), 478–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olligschlaeger, A. M. (1997). Spatial analysis of crime using GIS-based data: weighted spatial adaptive filtering and chaotic cellular forecasting with application to street level drug markets. Carnegie Mellon University.

  • Özden, S., & Ayan, S. (2016). Forest crimes as a threat to sustainable forest management. Sibirskij Lesnoj Zurnal\Siberian Journal of Forest Science, 4, 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, K., Bevilacqua, E., Mountrakis, G., & Malmsheimer, R. W. (2016). Spatial analysis of forest crimes in Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri. Journal of Geospatial Applications in Natural Resources, 1(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. H., & McCullagh, M. J. (1999). Hotbeds of crime and the search for spatial accuracy. Journal of Geographical Systems, 1(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101090050020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C., & Schumacker, R. E. (2009). Interaction effects: Centering, variance inflation factor, and interpretation issues. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35(1), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolunay, A., & Alkan, H. (2008). Intervention to the misuse of land by the forest villages: a case study from Turkey. Ekoloji, 17(68), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5053/ekoloji.2008.681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, J., & Xia, Z. G. (2008). Examining spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality using geographically weighted regression I: model design and evaluation. Science of Total Environment, 407(1), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • TSI (2013). Registration system results from address based population. Turkish statistical institute (TSI), Pub. No. 4144, Ankara.

  • Wang, Q., Ni, J., & Tenhunen, J. (2005). Application of a geographically-weighted regression analysis to estimate net primary production of Chinese forest ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 14(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00153.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, M. G., & Johnson, R. (2001). Quantifying forest visibility with spatial data. Environmental Management, 27(3), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, M. G., & Tynon, J. (2006). Crime mapping in the national forests. Journal of Forestry, 104(6), 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, M. G., & Tynon, J. (2008). Revisiting the spatial analysis of crime in National Forests. Journal of Forestry, 106(2), 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006). Strengthening law enforcement and governance: addressing a systemic constraint to sustainable development. Report No. 36638-GLB. August. 1–77 Pp., World Bank, Washington, DC.

  • Yang, J., He, H. S., Shifley, S. R., & Gustafson, E. J. (2007). Spatial patterns of modern period human-caused fire occurrence in the Missouri Ozark Highlands. Forest Science, 53(1), 1–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, Ö., & Tecim, V. (2013). Exploring scale effect using geographically weighted regression on mass dataset of urban robbery. ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 1, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-W1-147-2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & Shi, H. (2004). Local modeling of tree growth by geographically weighted regression. Forest Science, 50(2), 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X. (2016). GIS for environmental applications: practical approach. Taylor & Francis Ltd., 490 p. Routledge, New York.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Forestry, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, KSU, Avsar Kampusu, 46100, Onikisubat/Kahramanmaras, Turkey

    Mehmet Pak, Sercan Gülci & Arif Okumuş

Authors
  1. Mehmet Pak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sercan Gülci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arif Okumuş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Pak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pak, M., Gülci, S. & Okumuş, A. A study on the use and modeling of geographical information system for combating forest crimes: an assessment of crimes in the eastern Mediterranean forests. Environ Monit Assess 190, 62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6445-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6445-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation