Skip to main content

A simplified sampling procedure for the estimation of methane emission in rice fields

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment volume 189, Article number: 468 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Manual closed chamber methods are widely used for CH4 measurement from rice paddies. Despite diurnal and seasonal variations in CH4 emissions, fixed sampling times, usually during the day, are used. Here, we monitored CH4 emission from rice paddies for one complete rice-growing season. Daytime CH4 emission increased from 0800 h, and maximal emission was observed at 1200 h. Daily averaged CH4 flux increased during plant growth or fertilizer application and decreased upon drainage of plants. CH4 measurement results were linearly interpolated and matched with the daily averaged CH4 emission calculated from the measured results. The time when daily averaged emission and the interpolated CH4 curve coincided during the daytime was largely invariant within each of the five distinctive periods. One-hourly sampling during each of these five periods was utilized to estimate the emission during each period, and we found that five one-hourly samples during the season accurately reflected the CH4 emission calculated based on all 136 hourly samples. This new sampling scheme is simple and more efficient than current sampling practices. Previously reported sampling schemes yielded estimates 9 to 32% higher than the measured CH4 emission, while our suggested scheme yielded an estimate that was only 5% different from that based on all 136-h samples. The sampling scheme proposed in this study can be used in rice paddy fields in Korea and extended worldwide to countries that use similar farming practices. This sampling scheme will help in producing more accurate global methane budget from rice paddy fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Ali, M. H. (2010). Fundamentals of irrigation and on-farm water management. Spring, 1, 556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., Dahiya, R. P., Talyan, V., & Vrat, P. (2005). Investigations of methane emissions from rice cultivation in Indian context. Environment International, 31, 469–482.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buendia, L. V., Neue, H. U., Wassmann, R., Lantin, R. S., Javellana, A. M., Arah, J., et al. (1998). An efficient sampling strategy for estimating methane emission from rice field. Chemosphere, 36, 395–407.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Z., Xing, G., Yan, X., Xu, H., Tsuruta, H., Yagi, K., et al. (1997). Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilisers and water management. Plant and Soil, 196, 7–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Wolf, B., Zheng, X., Yao, Z., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Brüggemann, N., et al. (2011). Annual methane uptake by temperate semiarid steppes as regulated by stocking rates, aboveground plant biomass and topsoil air permeability. Global Change Biology, 17, 2803–2816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, X., Peng, R., Chen, J., Luo, Y., Zhang, Q., An, S., et al. (2007). CH4 and N2O emissions from Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis in experimental mesocosms. Chemosphere, 68, 420–427.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (2004). Methanogenic microbial communities associated with aquatic plants. In A. Varma, L. Abbott, D. Werner, & R. Hampp (Eds.), Plant surface microbiology (pp. 35–50). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakua, T. B., Rangan, L., & Mitra, S. (2013). Greenhouse gases emission from rice paddy ecosystem and their management. In N. Tuteja & S. S. Gill (Eds.), Crop improvement under adverse conditions (pp. 65–89). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Denmead, O. (2008). Approaches to measuring fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide between landscapes and the atmosphere. Plant and Soil, 309, 5–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, H., Yao, Z., Zheng, X., Mei, B., Xie, B., Wang, R., et al. (2011). Effect of ammonium-based, non-sulfate fertilizers on CH4 emissions from a paddy field with a typical Chinese water management regime. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 1095–1101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, W. A. (1993). Micrometeorological and chamber measurements of CO2 flux from bare soil. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 67, 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frei, M., Razzak, M. A., Hossain, M. M., Oehme, M., Dewan, S., & Becker, K. (2007). Methane emissions and related physicochemical soil and water parameters in rice—fish systems in Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 120, 391–398.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi, N., Baruah, K. K., Gogoi, B., & Gupta, P. K. (2005). Methane emission characteristics and its relations with plant and soil parameters under irrigated rice ecosystem of northeast India. Chemosphere, 59, 1677–1684.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, J., Kim, S. Y., & Kim, P. J. (2013). Effect of rice cultivar on CH4 emissions and productivity in Korean paddy soil. Field Crops Research, 146, 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, M. M., Kim, G. W., Kim, P. J., & Kim, S. Y. (2016). Comparison of net global warming potential between continuous flooding and midseason drainage in monsoon region paddy during rice cropping. Field Crops Research, 193, 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heczko, J., Zaujec, A. (2009). The influence of farming systems on area heterogeneity of total organic carbon contents, Humic Substances in Ecosystems 8, 8, Soporna (Slovak Republic). 13–17 Sept 2009.

  • Hendriks, D., Van Huissteden, J., Dolman, A., & Van der Molen, M. (2007). The full greenhouse gas balance of an abandoned peat meadow. Biogeosciences Discussions, 4, 277–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M., Jurisch, N., Borraz, E. A., Hagemann, U., Drösler, M., Sommer, M., & Augustin, J. (2015). Automated modeling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes based on periodic closed chamber measurements: a standardized conceptual and practical approach. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 200, 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. In B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 1535). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, N., Pathak, H., Mitra, S., & Bhatia, A. (2004). Emission of methane from rice fields—a review. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research India, 63, 101–115.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Z., Cai, Z., Xu, H., & Li, X. (2001). Effect of rice plants on CH4 production, transport, oxidation and emission in rice paddy soil. Plant and Soil, 230, 211–221.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G. Y., Gutierrez, J., Jeong, H. C., Lee, J. S., Haque, M. D. M., & Kim, P. J. (2014a). Effect of intermittent drainage on methane and nitrous oxide emissions under different fertilization in a temperate paddy soil during rice cultivation. Journal of Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry, 57, 229–236.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. Y., Pramanik, P., Gutierrez, J., Hwang, H. Y., & Kim, P. J. (2014b). Comparison of methane emission characteristics in air-dried and composted cattle manure amended paddy soil during rice cultivation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 197, 60–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. Y., Gutierrez, J., & Kim, P. J. (2016). Unexpected stimulation of CH4 emissions under continuous no-tillage system in mono-rice paddy soils during cultivation. Geoderma, 267, 34–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschke, S., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., et al. (2013). Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nature Geoscience, 6, 813–823.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, P., Schrier-Uijl, A., Hensen, A., Veenendaal, E., & Jonker, H. (2010). Annual balances of CH4 and N2O from a managed fen meadow using eddy covariance flux measurements. European Journal of Soil Science, 61, 773–784.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Nayak, A. K., Mohanty, S., & Das, B. S. (2016). Greenhouse gas emission from direct seeded paddy fields under different soil water potentials in Eastern India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 228, 111–123.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. H., Park, K. D., Jung, K. Y., Ali, M. A., Lee, D., Gutierrez, J., et al. (2010). Effect of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) as a green manure on rice productivity and methane emission in paddy soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 138, 343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Gu, J., Park, H., Yun, H., Kim, S., Lee, W., et al. (2014). Estimation of populations exposed to road traffic noise in districts of Seoul metropolitan area of Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 2729–2740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Liu, M., Cheng, Y., Wang, D., Qin, J., Jiao, J., Li, H., & Hu, F. (2011). Methane emissions from double-rice cropping system under conventional and no tillage in southeast China. Soil and Tillage Research, 113, 77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, K. D., Flanagan, L. B., & Cai, T. (2010). Diurnal and seasonal variation in methane emissions in a northern Canadian peatland measured by eddy covariance. Global Change Biology, 16, 2420–2435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W. F., Chen, W., Duan, B. W., Guo, W. M., Lu, Y., Lantin, R. S., et al. (2000). Methane emissions and mitigation options in irrigated rice fields in Southeast China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 58, 65–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minami, K. (1995). The effect of nitrogen fertilizer use and other practices on methane emission from flooded rice. Fertilizer Research, 40, 71–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minamikawa, K., Yagi, K., Tokida, T., Sander, B. O., & Wassmann, R. (2012). Appropriate frequency and time of day to measure methane emissions from an irrigated rice paddy in Japan using the manual closed chamber method. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, 2, 118–128.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyewole, O. A. (2012). Microbial communities and their activities in paddy fields: a review. Journal of Veterinary Advances, 2, 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, D. E. (1986). Gas flux. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis, part one. Physical and mineralogical methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5 (pp. 1103–1119). Madison: SSSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rural Development Administration, Korea (RDA). (1988). Methods of soil chemical analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA: Suwon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. N., Verma, A., & Tyagi, L. (2003). Investigating options for attenuating methane emission from Indian rice fields. Environment International, 29, 547–553.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, C., Xu, X., Tian, H., & Wang, Y. (2009). Ecosystem–atmosphere exchange of CH4 and N2O and ecosystem respiration in wetlands in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeastern China. Global Change Biology, 15, 692–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, M., Miller, W. (1996). Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. Methods of soil analysis part 3—chemical methods. 1201–1229.

  • Tyagi, L., Kumari, B., & Singh, S. N. (2010). Water management—a tool for methane mitigation from irrigated paddy fields. Science Total Environment, 408, 1085–1090.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Groenigen, K. J., van Kessel, C., & Hungate, B. A. (2013). Increased greenhouse-gas intensity of rice production under future atmospheric conditions. Nature Climate Change, 3, 288–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Neue, H. U., & Samonte, H. P. (1999). Factors controlling diel patterns of methane emission via rice. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 53, 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weishampel, P., Kolka, R. (2008). Measurement of methane fluxes from terrestrial landscapes using static, non-steady state enclosures. In: C. M. Hoover (Ed.), Field measurements for forest carbon monitoring (pp. 163–170). Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Weller, S., Kraus, D., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Wassmann, R., Tirol-Padre, A., & Kiese, R. (2015). Diurnal patterns of methane emissions from paddy rice fields in the Philippines. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 178, 755–767.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun, S. I., Choi, W. J., Choi, J. E., & Kim, H. Y. (2013). High-time resolution analysis of diel variation in methane emission from flooded rice fields. Communications in Soil Science and Plant, 44, 1620–1628.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yvon-Durocher, G., Allen, A. P., Bastviken, D., Conrad, R., Gudasz, C., St-Pierre, A., et al. (2014). Methane fluxes show consistent temperature dependence across microbial to ecosystem scales. Nature, 507, 488–491.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zona, D., Oechel, W., Kochendorfer, J., Paw, U., Salyuk, A., Olivas, P. et al. (2009). Methane fluxes during the initiation of a large-scale water table manipulation experiment in the Alaskan Arctic tundra. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003487.

  • Zou, J. W., Huang, Y., Jiang, J. Y., Zheng, X. H., & Sass, L. R. (2005). A 3-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China: effects of water regime, crop residue, and fertilizer application. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, GB2021. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, & Future Planning (NRF-2015R1A2A1A09005838).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, South Korea

    Nadar Hussain Khokhar & Jae-Woo Park

Authors
  1. Nadar Hussain Khokhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jae-Woo Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Woo Park.

Additional information

Highlights

• Measured CH4 were interpolated and matched with the average daily CH4 emission.

• The time when the two were the same was invariant within each of the five periods.

• One-hourly sampling in each period can be used to estimate the emission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khokhar, N.H., Park, JW. A simplified sampling procedure for the estimation of methane emission in rice fields. Environ Monit Assess 189, 468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6184-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6184-z

Keywords

  • Methane emission
  • Rice paddies
  • Greenhouse gases
  • Agriculture and environment