Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Habitat monitoring and conservation prioritisation of protected areas in Western Ghats, Kerala, India

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatially explicit approach is essential to prioritise the ecosystems for biodiversity conservation. In the present study, the conservation status of 20 protected areas of the Western Ghats of Kerala, India, was analysed based on long-term changes in forests (1975–1985–1995–2005–2013), landscape level changes in fragmentation and forest fires (2005–2015). This study has shown that a significant forest loss occurred in protected areas before declaration. Idukki is one of the major protected areas which showed a drastic reduction (18.83%) in its forest cover. During 1985–1995, Periyar tiger reserve had lost 24.19 km2 core 3 forest area followed by Peppara (18.54 km2), Parambikulam (17.93 km2), Chimmony (17.71 km2), Peechi-Vazhani (12.31 km2) and Neyyar (11.67 km2). An area of 71.33 km2 of the protected area was affected by fires in 2014. Overall protected area-wise decadal analysis indicates Periyar has the highest number of fire incidences followed by Wayanad, Kurinjimala, Silent Valley and Eravikulam. Disturbances in the form of fires and fragmentation still exist and may have significant conservation threat to flora and fauna. Among protected areas, many are having a probability to go under threat or dynamic stage. Chinnar, Thattekkad and Kurinjimala sanctuaries are representing high levels of vulnerability, or they are near to decline stage. Habitat level monitoring of the anthropogenic disturbances can be efficiently useful for the strategic conservation planning. The present study has provided geospatial database on spatial patterns of deforestation, fragmentation and forest fires in protected areas of Kerala. Conservation prioritization approach based on these parameters will be useful for the strategic planning in the state of Kerala.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chape, S., Harrison, J., Spalding, M., & Lysenko, I. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B London Biological Sciences, 360, 443–455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N. E., Boakes, E. H., McGowan, P. J., Mace, G. M., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). Protected areas in South Asia have not prevented habitat loss: a study using historical models of land-use change. PloS One, 8(5), e65298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, N., Stolton, S., Belokurov, A., Krueger, L., Lopoukhine, N., MacKinnon, K. Sandwith T., & Sekhran, N. (2010). Natural solutions: protected areas helping people cope with climate change. IUCN/WCPA “Parks for Life” Coordination Office.

  • Dutta, K., Reddy, C. S., Sharma, S., & Jha, C. S. (2016). Quantification and monitoring of forest cover changes in Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India (1920-2012). Current Science, 110(4), 508–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. (2002). Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecological Applications, 12, 346–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T., van der Werf, G. R., Kasibhatla, P. S., Collatz, G. J., Morton, D. C., & DeFries, R. S. (2010). Assessing variability and longterm trends in burned area by merging multiple satellite fire products. Biogeosciences, 7(3), 1171–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. J., & DeFries, R. (2007). Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecological Applications, 17(4), 974–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., & Kommareddy, A. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiremath, A. J., & Sundaram, B. (2005). The fire-lantana cycle hypothesis in Indian forests. Conservation and Society, 3(1), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iniguez, J. M., Thomas, W. S., & Stephen, R. Y. (2008). Topography affected landscape fire history patterns in southern Arizona, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(3), 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinario, G., Hansen, M. C., & Potapov, P. V. (2015). Forest cover dynamics of shifting cultivation in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a remote sensing-based assessment for2000–2010. Environmental Research Letters, 10(2015), 094009. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munsi, M., Areendran, G., Ghosh, A., & Joshi, P. K. (2010). Landscape characterisation of the forests of Himalayan foothills. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 38, 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nita, A., Buttler, A., Rozylowicz, L., & Patru-Stupariu, I. (2015). Perception and use of landscape concepts in the procedure of Environmental Impact Assessment: Case study—Switzerland and Romania. Land Use Policy, 44, 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nita, A., Rozylowicz, L., Manolache, S., Ciocanea, C. M., Miu, I. V., & Popescu, V. D. (2016). Collaboration networks in applied conservation projects across Europe. PloS One, 11(10), e0164503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveras, I., Anderson, L. O., & Malhi, Y. (2014). Application of remote sensing to understanding fire regimes and biomass burning emissions of the tropical Andes. Global Biogeochimical Cycles, 28(4), 480–496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puyravaud, J. P. (2003). Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 177, 593–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainis, R. (2003). Application of GIS and landscape metrics in monitoring urban land use change. Urban ecosystem studies in Malaysia—a study of change. Edited by Noorazuan Md Hashim & Ruslan Rainis. Universal Publishers.

  • Reddy, C. S., Sreelekshmi, S., Jha, C. S., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2013). National assessment of forest fragmentation in India: landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation and forest cover change. Ecological Engineering, 60, 453–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S., Diwakar, P. G., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2015). Nationwide classification of forest types of India using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(12), 777. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4990-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S., Dadhwal, V. K., Harikrishna, P., Pasha, S. V., Satish, K. V., Dutta, K., Saranya, K. R. L., Rakesh, F., Rajashekar, G., & Diwakar, P. G. (2016). Quantification and monitoring of deforestation in India over eight decades (1930–2013). Biodiversity and Conservation, 25, 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritters, K. H., Wickham, J. D., O’Neill, R. V., Jones, K. B., Smith, E. R., Coulston, J. W., Wade, T. G., & Smith, J. H. (2002). Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems, 5, 815–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosencranz, A., & Lele, S. (2008). Supreme Court and India’s forests. Economic & Political Weekly, 43, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T. K., Coomes, O. T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., & Lambin, E. (2005). Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change, 15(1), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, D. (2003). Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation: can pattern reflect process? DOC Science Internal Series 98. Wellington: Department of Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satish, K. V., Saranya, K. R. L., Reddy, C. S., Harikrishna, P., Jha, C. S., & Rao, P. V. V. P. (2014). Geospatial assessment and monitoring of historical forest cover changes in Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India (1920–2012). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(12), 8125–8140.

  • Vogt, P., Riitters, K., Estreguil, C., Kozak, J., Wade, T., & Wickham, J. (2007). Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecology, 22, 171e177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present work has been carried out under the national project ‘Inventorisation and Monitoring of Biosphere Reserves in India using remote sensing and GIS technology’, funded by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India. Authors are thankful to Director, NRSC, Deputy Director, NRSC, and Group Director, Forestry and Ecology Group, NRSC, for encouragement, and Forest department of Kerala for permission and facilities to carry out the field work. Thanks to anonymous reviewers for their critical comments for the improvement of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Sudhakar Reddy.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Athira, K., Reddy, C.S., Saranya, K.R.L. et al. Habitat monitoring and conservation prioritisation of protected areas in Western Ghats, Kerala, India. Environ Monit Assess 189, 295 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5998-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5998-z

Keywords

Navigation