What are the socioeconomic implications of the value chain of biodiversity products? A case study in Northeastern Brazil

  • Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva
  • Laura Jane Gomes
  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
Article

Abstract

The trade in biodiversity products has gained increasing importance in conservation and livelihood strategies. The aim of this study is to describe and analyze the socioeconomic aspects and dynamics of the production and commercialization of two important products of Brazilian biodiversity from the fruits of Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. and Dimorphandra gardneriana Tul. Interviews were conducted with who were involved in the various stages of value chains. Data were analyzed under an analytical/descriptive approach. It was found that the two value chains under study, although they share the same production environment and workforce, are different models of the commercial appropriation of the forest environment: one is related to local traditions, whereas the other seeks to meet an industry-related demand originating from a multinational pharmaceutical company. Harvesters become highly dependent on the trends imposed by these markets. Thus, it is clear that promoting these products as a conservation strategy requires an understanding of how their value chains arise, are established, and operate.

Keywords

Plant extractivism Ethnobiology Ethnoecology Livelihood Non-timber forest products Plant management 

References

  1. Albuquerque, U. P., Lucena, R. F. P., & Lins Neto, E. M. F.  (2014). Selection of research participants. In U. P. Albuquerque, R. F. P. Lucena, & L. V. F. C. Cunha (Eds.), Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer Protocols Handbooks.Google Scholar
  2. Alexiades, M.N., & Shanley, P. (2004). Productos forestales, medios de subsistencia y conservación: estudios de caso sobre sistemas de manejo de productos forestales no maderables. Vol.3 - América Latina. Centro para la investigación florestal internacional (CIFOR), Indonésia.Google Scholar
  3. APNE, Associação de Plantas do Nordeste. (2008). Estatística florestal da caatinga, Vol. 1, APNE, Natal.Google Scholar
  4. Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Persona.Google Scholar
  5. Belcher, B., & Kusters, K. (2004). Non-timber forest product commercialisation: development and conservation lessons. In: Kusters, K., Belcher, B. (Eds.) Forest products, livelihoods and conservation: case studies of non-timber forest product systems. Vol. 1 – Ásia, 1–22. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonésia.Google Scholar
  6. Belcher, B., & Schreckenberg, K. (2007). Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: a reality check. Development Policy Review, 25, 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booker, A., Johnston, D., & Heinrich, M. (2012). Value chains of herbal medicines: research needs and key challenges in the context of ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 140, 624–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brasil. (2000). Lei 9985/2000 que Institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidade de Conservação da Naturaza (SNUC). Brasília.Google Scholar
  9. Brasil. (2009). Plano nacional de promoção das cadeias de produtos da sociobiodiversidade. Brasília: MDA, MMA, MDS.Google Scholar
  10. Gomes, L. J., Gomes, M. A. O., & Jesus, N. B. (2010). Aspectos socioambientais da atividade extrativista de produtos florestais não-madeireiros: os casos da fava-d’anta (Dimorphandra sp.) e da aroeira-da-praia (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi). In U. P. Albuquerque & N. Hanazaki (Eds.), Árvores de valor e o valor das árvores: pontos de conexão (pp. 61–106). Recife: NUPEEA.Google Scholar
  11. Gonçalves, C. U. (2007). A organização dos piquizeiros na Chapada do Araripe. Agriculturas, 4, 21–23.Google Scholar
  12. IBAMA. (2006). Plano operativo de prevenção e combate aos incêndios florestais da floresta nacional de Araripe-Apodi. Crato: Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis.Google Scholar
  13. IBGE. (2010). Produção e vendas dos produtos e/ou serviços industriais, segundo as classes de atividades e a descrição dos produtos. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/industria/pia/produtos/produto2010/defaulttabzip_ods.shtm. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.Google Scholar
  14. Ingram, V., Ndumbe, L., & Ewane, M. (2012). Small scale, high value: gnetum africanum and buchholzianum value chains in Cameroon. Small-Scale Forestry, 11, 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, A. (2009). Valuation of non-timber forest products value chains. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kusters, K., & Belcher, B. (Eds.) (2004). Forest products, livelihoods and conservation: case studies of non-timber forest product systems. Vol. 1 – Ásia. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonésia.Google Scholar
  17. Landim, P. L., & Costa, J. G. M. (2012). Dimorphandra gardneriana Tulasne (Fava d’anta) - Uma abordagem etnobotânica e riscos de extinção. Revista da Biologia, 9, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lins Neto, E. M. F., Peroni, N., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2010). Traditional knowledge and management of Umbu (Spondias tuberosa, Anacardiaceae): an endemic species from the Semi–Arid Region of Northeastern Brazil. Economic Botany, 64, 11–21.Google Scholar
  19. Maraseni, T. N., Shivakoti, G. P., Cockfield, G., & Apan, A. (2006). Nepalese non-timber forest products: an analysis of the equitability of profit distribution across a supply chain to India. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 5, 191–206.Google Scholar
  20. Neumann, R. P., & Hirsch, E. (2000). Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: review and analysis of research. Indonédia: STM Grafika.Google Scholar
  21. Nygren, A., Lacuna-Richman, C., Keinänen, K., & Alsa, L. (2006). Ecological, socio-cultural, economic and political factors influencing the contribution of non-timber forest products to local livelihoods: case studies from Honduras and the Philippines. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 5, 249–269.Google Scholar
  22. Oliveira, M. E. B., Guerra, N. B., Barros, L. M., & Alves, R. E. (2008). Aspectos agronômicos e de qualidade do pequi. Fortaleza: Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical.Google Scholar
  23. Ruiz-Pérez, M., Belcher, B., Achdiawan, R., Alexiades, M., Aubertin, C., Caballero, J., Campbell, B., Clement, C., et al. (2004). Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples. Ecology and Society, 9, 4. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art4. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SAS Institute. (2001). SAS PROC GLM users guide. Version 8.02. Cary: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Shackleton, S., Paumgarten, F., Kassa, H., Husselman, M., & Zida, M. (2011). Opportunities for enhancing poor women’s socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs). International Forestry Review, 13, 36–151.Google Scholar
  26. Silva, R. R. V., Gomes, L. J., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2014). Methods and techniques for research on the supply chains of biodiversity products. In U. P. Albuquerque, L. V. F. C. Cunha, R. F. P. Lucena, & R. R. N. Alves (Eds.), Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology (pp. 335–347). New York: Springer Protocols Handbooks.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silva, R. R. V., Gomes, L. J., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2015). Plant extractivism in light of game theory: a case study in northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11:6.Google Scholar
  28. Soldati, G. T., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2008). Nom-timber forest products: an overview. Functional Ecosystems and Communities, 2, 21–31.Google Scholar
  29. Sousa-Júnior, J. R., Albuquerque, U. P., & Peroni, N. (2013). Traditional knowledge and management of Caryocar coriaceum wittm. (pequi) in the Brazilian savanna, northeastern Brazil. Economic Botany, 67, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Souza, G. C., Kubo, R., Guimarães, L., & Elisabetsky, E. (2006). An ethnobiological assessment of Rumohra adiantiformis (samambaia-preta) extractivism in Southern Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2737–2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sunderland, T., & Ndoye, O. (Eds). (2004). Forest Products, Livelihoods and Conservation. Case Studies of Non-Timber Forest Product Systems. Volume 2 – África. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonésia.Google Scholar
  32. Tuxill, J., & Nabhan, G. P. (2001). Plantas comunidades y áreas protegidas: un guía para el manejo in situ. Uruguay: Nordan-Comunidad.Google Scholar
  33. Varghese, A., & Ticktin, T. (2008). Regional variation in non-timber forest product harvest strategies, trade, and ecological impacts: the case of black dammar (Canarium strictum Roxb.) Use and conservation in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India. Ecology and Society, 13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art11. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.
  34. Velde, D. W., Rushton, J., Schreckenberg, K., Marshall, E., Edouard, F., Newton, A., et al. (2006). Entrepreneurship in value chains of non-timber forest products. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 725–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva
    • 1
  • Laura Jane Gomes
    • 2
  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Área de Engenharia FlorestalUniversidade Federal de AlagoasRio LargoBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciências FlorestaisUniversidade Federal de SergipeSão CristóvãoBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de Biologia, Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas SocioecológicosUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations