Skip to main content

Development and testing of a prototype tool for integrated assessment of chemical status in marine environments

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment volume 188, Article number: 115 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

We report the development and application of a prototype tool for integrated assessment of chemical status in aquatic environments based on substance- and matrix-specific environmental assessment criteria (thresholds). The Chemical Status Assessment Tool (CHASE) integrates data on hazardous substances in water, sediments and biota as well as bio-effect indicators and is based on a substance- or bio-effect-specific calculation of a ‘contamination ratio’ being the ratio between an observed concentration and a threshold value. Values <1.0 indicate areas potentially ‘unaffected’, while values >1.0 indicate areas potentially ‘affected’. These ratios are combined within matrices, i.e. for water, sediment and biota and for biological effects. The overall assessment used a ‘one out, all out principle’ with regard to each matrix. The CHASE tool was tested in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea in 376 assessment units. In the former, the chemical status was >1.0 in practically all areas indicating that all areas assessed were potentially affected. The North Sea included areas classified as unaffected or affected. The CHASE tool can in combination with temporal trend assessments of individual substances be advantageous for use in remedial action plans and, in particular, for the science-based evaluation of the status and for determining which specific substances are responsible for a status as potentially affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Andersen, J. H., Murray, C., Kaartokallio, H., Axe, P., & Molvær, J. (2010). A simple method for confidence rating of eutrophication status assessments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 919–924.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. H., Axe, P., Backer, H., Carstensen, J., Claussen, U., Fleming-Lehtinen, V., Järvinen, M., Kaartokallio, H., Knuuttila, S., Korpinen, S., Laamanen, M., Lysiak-Pastuszak, E., Martin, G., Møhlenberg, F., Murray, C., Nausch, G., Norkko, A., & Villnäs, A. (2011). Getting the measure of eutrophication in the Baltic Sea: towards improved assessment principles and methods. Biogeochemistry, 106, 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. H., Stock, A., (eds.), Heinänen, S., Mannerla, M., & Vinther, M. (2013). Human uses, pressures and impacts in the eastern North Sea. Aarhus University, DCE—Danish Centre for Environment and Energy. Technical Report from DCE—Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 18. 134 pp. http://www2.dmu.dk/Pub/TR18.pdf

  • Andersen, J. H., Dahl, K., Göke, C., Hartvig, M., Murray, C., Rindorf, A., Skov, H., Vinther, M., Korpinen, S. (2014). Integrated assessment of marine biodiversity status using a prototype indicator-based assessment tool. Frontiers in Marine Science. http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmars.2014.00055/abstract

  • Anon. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy.

  • Anon. (2008). Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, L 164/19, 25.06.2008.

  • Anon. (2013). Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union, L 226/1, 24.8.2013.

  • Anon. (2014). Technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools. Technical Report - 2014 – 077, Environment. European Commission, 159 pp.

  • Borja, A., Prins, T., Simboura, N., Andersen, J. H., Berg, T., Marques, J. C., Neto, J. M., Papadopoulou, N., Reker, J., Teixeira, H., & Uusitalo, L. (2014). Tales from a thousand and one ways to integrate marine ecosystem components when assessing the environmental status. Frontiers in Marine Science, 1, 22. doi:10.3389/fmars.2014.00022.

  • Broeg, K., & Lehtonen, K. K. (2006). Indices for the assessment of environmental pollution of the Baltic Sea coasts: integrated assessment of a multi-biomarker approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 53, 508–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Celander, M. (2011). Cocktail effects on biomarker responses in fish. Aquatic Toxicology, 105(3–4), 72–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EEA. (2011). Hazardous substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters. An overview. EEA Technical report No. 8/2011. European Environment Agency. 61 pp.

  • HELCOM. (2007). Baltic Sea action plan. Helsinki Commission, 101 pp.

  • HELCOM. (2010a). Hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea—an integrated thematic assessment of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, 120B, 1–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • HELCOM. (2010b). Ecosystem health of the Baltic Sea 2003-2007: HELCOM initial holistic assessment. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, 122, 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • HELCOM. (2014). Manual for marine monitoring in the COMBINE programme of HELCOM. Available at: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/manuals-and-guidelines/.

  • Höher, N., Köhler, A., Strand, J., & Broeg, K. (2012). Effects of various pollutant mixtures on immune responses of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) collected at a salinity gradient in Danish coastal waters. Marine Environmental Research, 75, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T. H., Lyons, B. P., Thain, J. E., & Law, R. J. (2013). Evaluating legacy contaminants and emerging chemicals in marine environments using adverse outcome pathways and biological effects-directed analysis. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 74(2), 517–525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korpinen, S., Meski, L., Andersen, J. H., & Laamanen, M. (2012). Human pressures and their potential impact on the Baltic Sea ecosystem. Ecological Indicators, 15, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, R., Hanke, G., Angelidis, M., Batty, J., Bignert, A., Dachs, J., Davies, I., Denga, Y., Duffek, A., et al. (2010). Marine Strategy Framework Directive Task Group 8 report: contaminants and pollution effects. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, 58087.

  • Lehtonen, K. K., Sundelin, B., Lang, T., & Strand, J. (2014). Development of tools for integrated monitoring and assessment of hazardous substances and their biological effects in the Baltic Sea. Ambio, 43, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, E. R., & Morgan, L. G. (1990). The Potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the national status and trends program. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 52, Seattle, WA. 175 pp incl. appendices.

  • OSPAR. (2009). Assessment of trends and concentrations of selected hazardous substances in sediments and biota. CEMP Assessment Report 2008/2009. Monitoring and Assessment Series 390. 80 pp.

  • OSPAR. (2010). Quality status report 2010. OSPAR Commission. Available at: www.ospar.org.

  • Reynolds, S., Hill, A. (2002). ‘Cocktail’ effects—stirred not shaken….yet. Pesticide Outlook, October 2002, 209-213.

  • Tomlinson, D. L., Wilson, J. G., Harris, C. R., & Jefrey, D. W. (1980). Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 33, 566–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded via the HELCOM HOLAS project (EU HOLAS 21.0401/2008/513749/SUB/D2 and Swedish EPA), the HARMONY project (Danish Nature Agency, Swedish EPA, Norwegian NEA and German EPA), EMODnet Chemistry and the DEVOTES project (grant agreement no. 308392 under the 7th Framework Programme, ‘The Ocean of Tomorrow’ Theme). Special thanks are given to Katja Broeg, Britta Sundelin, Thomas Lang and Doris Schiedek for support with biological effect indicators. Also, special thanks are given to Anna Olszewska, Petriina Köngäs, Petra Ringeltaube, Rolf Schneider, Henry Vallius and Matti Verta for support with national data. Thanks are also due to Morten Bjergstrøm, Ulrich Claussen, Jacob Hagberg, Marianne Kroglund, Maria Laamanen, Flemming Møhlenberg and Johnny Reker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NIVA Denmark Water Research, Ørestads Boulevard 73, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark

    Jesper H. Andersen & Emilie M.F. Kallenbach

  2. Marine Research Centre, SYKE, Helsinki, Finland

    Jesper H. Andersen & Samuli Korpinen

  3. Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Ciarán Murray, Martin M. Larsen, Kim Gustavson & Jakob Strand

  4. Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway

    Norman Green & Tore Høgåsen

  5. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden

    Elin Dahlgren

  6. Marine Research Department, Environmental Protection Agency, Klaipėda, Lithuania

    Galina Garnaga-Budrė

  7. Department of Biology and Ecology, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, Lithuania

    Galina Garnaga-Budrė

  8. Thünen Institute of Fisheries Ecology, Hamburg, Germany

    Michael Haarich

  9. Centre for Sustainable Consumption and Production, SYKE, Helsinki, Finland

    Jaakko Mannio

Authors
  1. Jesper H. Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ciarán Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin M. Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Norman Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tore Høgåsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elin Dahlgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Galina Garnaga-Budrė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kim Gustavson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Michael Haarich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Emilie M.F. Kallenbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jaakko Mannio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jakob Strand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Samuli Korpinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesper H. Andersen.

Electronic supplementary material

The electronic supplementary material includes (1) additional results, (2) a list of substances and their target values, (3) a synthesis of the CHASE classifications, as well as (4) all individual CHASE classifications, the latter providing both an essential documentation and a potential management tool.

ESM 1

(PDF 4181 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andersen, J.H., Murray, C., Larsen, M.M. et al. Development and testing of a prototype tool for integrated assessment of chemical status in marine environments. Environ Monit Assess 188, 115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5121-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5121-x

Keywords

  • Chemical status
  • Contaminants
  • Hazardous substances
  • Monitoring
  • Assessment
  • Integration
  • Water framework directive
  • Marine strategy framework directive