Quantifying in-stream retention of nitrate at catchment scales using a practical mass balance approach
- 296 Downloads
As field data on in-stream nitrate retention is scarce at catchment scales, this study aimed at quantifying net retention of nitrate within the entire river network of a fourth-order stream. For this purpose, a practical mass balance approach combined with a Lagrangian sampling scheme was applied and seasonally repeated to estimate daily in-stream net retention of nitrate for a 17.4 km long, agriculturally influenced, segment of the Steinlach River in southwestern Germany. This river segment represents approximately 70 % of the length of the main stem and about 32 % of the streambed area of the entire river network. Sampling days in spring and summer were biogeochemically more active than in autumn and winter. Results obtained for the main stem of Steinlach River were subsequently extrapolated to the stream network in the catchment. It was demonstrated that, for baseflow conditions in spring and summer, in-stream nitrate retention could sum up to a relevant term of the catchment’s nitrogen balance if the entire stream network was considered.
KeywordsNitrate retention In-stream processes Mass balance approach Stream network Catchment scale
The authors thank J. H. Fleckenstein for helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science, Research and Arts of Baden-Württemberg (AZ Zu 33–721.3-2) and the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research, Leipzig (UFZ). The study was also supported by the EU FP7 Collaborative Project GLOBAQUA (Grant Agreement no 603629).
- Deforet, T., Marmonier, P., Rieffel, D., Crini, N., Fritsch, C., Giraudoux, P., & Gilbert, D. (2008). The influence of size, hydrological characteristics and vegetation cover on nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon cycling in lowland river gravel bars (Doubs River, France). Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 171(2), 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- European Environment Agency. (1999). Nutrients in European ecosystems. Environmental assessment report no. 4.http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/ENVIASSRP04. Accessed 4 June 2015.Google Scholar
- Osenbrück, K., Wöhling, T., Lemke, D., Rohrbach, N., Schwientek, M., Leven, C., Castillo Alvarez, C., Taubald, H., & Cirpka, O. A. (2013). Assessing hyporheic exchange and associated travel times by hydraulic, chemical, and isotopic monitoring at the Steinlach Test Site, Germany. Environmental Earth Sciences, 69(2), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Triska, F. J., & Oremland, R. S. (1981). Denitrification associated with periphyton communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 42(4), 745–748.Google Scholar
- van Grinsven, H. J. M., ten Berge, H. F. M., Dalgaard, T., Fraters, B., Durand, P., Hart, A., et al. (2012). Management, regulation and environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilization in northwestern Europe under the Nitrates Directive; a benchmark study. Biogeosciences, 9(12), 5143–5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar