Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey
- 877 Downloads
In recent years, natural areas have become a preferred recreation area for people looking to escape their busy urban lives. The world has become so complicated that people now seek solace in areas of nature. Recreational activities conducted in natural areas, such as Ilgaz Mountain National Park, should be respectful of the environment to ensure balance and no negative environmental impact. This balance should safeguard environmental protection and only be used with the right to establish recreation planning. National parks are protected areas where the most beautiful wonders of nature exist. Thus, urban planning for recreation, and demand for recreation areas, must demonstrate both the potential of recreation resources and the protection of Ilgaz Mountain National Park. Urban open and green spaces have an important function, and in this study, it has been looked at Ilgaz Mountain National Park to examine the current situation. The aim of this study is to ensure the sustainability of natural and cultural resources via an evaluation to reveal the necessary practices and precautions regarding the area’s recreational potential. As a result, Ilgaz Mountain National Park’s recreation potential was found to be 72 %, and thus, it is considered to be an area of high recreation potential.
KeywordsEnvironmental sensitivity National park Protected area Recreational potential Recreational opportunity Scenic attractiveness GIS analysis
- Calik, F., & Sertbas, K. (2014). Sport and recreation potential analysis of natural parks. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 14(2), 263–270.Google Scholar
- Cetin, M. (2015a). Consideration of permeable pavement in landscape architecture. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 16(1), 385–392.Google Scholar
- Cetin, M. (2015b). Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(5), 420–424. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066.
- Cetin, M. (2015c). Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: a case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(6), 490–495. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1081651.
- Cetin, M. (2015d). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu city. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 187(10), 640. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4861-3.
- D’Antonio, A. L. (2010). Recreation resource impacts in the bear lake road corridor of rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA: an assessment of resource conditions and visitor perceptions. Logan, UTAH, USA: Utah State University, Master dissertation.Google Scholar
- Duzgunes, E., & Demirel, O. (2013). Determining the tourism potential of the Altındere Valley National Park (Trabzon/Turkey) with respect to its conservation value. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 20(4), 358–368. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2013.777861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goonan, K. A. (2009). Protecting natural resources and the visitor experience on mountain summits in the Northern Forest: a framework for management. Master Dissertation. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
- Gulez, S. (1990). An evaluation method for determination of inside of forest recreation potential. Istanbul University. Journal of Faculty of Forestry, 40(2), 132–147.Google Scholar
- Kastamonu. (2015). National Parks Directorate, Directorate of Kastamonu Ilgaz Mountain National Park. http://bolge10.ormansu.gov.tr/10bolge/AnaSayfa/milliparklarsubemudurlugu/ilgaz.aspx?sflang=tr accessed 12 January 2015.Google Scholar
- Kaya, L. G., & Aytekin, A. (2009). Determination of outdoor recreation potential: case of the city of Bartın and its environs, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18(8), 1513–1524.Google Scholar
- Kaya, L. G., Cetin, M., & Doygun, H. (2009). A holistic approach in analyzing the landscape potential: Porsuk Dam Lake and its environs, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18(8), 1525–153.Google Scholar
- Monz, C. A., Marion, J. L., Goonan, K. A., Manning, R. E., Wimpey, J., & Carr, C. (2010). Assessment and monitoring of recreation impacts and resource conditions on mountain summits: examples from the Northern Forest, USA. Mountain Research and Development, 30(4), 332–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00078.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ngoka, P. C. (2013). Capacity and levels of utilization of tourism potentials of Yankari and Cross River National Parks—implications for optimistic ecotourism development in Nigeria. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 2(4), 1–12.Google Scholar
- NP. (2015). National Parks of Turkey 2015. Republic of Turkey. Ministry of forest and water. The general of directorate of nature protection and national parks. http://www.milliparklar.gov.tr/mp/ilgazdagi/index.htm accessed 12 January 2015.Google Scholar
- TC. (2015). Tourism and Culture. Republic of Turkey. Ministry of Tourism and Culture. Kastamonu directorate of culture and tourism. http://www.kastamonukultur.gov.tr/TR,63883/milli-parklar-ve-korunan-alanlar.html accessed 14 January 2015.Google Scholar
- Topay, M. (2013). Mapping of thermal comfort for outdoor recreation planning using GIS: the case of Isparta Province (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37, 110–120.Google Scholar
- Topay, M., & Memluk, Y. (2011). Suitable for recreational area events choice for a new method approach: a case study of Bartin-Uluyayla. Suleyman Demirel University. Journal of Faculty of Forestry, 12(2), 141–147. Isparta.Google Scholar