Advertisement

Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey

  • Mehmet Cetin
  • Hakan SevikEmail author
Article

Abstract

In recent years, natural areas have become a preferred recreation area for people looking to escape their busy urban lives. The world has become so complicated that people now seek solace in areas of nature. Recreational activities conducted in natural areas, such as Ilgaz Mountain National Park, should be respectful of the environment to ensure balance and no negative environmental impact. This balance should safeguard environmental protection and only be used with the right to establish recreation planning. National parks are protected areas where the most beautiful wonders of nature exist. Thus, urban planning for recreation, and demand for recreation areas, must demonstrate both the potential of recreation resources and the protection of Ilgaz Mountain National Park. Urban open and green spaces have an important function, and in this study, it has been looked at Ilgaz Mountain National Park to examine the current situation. The aim of this study is to ensure the sustainability of natural and cultural resources via an evaluation to reveal the necessary practices and precautions regarding the area’s recreational potential. As a result, Ilgaz Mountain National Park’s recreation potential was found to be 72 %, and thus, it is considered to be an area of high recreation potential.

Keywords

Environmental sensitivity National park Protected area Recreational potential Recreational opportunity Scenic attractiveness GIS analysis 

References

  1. Barros, A., Gonnet, J. M., & Pickering, C. M. (2013). Impacts of informal trails on vegetation and soils in the highest protected area in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of Environmental Management, 127, 50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2011). Public participation GIS: a new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calik, F., & Sertbas, K. (2014). Sport and recreation potential analysis of natural parks. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 14(2), 263–270.Google Scholar
  4. Cengiz, T. (2007). Tourism, an ecological approach in protected areas: Karagöl-Sahara National Park, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 14(3), 260–267. doi: 10.1080/13504500709469726.Google Scholar
  5. Cetin, M. (2015a). Consideration of permeable pavement in landscape architecture. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 16(1), 385–392.Google Scholar
  6. Cetin, M. (2015b). Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(5), 420–424. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066.
  7. Cetin, M. (2015c). Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: a case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(6), 490–495. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1081651.
  8. Cetin, M. (2015d). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu city. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 187(10), 640. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4861-3.
  9. Cheung, L. T. O., & Jim, C. Y. (2014). Expectations and willingness-to-pay for ecotourism services in Hong Kong’s conservation areas. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(2), 149–159. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2013.859183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chhetri, P., & Arrowsmith, C. (2008). GIS-based modeling of recreational potential of nature-based tourist destinations. Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 10(2), 233–257. doi: 10.1080/14616680802000089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Antonio, A. L. (2010). Recreation resource impacts in the bear lake road corridor of rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA: an assessment of resource conditions and visitor perceptions. Logan, UTAH, USA: Utah State University, Master dissertation.Google Scholar
  12. D'Antonio, A., Monz, C., Newman, P., Lawson, S., & Taff, D. (2013). Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social–ecological approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 124, 72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duzgunes, E., & Demirel, O. (2013). Determining the tourism potential of the Altındere Valley National Park (Trabzon/Turkey) with respect to its conservation value. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 20(4), 358–368. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2013.777861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geneletti, D., & Dawa, D. (2009). Environmental impact assessment of mountain tourism in developing regions: a study in Ladakh, Indian Himalaya. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(4), 229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goonan, K. A. (2009). Protecting natural resources and the visitor experience on mountain summits in the Northern Forest: a framework for management. Master Dissertation. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  16. Gulez, S. (1990). An evaluation method for determination of inside of forest recreation potential. Istanbul University. Journal of Faculty of Forestry, 40(2), 132–147.Google Scholar
  17. Kastamonu. (2015). National Parks Directorate, Directorate of Kastamonu Ilgaz Mountain National Park. http://bolge10.ormansu.gov.tr/10bolge/AnaSayfa/milliparklarsubemudurlugu/ilgaz.aspx?sflang=tr accessed 12 January 2015.Google Scholar
  18. Kaya, L. G., & Aytekin, A. (2009). Determination of outdoor recreation potential: case of the city of Bartın and its environs, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18(8), 1513–1524.Google Scholar
  19. Kaya, L. G., Cetin, M., & Doygun, H. (2009). A holistic approach in analyzing the landscape potential: Porsuk Dam Lake and its environs, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18(8), 1525–153.Google Scholar
  20. Kim, M. K., & Daigle, J. J. (2012). Monitoring of vegetation impact due to trampling on Cadillac Mountain summit using high spatial resolution remote sensing data sets. Environmental Management, 50(5), 956–968. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9905-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kliskey, A. D. (2000). Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52(1), 33–43. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00111-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maple, L. C., Eagles, P. F. J., & Rolfe, H. (2010). Birdwatchers’ specialisation characteristics and national park tourism planning. Journal of Ecotourism, 9(3), 219–238. doi: 10.1080/14724040903370213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Monz, C. A., Marion, J. L., Goonan, K. A., Manning, R. E., Wimpey, J., & Carr, C. (2010). Assessment and monitoring of recreation impacts and resource conditions on mountain summits: examples from the Northern Forest, USA. Mountain Research and Development, 30(4), 332–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00078.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ngoka, P. C. (2013). Capacity and levels of utilization of tourism potentials of Yankari and Cross River National Parks—implications for optimistic ecotourism development in Nigeria. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 2(4), 1–12.Google Scholar
  25. NP. (2015). National Parks of Turkey 2015. Republic of Turkey. Ministry of forest and water. The general of directorate of nature protection and national parks. http://www.milliparklar.gov.tr/mp/ilgazdagi/index.htm accessed 12 January 2015.Google Scholar
  26. Okelloa, M. M., & Yerian, S. (2009). Tourist satisfaction in relation to attractions and implications for conservation in the protected areas of the Northern Circuit, Tanzania. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(5), 605–625. doi: 10.1080/09669580902928450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. TC. (2015). Tourism and Culture. Republic of Turkey. Ministry of Tourism and Culture. Kastamonu directorate of culture and tourism. http://www.kastamonukultur.gov.tr/TR,63883/milli-parklar-ve-korunan-alanlar.html accessed 14 January 2015.Google Scholar
  28. Tomczyk, A. M. (2011). A GIS assessment and modelling of environmental sensitivity of recreational trails: the case of Gorce National Park, Poland. Applied Geography, 31(1), 339–351. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Topay, M. (2013). Mapping of thermal comfort for outdoor recreation planning using GIS: the case of Isparta Province (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37, 110–120.Google Scholar
  30. Topay, M., & Memluk, Y. (2011). Suitable for recreational area events choice for a new method approach: a case study of Bartin-Uluyayla. Suleyman Demirel University. Journal of Faculty of Forestry, 12(2), 141–147. Isparta.Google Scholar
  31. Zhang, J. T., Xiang, C., & Li, M. (2012). Effects of tourism and topography on vegetation diversity in the subalpine meadows of the Dongling Mountains of Beijing, China. Environmental Management, 49(2), 403–411. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9786-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and EngineeringKastamonu UniversityKastamonuTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and EngineeringKastamonu UniversityKastamonuTurkey

Personalised recommendations