Skip to main content
Log in

Bioefficacy evaluation and dissipation pattern of nanoformulation versus commercial formulation of pyridalyl in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was undertaken to evaluate the decline of the residues of pyridalyl in tomatoes grown in two different cultivation systems: open field (conventional cultivation) and net house (pot experiment). Field experiment was conducted with commercial (10 EC) and nanoformulation of pyridalyl on tomato crop. Tomato plants were subjected to pesticide spray, when fruits were close to ripeness. Fruit samples were taken periodically and cleaned up using QuEChERS methodology, and the residue of pyridalyl was analyzed by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC). It dissipated in tomato fruit following the first-order kinetics. In field, average initial deposit of pyridalyl in tomato was observed to be 0.222 and 0.371 μg g−1 at recommended and double the recommended application rate, respectively, using nanoformulation while it was 0.223 and 0.393 μg g−1 on using commercial formulation, respectively. The half-life (t1/2) value of nanopyridalyl in tomato fruit was 2.8 and 3.2 days while for commercial formulation, it was 2.5 and 2.6 days for recommended and double the recommended dose, respectively. In India, maximum residue limit (MRL) on tomato has not been fixed for pyridalyl but its residues were always below European MRLs (5 μg g−1) on tomato at both application rates. The results of terminal residue showed that pyridalyl residues were below the available MRL. Low residues in tomatoes suggested that this pesticide is safe to use under the recommended dosage. No statistical differences were observed between the cultivation systems in relation to the residue levels of pyridalyl.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armes, N. J., Jadhav, D. R., Bond, G. S., & King, A. B. S. (1992). Insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera in South India. Pesticide Science, 34, 355–364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, S. R., Nair, K. K., Kumar, R., Gogoi, R., Srivastava, C., Gopal, M., Subramanium, B., Devakumar, C., & Goswami, A. (2010). Nanosulfur: Potent fungicide against food pathogen, Aspergillus niger. In P K Giri, D K Goswami, A Perumal & A Chattopadhyay (Eds.), American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, 1276, 154–157.

  • D’Mello, J. P. F. (2003). Food safety: Contaminants and toxins (p. 480). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2010). The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (p. 399). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi, R., Singh, P. K., Kumar, R., Nair, K. K., Alam, I., Srivastava, C., Yadav, S., Gopal, M., Roy, S. C., & Goswami, A. (2013). Suitability of nano-sulphur for biorational management of powdery mildew of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus Moench) caused by Erysiphe cichoracearum. Journal of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, 4, 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, M., Roy, S.C., Ghose, M., Dasgupta, R., Devakumar, C., Subrahmanyam, B., Srivastava, C., Gogoi, R. Kumar, R., & Goswami, A. (2011a). Samfungin: A novel fungicide and the process for making the same. Indian Patent Application No. 1599/DEL/2011 filed 07/06/2011.

  • Gopal, M., Roy, S.C., Roy, I., Pradhan, S., Srivastava, C., Gogoi, R., Kumar, R. & Goswami, A. (2011b). Nanoencapsulated hexaconazole: a novel fungicide and the process for making the same. Indian Patent Application No. 2051/DEL/2011 filed 21/07/2011.

  • Gopal, M., Kumar, R., & Goswami, A. (2012a). Nano-pesticides—a recent approach for pest control. The Journal of Plant Protection Sciences, 4(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, M., Srivastava, C., Gogoi, R., Kumar, R., & Goswami, A. (2012b). Addressing environmental concern with nano pesticides for sustainable agriculture. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 8(1), 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafy, H. E. M., & El-Sayed, W. (2013). Efficacy of Bio-And Chemical insecticides in the control of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) and Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato plants. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 943–948.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Nair, K. K., Alam, M. I., Gogoi, R., Singh, P. K., Srivastava, C., Yadav, S., Gopal, M., Chaudhary, S. R., Pradhan, S., & Goswami, A. (2011). A simple method for the estimation of sulphur in nanoformulations by UV spectrophotometry. Current Science, 100, 1542–1546.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Nair, K. K., Verma, S., Gogoi, R., Singh, P. K., Srivastava, C., Alpana, Gopal, M., Chaudhary, S. R., & Goswami, A. (2012). Developing nanosulphur for mitigation of agricultural pests and better crop health. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Research, 7(2), 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omirou, M., Vryzas, Z., Mourkidou, E. P., & Economou, A. (2009). Dissipation rates of iprodione and thiacloprid during tomato production in greenhouse. Food Chemistry, 116, 499–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patra, P., Choudhury, S.R., Mandal, S., Basu, A., Goswami, A., Gogoi, R., Srivastava, C., Kumar, R., & Gopal, M. (2013). Effect sulfur and ZnO nanoparticles on stress physiology and plant (Vigna radiata) nutrition. In PK Giri, DK Goswami, & A Perumal (Eds.), Advanced Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, 143, 301–309.

  • Saini, P. (2014). Ph.D. Thesis: Residue studies of pyridalyl and its nanoformulation on vegetables. New Delhi: Indian Agricultural Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini, P., Gopal, M., Kumar, R., & Srivastava, C. (2014). Development of pyridalyl nanocapsule suspension for efficient management of tomato fruit and shoot borer (Helicoverpa armigera). Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part. B, 49(5), 344–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saini, P., Gopal, M., Kumar, R., & Gogoi, R. (2015). Residue, dissipation, and safety evaluation of pyridalyl nanoformulation in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus [L] Moench). Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamto, N., Saito, S., Hirose, T., Suzuki, M., Matsuo, S., Izumi, K., Nagatomi, T., Ikegami, H., Umeda, K., Tsushima, K., & Matsuo, N. (2003). The discovery of pyridalyl: a novel insecticidal agent for controlling lepidop- terous pests. Pest Management Science, 60, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, R. K., Mistry, N. C., Singh, B., & Gandhi, C. P. (2013). Indian horticulture data base-2013 (p. 289). Haryana: National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Gurgaon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Director, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, for facilitating the work. One of the authors (PS) acknowledges the grant received from PG school of IARI.

Compliance with ethical standards

The study does not involve any human Participants and/or animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhuban Gopal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saini, P., Gopal, M., Kumar, R. et al. Bioefficacy evaluation and dissipation pattern of nanoformulation versus commercial formulation of pyridalyl in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Environ Monit Assess 187, 541 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4767-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4767-0

Keywords

Navigation