Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Equitable fund allocation, an economical approach for sustainable waste load allocation

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research aims to study a novel approach for waste load allocation (WLA) to meet environmental, economical, and equity objectives, simultaneously. For this purpose, based on a simulation-optimization model developed for Haraz River in north of Iran, the waste loads are allocated according to discharge permit market. The non-dominated solutions are initially achieved through multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). Here, the violation of environmental standards based on dissolved oxygen (DO) versus biochemical oxidation demand (BOD) removal costs is minimized to find economical total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). This can save 41 % in total abatement costs in comparison with the conventional command and control policy. The BOD discharge permit market then increases the revenues to 45 %. This framework ensures that the environmental limits are fulfilled but the inequity index is rather high (about 4.65). For instance, the discharge permit buyer may not be satisfied about the equity of WLA. Consequently, it is recommended that a third party or institution should be in charge of reallocating the funds. It means that the polluters which gain benefits by unfair discharges should pay taxes (or funds) to compensate the losses of other polluters. This intends to reduce the costs below the required values of the lowest inequity index condition. These compensations of equitable fund allocation (EFA) may help to reduce the dissatisfactions and develop WLA policies. It is concluded that EFA in integration with water quality trading (WQT) is a promising approach to meet the objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrad, G., & Feinerman, E. (2009). Regional planning of wastewater reuse for irrigation and river rehabilitation. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1), 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadnia, A., & Zahraie, B. (2010). Optimization of nonlinear Muskingum method with variable parameters using multi-objective particle swarm optimization. World environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, 2278-2284, doi: 10.1061/41114(371)235.

  • Baltar, A. M., & Fontane, D. G. (2008). Use of multi-objective particle swarm optimization in water resource management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 134(3), 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burn, D. H., & Yulianti, J. S. (2001). Waste-load allocation using genetic algorithms. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(2), 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collentine, D. (2005). Including non-point sources in a water quality trading permit program. Water Science and Technology, 51(3-4), 47–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daylami, A. A., Shamsai, A., & Niksokhan, M. H. (2010). Model for waste load allocation in rivers: a cooperative approach. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 8(6), 626–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadaeifard, F., Raissy, M., Faghani, M., Majlesi, A., & Farahani, G. N. (2012). Evaluation of physicochemical parameters of waste water from rainbow trout fish farms and their impacts on water quality of Koohrang system—Iran. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 4(8), 170–177. doi:10.5897/IJFA12.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feizi Ashtiani, E., Niksokhan, M. H., & Ardestani, M. (2015). Multi-objective waste load allocation in river system by MOPSO. International Journal of Environmental Research, 9(1), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi, S., Ardestani, M., & Niksokhan, M. H. (2015a). Seasonal waste load allocation policy within integrated discharge permits and reclaimed water market. Water Policy. doi:10.2166/wp.2015.301. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi, S., Niksokhan, M.H., Ardestani, M. & Jaberi, H. (2015b). Enhancement of surface water quality using trading discharge permits and artificial aeration. Environmental Earth Sciences, in press.

  • Jamshidi, S., Niksokhan, M. H., & Ardestani, M. (2014). Surface water quality management using integrated discharge permit and reclaimed water market. Water Science and Technology, 70(5), 917–924. doi:10.2166/wst.2014.314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurek, W., & Ostfeld, A. (2013). Multi-objective optimization of water quality, pumps operation, and storage sizing of water distribution systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 115, 189–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahjouri, N., & Ardestani, A. (2010). A game theoretic approach for interbasin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 167, 527–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malekmohammadi, B., Zahraie, B., & Kerachian, R. (2011). Ranking solutions of multi-objective reservoir operation optimization models using multi criteria decision analysis. Expert systems with applications, 38, 7851–7863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni-Bandpei, A., & Yousefi, Z. (2013). Status of water quality parameters along Haraz River. International Journal of Environmental Research, 7(4), 1029–1038.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafavi, S. A., & Afshar, A. (2011). Waste load allocation using non-dominated archiving multi-colony ant algorithm. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasrabadi, T. (2015). An index approach to metallic pollution in river waters. International Journal of Environmental Research, 9(1), 385–394.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, D. A., & Woodward, R. T. (2012). An ex post evaluation of Ohio’s Great Miami water quality trading program. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 48(1), 156–169. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00601.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo, M. R., Kerachian, R., & Niksokhan, M. H. (2012). Equitable waste load allocation in rivers using fuzzy bi-matrix games. Water Resources Management, 26(15), 4539–4552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niksokhan, M. H., Kerachian, R., & Amin, P. (2009a). A stochastic conflict resolution model for trading pollutant discharge permits in river systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 154, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niksokhan, M. H., Kerachian, R., & Karamouz, M. (2009b). A game theoretic approach for trading discharge permits in rivers. Water Science and Technology, 60(3), 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishizawa, E. (2003). Effluent trading for water quality management: concept and application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47, 169–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N. P., Shortle, J. S., Reed, P. M., & Nguyen, T. T. (2013). Water quality trading with asymmetric information, uncertainty and transaction costs: a stochastic agent-based simulation. Resource and Energy Economics, 35(1), 60–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obropta, C. C., Niazi, M., & Kardos, J. S. (2008). Application of an environmental decision support system to a water quality trading program affected by surface water diversions. Environmental Management, 42, 946–956. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9153-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, D. (2011). Sociopolitical conditions for successful water quality trading in the south nation river watershed, Ontario, Canada. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 47(1), 39–51. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00511.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pejman, A., Nabi Bidhendi, G., Karbassi, A., Mehrdadi, N., & Esmaeili Bidhendi, M. (2009). Evaluation of spatial and seasonal variations in surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6(3), 467–476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, I., Qaderi, K., & Abasiyan, A. M. (2013). Optimal reservoir operation using MOPSO with time variant inertia and acceleration coefficients. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(3), 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranga Prabodanie, R. A., Raffensperger, J. F., & Milke, M. W. (2010). A pollution offset system for trading non-point source water pollution permits. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, M. O., & Gottlieb, J. (2011). Point-nonpoint trading—can it work? Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 47(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirangi, E., Kerachian, R., & Shafai Bajestan, M. (2007). A simplified model for reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: application of the young conflict resolution theory. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 146(1-3), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saremi, A., Saremi, K., Saremi, A., Sadeghi, M., & Sadeghi, H. (2013). The effect of aquaculture effluents on water quality parameters of Haraz River. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 12(2), 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (2004). Water quality trading assessment handbook. 1-120.

  • Ward, F. A., & Pulido-Velázquez, M. (2008). Efficiency, equity, and sustainability in a water quantity-quality optimization model in the Rio Grande basin. Ecological Economics, 66, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yandamuri, S. R., Srinivasan, K., & Murty Bhallamudi, S. (2006). Multiobjective optimal waste load allocation models for rivers using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132(3), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, 25 Ghods St., PO Box: 14155-6135, Tehran, Iran

    Elham Feizi Ashtiani, Mohammad Hossein Niksokhan & Shervin Jamshidi

Authors
  1. Elham Feizi Ashtiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Hossein Niksokhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shervin Jamshidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Hossein Niksokhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashtiani, E.F., Niksokhan, M.H. & Jamshidi, S. Equitable fund allocation, an economical approach for sustainable waste load allocation. Environ Monit Assess 187, 522 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4739-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4739-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation