Spatial assessment of landscape ecological connectivity in different urban gradient
- 644 Downloads
Urbanization has resulted in remnant natural patches within cities that often have no connectivity among themselves and to natural reserves outside the urban area. Protecting ecological connectivity in fragmented urban areas is becoming crucial in maintaining urban biodiversity and securing critical habitat levels and configurations under continual development pressures. Nevertheless, few studies have been undertaken for urban landscapes. This study aims to assess ecological connectivity for a group of species that represent the urban desert landscape in the Phoenix metropolitan area and to compare the connectivity values along the different urban gradient. A GIS-based landscape connectivity model which relies upon ecological connectivity index (ECI) was developed and applied to this region. A GIS-based concentric buffering technique was employed to delineate conceptual boundaries for urban, suburban, and rural zones. The research findings demonstrated that urban habitats and potential habitat patches would be significantly influenced by future urban development. Particularly, the largest loss of higher connectivity would likely to be anticipated in the “in-between areas” where urban, suburban, and rural zones overlap one another. The connectivity maps would be useful to provide spatial identification regarding connectivity patterns and vulnerability for urban and suburban activities in this area. This study provides planners and landscape architects with a spatial guidance to minimize ecological fragmentation, which ultimately leads to urban landscape sustainability. This study suggests that conventional planning practices which disregard the ecological processes in urban landscapes need to integrate landscape ecology into planning and design strategies.
KeywordsLandscape ecological connectivity Metropolitan landscape Urban gradient Phoenix
- Anderson, A. H., & Anderson, A. (1973). The cactus wren. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- Arizona Game and Fish Department. (2009). Foxes. http://www.azgfd.gov/h_f/game_foxes.shtml.
- Beier, P., Penrod, K. L., Kyjem, C., Soebcerm, W., & Cabaero, C. (2005). South coast missing linkages: Restoring connectivity to wildlands in the largest metropolitan area in the United States. In K. R. Crooks (Ed.), Connectivity and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, M. G. (2005). A passive adaptive management approach for grassland loss and fragmentation on the United States Army Garrison Fort Huachuca, Arizona. Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
- Cook, E. A. (2000). Ecological Networks in Urban Landscapes, Doctoral Dissertation. The Netherlands, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
- Cook, E. A., & van Lier, H. N. (1994). Landscape planning and ecological networks. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Crooks, R., & Sanjayan, M. A. (Eds.). (2006). Connectivity conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- DeStefano, S., & Johnson, E. A. (2005). Species that benefit from sprawl. In E. A. Johnson & M. W. Klemens (Eds.), Nature in fragments: the legacy of sprawl (pp. 206–236). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Dufrêne, M., & Legendre, P. (1997). Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67, 345–366.Google Scholar
- Erickson, D. (2006). MetroGreen: Connecting open space in North American cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Esbah, H. (2001). Using Landscape Structure Indices to Understand the Possible Impacts of Landscape Change: Case of the Mountain Preserves in the City of Phoenix. Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
- Esbah, H., Cook, E. A., & Ewan, J. (2009). Effects of increasing urbanization on the ecological integrity of open space preserves. Journal of Environmental Management, 43, 846–862.Google Scholar
- ESRI. (2010). ArcGIS Desktop Help 9.3. http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgiSDEsktop/9.3/index.cfm?TopicName=cost_path.
- Ewan, J., & Underhill, M. (2003). Exploration of the edge. Tempe: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
- Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Frost, N. (2005). San Joaquin Kit Fox Home Range, Habitat Use, and Movements in Urban Bakersfield. Master Thesis, Humboldt State University.Google Scholar
- Gammage, G., Jr. (1999). Phoenix in perspective: reflection on developing the desert. Tempe: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
- IUCN. (2006). Cactus Wren. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/147753/0.
- Knowles-Yanez, K., Moritz, C., Fry, J., Redman, C. L., Bucchin, M., & McCartney, P. H. (1999). Historic land use: phase 1 report on generalized land use. Tempe: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
- Lindenmayer, D. B., & Fisher, J. (2006). Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- McHarg, I. L. (1992). Design with nature. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Melnick, R. (2003). Expanding our view of region, farther than the eye can see. In Arizona State University, a regional atlas for greater phoenix: a preview of the region’s 50-year future.Google Scholar
- Noss, R. F. (2004). Can urban areas have ecological integrity? In W. W. Shaw, K. Harris, & L. VanDurff (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international urban wildlife symposium on urban wildlife conservation. Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
- Park, S. (2010). Landscape Connectivity Assessment in the Phoenix Metropolitan Region: An integrative approach of landscape ecology and planning. Proceedings of Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture (CELA). Maastrich, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Patton, A., & Francl, K. (2008). Vulpes macrotis. Animal Diversity Web. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Vulpes_macrotis.html.
- Rosenberg, K. V., Ohmart, R. D., Hunter, W. C., & Anderson, B. W. (1991). Birds of the lower Colorado River valley. Tucson, AZ: University Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- US Census Bureau. (2009). Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas. http://www.census.gov/population/www/metroareas/metrodef.html.
- Witzeman, J. L., Demaree, S. R., & Radke, F. L. (1997). Birds of Phoenix and Maricopa County. Phoenix: Maricopa Audubon Society.Google Scholar
- Zhang, S., York, A. M., & Boone, C. G. (2010). Methodological issues in land fragmentation gradient analysis. A poster presented at the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP-LTER) Twelfth Annual Poster symposium, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar