Skip to main content
Log in

Evaporation losses and dispersion of volatile organic compounds from tank farms

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is an application of a Gaussian dispersion model to evaluate volatilization losses from tank farms. It reports methodology to estimate evaporation losses of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from organic liquid in storage tanks. This study used fixed roof and floating roof equations for breathing and working losses. Total loss, the breathing loss, vapor pressure, molecular weight of the product, tank diameter, diurnal temperature, paint factor, tank capacity, and number of turnovers were considered and factored in the calculation. AERMOD and ALOHA softwares were used to simulate the dispersion of VOCs under normal and accidental scenarios. For the modeling purposes, meteorological data such as annual average ambient temperature, annual average atmospheric pressure, daily minimum ambient temperature, daily maximum ambient temperature, solar insulation factor, and average wind speed were included as input in the calculation and modeling activities. The study took place in Sharjah Emirate in United Arab Emirates, which borders Dubai to the south and Ajman to the north, and the three form a conurbation. The reported method was used to estimate evaporation losses for baseline and hypothetical leak scenarios. Results of this research show that liquid storage tanks in the study area emit a low concentration of VOC under the studied and assumed conditions, e.g., new tanks with high performance sealing as well as the noted earlier climatic conditions. The dispersion of those concentrations is controlled by the prevailing wind direction. The predicted VOCs concentrations were within the range of the measured VOCs values in air. The study found that the spatial distributions of the predicted concentration attenuate with time and distance. Under the reported accidental spill scenario, the Gaussian model indicates that the danger area starts within the zone of less than 10 m. The danger area is subjected to flame pockets, and the VOC concentrations in this area will exceed 19,800 ppm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Petroleum Institute (API). (1982). Evaporation loss from internal floating roof tanks, Third Edition, Bulletin No. 2519. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.

  • American Petroleum Institute (API). (1984). Manual of petroleum measurement standards: Chapter 19: Evaporative loss measurement, section 2, evaporative loss from floating roof tanks, preliminary draft. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, December 1994.

  • American Petroleum Institute (API). (1989). Evaporative loss from external floating roof tanks, Third Edition, Bulletin No. 2517. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.

  • Ashafi, Kh., Shafiepour, M., Salimian, M., & Momeni, M. R. (2012). Determination and dispersion modeling of VOC emission from liquid storage tank in Asalouyeh Zone. Journal of Environmental Studies, 38(3), 13–15.

  • Carletti, S., Di Nicola, G., & Passerini, G. (2014). Evaluation of fugitive emission of hydrocarbons from a refinery during a signficant pollution episode. The 9th International Conference “Environmental Engineering”, 22–23 May 2014. Vilnius, Lithuania: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Press Technika.

  • Duan, J. C., Tan, J. H., Yang, L., Wu, S. X., & Hao, J. M. (2008). Concentration, sources and ozone formation potential of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during ozone episode in Beijing. Atmospheric Research, 88, 25–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Ho, S. S. H., Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Yu, J. Z., & Louie, P. K. K. (2011). Characteristics and health impacts of VOCs and carbonyls associated with residential cooking activities in Hong Kong. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186, 344–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Luo, J., & Bennett, G. (1993). Statistical evaluation of lower flammability distance (LFD) using four hazardous release models. Process Safety Progress, 12(1), 1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linga, Z. H., & Guoa, H. (2014). Contribution of VOC sources to photochemical ozone formation and its control policy implication in Hong Kong. Environmental Science & Policy, 38, 180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. J., Lee, R. F., Brode, R. W., Wilson, R. B., Cimorelli, A. J., Perry, S. G., Weil, J. C., Venkatram, A., & Peters, W. D. (1998). Model evaluation results for AERMOD, Prepared for Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.

  • Passerini, G., Ciarelli, G., & Carletti, S. (2011). Evaluation of ozone behavior in a complex coastal environment, in 8th International Conference on Environmental Engineering, Vilnius, Lithuania, 240–247.

  • Patel, V. C., & Kumar, A. (1998). Evaluation of three air dispersion models: ISCST2, ISCLT2, and SCREEN2 for mercury emissions in an urban area. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 53, 259–277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peress, J. (2001). Estimate storage tank emissions, Tritech Consulting Engineers, CEP www.cepmagazine.org.

  • Riswadkar, R. M., & Kumar, A. (1994). Evaluation of the ISC short term model in a large-scale multiple source region for different stability classes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1–14.

  • Spicer, T., & Havens, J. (1989). User’s guide for the DEGADIS 2.1 dense gas dispersion model. EPA-450/4-89-019. Cincinnati: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1992). Supplement E to AP-42, compilation of air pollutant emission factors, volume 1, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC (Oct. 1992).

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1995). Protocol for equipment leak emission estimates, 1995. EPA 453/95, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • WHO (2009). Country profiles of environmental burden of disease: United Arab Emirates; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/national/countryprofile/unitedarabemirates.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fares M. Howari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howari, F.M. Evaporation losses and dispersion of volatile organic compounds from tank farms. Environ Monit Assess 187, 273 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4456-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4456-z

Keywords

Navigation