Advertisement

Challenges and difficulties in assessing the environmental status under the requirements of the Ecosystem Approach in North African countries, illustrated by eutrophication assessment

  • Maialen GarmendiaEmail author
  • Ángel Borja
  • Françoise Breton
  • Momme Butenschön
  • Anna Marín
  • Peter I. Miller
  • François Morisseau
  • Weidong Xu
Article

Abstract

Marine ecosystems provide many ecosystem goods and services. However, these ecosystems and the benefits they create for humans are subject to competing uses and increasing pressures. As a consequence of the increasing threats to the marine environment, several regulations require applying an ecosystem-based approach for managing the marine environment. Within the Mediterranean Sea, in 2008, the Contracting Parties of the Mediterranean Action Plan decided to progressively apply the Ecosystem Approach (EcAp) with the objective of achieving Good Environmental Status (GES) for 2018. To assess the environmental status, the EcAp proposes 11 Ecological Objectives, each of which requires a set of relevant indicators to be integrated. Progress towards the EcAp entails a gradual and important challenge for North African countries, and efforts have to be initiated to propose and discuss methods. Accordingly, to enhance the capacity of North African countries to implement EcAp and particularly to propose and discuss indicators and methods to assess GES, the aim of this manuscript is to identify the practical problems and gaps found at each stage of the environmental status assessment process. For this purpose, a stepwise method has been proposed to assess the environmental status using Ecologic Objective 5-Eutrophication as example.

Keywords

Ecosystem Approach Eutrophication Mediterranean Action Plan Good Environmental Status Indicators North Africa Mediterranean Sea 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the research performed within the EU FP7 program “Marine Ecosystem Dynamics and Indicators for North-Africa” (MEDINA; grant number 282977; http://www.medinaproject.eu/puplic/home.php). We would like to thank Marta Dinarès for the useful suggestions.

References

  1. Allen, J. I., Blackford, J., Holt, J. T., Proctor, R., Ashworth, M., & Siddorn, J. (2001). A highly spatially resolved ecosystem model for the North West European Continental Shelf. Sarsia, 86(6), 423–440. doi: 10.1080/00364827.2001.10420484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J. I., Holt, J. T., Blackford, J., & Proctor, R. (2007). Error quantification of a high-resolution coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem coastal-ocean model: part 2. Chlorophyll-a, nutrients and SPM. Journal of Marine Systems, 68(3–4), 381–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, J. H., Murray, C., Kaartokallio, H., Axe, P., & Molvær, J. (2010). A simple method for confidence rating of eutrophication status classifications. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(6), 919–924. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.03.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen, J. H., Axe, P., Backer, H., Carstensen, J., Claussen, U., Fleming-Lehtinen, V., et al. (2011). Getting the measure of eutrophication in the Baltic Sea: towards improved assessment principles and methods. Biogeochemistry, 106(2), 137–156. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9508-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Artioli, Y., Blackford, J. C., Butenschön, M., Holt, J. T., Wakelin, S. L., Thomas, H., et al. (2012). The carbonate system in the North Sea: sensitivity and model validation. Journal of Marine Systems, 102–104, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bald, J., Borja, A., Muxika, I., Franco, J., & Valencia, V. (2005). Assessing reference conditions and physico-chemical status according to the European Water Framework Directive: a case-study from the Basque Country (Northern Spain). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(12), 1508–1522. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertram, C., & Rehdanz, K. (2013). On the environmental effectiveness of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Marine Policy, 38, 25–40. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Best, M. A., Wither, A. W., & Coates, S. (2007). Dissolved oxygen as a physico-chemical supporting element in the Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55(1–6), 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birk, S., Bonne, W., Borja, A., Brucet, S., Courrat, A., Poikane, S., et al. (2012). Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators, 18, 31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackford, J. C., Allen, J. I., & Gilbert, F. J. (2004). Ecosystem dynamics at six contrasting sites: a generic modelling study. Journal of Marine Systems, 52(1–4), 191–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2004.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borja, Á. (2005). The European water framework directive: a challenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelf research. Continental Shelf Research, 25(14), 1768–1783. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2005.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borja, Á., & Dauer, D. M. (2008). Assessing the environmental quality status in estuarine and coastal systems: comparing methodologies and indices. Ecological Indicators, 8(4), 331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borja, Á., & Rodríguez, J. G. (2010). Problems associated with the “one-out, all-out” principle, when using multiple ecosystem components in assessing the ecological status of marine waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(8), 1143–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Borja, Á., Franco, J., Valencia, V., Bald, J., Muxika, I., Jesús Belzunce, M., & Solaun, O. (2004). Implementation of the European water framework directive from the Basque country (northern Spain): a methodological approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48(3–4), 209–218. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borja, Á., Galparsoro, I., Solaun, O., Muxika, I., Tello, E. M., Uriarte, A., & Valencia, V. (2006). The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 66(1–2), 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.07.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borja, Á., Bricker, S. B., Dauer, D. M., Demetriades, N. T., Ferreira, J. G., Forbes, A. T., et al. (2008). Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56(9), 1519–1537. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Borja, Á., Elliott, M., Carstensen, J., Heiskanen, A.-S., & van de Bund, W. (2010). Marine management—towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(12), 2175–2186. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Borja, Á., Dauer, D. M., & Grémare, A. (2012). The importance of setting targets and reference conditions in assessing marine ecosystem quality. Ecological Indicators, 12(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Borja, Á., Elliott, M., Andersen, J. H., Cardoso, A. C., Carstensen, J., Ferreira, J. G., et al. (2013). Good environmental status of marine ecosystems: what is it and how do we know when we have attained it? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 76(1–2), 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.08.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brito, A. C., Brotas, V., Caetano, M., Coutinho, T. P., Bordalo, A. A., Icely, J., et al. (2012). Defining phytoplankton class boundaries in Portuguese transitional waters: an evaluation of the ecological quality status according to the Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators, 19, 5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Campani, T., Baini, M., Giannetti, M., Cancelli, F., Mancusi, C., Serena, F., et al. (2013). Presence of plastic debris in loggerhead turtle stranded along the Tuscany coasts of the Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean Marine Mammals (Italy). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 74(1), 225–230. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.06.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carletti, A., & Heiskanen, A.-S. (2009). Water Framework Directive intercalibration technical report. Part 3: coastal and transitional waters.Google Scholar
  23. Cinnirella, S., Graziano, M., Pon, J., Murciano, C., Albaigés, J., & Pirrone, N. (2013). Integrated assessment of chemical pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: Driver-Pressures-State-Welfare analysis. Ocean and Coastal Management, 80, 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.02.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Claussen, U., Zevenboom, W., Brockmann, U., Topcu, D., & Bot, P. (2009). Assessment of the eutrophication status of transitional, coastal and marine waters within OSPAR. Hydrobiologia, 629(1), 49–58. doi: 10.1007/s10750-009-9763-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coppini, G., Lyubarstev, V., Pinardi, N., Colella, S., Santoleri, R., & Christiansen, T. (2012). Chl a trends in European seas estimated using ocean-colour products. Ocean Science Discussions, 9(2), 1481–1518. doi: 10.5194/osd-9-1481-2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Curtin, R., & Prellezo, R. (2010). Understanding marine ecosystem based management: a literature review. Marine Policy, 34(5), 821–830. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Devlin, M., Bricker, S., & Painting, S. (2011). Comparison of five methods for assessing impacts of nutrient enrichment using estuarine case studies. Biogeochemistry, 106(2), 177–205. doi: 10.1007/s10533-011-9588-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Drira, Z., Belhassen, M., Ayadi, H., Hamza, A., Zarrad, R., Bouaïn, A., & Aleya, L. (2010). Copepod community structure related to environmental factors from a summer cruise in the Gulf of Gabès (Tunisia, eastern Mediterranean Sea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 90(01), 145–157. doi: 10.1017/S0025315409990403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. European Commission. (2000). DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC. Water Framework Directive.Google Scholar
  30. European Commission. (2008). DIRECTIVE 2008/56/EC. Marine Strategy Framework Directive.Google Scholar
  31. European Commission. (2011). Relationship between the initial assessment of marine waters and the criteria for Good Environmental Status.Google Scholar
  32. Ferreira, J. G., Vale, C., Soares, C. V., Salas, F., Stacey, P. E., Bricker, S. B., et al. (2007). Monitoring of coastal and transitional waters under the E.U. Water Framework Directive. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 135(1–3), 195–216. doi: 10.1007/s10661-007-9643-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferreira, J. G., Andersen, J. H., Borja, Á., Bricker, S. B., Camp, J., Cardoso da Silva, M., et al. (2011). Overview of eutrophication indicators to assess environmental status within the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 93(2), 117–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.03.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Flo, E., Garcés, E., Manzanera, M., & Camp, J. (2011). Coastal inshore waters in the NW Mediterranean: physicochemical and biological characterization and management implications. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 93(4), 279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fossi, M. C., Coppola, D., Baini, M., Giannetti, M., Guerranti, C., Marsili, L., et al. (2014). Large filter feeding marine organisms as indicators of microplastic in the pelagic environment: the case studies of the Mediterranean basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) and fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus). Marine Environmental Research, 100, 17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Galgani, F., Claro, F., Depledge, M., & Fossi, C. (2014). Monitoring the impact of litter in large vertebrates in the Mediterranean Sea within the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD): constraints, specificities and recommendations. Marine Environmental Research, 100, 3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Garmendia, M., Borja, Á., Franco, J., & Revilla, M. (2013). Phytoplankton composition indicators for the assessment of eutrophication in marine waters: present state and challenges within the European directives. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 66(1–2), 7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gohin, F. (2011). Joint use of satellite and in-situ data for coastal monitoring. Ocean Science Discussions, 8(3), 955–998. doi: 10.5194/osd-8-955-2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gohin, F., Saulquin, B., Oger-Jeanneret, H., Lozac’h, L., Lampert, L., Lefebvre, A., et al. (2008). Towards a better assessment of the ecological status of coastal waters using satellite-derived chlorophyll-a concentrations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(8), 3329–3340. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Groffman, P. M., Baron, J. S., Blett, T., Gold, A. J., Goodman, I., Gunderson, L. H., et al. (2006). Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems, 9(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10021-003-0142-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Halpern, B. S., & Fujita, R. (2013). Assumptions, challenges, and future directions in cumulative impact analysis. Ecosphere, 4(10), art131. doi: 10.1890/ES13-00181.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Halpern, B. S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K. A., Kappel, C. V., Micheli, F., D’Agrosa, C., et al. (2008). A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science, 319(5865), 948–952. doi: 10.1126/science.1149345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hassen, M. B., Hamza, A., Drira, Z., Zouari, A., Akrout, F., Messaoudi, S., et al. (2009). Phytoplankton-pigment signatures and their relationship to spring–summer stratification in the Gulf of Gabes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 83(3), 296–306. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. HELCOM. (2010). Ecosystem health of the Baltic Sea 2003-2007: HELCOM Initial Holistic Assessment.Google Scholar
  45. Hering, D., Feld, C. K., Moog, O., & Ofenböck, T. (2006). Cook book for the development of a multimetric index for biological condition of aquatic ecosystems: experiences from the European AQEM and STAR projects and related initiatives. Hydrobiologia, 566(1), 311–324. doi: 10.1007/s10750-006-0087-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holt, J. T., & James, I. D. (2001). An s coordinate density evolving model of the northwest European continental shelf: 1. Model description and density structure. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans, 106(C7), 14015–14034. doi: 10.1029/2000JC000304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holt, J. T., & Proctor, R. (2008). The seasonal circulation and volume transport on the northwest European continental shelf: a fine-resolution model study. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113(C6). doi: 10.1029/2006JC004034.
  48. Holt, J. T., Proctor, R., Blackford, J. C., Allen, J. I., & Ashworth, M. (2004). Advective controls on primary production in the stratified western Irish Sea: an eddy-resolving model study. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans, 109(C5), C05024. doi: 10.1029/2003JC001951.Google Scholar
  49. Ignatiades, L., Gotsis-Skretas, O., Pagou, K., & Krasakopoulou, E. (2009). Diversification of phytoplankton community structure and related parameters along a large-scale longitudinal east–west transect of the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Plankton Research, 31(4), 411–428. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbn124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. INCOMMET Project. (2012). Gulf of Gabes: a literature review (p. 32). http://www.incommet.org/medias/document/Gulf%20of%20Gabes%20a%20review.pdf
  51. Irvine, K. (2004). Classifying ecological status under the European Water Framework Directive: the need for monitoring to account for natural variability. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 14(2), 107–112. doi: 10.1002/aqc.622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Karydis, M., & Kitsiou, D. (2012). Eutrophication and environmental policy in the Mediterranean Sea: a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(8), 4931–4984. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2313-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee, Z.-P., Darecki, M., Carder, K. L., Davis, C. O., Stramski, D., & Rhea, W. J. (2005). Diffuse attenuation coefficient of downwelling irradiance: an evaluation of remote sensing methods. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans, 110(C2), C02017. doi: 10.1029/2004JC002573.Google Scholar
  54. Lyche Solheim, A., Rekolainen, S., Moe, S. J., Carvalho, L., Phillips, G., Ptacnik, R., et al. (2008). Ecological threshold responses in European lakes and their applicability for the Water Framework Directive (WFD) implementation: synthesis of lakes results from the REBECCA project. Aquatic Ecology, 42(2), 317–334. doi: 10.1007/s10452-008-9188-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marín, A., Garmendia, M., Dinarès, M., Baeta, M., Breton, F., & Saurí, D. (2014). D5.2-Report on ecosystem status assessment. MEDINA project.Google Scholar
  56. McQuatters-Gollop, A., Gilbert, A. J., Mee, L. D., Vermaat, J. E., Artioli, Y., Humborg, C., & Wulff, F. (2009). How well do ecosystem indicators communicate the effects of anthropogenic eutrophication? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 82(4), 583–596. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.02.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mercado, J. M., Ramírez, T., Cortés, D., Sebastián, M., & Vargas-Yáñez, M. (2005). Seasonal and inter-annual variability of the phytoplankton communities in an upwelling area of the Alborán Sea (SW Mediterranean Sea). Scientia Marina, 69(4), 451–465. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2007.04.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morel, A., Huot, Y., Gentili, B., Werdell, P. J., Hooker, S. B., & Franz, B. A. (2007). Examining the consistency of products derived from various ocean color sensors in open ocean (case 1) waters in the perspective of a multi-sensor approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 111(1), 69–88. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Novoa, S., Chust, G., Sagarminaga, Y., Revilla, M., Borja, A., & Franco, J. (2012). Water quality assessment using satellite-derived chlorophyll-a within the European directives, in the southeastern Bay of Biscay. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64(4), 739–750. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.01.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Reilly, J. E., Maritorena, S., Mitchell, B. G., Siegel, D. A., Carder, K. L., Garver, S. A., et al. (1998). Ocean color chlorophyll algorithms for SeaWiFS. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans, 103(C11), 24937–24953. doi: 10.1029/98JC02160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Petus, C., Chust, G., Gohin, F., Doxaran, D., Froidefond, J.-M., & Sagarminaga, Y. (2010). Estimating turbidity and total suspended matter in the Adour River plume (South Bay of Biscay) using MODIS 250-m imagery. Continental Shelf Research, 30(5), 379–392. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2009.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pierson, D. C., Kratzer, S., Strömbeck, N., & Håkansson, B. (2008). Relationship between the attenuation of downwelling irradiance at 490 nm with the attenuation of PAR (400 nm–700 nm) in the Baltic Sea. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(3), 668–680. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.06.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Santoleri, R., Volpe, G., Marullo, S., & Nardelli, B. B. (2008). Open waters optical remote sensing of the Mediterranean Sea. In V. Barale & M. Gade (Eds.), Remote sensing of the European seas (pp. 103–116). Netherlands: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6772-3_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Saulquin, B., Hamdi, A., Gohin, F., Populus, J., Mangin, A., & d’ Andon, O. F. (2013). Estimation of the diffuse attenuation coefficient KdPAR using MERIS and application to seabed habitat mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 128, 224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shutler, J. D., Smyth, T. J., Land, P. E., & Groom, S. B. (2005). A near‐real time automatic MODIS data processing system. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(5), 1049–1055. doi: 10.1080/01431160412331299244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Teixeira, H., Borja, Á., Weisberg, S. B., Ananda Ranasinghe, J., Cadien, D. B., Dauer, D. M., et al. (2010). Assessing coastal benthic macrofauna community condition using best professional judgement—developing consensus across North America and Europe. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(4), 589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Uitz, J., Claustre, H., Morel, A., & Hooker, S. B. (2006). Vertical distribution of phytoplankton communities in open ocean: an assessment based on surface chlorophyll. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans, 111(C8), C08005. doi: 10.1029/2005JC003207.Google Scholar
  68. UNEP/MAP. (2008). UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG.17/5. Draft decisions for the 15th meeting of the Contracting Parties (p. 329). Almeria, Spain.Google Scholar
  69. UNEP/MAP. (2012a). UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG.20/5. Draft decisions for the 17th meeting of the Contracting Parties (p. 292). Paris, France.Google Scholar
  70. UNEP/MAP. (2012b). UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG.20/Inf.8. Initial integrated assessment of the Mediterranean Sea: fulfilling step 3 of the ecosystem approach process. Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  71. UNEP/MAP. (2012c). UNEP(DEC)/MED WG.372/3. Approaches for definition of GES and setting targets for the pollution related ecological objectives in the framework of the ecosystem approach. (EO5: eutrophication, EP9: contaminants, EP10: marine litter, EO11: noise). Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.Google Scholar
  72. UNEP/MAP. (2014a). UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.401/3. Draft monitoring and assessment methodological guidance (p. 262). Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  73. UNEP/MAP. (2014b). UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG. 390/4. Report of the Integrated Correspondence Groups of GES and Targets Meeting. Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  74. UNEP/MAP/PAP. (2008). Protocol on Integrated Coastal Zone Management in the Mediterranean. Split, Croatia.Google Scholar
  75. Venables, W., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). Springer. http://www.springer.com/mathematics/probability/book/978-0-387-95457-8.
  76. Wakelin, S. L., Holt, J. T., & Proctor, R. (2009). The influence of initial conditions and open boundary conditions on shelf circulation in a 3D ocean-shelf model of the North East Atlantic. Ocean Dynamics, 59(1), 67–81. doi: 10.1007/s10236-008-0164-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wakelin, S. L., Holt, J. T., Blackford, J. C., Allen, J. I., Butenschön, M., & Artioli, Y. (2012). Modeling the carbon fluxes of the northwest European continental shelf: validation and budgets. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans, 117(C5), C05020. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007402.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maialen Garmendia
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ángel Borja
    • 3
  • Françoise Breton
    • 2
  • Momme Butenschön
    • 4
  • Anna Marín
    • 2
  • Peter I. Miller
    • 4
  • François Morisseau
    • 5
  • Weidong Xu
    • 4
  1. 1.Basque Centre for Climate ChangeBilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Research Group SGR INTERFASE, Department of GeographyUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.AZTI-TecnaliaPasaiaSpain
  4. 4.Plymouth Marine LaboratoryPlymouthUK
  5. 5.Agence des Aires Marines ProtégéesBrestFrance

Personalised recommendations