Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis on the threats and spatiotemporal distribution pattern of security in World Natural Heritage Sites

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

World Natural Heritage Sites (WNHS) are treasures that need human protection and invite appreciation, which makes conservation of WNHS an urgent task. This paper assesses where in the world threats are most pressing and which WNHS require emergency assistance. Using an analysis of “hot spots” and inverse distance weighting, it finds that Africa is the region where WNHS are least secure. Reports of the state of the conservation of WNHS describe the many threats that exist. Of these, management activities and institutional factors are the primary threats. The paper suggests relevant measures to improve the WNHS security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. World Natural Heritage Sites include natural heritage and mixed heritage identified by the WHC of UNESCO.

References

  • Al-hagla, S. (2010). Sustainable urban development in historical areas using the tourist trail approach: a case study of the Cultural Heritage and Urban Development (CHUD) project in Saida, Lebanon. Cities, 27(4), 234–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, T. A., Smith, S. J., & Cowley, E. R. (2011). Riparian area management: multiple indicator monitoring (MIM) of stream channels and streamside vegetation. Technical Reference 1737–23. BLM/OC/ST-10/003 + 1737 + REV (pp. 155). Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Operations Center

  • Courtney, P., Hill, G., & Roberts, D. (2006). The role of Natural Heritage in rural development: an analysis of economic linkages in Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. J., Roberts, J. M., & Hall-Spencer, J. (2007). Preserving deep-sea natural heritage: emerging issues in offshore conservation and management. Biological Conservation, 138(3–4), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F., & Longley, P. (2007). Geospatial analysis: a comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools. Winchelsea: Winchelsea Press. http://www.spatialanalysisonline.com

  • Drost, A. (1996). Developing sustainable tourism for world heritage sites. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 479–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. C., Bell, A. M., Pederson, D. K., Roelfsema, C. M., & Bengtson Nash, S. (2005). Herbicides implicated as the cause of severe mangrove dieback in the Mackay region, NE Australia: consequences for marine plant habitats of the GBR World Heritage Area. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 51(1–4), 308–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, L. A. (1971). Conceptual models for the geographic analysis of population dynamics in primary communities. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 53(2), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, B., & Fyall, A. (2000). Managing heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 682–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, P., Atkinson, A., & Goldbach, M. (2006). Travel and transportation management: planning and conducting route inventories. Technical Reference 9113–1, BLM/WO/ST-06/007 + 9113 (pp. 51). Denver, CO: Bureau of Land Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A. J. (2013). Managing global heritage in the face of future climate change: the importance of understanding geological and geomorphological processes and hazards. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(7), 632–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Sánchez, M., Domínguez-Cuesta, M. J., Aranburu, A., & Martosc, E. (2011). Quantitative indexes based on geomorphologic features: a tool for evaluating human impact on natural and cultural heritage in caves. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 12, 270–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, J., & Vass-Bowen, N. (1997). Buffering external threats to heritage conservation areas: a planner’s perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37(3), 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Y. F., & Marion, J. L. (1999). Characterizing backcountry camping impacts in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Journal of Environmental Management, 57(3), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. M., Wu, B. H., & Cai, L. P. (2008). Tourism development of world heritage sites in China: a geographic perspective. Tourism Management, 29(2), 308–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. A. (2003). Dorset GA Group supports multi-national oil industry field excursion to Britain’s first Natural World Heritage Site, 26–29 September 2002. Proceedings of the Geologists Association, 114(2), 173–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri, K., Nautiyal, S., Rao, K. S., & Saxena, K. G. (2001). Conservation policy–people conflicts: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (a World Heritage Site), India. Forest Policy and Economics, 2(3–4), 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nursey-Bray, M., & Rist, P. (2009). Co-management and protected area management: achieving effective management of a contested site, lessons from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA). Marine Policy, 33(1), 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osti, M., Coad, L., Fisher, J. B., Bomhard, B., & Hutton, J. M. (2011). Oil and gas development in the World Heritage and wider protected area network in sub-Saharan Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20(9), 1863–1877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overmars, K. P., & Verburg, P. H. (2005). Analysis of land use drivers at the watershed and household level: linking two paradigms at the Philippine forest fringe. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19(2), 125–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patry, M., Bassett C., & Leclerq B. (2005). The state of conservation of World Heritage forests. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-43-2.pdf. Accessed 15 January, 2013.

  • Ross, A., Rowan-Robinson, J., & Walton, W. (1995). Sustainable development in Scotland: the role of Scottish Natural Heritage. Land Use Policy, 12(3), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekercioglu, C. H., Anderson, S., Akçay, E., & Bilgin, R. (2011). Turkey’s rich Natural Heritage under assault. Science, 334(6063), 1637–U1638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, M. (Ed.). (1998). Visitor management: case studies from World Heritage Sites (pp. 46–65). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su, M. M., & Li, B. (2012). Resource management at World Heritage sites in China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12, 293–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topay, M. (2007). The importance of climate for recreational planning of rural areas; case study of Muğla Province, Turkey. 3rd International Workshop on Climate, Tourism and Recreation, 19–22.

  • UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/. Accessed 15 January, 2013.

  • UNESCO. (2013). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. World Heritage Centre. http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/. Accessed 15 January, 2013.

  • Verburg, P. H., Veldkamp, W. S. A., Espaldon, R. L. V., & Mastura, S. S. A. (2002). Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLIE-S model. Environmental Management, 30(3), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wager, J. (1995). Developing a strategy for the Angkor World Heritage site. Tourism Management, 16(7), 515–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2012). Management of the Grand Canal and it’s [sic] bid as a World Cultural Heritage site. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 1(1), 34–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, S., Bailey, D., Borman, M., Cote, S., Eisner, J., Elmore, W., et al. (2006). Riparian area management: grazing management processes and strategies for riparian-wetland areas (Technical Reference 1737–20. BLM/ST/ST-06/002+1737 (pp. 105). Denver, CO: U.S.). Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center: Department of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. P., Yao, L. M., & Mo, L. W. (2011). Simulation of low-carbon tourism in World Natural and Cultural Heritage areas: an application to Shizhong District of Leshan City in China. Energy Policy, 39(7), 4298–4307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D., Pavlik, C., Ruggles, S., & Armstrong, M. P. (1999). An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal kriging and inverse distance weighting. Mathematical Geology, 31, 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Based on the data obtained from the WHC, the security of WNHS in the world was analyzed in this paper. We appreciate the work that the WHC has been doing to protect the WHS, and we thank the WHC sincerely. This paper is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301163) and its program sponsoring doctors in the western region of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XBBS201210). We also appreciate the suggestions of all anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaoping Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Yang, Z. & Du, X. Analysis on the threats and spatiotemporal distribution pattern of security in World Natural Heritage Sites. Environ Monit Assess 187, 4143 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4143-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4143-5

Keywords

Navigation