Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 186, Issue 10, pp 6553–6564 | Cite as

Comparison of diffusive gradients in thin film technique with traditional methods for evaluation of zinc bioavailability in soils

  • Qin SunEmail author
  • Jing Chen
  • Shiming Ding
  • Yu Yao
  • Yifei Chen
Article

Abstract

The technique of diffusive gradients in thin film (DGT) has been shown to be a promising tool to assess zinc (Zn) bioavailability in soils, but there exists considerable debate on its suitability. In this study, Zn bioavailability was systematically investigated in wheat- and maize-grown soils using this technique and seven traditional methods, including soil solution concentration and six widely used single-step extraction methods (HAc, EDTA, NaAc, NH4Ac, CaCl2, and MgCl2). The concentrations of Zn in the shoots and roots of these two plant species increased continuously with increasing additions of Zn to the soils, accompanied by significant decreases in shoot biomass and root biomass at Zn concentrations greater than 400 mg kg−1 for maize and 800 mg kg−1 for wheat. Zinc uptake and accumulation was higher in maize roots than in wheat roots. Both the concentrations of bioavailable Zn measured by DGT (C DGT) and soil solutions (C sol) increased linearly with increasing additions of Zn to the soils, while no strong linear relationships were observed for the extraction methods. Higher concentrations of extractable Zn, lower values of C sol, and larger values of R (i.e., the ratio of C DGT to C sol) were observed in maize-grown soils compared with those of wheat-grown soils, while the values of C DGT between the two plants were similar. These findings demonstrate that there likely exists a stronger resupply of Zn from the soil solid phases in maize-grown soils to satisfy a higher Zn uptake and accumulation in this plant. Linear correlation analyses showed that C DGT had the highest correlation coefficients with plant Zn concentrations compared with other traditional methods, implying that the DGT technique is more sensitive and robust in reflecting Zn bioavailability in soils to plants.

Keywords

DGT Extraction method Soil solution Zinc bioavailability Wheat Maize Soil 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (Nos. 41001334 and 41322011) and the Project of Knowledge Innovation for the 3rd period, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KZCX2-YW-JS304).

References

  1. Agbenin, J. O., & Welp, G. (2012). Bioavailability of copper, cadmium, zinc, and lead in tropical savanna soils assessed by diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) and ion exchange resin membranes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184, 2275–2284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahumada, I., Ascar, L., Pedraza, C., Vásquez, V., Carrasco, A., Richter, P., & Brown, S. (2011). Determination of the bioavailable fraction of Cu and Zn in soils amended with biosolids as determined by diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT), BCR sequential extraction, and ryegrass plant. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 219, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almås, Å. R., Lombnӕs, P., Sogn, T. A., & Mulder, J. (2006). Speciation of Cd and Zn in contaminated soils assessed by DGT-DIFS, and WHAM/Model VI in relation to uptake by spinach and ryegrass. Chemosphere, 62, 1647–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, A., McLaren, R. G., Reichman, S. M., Speir, T. W., & Condron, L. M. (2011). Evaluation of soil metal bioavailablity estimates using two plant species (L.perenne and T.aestivum) grown in a range of agricultural soils treated with biosolids and metal salts. Environmental Pollution, 159, 1523–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borkert, C. M., Cox, F. R., & Tucker, M. R. (1998). Zinc and copper toxicity in peanut, soybean, rice, and corn in soil mixtures. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29, 2991–3005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bremner, J. M. (1996). In D. L. Spark (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods (pp. 1085–1121). Madison: SSSA and ASA.Google Scholar
  7. Brennan, D., Coulter, B., Mullen, G., & Courtney, R. (2008). Evaluation of mehlich 3 for extraction of copper and zinc from Irish grassland soils and for prediction of herbage content. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 39(13–14), 1943–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chomchoei, R., Shiowatana, J., & Pongsakul, P. (2002). Continuous-flow system for reduction of metal readsorption during sequential extraction of soil. Analytica Chimica Acta, 472, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clayton, P. M., & Tiller, K. G. (1979). A chemical method for the determination of the heavy metal content of soils in environmental studies. CSIRO Australian Division of Soils, Technical Paper 41.Google Scholar
  10. Cornu, J. Y., & Denaix, L. (2006). Prediction of zinc and cadmium phytoavailability within a contaminated agricultural site using DGT. Environmental Chemistry, 3, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dao, L. G., Morrison, L., Kiely, G., & Zhang, C. S. (2013). Spatial distribution of potentially bioavailable metals in surface soils of a contaminated sports ground in Galway, Ireland. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 35, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davison, W., & Zhang, H. (1994). In-situ speciation measurements of trace components in natural waters using thin film gels. Nature, 367(6463), 546–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Degryse, F., Smolders, E., Oliver, I., & Zhang, H. (2003). Relating soil solution Zn concentration to diffusive gradients in thin films measurements in contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 3958–3965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Degryse, F., Smolders, E., Zhang, H., & Davison, W. (2009). Predicting availability of mineral elements to plants with the DGT technique: a review of experimental data and interpretation by modeling. Environmental Chemistry, 6, 198–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feng, M. H., Shan, X. Q., Zhang, S. Z., & Wen, B. (2005a). Comparison of a rhizosphere-based method with other one-step extraction methods for assessing the bioavailability of soil metals to wheat. Chemosphere, 59, 939–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feng, M. H., Shan, X. Q., Zhang, S. Z., & Wen, B. (2005b). A comparison of the rhizosphere-based method with DTPA, EDTA, CaCl2 and NaNO3 extraction methods for prediction of bioavailability of metals in soil to barley. Environmental Pollution, 137, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerritse, R. G., Van Driel, W., Smilde, K. W., & van Luit, B. (1983). Uptake of heavy metals by crops in relation to their concentration in soil solution. Plant and Soil, 75(3), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gleyzes, C., Tellier, S., & Astruc, M. (2002). Fractionation studies of trace elements in contaminated soils and sediments: a review of sequential extraction procedures. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 21, 451–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haq, A. U., Bates, T. E., & Soon, Y. K. (1980). Comparison of extractants for plant-available zinc, cadmium, nickel, and copper in contaminated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 772–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper, M. P., Davison, W., Zhang, H., & Tych, W. (1998). Kinetics of metal exchange between solids and solutions in sediments and soils interpreted from DGT measured fluxes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 62(16), 2757–2770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harper, M. P., Davison, W., & Tych, W. (2000). DIFS—a modelling and simulation tool for DGT induced trace metal remobilisation in sediments and soils. Environmental Modelling & Software, 15, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haynes, R. J., & Swift, R. S. (1983). An evaluation of the use of DTPA and EDTA as extractants for micronutrients in moderately acid soils. Plant and Soil, 74, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hooda, P. S., Zhang, H., Davison, W., & Edwards, A. C. (1999). Measuring bioavailability trace metals by diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT): soil moisture effects on its performance in soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 50, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Houba, V. J. G., Lexmond, T. M., Novozamsky, I., & van der Lee, J. J. (1996). State of the art and future developments in soil analysis for bioavailability assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 178, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jopony, M., & Young, S. D. (1993). Assessment of lead availability in soils contaminated by mine spoil. Plant and Soil, 151, 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jopony, M., & Young, S. D. (1994). The solid solution equilibria of lead and cadmium in polluted soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 45, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplan, O., Yaman, M., & Kaya, G. (2009). Distribution of nickel in different phases of soil samples and plant parts taken from serpentine and copper mining area. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 21(7), 5757–5767.Google Scholar
  28. Koster, M., Reijndersb, L., van Oosta, N. R., & Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. (2005). Comparison of the method of diffusive gels in thin films with conventional extraction techniques for evaluating zinc accumulation in plants and isopods. Environmental Pollution, 133, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, F. L., Shan, X. Q., Zhang, T. H., & Zhang, S. Z. (1998). Evaluation of plant availability of rare earth elements in soils by chemical fractionation and multiple regression analysis. Environmental Pollution, 102, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindsay, W. L., & Norvell, W. A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luo, Y. M., Yan, W. D., & Christie, P. (2001). Soil solution dynamics of Cu and Zn in a Cu- and Zn-polluted soil as influenced by γ-irradiation and Cu-Zn interaction. Chemosphere, 42, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luo, J., Zhang, H., Zhao, F. J., & Davison, W. (2010). Distinguishing diffusional and plant control of Cd and Ni uptake by hyperaccumulator and nonhyperaccumulator plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 6636–6641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McBride, M. B., Sauve, S., & Hendershot, W. (1997). Solubility control of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in contaminated. European Journal of Soil Science, 48, 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McBride, M. B., Nibarger, E. A., Richards, B. K., & Steenhuis, T. (2003). Trace metal accumulation by red clover grown on sewage sludge-amended soils and correlation to Mehlich 3 and calcium chloride-extractable metals. Soil Science, 168, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGrath, S. P., Knight, B., Killham, K., Preston, S., & Paton, G. I. (1999). Assessment of the toxicity of metals in soils amended with sewage sludge using a chemical speciation technique and a lux-based biosensor. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18(4), 659–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McLaughlin, M. J., Zarcinas, B. A., Stevens, D. P., & Cook, N. (1999). Soil testing for heavy metals. In International symposium on soil and plant analysis (pp. 1661–1700). Brisbane, Australia: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
  37. McLaughlin, M. J., Zarcinas, B. A., Stevens, D. P., & Cook, N. (2000). Soil testing for heavy metals. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 31, 1661–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Menzies, N. W., Donn, M. J., & Kopittke, P. M. (2007). Evaluation of extractants for estimation of the phytoavailable trace metals in soils. Environmental Pollution, 145, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miner, G. S., Gutierrez, R., & King, L. D. (1997). Soil factors affecting plant concentrations of cadmium, copper, and zinc on sludge-amended soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26, 989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muhammad, I., Puschenreiter, M., & Wenzel, W. W. (2012). Cadmium and Zn availability as affected by pH manipulation and its assessment by soil extraction, DGT and indicator plants. Science of the Total Environment, 416, 490–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mundus, S., Lombi, E., Holm, P. E., Zhang, H., & Husted, S. (2012). Assessing the plant availability of manganese in soils using diffusive gradients in thin films. Geoderma, 183–184, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nagajyoti, P. C., Lee, K. D., & Sreekanth, T. V. M. (2010). Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environmental Chemical Letters, 8, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nolan, A. L., Zhang, H., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2005). Prediction of zinc, cadmium, lead, and copper availability to wheat in contaminated soils using chemical speciation, diffusive gradients in thin films, extraction, and isotopic dilution techniques. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 496–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Novozamsky, I., Lexmond, T. H. M., & Houba, V. J. G. (1993). A single extraction procedure of soil for evaluation of uptake of some heavy metals by plants. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 51, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nowack, B., Koehler, S., & Schulin, R. (2004). Use of diffusive gradients in thin film in undisturbed field soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 1133–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Payá-Pérez, A., Sala, J., & Mousty, F. (1993). Comparison of ICPAES and ICP-MS for the analysis of trace elements in soil extracts. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 51, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Qiu, H., Gu, H. H., He, E. K., Wang, S. Z., & Qiu, R. L. (2012). Attenuation of metal bioavailability in acidic multi-metal contaminated soil treated with fly ash and steel slag. Pedosphere, 22(4), 544–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sanka, M., & Dolezal, M. (1992). Prediction of plant contamination by cadmium and zinc based on soil extraction method and contents in seedlings. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 46, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sauvé, S. B., Dumestre, A., McBride, M., & Hendershot, H. (1998). Derivation of soil quality criteria using predicted chemical speciation of pb2+ and Cu2+. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 17(8), 1481–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scally, S., Davison, W., & Zhang, H. (2006). Diffusion coefficients of metals and metal complexes in hydrogels used in diffusive gradients in thin films. Analytica Chimica Acta, 558, 222–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sistani, K. R., Mays, D. A., Taylor, R. W., & Buford, C. (1995). Evaluation of four chemical extractants for metal determinations in wetland soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 26, 2167–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sonmez, O., & Pierzynski, G. M. (2005). Assessment of zinc phytoavailability by diffusive gradients in thin films. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24(4), 934–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Soriano-Disla, J. M., Speir, T. W., Gómez, I., Clucas, L. M., Mclaren, R. G., & Navarro-Pedreno, J. (2010). Evaluation of different extraction methods for the assessment of heavy metal bioavailability in various soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 213, 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephan, C. H., Courchesne, F., Hendershot, W. H., McGrath, S. P., Chaudri, A. M., Sappin-Didier, V., & Sauvé, S. (2008). Speciation of zinc in contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution, 155, 208–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tandy, S., Mundus, S., Yngvesson, J., de Bang, T. C., Lombi, E., Schjoerring, J. K., & Husted, S. (2011). The use of DGT for prediction of plant available copper, zinc and phosphorus in agricultural soils. Plant and Soil, 346, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979). Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51, 844–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tian, Y., Wang, X. R., Luo, J., Yu, H. X., & Zhang, H. (2008a). Evaluation of holistic approaches to predicting the concentrations of metals in field-cultivated rice. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(20), 7649–7654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tian, Y., Wang, X. R., Lin, R. Z., & Yu, H. X. (2008b). Single and Combined Aging of Cadmium, Lead and Zinc in Soil. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 27(1), 0156–0159.Google Scholar
  59. Tye, A. M., Young, S. D., Crout, N. M. J., Zhang, H., Preston, S., Barbosa-Jefferson, V. L., Davison, W., McGrath, S. P., Paton, G. I., Kilham, K., & Resende, L. (2003). Predicting the activity of Cd2+ and Zn2+ in soil pore water from the radio-labile metal fraction. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67(3), 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ure, A. M., Quevauviller, P. H., Muntau, H., & Griepink, B. (1993). Speciation of heavy metals in soils and sediments. An account of the improvement and harmonization of extraction techniques undertaken under the auspices of the BCR of the commission of the European communities. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 51, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vulkan, R., Zhao, F. J., Barbosa-Jefferson, V., Preston, S., Paton, G. I., Tipping, E., & McGrath, S. P. (2000). Copper speciation and impacts on bacterial biosensors in the pore water of copper-contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 5115–5121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Warne, M. S. T., Heemsbergen, D., Stevens, D., McLaughlin, M., Cozens, G., & Whatmuff, M. (2008). Modeling toxicity of copper and zinc salts to wheat in 14 soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 27, 786–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wear, J. I., & Evans, C. E. (1968). Relationship of zinc uptake by corn and sorghum to soil zinc measured by three extractants. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 32, 543–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu, Q., Hendershot, W. H., Marshall, W. D., & Ge, Y. (2000). Speciation of cadmium, copper, lead and zinc in contaminated soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 31, 1129–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang, H., & Davison, W. (1995). Performance characteristics of diffusion gradients in thin films for the in situ measurement of trace metals in aqueous solution. Analytical Chemistry, 67(19), 3391–3400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang, H., Zhao, F. J., Sun, B., Davison, W., & McGrath, S. P. (2001). A new method to measure effective soil solution concentration predicts copper availability to plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(12), 2602–2607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang, H., Lombi, E., Smolders, E., & McGrath, S. P. (2004). Kinetic of Zn release in soils and prediction of Zn concentration in plants using diffusive gradients in thin films. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(13), 3608–3613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qin Sun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jing Chen
    • 1
  • Shiming Ding
    • 2
  • Yu Yao
    • 1
  • Yifei Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of EnvironmentHohai UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and LimnologyChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations