Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting field capacity, wilting point, and the other physical properties of soils using hyperspectral reflectance spectroscopy: two different statistical approaches

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we examined the ability of reflectance spectroscopy to predict some of the most important soil parameters for irrigation such as field capacity (FC), wilting point (WP), clay, sand, and silt content. FC and WP were determined for 305 soil samples. In addition to these soil analyses, clay, silt, and sand contents of 145 soil samples were detected. Raw spectral reflectance (raw) of these soil samples, between 350 and 2,500-nm wavelengths, was measured. In addition, first order derivatives of the reflectance (first) were calculated. Two different statistical approaches were used in detecting soil properties from hyperspectral data. Models were evaluated using the correlation of coefficient (r), coefficient of determination (R 2), root mean square error (RMSE), and residual prediction deviation (RPD). In the first method, two appropriate wavelengths were selected for raw reflectance and first derivative separately for each soil property. Selection of wavelengths was carried out based on the highest positive and negative correlations between soil property and raw reflectance or first order derivatives. By means of detected wavelengths, new combinations for each soil property were calculated using rationing, differencing, normalized differencing, and multiple regression techniques. Of these techniques, multiple regression provided the best correlation (P < 0.01) for selected wavelengths and all soil properties. To estimate FC, WP, clay, sand, and silt, multiple regression equations based on first(2,310)-first(2,360), first(2,310)-first(2,360), first(2,240)-first(1,320), first(2,240)-first(1,330), and raw(2,260)-raw(360) were used. Partial least square regression (PLSR) was performed as the second method. Raw reflectance was a better predictor of WP and FC, whereas first order derivative was a better predictor of clay, sand, and silt content. According to RPD values, statistically excellent predictions were obtained for FC (2.18), and estimations for WP (2.0), clay (1.8), and silt (1.63) were acceptable. However, sand values were poorly predicted (RDP = 0.63). In conclusion, both of the methods examined here offer quick and inexpensive means of predicting soil properties using spectral reflectance data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonucci, F., Menesatti, P., Holden, N. M., Canali, E., Giorgi, S., Maienza, A., et al. (2012). Hyperspectral visible and near-infrared determination of copper concentration in agricultural polluted soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 43, 1401–1411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, S., Berglöf, T., & Kylin, H. (2007). Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a tool to predict pesticide sorption in soil. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 78(5), 295–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili, A. V., Van Es, H. M., Akbas, F., Durak, A., & Hively, W. D. (2010). Visible-near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for assessment of soil properties in a semi-arid area of Turkey. Journal of Arid Environments, 74, 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili, A. V., Cullu, M. A., Van Es, H. M., Aydemir, A., & Aydemir, S. (2011). The use of hyperspectral visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for the characterization of salt-affected soils in the Harran Plain, Turkey. Arid Land Research and Management, 25(1), 19–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bogrekci, I., & Lee, W. S. (2005a). Spectral soil signatures and sensing phosphorus. Biosystems Engineering, 92, 527–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogrekci, I., & Lee, W. S. (2005b). Spectral phosphorus mapping using diffuse reflectance of soils and grass. Spectral soil signatures and sensing phosphorus. Biosystems Engineering, 91(3), 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyoucos, G. H. (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43, 438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, S., Weindorf, D. C., Zhua, Y., Li, B., Morganc, C. L. S., Gec, Y., et al. (2012). Spectral reflectance variability from soil physicochemical properties in oil contaminated soils. Geoderma, 177–178, 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. W., Laird, D. A., Mausbach, M. J., & Hurburgh, C. R. (2001). Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy-principal components regression analyses of soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 480–490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. W., Laird, D. A., & Hurburgh, G. R. (2005). Influence of soil moisture on near-infrared reflectance spectroscopic measurement of soil properties. Soil Science, 170, 244–255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., & Wu, X. (2006). A modified PLSR method in prediction. Journal of Data Science, 4, 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodak, M., Niklinska, M., & Beese, F. (2007). Near-infrared spectroscopy for analysis of chemical and microbiological properties of forest soil organic horizons in a heavymetal-polluted area. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44, 171–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzolino, D., Cynkar, W., Shah, N., & Smith, P. (2011). Quantitative analysis of minerals and electric conductivity of red grape homogenates by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 77, 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debaene, G., Niedźwiecki, J., & Pecio, A. (2010). Visible and near-infrared spectrophotometer for soil analysis: preliminary results. Polish Journal of Agronomy, 3, 3–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debaene, G., Niedźwiecki, J., Pecio, A., & Żurek, A. (2014). Effect of the number of calibration samples on the prediction of several soil properties at the farm-scale. Geoderma, 214, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demattê, J. A. M., Sousa, A. A., Alves, M. C., Nanni, M. R., Fiorio, P. R., & Campos, R. C. (2006). Determining soil water status and other soil characteristics by spectral proximal sensing. Geoderma, 135, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, B. W., Beecher, H. G., Batten, G. D., & Ciavarella, S. (2002). The potential of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for soil analysis—a case study from the Riverine Plain of south- eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 42, 607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin, S., & Brohi, A. R. (2006). Spatial variation of soil water content in topsoil and subsoil of a Typic Ustifluvent. Agricultural Water Management, 83(1–2), 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, C., Lagacherie, P., & Coulouma, G. (2008). Continuum removal versus PLSR method for clay and calcium carbonate content estimation from laboratory and airborne hyperspectral measurements. Geoderma, 148, 141–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, V. E., Israelsen, O. W., & Stringham, G. E. (1980). Irrigation principles and practices (Fourthth ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. 417pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., Huang, M., Garcia, A., Hernandez, A., & Song, H. (2007). Prediction of soil macronutrients content using near-infrared spectroscopy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 58, 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, K., Singh, B., & McBratney, A. (2003). Simultaneous estimation of several soil properties by ultra-violet, visible, and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 41, 1101–1114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. D., Pinter, Jr. P. J., Reginato, R. J., & Idso, S. B. (1980). Hand-held radiometry. In: a set of notes developed for use at the workshop on hand-held radiometry, Phoenix, Arizona (Science and Education Administration, Agricultural Reviews and Manuals, Western Series, No. 19) 66 p.

  • Koksal, E. S. (2011). Hyperspectral reflectance data processing through cluster and principal component analysis for estimating irrigation and yield related indicators. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 1317–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koksal, E. S., Cemek, B., Artik, C., Temizel, K. E., & Tasan, M. (2011). A new approach for neutron moisture meter calibration: artificial neural network. Irrigation Science, 29, 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moron, A., & Cozzolino, D. (2003). Exploring the use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to study physical properties and microelements in soils. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 11(2), 145–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao, L., Chen, L. X., Duan, W. B., Song, R. Q., & Wang, X. F. (2011). Comparison of three multivariate methods of inferential modeling of soil organic matter using hyper spectra. Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering (RSETE), International Conference. 8124–8127, Nanjing, China.

  • Ramos, M. C., & Martínez-Casasnovas, J. A. (2014). Soil water variability and its influence on transpirable soil water fraction with two grape varieties under different rainfall regimes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 185(1), 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankey, J. B., Brown, D. J., Bernard, M. L., & Lawrence, R. L. (2008). Comparing local vs global visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) calibrations for the prediction of soil clay, organic C and inorganic C. Geoderma, 148, 149–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, T., Cui, L., Wang, J., Fei, T., Chen, Y., & Wu, G. (2012). Comparison of multivariate methods for estimating soil total nitrogen with visible/near-infrared spectroscopy. Plant and Soil, 366(1–2), 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibayama, M., Takahashi, W., Morinaga, S., & Akiyama, T. (1993). Canopy water deficit detection in paddy rice using a high resolution field spectroradiometer. Remote Sensing of Environment, 45, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, L. K., & Dalsgaard, S. (2005). Determination of clay and other soil properties by near infrared spectroscopy. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 159–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A., Udelhoven, T., Denis, A., Tychon, B., Lioy, R., Hoffmann, L., et al. (2010). Measuring soil organic carbon in croplands at regional scale using airborne imaging spectroscopy. Geoderma, 158, 32–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taxonomy, S. (1999). Keys to soil taxonomy (8th ed.). Blacksburg VI: Pocahontas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasques, G. M., Grunwald, S., & Sickman, J. O. (2008). Comparison of multivariate methods for inferential modeling of soil carbon using visible/near-infrared spectra. Geoderma, 146, 14–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Walvoort, D. J. J., McBratney, A. B., Janik, L. J., & Skjemstad, J. O. (2006). Visible, near-infrared, mid-infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma, 131, 59–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waes, C., Mestdagh, I., Lootens, P., & Carlier, L. (2005). Possibilities of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for the prediction of organic carbon concentrations in grassland soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, 143, 487–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhaus, M., Workman, J. J., Reeves, J. B., & Mark, H. (2004). Quantitative analysis. 'Near-infrared spectroscopy in agriculture'. Agronomy Monograph No. 44. In K. A. Barbarick, C. A. Roberts, W. A. Dick, J. J. Workman, J. B. Reeves III, L. Al-Amoodi (Eds.), (pp. 133–174). American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc.: Madison, WI.

  • Wetterlind, J., Stenberg, B., & Jonsson, A. (2008). Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy compared with soil clay and organic matter content for estimating within-field variation in N uptake in cereals. Plant and Soil, 302, 317–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., & Li, J. (2013). Predictions of soil organic carbon using laboratory-based hyperspectral data in the northern Tianshan mountains, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 3897–3908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zornoza, R., Guerrero, C., Mataix-Solera, J., Scow, K. M., Arcenegui, V., & Mataix- Beneyto, J. (2008). Near infrared spectroscopy for determination of various physical, chemical and biochemical properties of Mediterranean soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 40, 1923–1930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Arslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arslan, H., Tasan, M., Yildirim, D. et al. Predicting field capacity, wilting point, and the other physical properties of soils using hyperspectral reflectance spectroscopy: two different statistical approaches. Environ Monit Assess 186, 5077–5088 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3761-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3761-2

Keywords

Navigation