Skip to main content

Noise tolerance of algorithms for estimating chlorophyll a concentration in turbid waters

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment volume 186, pages 2297–2311 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

The accuracy and noise tolerance of 13 global models and 5 Case II chlorophyll a (chl a) retrieval models were evaluated using three dataset. It was found that if 5 % input noise related to atmospheric correction is considered, then the uncertainty associated with noise tolerance varied from 5.5 % to 55.6 %, and these uncertainties generally accounts for 15.63 % to 24.75 % of the total uncertainty. This observation suggests that an optimal algorithm not only should have a strong chl a concentration prediction ability but also should possess high insensitivity to the noise of remote-sensing imagery. The accuracy evaluations of chl a models were based on comparisons of chl a predicted models with chl a concentration measured analytically for field measurements. The results indicate that none of the selected chl a estimation algorithms provide accurate retrievals of chl a in turbid waters. This may be attributed to the strong optical influence of organic and inorganic matter at the blue green range, and the non-negligible of non-organic matter absorption at the red and near-infrared ranges. In order to solve this problem, the chl a concentration retrieval models must be further optimized. After being optimized using the empirical optimized method constructed in this paper, a single parameterized NDCI (normalized difference chl a index) model produces accurate retrievals in the Yellow River Estuary, Taihu Lake and Chesapeake Bay. If 5 % input noise associated with residual uncertainty 0of atmospheric correction is taken into account, the model produces only 29.96 % uncertainty for the remote sensing of chl a concentration in these three turbid waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Aiken, J., Fishwick, J. R., Lavender, S., Barlow, R. B., Moore, G. F., Sessions, H., et al. (2007). Validation of MERIS reflectance and chlorophyll during the BENCAL cruise October 2002: Preliminary validation of new demonstration products for phytoplankton functional types and photosynthetic parameters. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28, 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASD (1999). Analytic Spectral Devices. Technical Guide, 3rd edition.

  • Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Lee, Z. P., Hawes, S. K., & Cannizzaro J. P. (2003). MODIS ocean science team algorithm theoretical basis document: Case 2 chlorophyll a. ATBD 19, Version 7.

  • Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Cannizzaro, J. P., Campbell, J. W., & Mitchell, B. G. (2004). Performance of the MODIS semi-analytical ocean color algorithm for chlorophyll-a. Advances in Space Research, 33, 1152–1159.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, G. C., & Gould, R. W. (2006). Comparisons of optical properties of the coastal ocean derived from satellite ocean color and in situ measurements. Optics Express, 14(22), 10149–10163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Quan, W. T. (2013). An improved algorithm for retrieving chlorophyll-a from the Yellow River Estuary using MODIS imagery. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 2243–2255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. X., Yu, C. H., & Jin, L. (2003). Mathematical analysis. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Zhou, G. H., Wen, J. G., & Fu, J. (2010a). Effect of remotely sensed data errors on the retrieving accuracy of territorial parameters. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 30(5), 1347–1350.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Zhou, G. H., Wen, Z. H., & Fu, J. (2010b). Effect of remotely sensed data errors on the retrieving accuracy of territorial parameters. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 30(5), 1347–1350.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Fu, J., & Zhang, M. W. (2011a). An atmospheric correction algorithm for Landsat/TM imagery basing on inverse distance spatial interpolation algorithm: A case study in Taihu Lake. IEEE Journal of Selected Applied Earth Observation and Remote Sensing, 4(4), 882–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Wen, Z. H., & Xiao, Z. Q. (2011b). Spectral geometric triangle properties of chlorophyll-a inversion in Taihu Lake based on TM data. Journal of Water Resource and Projection, 3(1), 67–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Fu, J., & Sun, J. H. (2012). Using Landsat/TM imagery to estimating nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in Taihu Lake, China. IEEE Journal of Selected Applied Earth Observation and Remote Sensing, 5(1), 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavano, W. R., Boss, E., & Lee, K. B. (2007). Inherent optical properties of non-spherical marine-like particles—from theory to observation. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 45, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall'Olmo, G., & Gitelson, A. A. (2005). Effect of bio-optical parameter variability on the remote estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters: Experimental results. Applied Optics, 44, 412–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D. G. (1997). The airborne remote sensing of phytoplankton chlorophyll-a in the lakes and tarns of the English Lake District. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(9), 1961–1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilerson, A. A., Gitelson, A. A., Zhou, J., Gurlin, D., Moses, W., & Joannou, I. (2010). Algorithms for remote estimation chlorophyll-a in coastal and inland waters using red and near-infrared bands. Optical Express, 18, 24109–24125.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, L., & Tett, P. (2001). A methods for analysis of benthic chlorophyll-a pigment, In Marine biology report, 326–341. UK: Napier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitelson, A. A. (1992). The peak near 700 nm on reflectnce spectra of algae and water: Relationships of its magnitude and position with chlorophyll concentration. Internal Journal of Remote Sensing, 13, 3367–3373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitelson, A. A., Dall'Olmo, G., Moses, W., Rundquist, D. C., Barrow, T., Fisher, T. R., et al. (2008). A simple semi-analytical model for remote estimation of chlorophyll-a in turbid waters: Validation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112, 3582–3593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gons, H. J., Rijkeboer, M., Bagheri, S., & Ruddick, K. G. (1999). Optical teledection of chlorophyll a in estuarine and coastal waters. Environmental Science and Technology, 34, 5189–5192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gons, H. J., Auer, M. T., & Effler, S. W. (2008). MERIS satellite chlorophyll mapping of oligotrophic and eutrophic waters in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112, 4098–4106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. R., & Franz, B. A. (2008). Remote sensing fo ocean color: Assessment of the water-leaving radiance bidirectional effects on the atmospheric diffuse transmittance for SeaWiFS and MODIS intercomparisons. Remote Sensing Environment, 112, 2667–2685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. R., & Voss K. J. (1999). MODIS normalized water-leaving radiance algorithm theoretical basis document. NASA Technic Document. Under Contract Number NAS5-31363, Version 4.

  • Hu, C., Carder, K. L., & Muller-Karger, F. E. (2001). How precise are SeaWiFS ocean color estimates? Implications of digitization-noise errors. Remote Sensing Environment, 76, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. J. W., O'Reilly, J. E., & Oviatt, C. A. (2007). Validation of SeaWiFS chlorophyll a in Massachusetts Bay 2007. Remote Sensing of Environment, 27, 1677–1691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leathers, R. A., & McCormick, N. J. (1997). Ocean inherent optical properties estimation from irradiances. Applied Optics, 36(33), 8685–8699.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Z. P., Carder, K. L., & Arnone, R. A. (2002). Deriving inherent optical properties from water color: A multi-band quasi-analytical algorithm for optically deep waters. Applied Optics, 41(27), 5755–5772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marriari, M., Hu, M. C., & Daly, K. (2006). Validation of SeaWiFS chlorophyll a concentrations in the South Ocean: A revisit. Remote Sensing of Environment, 105, 367–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. W. (2011). A current review of empirical procedures of remote sensing in inland and near-coastal transitional waters. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(21), 6855–6899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., & Mishra, D. R. (2012). Normalized difference chlorophyll index: A novel model for remote estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters. Remote Sensing of Environment, 117, 394–406. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. S., Campbell, J. W., & Dowell, M. D. (2009). A class-based approach to characterizing and mapping the uncertainty of the MODIS ocean chlorophyll product. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 2424–2430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel, A., & Prieur, L. (1977). Analysis of variances in ocean color. Limnology and Oceanography, 22, 709–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, W., Gitelson, A. A., Berdnikov, S., & Povazhnyi, V. (2009). Satellite estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration using the red and NIR bands of MERIS—the Azov Sea case Study. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 6(4), 845–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. L., & Fargion, G. S. (2002). Ocean optics protocols for satellite ocean color sensor validation, Revision 3. SeaWiFS Technical Report Series (Part II):171–179.

  • Mueller, J. L., Davis, C. O., Arnone, R. A., Frouin, R., Carder, K. L., Lee, Z. P., Steward, R. G., Hooker, S., Mobley, C. D., & McClain C. R. (2003). Above-water radiance and remote sensing measurement and analysis protocols. Ocean optics protocols for satellite ocean-color sensor validation revision 4: Vol. III. Radiometric measurements and data analysis protocols. NASA Technical Memorandum 2003–21162.

  • O'Reilly, J. E., Maritorena, S., Mitchell, B. G., Siegcl, D. A., Carder, K. L., & Garver, S. A. (1998). Ocean color chlorophyll algorithms for SeaWiFS. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(11), 937–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, K. G., Gons, H. J., Rijkeboer, M., & Tilstone, G. (2001). Optical remote sensing of chlorophyll a in case II waters by use of an adaptive two-band algorithm with optimal error properties. Applied Optics, 40, 3575–3585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, T. J., Moore, G. F., Hirata, T., & Aiken, J. (2006). Semi-analytical model for the derivation of ocean color inherent optical properties: Description, implementation, and performance assessment. Applied Optics, 45(31), 8116–8132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyrakos, E., Vilas, L. G., Torres Palenzuela, J. M., & Barton, E. D. (2011). Remote sensing chlorophyll a of optically complex waters (rias Baixas, NW Spain): Application of a regionally specific chlorophyll a algorithm for MERIS full resolution data during an upwelling cycle. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 2471–2485. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeto, M., Werdell, P. J., Moore, T. S., & Campbell J. W. (2011). Are the world's oceans optically different. Journal of Geophysical Research 116. doi:10.1029/2011JC007230.

  • Tassan, S., & Ferrari, G. M. (2003). Variability of light absorption by aquatic particles in the near-infrared spectral region. Applied Optics, 42(24), 4802–4810.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilstone, G. H., Angel-Benavides, I. M., Pradhan, Y., Shutler, J. D., Groom, S., & Sathyendranath, S. (2011). An assessment of chlorophyll-a algorithms available for SeaWiFS in coastal and open areas of the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea. Remote Sensing Environment, 115, 2277–2291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzortziou, M., Herman, J. R., Gallegos, C. L., Neale, P. J., Subramanian, A., Harding, L. W., et al. (2006). Determination of chlorophyll contentand tropic state of lakes using field spectrometer and IRS-IC satellite data in the Mecklenburg Lake Distract, Germany. Remote Sensing of Environment, 73, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzortziou, M., Subramanian, A., Herman, J. R., Gallegos, C. L., Neale, P. J., & Harding, L. W. (2007). Remote sensing reflectancec and inherent optical properties in the mid Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 72, 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Shi, W., & Tang, J. (2011). Water property monitoring and assessment for China's inland Lake Taihu from MODIS-Aqua measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 841–854. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the China State Major Basic Research Project (2013CB429701), Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41210005), Science Foundation for 100 Excellent Youth Geological Scholars of China Geological Survey, Serial Maps of Geology and Geophysics on China Seas and Land on the Scale of 1:1000000 (200311000001), and the Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean (201005030). We would like to just express our gratitude to two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Ocean Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, China

    Jun Chen

  2. The Key Laboratory of Marine Hydrocarbon Resources and Environmental Geology, Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, Qingdao, 266071, China

    Jun Chen

Authors
  1. Jun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, J. Noise tolerance of algorithms for estimating chlorophyll a concentration in turbid waters. Environ Monit Assess 186, 2297–2311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3538-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3538-z

Keywords

  • Remote sensing
  • Chlorophyll a concentration
  • Noise tolerance
  • Turbid waters