Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 186, Issue 1, pp 135–149 | Cite as

The potential effects of climate change on the distribution and productivity of Cunninghamia lanceolata in China

  • Yupeng Liu
  • Deyong Yu
  • Bin Xun
  • Yun Sun
  • Ruifang Hao
Article

Abstract

Climate changes may have immediate implications for forest productivity and may produce dramatic shifts in tree species distributions in the future. Quantifying these implications is significant for both scientists and managers. Cunninghamia lanceolata is an important coniferous timber species due to its fast growth and wide distribution in China. This paper proposes a methodology aiming at enhancing the distribution and productivity of C. lanceolata against a background of climate change. First, we simulated the potential distributions and establishment probabilities of C. lanceolata based on a species distribution model. Second, a process-based model, the PnET-II model, was calibrated and its parameterization of water balance improved. Finally, the improved PnET-II model was used to simulate the net primary productivity (NPP) of C. lanceolata. The simulated NPP and potential distribution were combined to produce an integrated indicator, the estimated total NPP, which serves to comprehensively characterize the productivity of the forest under climate change. The results of the analysis showed that (1) the distribution of C. lanceolata will increase in central China, but the mean probability of establishment will decrease in the 2050s; (2) the PnET-II model was improved, calibrated, and successfully validated for the simulation of the NPP of C. lanceolata in China; and (3) all scenarios predicted a reduction in total NPP in the 2050s, with a markedly lower reduction under the a2 scenario than under the b2 scenario. The changes in NPP suggested that forest productivity will show a large decrease in southern China and a mild increase in central China. All of these findings could improve our understanding of the impact of climate change on forest ecosystem structure and function and could provide a basis for policy-makers to apply adaptive measures and overcome the unfavorable influences of climate change.

Keywords

Species establishment probability Net primary productivity Ecosystem models Water balance Evapotranspiration 

References

  1. Aber, J. D., & Federer, C. A. (1992). A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Oecologia, 92(4), 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aber, J. D., Ollinger, S. V., Federer, C. A., Reich, P. B., Goulden, M. L., Kicklighter, D. W., et al. (1995). Predicting the effects of climate change on water yield and forest production in the northeastern United States. Climate Research, 5, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aber, J. D., Reich, P. B., & Goulden, M. L. (1996). Extrapolating leaf CO2 exchange to the canopy: A generalized model of forest photosynthesis compared with measurements by eddy correlation. Oecologia, 106(2), 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aber, J. D., Ollinger, S. V., & Driscoll, C. T. (1997). Modeling nitrogen saturation in forest ecosystems in response to land use and atmospheric deposition. Ecological Modelling, 101(1), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, M. (2007). Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling, 200(1–2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bala, G., Caldeira, K., Wickett, M., Phillips, T. J., Lobell, D. B., Delire, C., et al. (2007). Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(16), 6550–6555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellassen, V., le Maire, G., Guin, O., Dhôte, J. F., Ciais, P., & Viovy, N. (2011). Modelling forest management within a global vegetation model—Part 2: Model validation from a tree to a continental scale. Ecological Modelling, 222(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coops, N. C., & Waring, R. H. (2011). Estimating the vulnerability of fifteen tree species under changing climate in Northwest North America. Ecological Modelling, 222(13), 2119–2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coops, N. C., Waring, R. H., & Schroeder, T. A. (2009). Combining a generic process-based productivity model and a statistical classification method to predict the presence and absence of tree species in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A. Ecological Modelling, 220(15), 1787–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., et al. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29(2), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evangelista, P. H., Kumar, S., Stohlgren, T. J., & Young, N. E. (2011). Assessing forest vulnerability and the potential distribution of pine beetles under current and future climate scenarios in the Interior West of the US. Forest Ecology and Management, 262(3), 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang, J., Liu, G., & Xu, S. (1996). Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 16(5), 497–508.Google Scholar
  13. Feng, Z. W., Chen, C. Y., Li, C. H., Xu, G. H., & Zhou, C. L. (1982). Relations between the growth-development and environment of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in Huitong, Hunan province. Journal of Nanjing Technological College of Forest Products, (3), 19–38.Google Scholar
  14. Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., et al. (2006). Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. Journal of Climate, 19(14), 3337–3353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC, Pachauri, R. K., & Reisinger, A. (2008). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  17. Jiang, H., Apps, M. J., Zhang, Y., Peng, C., & Woodard, P. M. (1999). Modelling the spatial pattern of net primary productivity in Chinese forests. Ecological Modelling, 122(3), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Landsberg, J. J., & Waring, R. H. (1997). A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management, 95(3), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Law, B. E., Waring, R. H., Anthoni, P. M., & Aber, J. D. (2000). Measurements of gross and net ecosystem productivity and water vapour exchange of a Pinus ponderosa ecosystem, and an evaluation of two generalized models. Global Change Biology, 6(2), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levis, S. (2010). Modeling vegetation and land use in models of the Earth System. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(6), 840–856.Google Scholar
  21. Macias Fauria, M., Michaletz, S. T., & Johnson, E. A. (2011). Predicting climate change effects on wildfires requires linking processes across scales. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(1), 99–112.Google Scholar
  22. Metzger, M., Schröter, D., Leemans, R., & Cramer, W. (2008). A spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of ecosystem service change in Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 8(3), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakiccenovic, N., Davidson, O., Davis, G., Grubler, A., Kram, T., Lebre La Rovere, E., et al. (2000). Special report on emissions scenarios: A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nayak, R. K., Patel, N. R., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2010). Estimation and analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity over India by remote-sensing-driven terrestrial biosphere model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 170(1–4), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niu, D., Wang, S., & Ouyang, Z. (2009). Comparisons of carbon storages in Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia macclurei plantations during a 22-year period in southern China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21(6), 801–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ollinger, S. V., Aber, J. D., Reich, P. B., & Freuder, R. J. (2002). Interactive effects of nitrogen deposition, tropospheric ozone, elevated CO2 and land use history on the carbon dynamics of northern hardwood forests. Global Change Biology, 8(6), 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ollinger, S. V., Richardson, A. D., Martin, M. E., Hollinger, D. Y., Frolking, S. E., Reich, P. B., et al. (2008). Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: Functional relations and potential climate feedbacks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(49), 19336–19341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng, C., Zhou, X., Zhao, S., Wang, X., Zhu, B., Piao, S., et al. (2009). Quantifying the response of forest carbon balance to future climate change in Northeastern China: Model validation and prediction. Global and Planetary Change, 66(3–4), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190(3–4), 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Purves, D., & Pacala, S. (2008). Predictive models of forest dynamics. Science, 320(5882), 1452–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Running, S. W., & Coughlan, J. C. (1988). A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecological Modelling, 42(2), 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Running, S. W., & Gower, S. T. (1991). FOREST-BGC, a general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. Tree Physiology, 9(1–2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Running, S. W., Nemani, R. R., Heinsch, F. A., Zhao, M., Reeves, M., & Hashimoto, H. (2004). A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. BioScience, 54(6), 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheller, R. M., & Mladenoff, D. J. (2004). A forest growth and biomass module for a landscape simulation model, LANDIS: Design, validation, and application. Ecological Modelling, 180(1), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheller, R. M., Mladenoff, D. J., Crow, T. R., & Sickley, T. A. (2005). Simulating the effects of fire reintroduction versus continued fire absence on forest composition and landscape structure in the boundary waters canoe area, Northern Minnesota, USA. Ecosystems, 8(4), 396–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheller, R. M., Domingo, J. B., Sturtevant, B. R., Williams, J. S., Rudy, A., Gustafson, E. J., et al. (2007). Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecological Modelling, 201(3–4), 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schröter, D., Cramer, W., Leemans, R., Prentice, I. C., Araújo, M. B., Arnell, N. W., et al. (2005). Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science, 310(5752), 1333–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheng, W., Ren, S., Yu, G., Gang, H., Jiang, C., & Zhang, M. (2011). Patterns and driving factors of WUE and NUE in natural forest ecosystems along the North–South Transect of Eastern China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(4), 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., et al. (2003). Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 9(2), 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tatarinov, F. A., Cienciala, E., Vopenka, P., & Avilov, V. (2011). Effect of climate change and nitrogen deposition on central-European forests: Regional-scale simulation for South Bohemia. Forest Ecology and Management, 262(10), 1919–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tian, D. L. (2011). Dataset of Chinese ecosystem located observation and research (vol. Huitong ecological station for Chinese fir plantation, forest ecosystem). Beijing: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
  42. Turner, W., Spector, S., Gardiner, N., Fladeland, M., Sterling, E., & Steininger, M. (2003). Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(6), 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang, S., & Liu, Z. (2010). NPP spatial distribution of forest ecosystem based on SPA model. Science & Technology Review, 28(1), 82–89.Google Scholar
  44. Webb, R. S., Rosenzweig, C. E., & Levine, E. R. (1993). Specifying land surface characteristics in general circulation models: Soil profile data set and derived water holding capacities. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(1), 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu, Z. (1984). Chinese fir. Beijing: China Forestry Publish House.Google Scholar
  46. Xu, C., Gertner, G. Z., & Scheller, R. M. (2009). Uncertainties in the response of a forest landscape to global climatic change. Global Change Biology, 15(1), 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu, C., Li, Y., Hu, J., Yang, X., Sheng, S., & Liu, M. (2012). Evaluating the difference between the normalized difference vegetation index and net primary productivity as the indicators of vegetation vigor assessment at landscape scale. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(3), 1275–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yu, D., Zhu, W., & Pan, Y. (2008). The role of atmospheric circulation system playing in coupling relationship between spring NPP and precipitation in East Asia area. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 145(1–3), 135–143.Google Scholar
  49. Zeng, X., Cai, X. A., Zhao, P., Rao, X., Zou, B., Zhou, L., et al. (2008). Biomass and net primary productivity of three plantation communities in hilly land of lower subtropical China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 30(6), 148–152.Google Scholar
  50. Zhang, X. S. (2008). Vegetation map of the People’s Republic of China (1:1000000). Beijing: Geoscience Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zhao, M., & Running, S. W. (2010). Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science, 329(5994), 940–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao, M., & Zhou, G. (2005). Estimation of biomass and net primary productivity of major planted forests in China based on forest inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management, 207(3), 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao, M., Xiang, W., Peng, C., & Tian, D. (2009). Simulating age-related changes in carbon storage and allocation in a Chinese fir plantation growing in southern China using the 3-PG model. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(6), 1520–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhu, W., Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. (2007). Estimation of net primary productivity of chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remote sensing. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 31(3), 413–424.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yupeng Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Deyong Yu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bin Xun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yun Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ruifang Hao
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource EcologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Center for Human-Environment System SustainabilityBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations