Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 185, Issue 2, pp 1189–1198 | Cite as

Biomonitoring of heavy metals in fish from the Danube River

  • Snježana ZrnčićEmail author
  • Dražen Oraić
  • Marko Ćaleta
  • Željko Mihaljević
  • Davor Zanella
  • Nina Bilandžić
Article

Abstract

The Croatian part of the Danube River extends over 188 km and comprises 58 % of the country’s overall area used for commercial freshwater fishing. To date, the heavy metal contamination of fish in the Croatian part of the Danube has not been studied. The main purpose of this study was to determine heavy metal levels in muscle tissue of sampled fish species and to analyze the measured values according to feeding habits of particular groups. Lead ranged from 0.015 μg−1 dry weight in planktivorous to 0.039 μg−1 dry weight in herbivorous fish, cadmium from 0.013 μg−1 dry weight in herbivorous to 0.018 μg−1 dry weight in piscivorous fish, mercury from 0.191 μg−1 dry weight in omnivorous to 0.441 μg−1 dry weight in planktivorous fish and arsenic from 0.018 μg−1 dry weight in planktivorous to 0.039 μg−1 dry weight in omnivorous fish. Among the analyzed metals in muscle tissue of sampled fish, only mercury exceeded the maximal level (0.5 mg kg−1) permitted according to the national and EU regulations determining maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs, indicating a hazard for consumers of fish from the Danube River.

Keywords

Heavy metals Danube River Freshwater fish Mercury 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out as a part of the project “Management of freshwater fisheries on bordering rivers—pilot study with a holistic regional approach” supported by the Croatian Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management with the Norwegian partner, Akvaplan-niva AS.

References

  1. Adhikari, S., Ghosh, L., & Ayyappan, S. (2006). Combined effects of water pH and alkalinity on the accumulation of lead, cadmium and chromium to Labeo rohita (Hamilton). International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3(3), 289–296.Google Scholar
  2. Andreji, J., & Stranai, I. (2004). Levels of cobalt, nickel, copper and manganese in fishes from Danube River. Zootehnie e Biotehnologii XXXVII: 301–306.Google Scholar
  3. Bervoets, L., Blust, R., & Verheyen, R. (2001). Accumulation of metals in the tissues of threespined stickelback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from natural fresh waters. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 48(2), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boening, D. W. (2000). Ecological effects, transport, and fate of mercury: a general review. Chemosphere, 40(12), 1335–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger, J., Gaines, K. F., Boring, C. S., Stephens, W. L., Snodgrass, J., Dixon, C., et al. (2002). Metal levels in fish from the Savannah River: potential hazards to fish and other receptors. Environmental Research. Section A, 89, 85–97. doi: 10.1006/enrs.2002.4330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarkson, T. W. (1998). Human toxicology of mercury. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 11(2–3), 303–317.Google Scholar
  7. Diaconescu, C., Urdes, L., Marius, H., Ianitchi, D., & Popa, D. (2008). The influence of heavy metal content on superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activity in the fish meat originated from different areas of Danube River. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 13(4), 3859–3862.Google Scholar
  8. Dušek, L., Svobodova, Z., Jankouskova, D., Vykusova, B., Jarkovsky, J., Šmid, R., et al. (2005). Bioaccumulation of mercury in muscle tissue of fish in the Elbe River (Czech Republic): multispecies monitoring study 1991–1996. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 61(2), 256–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EC (2006). Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. OJ, L364/5.Google Scholar
  10. FAO (2008). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  11. Fernandez, L. G., & Olalla, H. Y. (2000). Toxicity and bioaccumulation of lead and cadmium in marine protozoan communities. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 47(3), 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghillebaert, F., Chaillou, C., Deschamps, F., & Roubaud, P. (1995). Toxic effects, at three pH levels, of two reference molecules on common carp embryo. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 32(1), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruiz, K., Murányi, A., Molnár, M., & Horváth, B. (1998). Risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in Danube sediments from Hungary. Water Science and Technology, 37(6–7), 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gundacker, C. (2000). Comparison of heavy metal bioaccumulation in freshwater mollusks of urban river habitats in Vienna. Environment Pollution, 110(1), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen, J. C., & Dasher, G. (1997). Organic mercury: an environmental threat to the health of dietary exposed societies? Revue of Environmental Health, 12(2), 107–116.Google Scholar
  16. Havelkova, M., Dušek, L., Nemethova, D., Poleszczuk, G., & Svobodova, Z. (2008). Comparison of mercury distribution between liver and muscle—a biomonitoring of fish from lightly and heavily contaminated localities. Sensors, 8(7), 4095–4109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ICPDR (2002). Joint Danube Survey: investigation of the Tisza River and its tributaries. Final Report. Institute for Water Pollution Control, VITUKI Plc., in cooperation with the Secretariat of the ICPDR.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, T. A. (1991). Biological and environmental control of mercury accumulation by fish in lakes in lakes and reservoirs of Northern Manitoba, Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48(12), 2449–2470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jarić, I., Višnjić-Jeftić, Z., Cvijanović, G., Gačić, Z., Jovanović, L., Skorić, S., et al. (2011). Determination of different heavy metal and trace element accumulation in liver, gills, intestine and muscle of starlet (Acipenser ruthenus) from Danube River in Serbia by ICP-OES. Microchemical Journal, 98(1), 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lange, T. R., Royals, H. E., & Conner, L. L. (1993). Influence of water chemistry on mercury concentration in largemouth bass from Florida lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 122(1), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maitland, P. S. (2000). Guide to freshwater fish of Britain and Europe (p. 256). London: Hamlyn.Google Scholar
  22. Official Gazette (1998). Regulation on water classification. No. 77.Google Scholar
  23. Official Gazette (2008a). Ordinance setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. No. 154.Google Scholar
  24. Official Gazette (2008b). Regulation on hazardous substances in water. No. 137.Google Scholar
  25. Pajević, S., Borišev, M., Rončević, S., Vukov, D., & Igić, R. (2008). Heavy metal accumulation of Danube River aquatic plants—indication of chemical contamination. Central European Journal of Biology, 3(3), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poleksić, V., Lenhardt, M., Jarić, I., Djordjević, D., Gačić, Z., Cvijanović, G., et al. (2010). Liver, gills and skin histopathology and heavy metal content of the Danube sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus Linnaeus, 1758). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 29(3), 515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Povž, M., & Sket, B. (1990). Naše sladkovodne ribe. Ljubljana: Založba Mladinska knjiga.Google Scholar
  28. Rehwoldt, R., Karimian-Teherani, D., & Altmann, H. (1975). Measurement and distribution of various heavy metals in the Danube River and Danube Canal aquatic communities in the vicinity of Vienna, Austria. Science of the Total Environment, 3(4), 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rincon-Leon, F., Zurera-Cosano, G., Moreno-Rojas, R., & Amaro-Lopez, M. (1993). Importance of eating habits and sample size in the estimation of environmental mercury contamination using biological indicators. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 27(3), 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, M. K., & Sahyoun, N. R. (2005). Fish consumption: recommendations versus advisories, can they be reconciled? Nutrition Reviews, 63(2), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Svobodova, Z., Dušek, L., Hejtmanek, M., Vykusova, B., & Smid, R. (1999). Bioaccumulation of mercury in various fish species from Orlik and Kamyk water reservoirs in Czech Republic. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 43(3), 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tudor, M-I., Tudor, M., David, C., Teodorof, L., Tudor, D., Orhan, I. (2006). Heavy metals concentrations in aquatic environment and living organisms in the Danube delta, Romania. (pp. 435–442). In: Simeonov, L. & Chirila (Eds.) Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Chemicals as Intentional and Accidental Global Environmental Threats, held in Borovetz, Bulgaria, 16–27 Nov. 2005.Google Scholar
  33. Višnjić-Jeftić, Z., Jarić, I., Jovanović, L., Skorić, S., Smederevac-Lalić, M., Nikčević, M., et al. (2010). Heavy metal and trace element accumulation in muscle, liver and gills of the Pontic shad (Alosa immaculata Bennet 1835) from the Danube River (Serbia). Microchemical Journal, 95(2), 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vuković, T., & Ivanović, B. (1971). Slatkovodne ribe Jugoslavije. Sarajevo: Zemaljski muzej BiH.Google Scholar
  35. Wachs, B. (2000). Heavy metal content in Danubian fish. Archives of Hydrobiology Supplementband. Large rivers, 115(4), 533–556.Google Scholar
  36. Woitke, P., Wellmitz, J., Helm, D., Kube, P., Lepom, P., & Litheraty, P. (2003). Analysis and assessment of heavy metal pollution in suspended solids and sediments of the river Danube. Chemosphere, 51(8), 633–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zahir, F., Shamim, J. R., Soghra, K. H., & Rizwan, H. K. (2005). Low dose mercury toxicity and human health. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 20(2), 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Žarski, T. P., Debski, B., Beseda, I., & Valka, J. (1995). Mercury pollution of bream (Abramis brama L.) caught in the middle course of the Vistula River in 1990 and 1993. Ekológia (Bratislava), 14(3), 317–321.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Snježana Zrnčić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dražen Oraić
    • 1
  • Marko Ćaleta
    • 2
  • Željko Mihaljević
    • 1
  • Davor Zanella
    • 2
  • Nina Bilandžić
    • 1
  1. 1.Croatian Veterinary InstituteZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Faculty of Science, Department of ZoologyZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations