Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 184, Issue 10, pp 5917–5927 | Cite as

An assessment of the nutrient status of sugar maple in Ontario: indications of phosphorus limitation

  • N. J. CassonEmail author
  • M. C. Eimers
  • S. A. Watmough


Soil acidification, caused by elevated anthropogenic deposition, has led to concerns over nutrient imbalances in Ontario’s sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) forests. In this study, soil chemistry, foliar chemistry, crown condition, and tree growth were measured at 36 sugar maple stands that included acidic (pH < 4.4), moderately acidic (4.4 ≤ pH < 5.4), and non-acidic (pH ≥ 5.4) soil groups. Acidic sites had significantly lower foliar P, Ca, and Mg concentrations, and the Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System indicated that P, rather than Ca or Mg, was the most limiting nutrient. This is in spite of widespread reports of net Ca losses from acidified soils. Mass balance studies in the region indicate that in acidic forest soils, P input from deposition is greater than stream export. Low foliar P is therefore most likely due to low P availability to trees resulting from accumulation in organic matter/biomass and/or adsorption to Fe and Al hydroxides which are more prevalent in acidic soils. Despite differences in foliar nutrition, there were no significant differences in crown condition or tree growth across the study region, suggesting that low P availability is not yet having a widespread detrimental effect on tree health.


Phosphorus Soil acidification Nutrient limitation Sugar maple Forest health 



We gratefully acknowledge Diane Miller, Angela Adkinson, Ina Koseva, Rebecca Grant, and Krista Campbell for sample collection and preparation. We also thank Chris Watson for his helpful comments on a preliminary draft of the manuscript. Decline index data used in this study were provided by Ontario Ministry of Environment (OMOE) and produced through the hard work and dedication of staff, especially Dave McLaughlin through his contributions to the OFBN program. Funding for this project was provided by the OMOE and through a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Strategic Supplemental grant entitled Catchment controls on declining P export in Precambrian Shield catchments to MCE.


  1. Addison, J. A. (2009). Distribution and impacts of invasive earthworms in Canadian forest ecosystems. Biological Invasions, 11, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berggren, D., & Mulder, J. (1995). The role of organic matter in controlling aluminum solubility in acidic mineral soil horizons. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 5, 4167–4180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernier, B., & Brazeau, M. (1988a). Foliar nutrient status in relation to sugar maple dieback and decline in the Quebec Appalachians. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 754–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernier, B., & Brazeau, M. (1988b). Nutrient deficiency symptoms associated with sugar maple dieback and decline in the Quebec Appalachians. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 762–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernier, B., Pare, D., & Brazeau, M. (1989). Natural stresses, nutrient imbalances and forest decline in southeastern Quebec. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 48, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beaufils, E. R. (1957). Research for rational exploitation of Hevea using a physiological diagnosis based on the mineral analysis of various parts of the plants. Fertilite, 3, 27–38.Google Scholar
  7. Beaufils, E. R. (1973). Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Soil Science Bulletin, 1, 1–132.Google Scholar
  8. Beauregard, S. L., Cote, B., & Houle, D. (2010). Application of compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) to the dendrochemistry of three hardwoods in three geological regions of southern Quebec. Dendrochronologia, 28(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
  9. Bowman, W. D., Cleveland, C. C., Halada, L., Hreko, J., & Baron, J. S. (2008). Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nature Geoscience, 1, 767–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaser, P., Walthert, L., Zimmermann, S., Pannatier, E. G., & Luster, J. (2008). Classification schemes for the acidity, base saturation, and acidification status of forest soils in Switzerland. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 171, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blum, J., Klaue, A., Nezat, C., Driscoll, C., Johnson, C., & Siccama, T. (2002). Mycorrhizal weathering of apatite as an important calcium source in base-poor forest ecosystems. Nature, 417, 729–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braun, S., Thomas, V., Quiring, R., & Fluckiger, W. (2010). Does nitrogen deposition increase forest production? The role of phosphorus. Environmental Pollution, 158, 2043–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burke, M. K., & Raynal, D. J. (1998). Liming influences growth and nutrient balances in sugar maple (Acer saccharum) seedlings on an acidic forest soil. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 39, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duchesne, L., Ouimet, R., Camire, C., & Houle, D. (2001). Seasonal nutrient transfers by foliar resorption, leaching, and litter fall in a northern hardwood forest at Lake Clair Watershed, Quebec, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eimers, M. C., Watmough, S. A., Paterson, A., Dillon, P., & Yao, H. (2009). Long-term declines in phosphorus export from forested catchments in south-central Ontario. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 66, 1682–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans, L. J., & Smillie, G. W. (1976). Extractable iron and aluminium and their relationship to phosphate retention in Irish soils. Irish journal of agricultural research, 15, 65–73.Google Scholar
  17. Falkengren-Grerup, U., & Diekmann, M. (2003). Use of a gradient of N-deposition to calculate effect-related soil and vegetation measures in deciduous forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 180, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finzi, A. (2009). Decades of atmospheric deposition have not resulted in widespread phosphorus limitation or saturation of tree demand for nitrogen in southern New England. Biogeochemistry, 92, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giesler, R., Petersson, T., & Hogberg, P. (2002). Phosphorus limitation in boreal forests: effects of aluminum and iron accumulation in the humus layer. Ecosystems, 5, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gobran, G. R., Clegg, S., & Courchesne, F. (1998). Rhizospheric processes influencing the biogeochemistry of forest ecosystems. Biogeochemistry, 42, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gradowski, T., & Thomas, S. C. (2006). Phosphorus limitation of sugar maple growth in central Ontario. Forest Ecology and Management, 226, 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gradowski, T., & Thomas, S. C. (2008). Responses of Acer saccharum canopy trees and saplings to P, K and lime additions under high N deposition. Tree Physiology, 28, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gusewell, S. (2004). N: P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haimi, J., & Einbork, M. (1992). Effects of endogeic earthworms on soil processes and plant growth in coniferous forest soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 13, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hale, C. M., Frelich, L. E., & Reich, P. B. (2005). Exotic European earthworm invasion dynamics in northern hardwood forests of Minnesota, USA. Ecological Applications, 15, 848–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison, A., Carreira, J., Poskitt, J., Robertson, S., Smith, R., & Hall, J. (1999). Impacts of pollutant inputs on forest canopy condition in the UK: possible role of P limitations. Forestry, 72, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hornung, M., Bull, K. R., Cresser, M., Hall, J., Langan, S. J., Loveland, P., et al. (1995). An empirical map of critical loads of acidity for soils in Great Britain. Environmental Pollution, 90, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutchinson, T. C., Watmough, S. A., Sager, E. P. S., & Karagatzides, J. D. (1998). Effects of excess nitrogen deposition and soil acidification on sugar maple (Acer saccharum) in Ontario, Canada: an experimental study. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 299–310.Google Scholar
  29. Hutchinson, T. C., Watmough, S. A., Sager, E. P. S., & Karagatzides, J. D. (1999). The impact of simulated acid rain and fertilizer application on a mature sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) forest in central Ontario Canada. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 109, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonard, M., Augusto, L., Morel, C., Achat, D., & Saur, E. (2009). Forest floor contribution to phosphorus nutrition: experimental data. Annals of Forest Science, 66, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirkwood, E. E., & Nesbitt, H. W. (1991). Formation and evolution of soils from an acidified watershed: Plastic Lake, Ontario, Canada. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 55, 1295–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolb, T. E., & McCormick, L. H. (1993). Etiology of sugar maple decline in four Pennsylvania stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 3, 2395–2402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koseva, I. S., Watmough, S. A., & Aherne, J. (2010). Estimating base cation weathering rates in Canadian forest soils using a simple texture-based model. Biogeochemistry, 101, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Likens, G. E., Driscoll, C. T., Buso, D. C., Siccama, T. G., Johnson, C. E., Lovett, G. M., et al. (1998). The biogeochemistry of calcium at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry, 41, 89–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lozano, F. C., & Huynh, K. D. (1989). Foliar diagnosis of sugar maple decline by DRIS. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 20, 1895–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marschner, H. (1991). Mechanisms of adaptation of plants to acid soils. Plant and Soil, 45, 683–702.Google Scholar
  37. McKeague, J. H., & Day, J. A. (1966). Dithionite- and oxalate-extractable Fe and Al as aids in differentiating various classes of soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 46, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McLaughlin, D. L. (1998). A decade of forest tree monitoring in Canada: evidence of air pollution effects. Environmental Review, 6, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McLaughlin, D. L., Chiu, M., Durigon, D., & Liljalehto, H. (2000). The Ontario Hardwood Forest Health Survey: 1986–1998. Forest Chronicles, 76, 783–791.Google Scholar
  40. Mehlich, A. (1984). Mehlich-3 soil test extractant—a modification of Mehlich-2 extractant. Communications in Plant Science and Soil Analysis, 15, 1409–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, D., & Watmough, S. A. (2009). Soil acidification and foliar nutrient status of Ontario’s deciduous forest in 1986 and 2005. Environmental Pollution, 157, 664–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newman, E. I. (1995). Phosphorus inputs to terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 83, 713–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ohno, T., & Amirbahman, A. (2010). Phosphorus availability in boreal forest soils: a geochemical and nutrient uptake modeling approach. Geoderma, 155, 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ouimet, R., & Camiré, C. (1995). Foliar deficiencies of sugar maple stands associated with soil cation imbalances in the Quebec Appalachians. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 75, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pare, D., & Bernier, B. (1989). Phosphorus-fixing potential of Ah and H horizons subjected to acidification. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 132–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Park, B. B., & Yanai, R. D. (2009). Nutrient concentrations in roots, leaves and wood of seedling and mature sugar maple and American beech at two contrasting sites. Forest Ecology and Management, 258(10), 2233–2241.Google Scholar
  47. Pote, D. H., Daniel, T. C., Sharpley, A. N., Moore, P. A., Edwards, D. R., & Nichols, D. J. (1996). Relating extractable soil phosphorus to phosphorus losses in runoff. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60, 855–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reyes, I., Valery, A., & Valduz, Z. (2006). Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms isolated from rhizospheric and bulk soils of colonizer plants at an abandoned rock phosphate mine. Plant and Soil, 287, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosling, A., Suttle, K., Johansson, E., Van Hees, P., & Banfield, J. (2007). Phosphorous availability influences the dissolution of apatite by soil fungi. Geobiology, 5, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. SanClements, M. D., Fernandez, I. J., Norton, S. A., Amirbahman, A., & Rustad, L. E. (2010). Soil chemical and physical properties at The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 171(1–4), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharpley, A. N. (1995). Dependence of runoff phosphorus on extractable soil-phosphorus. Journal of Environmental Quality, 24, 920–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shaw, D. M., Reilly, G. A., Muysson, J. R., Pattenden, G. E., & Campbell, F. E. (1967). An estimate of the chemical composition of the Canadian Precambrian Shield. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 4, 829–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sherman, J., Fernandez, I. J., Norton, S. A., Ohno, T., & Rustad, L. E. (2006). Soil aluminum, iron, and phosphorus dynamics in response to long-term experimental nitrogen and sulfur additions at the Bear Brook Watershed in Main, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 121, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soil Classification Working Group (1998). The Canadian System of Soil Classification Publ. 1646 (Revisted), p. 187. Google Scholar
  55. Suarez, E. R., Pelletier, D. M., Fahey, T. J., & Groffman, P. M. (2004). Effects of exotic earthworms on soil phosphorus cycling in two broadleaf temperate forests. Ecosystems, 7, 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tessier, J., & Raynal, D. (2003). Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walworth, J. L., & Sumner, M. E. (1987). The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system. Advances in Soil Science, 6, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watmough, S. A., & Dillon, P. J. (2003a). Base cation and nitrogen budgets for a mixed hardwood catchment in south-central Ontario. Ecosystems, 6, 675–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Watmough, S. A., & Dillon, P. J. (2003b). Base cation and nitrogen budgets for a seven forested catchments in south-central Ontario, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 177, 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watmough, S. A., & Dillon, P. J. (2003c). Calcium losses from a forested catchment in south-central Ontario, Canada. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 3085–3089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weand, M., Arthur, M., Lovett, G., Sikora, F., & Weathers, K. (2010). The phosphorus status of northern hardwoods differs by species but is unaffected by nitrogen fertilization. Biogeochemistry, 97, 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood, T., Bormann, F., & Voigt, G. (1984). Phosphorus cycling in a northern hardwood forest—biological and chemical control. Science, 223, 391–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xue, N., Seip, H. M., Guo, J., Liao, B., & Zeng, Q. (2006). Distribution of Al–Fe- and Mn-pools and their correlation in soils from two acid deposition small catchments in Hunan, China. Chemosphere, 65, 2468–2476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yanai, R. (1992). Phosphorus budget of a 70-year-old northern hardwood forest. Biogeochemistry, 17, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate ProgramTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeographyTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  3. 3.Environmental and Resource StudiesTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations