Skip to main content

Mapping forest composition from the Canadian National Forest Inventory and land cover classification maps

Abstract

Canada’s National Forest Inventory (CanFI) provides coarse-grained, aggregated information on a large number of forest attributes. Though reasonably well suited for summary reporting on national forest resources, the coarse spatial nature of this data limits its usefulness in modeling applications that require information on forest composition at finer spatial resolutions. An alternative source of information is the land cover classification produced by the Canadian Forest Service as part of its Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests (EOSD) initiative. This product, which is derived from Landsat satellite imagery, provides relatively high resolution coverage, but only very general information on forest composition (such as conifer, mixedwood, and deciduous). Here we link the CanFI and EOSD products using a spatial randomization technique to distribute the forest composition information in CanFI to the forest cover classes in EOSD. The resultant geospatial coverages provide randomized predictions of forest composition, which incorporate the fine-scale spatial detail of the EOSD product and agree in general terms with the species composition summaries from the original CanFI estimates. We describe the approach and provide illustrative results for selected major commercial tree species in Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Freeman, E., & Moisen, G. (2007). Evaluating kriging as a tool to improve moderate resolution maps of forest biomass. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 128, 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, M. D. (2001). Canada’s national forest inventory, responding to current information needs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 67, 121–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, M. D., Brierley, T. T., & Omule, A. Y. (2005). Monitoring Canada’s forests: The National Forest Inventory. The Forestry Chronicle, 81, 214–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, M. D., Boudewyn, P., Power, K., & Russo, G. (2010). Canada. In E. Tomppo, D. Gschwantner, M. Lawrence, & R. E. McRoberts (Eds.), National forest inventories. Pathways for common reporting (pp. 97–111). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.H., & Wendt, D.G. (2000). Using classified Landsat Thematic Mapper data for stratification in a statewide forest inventory. In: R.E. McRoberts, G.A. Reams, & P.C. Van Deusen (Eds.). Proceedings of the First Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium, San Antonio, TX, 2–3 November 1999. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-213 (pp. 20–27).

  • Jacobs, D.M., & Rudis, V.A. (2005). Providing confidence in regional maps in predicting where nonnative species are invading the forested landscape. In McRoberts, R.E., Reams, G.A., Van Deusen, P.C., McWilliams, W.H., and Cieszewski, C.J. (Eds). Proceedings of the 4th Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium; 2002 Nov 19–21; New Orleans, LA (pp. 17–19). General Technical Report NC-252. USDA Forest Service, NC Research Station, St. Paul, MN

  • LaCroix, J. J., Ryu, R., Zheng, D., & Chen, J. (2006). Simulating fire spread with landscape management scenarios. Forest Science, 52, 522–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMaire, G., Davi, H., Soudani, K., Francoise, C., LeDantec, V., & Dufrene, E. (2005). Modeling annual production and carbon fluxes of a large managed temperate forest using forest inventories, satellite data and field measurements. Tree Physiology, 25, 859–872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little, E.L. Jr. (1971). Atlas of United states Trees. Volume 1. Conifers and Important Hardwoods. USDA Forest Service, Timber Management Research Division, Washington, DC. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1146.

  • Liu, J., Liu, S., Loveland, T. R., & Tieszen, L. L. (2008). Integrating remotely sensed land cover observations and a biogeochemical model for estimating forest ecosystem carbon dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 219, 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, T., Cieszewski, C.J., Zasada, M., & Zawadzki, J. (2003). Distributing FIA information onto segmented Landsat Thematic Mapper images stratified with industrial ground data. In McRoberts, R.E., Reams, G.A., Van Deusen, P.C., McWilliams, W.H., & Cieszewski, C.J. (Eds). Proceedings of the 4th Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium; 2002 Nov 19–21; New Orleans, LA (pp. 111–116). General Technical Report NC-252. USDA Forest Service, NC Research Station, St. Paul, MN.

  • McKenney, D. W., Pedlar, J., Hutchinson, M., Lawrence, K., & Campbell, K. (2007). Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of North American trees. Bioscience, 57, 939–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRoberts, R. E., Wendt, D. G., Nelson, M. D., & Hansen, M. H. (2002). Using a land cover classification based on satellite imagery to improve the precision of forest inventory area estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81, 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRoberts, R. E., Gormanson, D. D., & Hansen, M. H. (2005). Can a land cover change map be used to increase the precision of forest inventory estimates of change in forest area, volume growth, and mortality. In C. Kleinn, J. Nieschulze, & B. Sloboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st GIS and Remote Sensing Days—Environmental Studies, Göttingen, Germany, 7–8 October 2004 (pp. 63–73). Frankfurt am Main: Sauerländer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRoberts, R. E., Holden, G. R., Nelson, M. D., Liknes, G. C., & Gormanson, D. D. (2006). Using satellite imagery as ancillary data for increasing the precision of estimates for the Forest Inventory and Analysis program of the USDA Forest Service. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 2968–2980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, B. B., Wulder, M. A., & White, J. C. (2010). Identifying leading species using tree crown metrics derived from very high spatial resolution imagery in a boreal forest environment. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 36, 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, L. B., & Englefield, P. P. (2006). Fine-resolution mapping of wildfire fuel types for Canada: fuzzy logic modeling for an Alberta pilot area. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 120, 127–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Canada. (2010). The State of Canada’s Forests—Annual Report 2010. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M., Folving, S., Kennedy, P., Puumalainen, J., Chirici, G., Corona, P., Marchetti, M., Olsson, H., Ricotta, C., Ringvall, A., Ståhl, E. & Tomppo, E. (2003). Combining remote sensing and field data for deriving unbiased estimates of forest parameters over large regions. In: Corona, P., Köhl, M., and Marchetti, M. (Eds). Advances in forest inventory for sustainable forest management and biodiversity monitoring (pp. 19–32). Boston: Kluwer.

  • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (1998). Specifications for Automating Forest Resource Inventory for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Sault Ste. Marie, ON: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Information Management & Systems Branch.

  • Polson, J.E., Ens, D.R., & Whiting, J.W. (1989). Comparison of satellite forest cover maps to traditional forest inventory maps. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS’89. 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, vol. 4 (pp. 2401–2404).

  • Poso, S., Paananen, R., & Simila, M. (1987). Forest inventory by compartments using satellite imagery. Silva Fennica, 21, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riel, W. G., Fall, A., Shore, T. L., & Safranyik, L. A. (2004). A spatio-temporal simulation of mountain pine beetle impacts on the landscape. In T. L. Shore, J. E. Brooks, & J. E. Stone (Eds.), Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions; 2003 October 30–31, Kelowna, BC, Canada, (pp. 106–113). Information Report BC-X-399. Victoria, BC: Pacific Forestry Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayn-Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Recognition of tree species on aerial photographs. Ottawa: Canadian Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, G., Beckage, B., Smith, B., & Miller, P.A. (2010). Estimating potential forest NPP, biomass and their climatic sensitivity in New England using a dynamic ecosystem model. Ecosphere 1, article 18.

  • Thompson, I. D., Maher, S. C., Rouillard, D. P., Fryxell, J. M., & Baker, J. A. (2007). Accuracy of forest inventory mapping: some implications for boreal forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 252, 208–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulder, M. (2000). Large Area Remote Sensing Land Cover Mapping Projects. Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada. Available from: http://www.pfc.forestry.ca/eosd/cover/largearea_e.html. Accessed 20 June 2010.

  • Wulder, M., & Nelson, T. (2003). EOSD Land Cover Classification Legend Report. Victoria: Canadian Forest Service Pacific Forestry Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulder, M. A., Dechka, J. A., Gillis, M. A., Luther, J. E., Hall, R. J., Beaudoin, A., et al. (2003). Operational mapping of the land cover of the forested area of Canada with Landsat data: EOSD land cover program. The Forestry Chronicle, 79(6), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Luther, J. E., Strickland, G., Remmel, T. K., & Mitchell, S. (2006). Use of vector polygons for the accuracy assessment of pixel-based land cover maps. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 32, 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Magnussen, S. S., & McDonald, S. S. (2007). Validation of a large area land cover product using purpose-acquired airborne video. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106, 480–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Cranny, M., Hall, R. J., Luther, J. E., Beaudoin, A., et al. (2008). Monitoring Canada’s forests. Part 1: completion of the EOSD land cover project. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 34, 549–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yemshanov, D., Koch, F. H., McKenney, D. W., Downing, M. C., & Sapio, F. (2009). Mapping invasive species risks with stochastic models: a cross-border United States–Canada application for Sirex noctilio Fabricius. Risk Analysis, 29, 868–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yemshanov, D., Koch, F. H., Ben-Haim, Y., & Smith, W. (2010). Detection capacity, information gaps and the design of surveillance programs for invasive forest pests. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 2535–2546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Peng, C., Dang, Q., Chen, J., & Parton, S. (2005). Predicting forest growth and yield in northeastern Ontario using the process-based model of TRIPLEX1.0. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 2268–2280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service. Authors extend their gratitude and thanks to Mark Gillis and Katja Power (Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC) for providing technical support with CanFI data, and Kevin Lawrence and Darren Allen (Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, ON) for their help with preparing a seamless EOSD land cover dataset. Steen Magnussen (Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC) also provided valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Thanks also to the journal reviewers for suggestions that improved the manuscript. Any errors remain the responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denys Yemshanov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yemshanov, D., McKenney, D.W. & Pedlar, J.H. Mapping forest composition from the Canadian National Forest Inventory and land cover classification maps. Environ Monit Assess 184, 4655–4669 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2293-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2293-2

Keywords

  • National Forest Inventory
  • Land cover classification
  • Stochastic prediction
  • Species cover
  • Canada
  • Stand volume
  • Forest composition
  • Tree species