Skip to main content

Evaluating the utility and seasonality of NDVI values for assessing post-disturbance recovery in a subalpine forest

Abstract

Forest disturbances around the world have the potential to alter forest type and cover, with impacts on diversity, carbon storage, and landscape composition. These disturbances, especially fire, are common and often large, making ground investigation of forest recovery difficult. Remote sensing offers a means to monitor forest recovery in real time, over the entire landscape. Typically, recovery monitoring via remote sensing consists of measuring vegetation indices (e.g., NDVI) or index-derived metrics, with the assumption that recovery in NDVI (for example) is a meaningful measure of ecosystem recovery. This study tests that assumption using MODIS 16-day imagery from 2000 to 2010 in the area of the Colorado’s Routt National Forest Hinman burn (2002) and seedling density counts taken in the same area. Results indicate that NDVI is rarely correlated with forest recovery, and is dominated by annual and perennial forb cover, although topography complicates analysis. Utility of NDVI as a means to delineate areas of recovery or non-recovery are in doubt, as bootstrapped analysis indicates distinguishing power only slightly better than random. NDVI in revegetation analyses should carefully consider the ecology and seasonal patterns of the system in question.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Alexander, R. (1987). Ecology, silviculture, and management of the Engelmann spruce-Subalpine fir type in the central and southern Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service. Agricultural Handbook 659. Fort Collins, CO, USA.

  • Asner, G., Keller, M., Pereira, R., Zweede, J., & Silva, J. (2004). Canopy damage and recovery after selective logging in Amazonia: Field and satellite studies. Ecological Applications, 14(4), 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W., Flaherty, P., Lindemann, J., Veblen, T., Eisenhard, K., & Kulakowski, D. (2002). Effect of vegetation on the impact of a severe blowdown in the southern Rocky Mountains, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 168, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings, W. (1969). Vegetational pattern near alpine timberline as affected by fire–snowdrift interactions. Vegetatio, 19, 192–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchon, E., & Arseneault, D. (2004). Fire disturbance during climate change: Failure of postfire forest recovery on a boreal floodplain. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34(11), 2294–2305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casady, G. M., van Leeuwen, W. J. D., & Marsh, S. E. (2010). Evaluating post-wildfire vegetation regeneration as a response to multiple environmental determinants. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 15(5), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas-Gonzalez, M., Gerard, F., Balzter, H., & Riano, D. (2009). Analyzing forest recovery after wildfire disturbance in boreal Siberia using remotely sensed vegetation indices. Global Change Biology, 15, 561–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, url http://www.R-project.org.

  • Diaz-Delgado, R., Lloret, F., Pons, X., & Terradas, J. (2002). Satellite evidence of decreasing resilience in Mediterranean plant communities after recurrent wildfires. Ecology, 83(8), 2293–2303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Delgado, R., Lloret, F., & Pons, X. (2003). Influence of fire severity on plant regeneration by means of remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(8), 1751–1763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. 2009. Environmental systems research institute: ArcGIS version 9.2

  • French, N., Kasischke, E., Hall, R., Murphy, K., Verbyla, D., Hoy, E., et al. (2008). Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in the North American boreal forest region: An overview and summary of results. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 17, 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frolking, S., Palace, M., Clark, D., Chambers, J., Shugart, H., & Hurtt, G. (2009). Forest disturbance and recovery: A general review in the context of spaceborne remote sensing of impacts on aboveground biomass and canopy structure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, S., Fiske, G., & Bunn, A. (2006). Using satellite time-series data sets to analyze fire disturbance and forest recovery across Canada. Remote Sensing of Environment, 101, 352–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Burgan, R. (1999). Evaluation of NDVI for monitoring live fuel moisture in three vegetation types of the western US. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65(5), 603–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicke, J., Asner, G., Kasischke, E., French, N., Randerson, J., Collatz, G., et al. (2003). Post fire response of North American boreal forest net primary productivity analyzed with satellite observations. Global Change Biology, 9(8), 1145–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A., & Jackson, R. (1988). Soil and atmosphere influences on the spectra of partial canopies. Remote Sensing of Environment, 25, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A. R., Jackson, R. D., & Post, D. F. (1985). Spectral response of a plant canopy with different soil backgrounds. Remote Sensing of Environment, 17, 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, T., Song, C., Vose, J., & Band, L. (2011). Topography-mediated controls on local vegetation phenology estimated from MODIS vegetation index. Landscape Ecology, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9580-8.

  • Jenkins, J., Dicus, C., & Hebertson, E. (1998). Postfire succession and disturbance interactions on an intermountain subalpine spruce-fir forest. In T. Pruden and L. Brennan (Eds.), Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 20th. Proceedings. Fire in ecosystem management: Shifting the paradigm from suppression to prescription, (pp. 219–229). Tallahassee, Florida: Tall Timbers Research Station.

  • Jiang, Z., Huete, A., Chen, J., Chen, Y., Li, J., Yan, G., et al. (2006). Analysis of NDVI and scaled difference vegetation index retrievals of vegetation fraction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 101, 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashian, D., Turner, M., Romme, W., & Lorimer, C. (2005). Variability and convergence in stand structural development on a fire-dominated subalpine landscape. Ecology, 86(3), 643–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashian, D., Romme, W., Tinker, D., Turner, M., & Ryan, M. (2006). Carbon storage on landscapes with stand replacing fires. Bioscience, 56(7), 598–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lentile, L., Holden, A., Smith, A., Falkowski, M., Hudak, A., Morgan, P., et al. (2006). Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 15, 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LP DAAC (2010). These data are distributed by the Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC), located at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center (lpdaac.usgs.gov).

  • Lynch, E. (1998). Origin of a park-forest vegetation mosaic in the Wind River Range, Wyoming. Ecology, 79, 1320–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malak, D., & Pausas, J. (2006). Fire regime and post-fire NDVI changes in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean basin). International Journal of Wildland Fire, 15, 407–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moisen, G., & Frescino, T. (2002). Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics. Ecological Modelling, 157, 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRCS. (2010). Snotel data. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, R. (1998). Patterns of lodgepole pine regeneration following the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Forest Ecology and Management, 111, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J., Haas, R., Schell, J., & Deering, D. (1973). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS, Third ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351 I: 309–317.

  • Ruiz-Gallardo, J., Castaño, S., & Calera, A. (2004). Application of remote sensing and GIS to locate priority intervention areas after wildland fires in Mediterranean systems: A case study from south-eastern Spain. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 13, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, T., Cohen, W., & Yang, Z. (2007). Patterns of forest regrowth following clearcutting in western Oregon as determined from a Landsat time-series. Forest Ecology and Management, 243, 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, M., Heil, A., Hoelzemann, J., Spessa, A., Thonicke, K., Goldammer, J., et al. (2008). Global wildland fire emissions from 1960 to 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22(2), GB2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G., Patten, L., & Daniels, J. (1987). Mineral resources of the Mt Zirkel wilderness and northern Park range vicinity, Jackson and Routt counties, Colorado. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Offices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahelin, R. (1943). Factors influencing the natural restocking of high altitude burns by coniferous trees in the central Rocky Mountains. Ecology, 24, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S., & Hofer, R. (1998). Responses of spectral indices to variations in vegetation cover and soil background. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64(9), 915–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, J., & Justice, C. (2002). Towards operational monitoring of terrestrial systems by moderate resolution remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, W. (2008). Monitoring the effects of forest restoration treatments on post-fire vegetation recovery with MODIS multitemporal data. Sensors, 8, 2017–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, W., Casady, G., Neary, D., Bautista, S., Alloza, J., Carmel, Y., et al. (2010). Monitoring post-wildfire vegetation response with remotely sensed time-series data in Spain, USA, and Israel. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 19, 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijaya, A., Kusnadi, S., Gloaguen, R., & Heilmeier, H. (2010). Improved strategy for estimating stem volume and forest biomass using moderate resolution remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Forestry Research, 21(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research provided in part by the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and CIRES (Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences) at the University of Colorado. Field help included Rob Gonzales, Gerard Dillehay, and Alec Nelson. Feedback and critical reviews from Carol Wessman were much appreciated.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Buma.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buma, B. Evaluating the utility and seasonality of NDVI values for assessing post-disturbance recovery in a subalpine forest. Environ Monit Assess 184, 3849–3860 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2228-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2228-y

Keywords

  • MODIS
  • Remote sensing
  • NDVI
  • Disturbance recovery
  • Forest fire regeneration