Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating in-situ, Landsat, and MODIS data for mapping in Southern African savannas: experiences of LCCS-based land-cover mapping in the Kalahari in Namibia

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrated ecosystem assessment initiatives are important steps towards a global biodiversity observing system. Reliable earth observation data are key information for tracking biodiversity change on various scales. Regarding the establishment of standardized environmental observation systems, a key question is: What can be observed on each scale and how can land cover information be transferred? In this study, a land cover map from a dry semi-arid savanna ecosystem in Namibia was obtained based on the UN LCCS, in-situ data, and MODIS and Landsat satellite imagery. In situ botanical relevé samples were used as baseline data for the definition of a standardized LCCS legend. A standard LCCS code for savanna vegetation types is introduced. An object-oriented segmentation of Landsat imagery was used as intermediate stage for downscaling in-situ training data on a coarse MODIS resolution. MODIS time series metrics of the growing season 2004/2005 were used to classify Kalahari vegetation types using a tree-based ensemble classifier (Random Forest). The prevailing Kalahari vegetation types based on LCCS was open broadleaved deciduous shrubland with an herbaceous layer which differs from the class assignments of the global and regional land-cover maps. The separability analysis based on Bhattacharya distance measurements applied on two LCCS levels indicated a relationship of spectral mapping dependencies of annual MODIS time series features due to the thematic detail of the classification scheme. The analysis of LCCS classifiers showed an increased significance of life-form composition and soil conditions to the mapping accuracy. An overall accuracy of 92.48% was achieved. Woody plant associations proved to be most stable due to small omission and commission errors. The case study comprised a first suitability assessment of the LCCS classifier approach for a southern African savanna ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibald, S., & Scholes, R. J. (2007). Leaf green-up in a semi-arid African savanna—separating tree and grass responses to environmental cues. Journal of Vegetation Science, 18, 583–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. E. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 26, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. (1989). Phenoloy of nine common woody species in semi-arid, deciduous Kalahari Sand vegetation. Vegetatio, 79, 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colditz, R., Conrad, C., Wehrmann, T., Schmidt, M., & Dech, S. (2008). TiSeG: Flexible software tool for time-series generation of MODIS data utilizing the quality assessment science data set. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46, 3296–3308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cord, A., Conrad, C., Schmidt, M., & Dech, S. (2010). Standardized FAO-LCCS land cover mapping in heterogeneous tree savannas of West Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(9), 1083–1091. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.03.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, P., Bicheron, P., Brockman, C., Bontemps, S., et al. (2009). The first 300 m global land cover map for 2005 using ENVISAT MERIS time series: A product of the GlobCover system. In Proceedings of the 33th international symposium of remote sensing of environment (pp. 1–4), 4–8 May, Stresa.

  • DeFries, R., Hansen, M., Townsend, J., Janetos, A., & Loveland, T. (2000). A new global 1-km dataset of percentage tree cover derived from remote sensing. Global Change Biology, 6, 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, A. (2005). Land cover classification system. Classification concepts and user manual. Software version 2 2nd ed., FAO, Environment and Natural Resources Series number 8, Rome.

  • Edwards, D. (1983). A broad-scale structural classification of vegetation for practical purposes. Bothalia, 14, 705–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2009). Advanced Database Gateway (ADG). Glaobal Land Cover Network (p. 1). Retrieved from http://www.glcn.org/sof_4_en.jsp.

  • Fritz, S., Belward, A., Mayaux, P., & Bartholome, E. (2004). A new land-cover map of Africa for the year 2000. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 861–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, P. (1996). The ecology of miombo woodlands (Africa), CIFOR, Jakarta. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/agris/search/display.do?f=./1998/v2402/Q11997000079.xml;Q11997000079. Accessed 25 October 2009.

  • Gessner, U., Klein, D., Conrad, C., Schmidt, M., & Dech, S. (2009). Towards an automated estimation of vegetation cover fractions on multiple scales: Examples of Eastern and Southern Africa. In Proceedings of the 33th international symposium of remote sensing of environment (pp. 1–4), 4–8 May, Stresa.

  • GLCF (2007). Global land cover facility. Landsat Imagery. http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu/data/landsat/. Accessed 19 July 2007.

  • Guerschman, J. P., Hill, M. J., Renzullo, L. J., Barrett, D. J., et al. (2009). Estimating fractional cover of photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil in the Australian tropical savanna region upscaling the EO-1 Hyperion and MODIS sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(5), 928–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanan, N., Sankaran, M., Ratnam, J., Dangelmayr, G., et al. (2006). Biocomplexity in African Savannas. Scientific Reports on Research Projects undertaken in the Kruger National Park during 2005 (pp. 47–48).

  • Hansen, C., Defries, S., Townshend, G., Sohlberg, R., et al. (2002). Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: Examples using AVHRR and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. C., Defries, R. S., Townshend, J. R., Carroll, M., et al. (2003). Global percent tree cover at a spatial resolution of 500 meters: First results of the MODIS vegetation continuous fields algorithm. Earth Interactions, 7(10), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold, M., Mayaux, P., Woodcock, C., Baccini, A., & Schmullius, C. (2008). Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(5), 2538–2556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, A., Uppala, S., Klinker, E., Burridge, D., et al. (2005). The transformation of earth-system observations into information of socio-economic value in GEOSS. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 131(613), 3493–3512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, P., et al. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüttich, C., Gessner, U., Herold, M., Strohbach, B. J., et al. (2009). On the suitability of MODIS time series metrics to map vegetation types in dry savanna ecosystems: A case study in the Kalahari of NE Namibia. Remote Sensing, 1(4), 620–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, L. J., & Gregorio, A. D. (2002). Parametric land cover and land-use classi cations as tools for environmental change detection. Environment, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 91, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, M., Henkel, K., Herold, M., & Churkina, G. (2006). Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 101(4), 534–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, C. O., Vermote, E., Townshend, J. R., Defries, R., et al. (1998). The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS): Land remote sensing for global change research. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36(4), 1228–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landgrebe, D., & Biehl, L. (2001). An introduction to MultiSpec (pp. 1–171). http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~biehl/MultiSpec/Intro5_01.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2009.

  • Latifovic, R. (2004). Land cover mapping of North and Central America—Global Land Cover 2000. Remote Sensing of Environment, 89(1), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, T. (2008). North America land cover summit. In J. Campbell, K. Jones, J. Smith, & M. Koeppe (Eds.), Association of American Geographers. Washington.

  • Loveland, T., Reed, B., Brown, J., Ohlsen, D., et al. (2000). Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6 & 7), 1303–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, J., & Obeid, S. (2002). The communal lands in Eastern Namibia. Windhoek: Raison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchoney, D. (2008). Earth observations for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(5), 1909–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H. (2001). Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(12), 2377–2400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, K., Herold, M., Hartley, A., & Schmullius, C. (2007). Comparative assessment of CORINE2000 and GLC2000: Spatial analysis of land cover data for Europe. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9(4), 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., et al. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience, 51(11), 933–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, H. M., & Cooper, H. D. (2006). Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(3), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Privette, J., Tian, Y., Roberts, G., Scholes, R., et al. (2004). Vegetation structure characteristics and relationships of Kalahari woodlands and savannas. Global Change Biology, 10, 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running, S., Loveland, T., Pierce, L., Nemany, R., & Hunt, E. (1995). A remote sensing based vegetation classification logic for global land cover analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M., Albertson, J. D., Caylor, K. K., & Williams, C. A. (2002). Determining land surface fractional cover from NDVI and rainfall time series for a savanna ecosystem. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82, 376–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, R., & Biggs, R. (2005). A biodiversity intactness index. Nature, 434, 45–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, R., Frost, P., & Tian, Y. (2004). Canopy structure in savannas along a moisture gradient on Kalahari sands. Global Change Biology, 10, 292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, R. J., Mace, G. M., Turner, W., Geller, G. N., et al. (2008). Toward a global biodiversity observing system. Science, 321(5892), 1044–1045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sedano, F., Gong, P., & Ferrao, M. (2005). Land cover assessment with MODIS imagery in southern African Miombo ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4), 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach, B. J. (2001). Vegetation survey of Namibia. Journal of the Namibia Scientific Society, 49, 93–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach, B., Strohbach, M., Katuahuripa, J., & Mouton, H. (2004). A reconnaissance survey of the landscapes, soils and vegetation of the eastern communal areas (Otjiozondjupa and Omaheke Regions), Namibia (p. 119).

  • Thompson, M. (1996). A standard land-cover classification scheme for remote-sensing applications in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 92, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trodd, N. M., & Dougill, A. J. (1998). Monitoring vegetation dynamics in semi-arid African rangelands. Applied Geography, 18(4), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W. (2003). Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(6), 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenseil, H., & Samimi, C. (2007). Woody vegetation cover in Namibian savannahs: A modelling approach based on remote sensing. Erdkunde, 61(4), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Christian Hüttich & Stefan Dech

  2. Center for Geoinformation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Martin Herold

  3. National Botanical Research Institute of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia

    Ben J. Strohbach

  4. German Remote Sensing Data Center, German Aerospace Center, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany

    Stefan Dech

Authors
  1. Christian Hüttich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Herold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ben J. Strohbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Dech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Hüttich.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 337 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hüttich, C., Herold, M., Strohbach, B.J. et al. Integrating in-situ, Landsat, and MODIS data for mapping in Southern African savannas: experiences of LCCS-based land-cover mapping in the Kalahari in Namibia. Environ Monit Assess 176, 531–547 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1602-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1602-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation