A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities
Worldwide, decision-makers and nongovernment organizations are increasing their use of citizen volunteers to enhance their ability to monitor and manage natural resources, track species at risk, and conserve protected areas. We reviewed the last 10 years of relevant citizen science literature for areas of consensus, divergence, and knowledge gaps. Different community-based monitoring (CBM) activities and governance structures were examined and contrasted. Literature was examined for evidence of common benefits, challenges, and recommendations for successful citizen science. Two major gaps were identified: (1) a need to compare and contrast the success (and the situations that induce success) of CBM programs which present sound evidence of citizen scientists influencing positive environmental changes in the local ecosystems they monitor and (2) more case studies showing use of CBM data by decision-makers or the barriers to linkages and how these might be overcome. If new research focuses on these gaps, and on the differences of opinions that exist, we will have a much better understanding of the social, economic, and ecological benefits of citizen science.
KeywordsCitizen science Community-based monitoring Social capital Environmental democratization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Audubon (2008). The 109th Christmas bird count. Retrieved from: http://www.audubon.org/Bird/cbc/ on September 10th, 2008.
- Bucket Brigade (2006). Bucket brigade introduction. Retrieved from: http://www.gcmonitor.org/article.php?list=type&type=9 on September 15th, 2008
- Conrad, C. (2006). Towards meaningful community-based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: Where we are versus where we would like to be. Environments, 34, 25–36.Google Scholar
- Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., & Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12, 11–21.Google Scholar
- Cornell Lab of Ornithology (2008). Citizen Science. Retrieved from: http://www.birds.cornell.edu/LabPrograms/CitSci/ on September 10th, 2008.
- Ely, E. (2008a). Getting volunteer data into science journals. The Volunteer Monitor, 19, 8–11.Google Scholar
- Ely, E. (2008b). Volunteer monitoring and the democratization of science. The Volunteer Monitor, 19, 1–5.Google Scholar
- Florida Lakewatch (2008). Florida LAKEWATCH: Florida’s volunteer water quality monitoring program, Retrieved from: http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu/ on September 15th, 2008.
- Fore, L. S., Paulsen, K., & O’Laughlin, K. (2001). Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biology, 46, 109–123.Google Scholar
- Gadgil, M. (2006). Science and the right to information. Economic and Political Weekly, 13, 1895–1902.Google Scholar
- Global Community Monitor. (2006). Retrieved from www.gcmonitor.org on September 15th, 2008.
- Jones, F. C., Baird, D., Bowman, M., Cameron, G., Craig, B., Cutler, B., et al. (2006). Performance of Ontario’s Benthos Biomonitoring Network: Impacts on participants’ social capital, environmental action and problem-solving ability. Environments, 34, 37–53.Google Scholar
- Karney, R. (2009). Poor water quality? Not in my backyard! The effectiveness of neighbourhood pond associations in the protections and improvement of shellfish growing waters on Martha’s Vineyard. Martha’s Vineyard Shellfish Group, Inc. Accessed from www.mvshellfishgroup.org/article.php?id=46 on June 26, 2009.
- Lakshminarayanan, S. (2007). Using citizens to do science versus citizens as scientists. Ecology and Society, 12, Response 2, 1.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, A. (2005). “Reluctant citizens? The disjuncture between participatory biological monitoring and environmental governance.” Paper presented at the International Sociology Association Conference “Environment, knowledge and democracy” Marseilles, France, p. 6, 7 July 2005.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, A., & Turnhout, E. (2005). “Personal meaning in the public space: The bureaucratization of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Royal Geographical Society, August 31, 2005.Google Scholar
- Lynam, T., Jong, W., Sheil, D., Kusumanto, T., & Evans, K. (2007). A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society, 12, 5–18.Google Scholar
- Milne, R., Rosolen, S., Whitelaw, G., & Bennett, L. (2006). Multi-party monitoring in Ontario: Challenges and emerging solutions. Environments, 34, 11–23.Google Scholar
- Nagendra, H., Karmacharya, M., & Karna, B. (2005). Evaluating forest management in Nepal: Views across space and time. Ecology and Society, 10, 24–40.Google Scholar
- Oberhauser, K. S., & Solensky, M. J. (2004). The Monarch butterfly: Biology and conservation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Pollock, R. M., Whitelaw, G. S., & Atkinson, D. K. (2003). Linking community based ecosystem monitoring to local decision making and policy development on sustainability: Voluntary Sector Initiative (VSI) Project: Final Report. Canadian Nature Federation: Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network Coordinating Office, Environment Canada. Accessed on September 15th, 2008: The Canadian Community Monitoring Network website: http://www.ccmn.ca/english/library/vsi/intro.html.
- Pretty, J., Guijt, I., Thompson, J., & Scoones, I. (1995). Participatory learning and action: A trainer’s guide (p. 267). IIED Participatory Methodology Series, London.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, K. V., Hames, R. S., Rohrbaugh, R. W. Jr, Barker Swarthout, S. E., Lowe, J. D., & Dhondt, A. A. (2003). A land manager’s guide to improving habitat for forest thrushes. Ithaca: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, K. V., Rohrbaugh, R. W. Jr, Barker, S. E., Lowe, J. D., Hames, R. S., & Dhondt, A. A. (1999). A land manager’s guide to improving habitat for scarlet tanagers and other forest-interior birds. Ithaca: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology.Google Scholar
- Sharpe, A., & Conrad, C. (2006). Community based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: Challenges and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 13, 305–409.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, B., Wood, C., Iliff, M., Bonney, R., Fink, D., & Kelling, S. (2009). eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142, 2282–2292.Google Scholar
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2009). Introducing the Aarhus Convention. Accessed on June 21, 2009 at http://www.unece.org/env/pp/.