Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 175, Issue 1–4, pp 661–676 | Cite as

Predicting potentially plant-available lead in contaminated residential sites

  • Syam S. Andra
  • Dibyendu Sarkar
  • Sumathi K. M. Saminathan
  • Rupali Datta


Lead (Pb)-based paints pose a serious health problem to people living in residential settings constructed prior to 1978. Children are at a greater risk to Pb exposure resulting from hand-to-mouth activity in Pb-contaminated residential soils. For soil Pb, the most environmentally friendly, potentially cheap, and visually unobtrusive in situ technology is phytoremediation. However, the limiting factor in a successful phytoremediation strategy is the availability of Pb for plant uptake. The purpose of this study was to establish a relationship between soil properties and the plant-available/exchangeable Pb fraction in the selected Pb-based paint-contaminated residential sites. We selected 20 such sites from two different locations (San Antonio, Texas and Baltimore, Maryland) with varying soil properties and total soil Pb concentrations ranging between 256 and 4,182 mg kg−1. Despite higher Pb levels in these soils that exceeds US EPA permissible limit of 400 mg kg − 1, it is known that the plant-available Pb pools are significantly lower because of their sorption to soil components such as organic matter, Fe–Mn oxides, and clays, and their precipitation in the form of carbonates, hydroxides, and phosphates. Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering showed that the potentially plant-available Pb fraction is controlled by soil pH in the case of acidic Baltimore soils, while soil organic matter plays a major role in alkaline San Antonio soils. Statistical models developed suggest that Pb is likely to be more available for plant uptake in Baltimore soils and a chelant-assisted phytoextraction strategy will be potentially necessary for San Antonio soils in mobilizing Pb from complexed pool to the plant-available pool. A thorough knowledge of site-specific factors is therefore essential in developing a suitable and successful phytoremediation model.


Cluster analysis Correlation Lead-based paint Phytoremediation Principal components analysis Regression Soil properties Soluble lead fraction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdu, N. (2006). Soil-phosphorus extraction methodologies: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 1, 159–161.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. H., & Basta, N. T. (2009). Application of ridge regression to quantify marginal effects of collinear soil properties on phytoaccumulation of arsenic, cadmium, lead and zinc. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28, 619–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andra, S. S., Sarkar, D., Datta, R., & Saminathan, S. (2006). Lead in soils in paint contaminated residential sites at San Antonio, Texas, and Baltimore, Maryland. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 77, 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andra, S. S., Datta, R., Sarkar, D., Saminathan, S. K. M., Mullens, C. P., & Bach, S. B. H. (2009). Analysis of phytochelatin complexes in the lead tolerant vetiver grass [Vetiveria zizanioides (L.)] using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Environmental Pollution, 157, 2173–2183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao, X., Ma, L. Q., Chen, M., Hardison, D. W., & Harris, W. G. (2003). Weathering of lead bullets and their environmental effects at outdoor shooting ranges. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 526–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao, X., Ma, L. Q., Chen, M., Singh, S. P., & Harris, W. G. (2002). Impacts of phosphate amendments on lead biogeochemistry at a contaminated site. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 5296–5304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlatchka, R., & Cambier, P. (2000). Influence of reducing conditions on solubility of trace metals in contaminated soils. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 118, 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Datta, R., & Sarkar, D. (2004). Effective integration of soil chemistry and plant molecular biology in phytoremediation of metals: An overview. Environmental Geosciences, 11(2), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, B. E. (1997). Heavy metal contaminated soils in an old industrial area of Wales, Great Britain: Source identification through statistical data interpretation. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 94, 85–98.Google Scholar
  10. Dayton, E. A., Basta, N. T., Payton, M. E., Bradham, K. D., Schroder, J. L., & Lanno, R. P. (2006). Evaluating the contribution of soil properties to modifying lead phytoavailability and phytotoxicity. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25, 719–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang, J. W., & Cunningham, S. D. (1996). Lead phytoextraction: Species variation in lead uptake and translocation. New Phytologist, 134, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, J. W., Chen, J. J., Berti, W. R., & Cunningham, S. D. (1997). Phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soils: Role of synthetic chelates in lead phytoextraction. Environmental Science and Technology, 31, 800–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Impellitteri, C. A., Lu, Y. F., Saxe, J. K., Allen, H. E., & Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. (2002). Correlation of the partitioning of dissolved organic matter fractions with the desorption of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from 18 Dutch soils. Environment International, 28, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobs, D. E., Clickner, R. P., Zhou, J. Y., Viet, S. M., Marker, D. A., Rogers, J. W., et al. (2002). The prevalence of lead-based paint hazards in U.S. housing. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, A599–A606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jin, C. W., Zheng, S. J., He, Y. F., DiZhou, G., & Zhou, Z. X. (2005). Lead contamination in tea garden soils and factors affecting its bioavailability. Chemosphere, 59(8), 1151–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ji-tao, S., Bao-guo, T., Hong-tao, W., Basta, N., Schroder, J., & Casillas, M. (2006). Assessing availability, phytotoxicity and bioaccumulation of lead to rye grass and millet based on 0.1 mol/L Ca(NO3)2 extraction. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18, 958–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, J. X., Yang, X. E., He, Z. L., Jilani, G., Sun, C. Y., & Chen, S. M. (2007). Fractionation of lead in paddy soils and its bioavailability to rice plants. Geoderma, 141, 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martínez, C. E., & Motto, H. L. (2000). Solubility of lead, zinc and copper added to mineral soils. Environmental Pollution, 107, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mehlich, A. (1984). Mehlich-3 soil test extractant—a modification of Mehlich-2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 15, 1409–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miao, S. Y., DeLaune, R. D., & Jugsujinda, A. (2006). Influence of sediment redox conditions on release/solubility of metals and nutrients in a Louisiana Mississippi River deltaic plain freshwater lake. Science of the Total Environment, 371, 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Obrador, A., Alvarez, J. M., Lopez-Valdivia, L. M., Gonzalez, D., & Rico, N. M. I. (2007). Relationships of soil properties with Mn and Zn distribution in acidic soils and their uptake by a barley crop. Geoderma, 137, 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ. 939. Washington: USDA.Google Scholar
  23. Plassard, F., Winiarski, T., & Petit-Ramel, M. (2000). Retention and distribution of three heavy metals in a carbonated soil: Comparison between batch and unsaturated column studies. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 42, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rico, M. I., Alvarez, J. M., Lopez-Valdivia, L. M., Novillo, J., & Obrador, A. (2009). Manganese and zinc in acidic agricultural soils from central Spain: Distribution and phytoavailability prediction with chemical extraction tests. Soil Science, 174, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rioux, P. (2001). Baltimore lead paint abatement study faulted by court. International Real Estate Digest. Retrieved September 10, 2001 from http://www.IRED.com.
  26. Sarkar, D., Andra, S. S., Saminathan, S. K. M., & Datta, R. (2008). Chelant-aided enhancement of lead mobilization in residential soils. Environmental Pollution, 156, 1139–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sauvé, S., McBride, M., & Hendershot, W. (1998). Soil solution speciation of lead(II): Effects of organic matter and pH. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62(3), 618–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sparks, D. (1996). Method of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical methods. Madison: SSSA Publications.Google Scholar
  29. U.S. Census (2000). United States Census 2000: Census 2000 data for the State of Texas. Retrieved January 10, 2005 from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html, last updated 15 April 2010.
  30. USEPA (1996). Test methods for evaluating solid waste, SW 846 (3rd ed.). Washington: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.Google Scholar
  31. USEPA (2001). U.S. EPA, Lead: Identification of dangerous levels of lead; Final rule. 40CFR745. Federal Register, 66, 6763–6765.Google Scholar
  32. Watanabe, F. S., & Olsen, S. R. (1965). Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Proceedings—Soil Science Society of America, 29, 677–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang, Q. W., Shu, W. S., Qiu, J. W., Wang, H. B., & Lan, C. Y. (2004). Lead in paddy soils and rice plants and its potential health risk around Lechang lead/zinc mine, Guangdong, China. Environment International, 30, 883–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syam S. Andra
    • 1
  • Dibyendu Sarkar
    • 2
  • Sumathi K. M. Saminathan
    • 1
  • Rupali Datta
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental Geochemistry LaboratoryUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Environmental StudiesMontclair State UniversityMontclairUSA
  3. 3.Biological SciencesMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations