Skip to main content

Assessment of the statistical significance of seasonal groundwater quality change in a karstic aquifer system near Izmir-Turkey

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to statistically evaluate the significance of seasonal groundwater quality change and to provide an assessment on the spatial distribution of specific groundwater quality parameters. The studied area was the Mount Nif karstic aquifer system located in the southeast of the city of Izmir. Groundwater samples were collected at 57 sampling points in the rainy winter and dry summer seasons. Groundwater quality indicators of interest were electrical conductivity (EC), nitrate, chloride, sulfate, sodium, some heavy metals, and arsenic. Maps showing the spatial distributions and temporal changes of these parameters were created to further interpret spatial patterns and seasonal changes in groundwater quality. Furthermore, statistical tests were conducted to confirm whether the seasonal changes for each quality parameter were statistically significant. It was evident from the statistical tests that the seasonal changes in most groundwater quality parameters were statistically not significant. However, the increase in EC values and aluminum concentrations from winter to summer was found to be significant. Furthermore, a negative correlation between sampling elevation and groundwater quality was found. It was shown that with simple statistical testing, important conclusions can be drawn from limited monitoring data. It was concluded that less groundwater recharge in the dry period of the year does not always imply higher concentrations for all groundwater quality parameters because water circulation times, lithology, quality and extent of recharge, and land use patterns also play an important role on the alteration of groundwater quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • APHA (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater (21st ed.). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakalowicz, M. (2005). Karst groundwater: A challenge for new resources. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(1), 148–160.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2008). Spatial analysis of water quality trends in the Han River basin, South Korea. Water Research, 42(13), 3285–3304.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charideh, A., & Rahman, A. (2006). Environmental isotopic and hydrochemical study of water in the karst aquifer and submarine springs of the Syrian coast. Hydrogeology Journal, 15(2), 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DMI (2006). Annual meteorological report for Izmir. State Meteorological Service of Turkey.

  • DSI (2009). Flow monitoring stations online database. General Directorate of the Turkish State Hydraulic Works. http://www.dsi.gov.tr/agibilgi/agibilgi.aspx. Accessed 10 April 2009.

  • Ekemen, T., Kacaroglu, F., & Kavak, K. S. (2006). The study of karst hydrogeology of the Tecer Mountain, Sivas (in Turkish). Yerbilimleri, 27(2), 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enwright, N., & Hudak, P. (2009). Spatial distribution of nitrate and related factors in the high plains aquifer, Texas. Environmental Geology, 58, 1541–1548.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2003). National primary and secondary drinking water standards. EPA 816-F-03-016. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.

  • Gunay, G. (2006). Hydrology and hydrogeology of Sakaryabasi Karstic springs, Cifteler, Turkey. Environmental Geology, 51(2), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautman, D. P., & Munch, D. J. (1997) Method 300.1—Determination of inorganic anions in drinking water by ion chromatography. National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Helsel, D. R., & Hirsch, R. M. (2002). Statistical methods in water resources. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaçaroğlu, F. (1999). Review of groundwater pollution and protection in karst areas. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 113(1–4), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannel, P. R., Lee, S., & Lee, Y.-S. (2008). Assessment of spatial–temporal patterns of surface and ground water qualities and factors influencing management strategy of groundwater system in an urban river corridor of Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(4), 595–604.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoH (2005). Regulation concerning water intended for human consumption. Ankara, Republic of Turkey: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moratalla, A., Gómez-Alday, J., De las Heras, J., Sanz, D., & Castaño, S. (2008). Nitrate in the water-supply wells in the Mancha Oriental Hydrogeological System (SE Spain). Water Resources Management, 23, 1621–1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, C., Elci, A., Gunduz, O., & Erdogan, B. (2008). Hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical characterization of a karstic mountain region. Environmental Geology, 52(2), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TURKSTAT (2008). Databank for population, housing and demography. Turkish Statistics Institution. http://www.tuik.gov.tr. Accessed 28 January 2009.

  • Vijith, H., & Satheesh, R. (2007). Geographical information system based assessment of spatiotemporal characteristics of groundwater quality of upland sub-watersheds of Meenachil River, parts of Western Ghats, Kottayam District, Kerala, India. Environmental Geology, 53(1), 1–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alper Elçi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elçi, A., Polat, R. Assessment of the statistical significance of seasonal groundwater quality change in a karstic aquifer system near Izmir-Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 172, 445–462 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1346-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1346-2

Keywords

  • GIS
  • Groundwater
  • Nitrate
  • Paired t test
  • Spatial assessment
  • Wilcoxon signed rank test