Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 172, Issue 1–4, pp 145–156 | Cite as

Application of network method as a tool for integrating biodiversity values in Environmental Impact Assessment

Article

Abstract

Highway construction or expansion projects are among major activities of economic development especially in developing countries. However, road development consistently can lead to major damages to the environment, including habitat fragmentation and ecological instabilities and a considerable threat to fauna and flora. At this point, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in road developments is needed to address and evaluate the ecological issues in decision-making. The object of this study is to strengthen the consideration of ecological issues, i.e., biodiversity in the existing EIA tools. This paper regards a network method as a means to make informed planning decisions by the lessons from a case study. The results indicate that network method is well suited to be applied in ecological impacts assessment. However, some limitations such as complexity and time consumed make casual networks unpopular. Also, impact of traffic noise on acoustic communication (wildlife and human) was performed. It has been shown that sound level for human is much higher than admissible standards. Finally, the study expresses some mitigation measures to improve the acquisition for environmental impact assessment process.

Keywords

Network method Biodiversity Noise Environmental Impact Assessment Infrastructure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnass, A. N. (1985). The effects of highway traffic noise on the phonotactic and associated reproductive behavior of selected anurans. Nashville: Vanderbilt Univ.Google Scholar
  2. Barrow, C. J. (1997). Environmental and social impact assessment—An introduction. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  3. Barthwal, R. R. (2002). Environmental impact assessment. New Delhi: New Age.Google Scholar
  4. Bialek, W., & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R. (2005). Features and dimensions: Motion estimation in fly vision. arXiv:q-bio.NC/0505003.
  5. Byron, H. (2000). Biodiversity and environmental impact assessment: A good practice guide for road schemes. The RSPB, WWFUK, English Nature and Wildlife Trusts, Sandy, Beds.Google Scholar
  6. Canter, L. W. (1996). Environmental impact assessment. New York: Mc Graw–Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Darvish Sefat, A. A. (2007). Atlas of protected areas of Iran. Tehran: Tehran University Publication, ISBN: 964039114.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (1999). Guideline for the assessment of indirect and cumulative impacts as well as impact interactions. Luxemborg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  9. Fahrig, L. (1997). Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 603–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forman, R. T. T. (2003). Road ecology: Science and solutions. Washington: Island.Google Scholar
  11. Frid, A., & Dill, L. (2002). Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conservation Ecology, 6, 11.Google Scholar
  12. Gilliland, M. W., & Risser, P. G. (1977). The use of systems diagrams for environmental impact assessment. Ecological Modeling, 3, 188–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geneletti, D. (2006). Some common shortcomings in the treatment of impacts of linear infrastructures on natural habitat. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 257–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gontier, M., Balfors, B., & Mörtberg, U. (2006). Biodiversity in environmental assessment-current practice and tools for prediction. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gontier, M. (2007). Scale issues in the assessment of ecological impacts using a GIS-based habitat model — A case study for the Stockholm region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 440–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstetter, P., & Müller-Wenk, R. (2005). Monetization of health damages from road noise with implications for monetizing health impacts in life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 1235–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lavine, M. J. (1978). Bridging the gap between economic and environmental concerns in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Review 2. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. Lengagne, T. (2008). Traffic noise affects communication behavior in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea. Biological Conservation, 141, 2023–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lohani, B., Evans, J. W., Ludwig, H., Everitt, R. R., Carpenter, R. A., & Tu, S. L. (1997). Environmental Impact Assessment for developing countries in Asia 1. Overview, 356. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Environment_Impact/chap3.pdf.
  20. Luckenbach, R. A., & Bury, R. B. (1983). Effects of off-road vehicles on the biota of Algodones Dunes, Imperial County, California. Journal of Applied Ecology, 20, 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monavai, S. M. (2001). A guide to environmental impact assessment of highways. Joint publication of Iran DOE and UNDP; 40.Google Scholar
  22. Mörtberg, U. M., Balfors, B., & Knol, W. C. (2007). Landscape ecological assessment: A tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 82, 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niven, J. E., Vahasoyrinki, M., Kauranen, M., Hardie, R. C., Juusola, M., & Weckstrom, M. (2003). The contribution of Shaker Kϸ channels to the information capacity of Drosophila photoreceptors. Nature, 421, 630–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Opdam, P., & Wiens, J. A. (2002). Fragmentation, habitat loss and landscape management. In K. Norris & D. J. Pain (Eds.), Conserving bird biodiversity general principles and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  25. Parkhurst, G., & Richardson, J. (2002). Modal integration of bus and car in UK local transport policy: The case for strategic environmental assessment. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pearce, D. (1993). Blueprint 3: Measuring sustainable development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  27. Perdicoulis, A., & Glasson, J. (2006). Causal networks in EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 553–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Slootweg, R., & Kolhoff, A. (2003). A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 657–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Söderman, T. (2005). Treatment of biodiversity issues in Finnish environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal, 22(2), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Söderman, T. (2006). Treatment of biodiversity issues in impact assessment of electricity power transmission lines: A Finnish case review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sorensen, J. (1971). A framework for identification and control of resource degradation and conflict in the multiple use of the coastal zone. Berkeley: University of California, Department of landscape Architecture.Google Scholar
  33. Sorensen, J. (1972). Some procedures and programs for environmental impact assessment. In R. B. Ditton & T. L. Goodale (Eds.), Environmental impact analysis: Philosophy and methods. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  34. Sornborger, A. T., & Adams, M. R. (2008). The evolution of fidelity in sensory systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 253, 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shopley, J. B., & Fuggle, R. F. (1984). A comprehensive review of current environmental impact assessment methods and techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 18, 25–47.Google Scholar
  36. Trombulak, S. C., & Frissell, C. A. (2000). Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology, 14(1), 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Verbooma, J., Alkemadeb, R., Klijna, J., Metzgerc, M. J., & Reijnena, R. (2007). Combining biodiversity modeling with political and economic development scenarios for 25 EU countries. Ecological Indicators, 62, 267–276.Google Scholar
  38. Wegner, A., Moore, S. A., & Bailey, J. (2005). Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: Practitioner perceptions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Graduate School of the Environment and Energy, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations