Abstract
The Cauvery river basin of South India has a large phyto-floristic wealth, rightfully enough to constitute a separate phyto-geographic unit. Increase in the anthropogenic pressures within the river basin and surrounding landscapes have persistently stressed the riparian ecosystem structure adversely, besides altering its composition. The objective of this study was to examine the present status of riparian vegetation along the Cauvery river basin, in response to anthropogenic pressures. For vegetation analysis, the riparian forest coming in the middle stretch of Cauvery river was categorized into two zones, viz., forest zone covering ~54 km stretch and agroecosystem zone covering ~80 km stretch. In each zone, tree species were quantified using transects at 8-km interval. Overall tree species accounting for both forest and agroecosystem were recorded and compared. The results indicate that the mean density and basal area of trees per plot were higher in the forest zone than agroecosystem zone. The Shannon–Weiner diversity of forest zone is 4.6, which is higher than agroecosystem. In addition, species composition indicated a relatively low or poor similarity between the two zones. The vegetation density and site disturbance scores for all the study sites reveals that sand mining and grazing areas have exerted negative impact on riparian forest. The results of the present study clearly brought out the need for preparing and implementing site-specific conservation plans for riparian ecosystem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amitha Bachan, K. H. (2003). Riparian vegetation along the middle and lower zones of the Chalakkudy River. Iringalakkuda, Kerala, India: Limnological Association of Kerala.
Arizmendi, M. C., Davila, P., Estrada, A., Figueroa, E., et al. (2008). Riparian mesquite bushes are important for bird conservation in tropical arid Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments, 72, 1146–1163. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.12.017.
Bavins, M., Couchman, D., & Beumer, J. (2000). Fisheries guides for fish habitat buffer zones. Department of Primary Industries, Queensland, Fish Habitat Guide FHG 003, p.s 11
Cincotta, R. P., & Engelman, R. (2000). Nature’s place: Human population and the future of biological diversity (p. 80). Washington: Population Action International.
Cooper, J. R., Gilliam, J. W., Daniels, R. B., & Robarge, W. P. (1987). Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 51, 416–420.
Curtis, J. T., & McIntosh, R. P. (1951). An upland forest continuum in the prairie forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology, 32, 476–496
Dudgeon, D. (1992). Endangered ecosystems: A review of the conservation status of tropical Asian rivers. Hydrobiologia, 248, 167–191
Dudgeon, D. (2000). The ecology of tropical Asian rivers and streams in relation to biodiversity conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 239–263.
Edward, P. G., Hucklebridge, K., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., Pamela, L. N., & Pitt, J. (2008). Reconciling environmental and flood control goals on an Arid-Zone River: Case study of the limitrophe region of the Lower Colorado River in the United States and Mexico. Environmental Management, 41, 322–335.
Francisca, C. A., & Maria, T. F. (2005). Human disturbed landscapes: Effects on composition and integrity of riparian woody vegetation in the Tagus river basin, Portugal. Environmental Conservation, 32(1), 30–41.
Gamble, J. S. (1967). Flora of the presidency of Madras (Vols. 1–3). Calcutta: Botanical Survey of India.
Gopal, B. (1988). Wetlands: Management and conservation in India. Water Quality Bulletin, 13, 3–6.
Gustav, N., Kvist, L. P., Vanclay, J. K., Christensen, H., Freitas, L., & Ruiz, J. (2001). Structure and floristic composition of flood plain forests in the Peruvian Amazon I. Overstorey. Forest Ecology and Management, 150, 27–57.
Hinojosa-Huerta, O. (2006). Birds, water, and salt cedar: Strategies for riparian restoration in the Colorado river delta. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Jayaram, K. C. (2000). Kaveri riverine system: An environmental study (pp. 1–6). Chennai: The Madras Science Foundation.
Johnsingh, A. J. T., & Joshua, J. (1989). The threatened gallery forest of the River Tambiraparani, Mundanthurai Wildlife Sanctuary, South India. Biological Conservation, 47, 273–280.
Kausalya, S. (2005). Otters in River Cauvery, Karnataka. New Delhi: Wildlife trust of India.
Keshavamurthy, K. R., & Yoganarasimhan, S. N. (1990). Flora of Coorg (1st ed.). New Delhi: Vimsat.
Madhav, G. (2004). Karnataka state of environment report and action plan biodiversity sector. ENVIS Technical Report No. 16, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Michael, L. S., Pamela, L. N., Edward, P. G., Cory, L. J., Joseph, A. E. et al. (2009). Assessing the extent and diversity of riparian ecosystems in Sonora, Mexico: Toward refining conservation strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 247–269.
Naiman, R. J., & Decamps, H. (1997). The ecology of the interfaces; riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 621–658.
Nilsson, C., & Jansson, R. (1995). Floristic differences between riparian corridors of regulated and free-flowing boreal rivers. Regulated Rivers Research and Management, 11, 55–66.
NRC (National Research Council) (2002). Riparian areas: Functions and strategies for management. Water science and technology board. Washington: National Academy Press.
Pamela, L. N., Edward, P. G., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., Francisco, Z., & Keith, H. (2008). Riparian vegetation dynamics and evapotranspiration for the Riparian Corridor in the delta of the Colorado River, Mexico: Implications for conservation and management. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 864–874.
Saldhanha, C. F. (1976). Flora of Hassan District (1st ed.). New Delhi: Amerind.
Shannon, C. E., & Weiner, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of communication. Urbane: University of lllinois Press.
Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.
Smakhtin, V., Arunachalam, M., Behera, S., Chatterjee, A., Das, S., Gautam, P., et al. (2006). Developing the procedures for assessment of ecological value and condition of Indian Rivers in the context of Environmental Water Demand (pp. 9–10, 13). Retrieved 8 March 2008 from http://nrlp.iwmi.org/pdocs/DReports/phase_01/18.
Sorensen, T. (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter/Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 5(4),1–34.
Tabacchi, E., David, L. C., Hauer, R., Pinay, G., Marie, A. et al. (1998). Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape. Fresh Water Biology, 40(3), 497–516
Villasenor-Gomez, J. F. (2006). Habitat use and the effects of disturbance on wintering birds using riparian habitats in Sonora, Mexico. Dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sunil, C., Somashekar, R.K. & Nagaraja, B.C. Riparian vegetation assessment of Cauvery River Basin of South India. Environ Monit Assess 170, 545–553 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1256-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1256-3