Abstract
Diatoms and macroinvertebrates have been extensively used as water quality indicators in Europe for the last two decades. In Portugal, the use of biological indicators to assess water quality in rivers has increased greatly. The aim of this work was to assess the water quality and ecological status of the Ul River in order to evaluate its ability for the establishment of a fluvial beach, using periphytic diatoms and macroinvertebrates as indicators. Four sites were selected along the Ul River. At each site, biological, physical, and chemical parameters were investigated. Epilithic diatoms and macroinvertebrates were sampled. The Specific Polluosensitivity Index and the Biological Diatom Index were applied to diatom data, while for macroinvertebrates, the Iberian Biological Monitoring Working Party (IBMWP) was used. According to the results obtained, it was possible to conclude that up to now, this river does not possess the ideal conditions for the establishment of a fluvial beach. We concluded that epilithic diatoms and macroinvertebrates provided consistent information on water quality assessment and can be used as biological indicators of the water quality in Ul River.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alba-Tercedor, J. (1996). Macroinvertebrados acuaticos y calidad de las aguas de los rios (pp. 203–213). Almería, II: IV SIAGA.
Alba-Tercedor, J., & Sánchez-Ortega, A. (1988). Un método rápido y simple para evaluar la calidad biológica de las aguas corrientes basado en el de Hellawell (1978). Limnetica, 4, 51–56.
Almeida, S. F. P. (1998). Use of freshwater diatoms for water quality evaluation (524 pp.). Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro.
Almeida, S. F. P., & Gil, M. C. P. (2001). Ecology of freshwater diatoms from the central region of Portugal. Cryptogamie Algologie, 22, 109–126.
APHA (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (19th ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association.
Castela, J., et al. (2008). Evaluation of stream ecological integrity using litter decomposition and benthic invertebrates. Environmental Pollution, 153, 440–449.
Coste, M. (1986). Les méthodes microfloristiques d’evaluation de la qualité des eaux (25 pp + annexe). Bordeaux: Cemagref.
Descy, J. P., & Coste, M. (1991). A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie, 24, 2112–2116.
DIN EN ISO 11369:1997 (1997). Water quality—Determination of selected plant treatment agents—Method using high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection after solid–liquid extraction. ISO 11369:1997.
EC Parliament and Council (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, 327, 1–72.
Eloranta, P., & Soininen, J. (2002). Ecological status of some Finnish rivers evaluated using benthic diatom communities. Journal of Applied Phycology, 14, 1–7.
Feio, M. J., et al. (2007). Diatoms and macroinvertebrates provide consistent and complementary information on environmental quality. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 168/3, 247–258.
Gomà, J., et al. (2004). Water quality evaluation in Catalonian Mediterranean rivers using epilithic diatoms as bioindicators. Vie Milieu, 54, 81–90.
Gomà, J., et al. (2005). Diatom communities and water quality assessment in Mountain Rivers of the upper Segre basin (La Cerdanya, Oriental Pyrenees). Hydrobiologia, 551, 209–225.
ISO 6340 (1995). Water quality. Detection of Salmonella species. Geneva: ISO
ISO 7899-2 (2000). Water quality. Detection and enumeration of intestinal enterococci in surface and waste water. Membrane filtration method. Geneva: ISO
ISO 9308-1 (2000). Water quality—Detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria—Part 1: Membrane filtration method. ISO 9308-1:2000 (German version EN ISO 9308-1:2000). Geneva: ISO
Kelly, M. G., & Whitton, B. A. (1995). The trophic diatom index: A new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology, 7, 433–444.
Kelly, M. G., et al. (1998). Recommendations for routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology, 10, 215–224.
Kilroy, C., et al. (2006). Benthic diatom communities in subalpine pools in New Zealand: relationships to environmental variables. Hydrobiologia, 561, 95–110.
Krammer, K., & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1986–1991). Bacillariophyceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, 2(1–4). Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
Kwandrans, J., et al. (1998). Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland. Journal of Applied Phycology, 10, 193–201.
Lecointe, C., et al. (1993). OMNIDIA, software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia, 269/270, 509–513.
Lenoir, A., & Coste, M. (1996). Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French National Water Board Network. In B. A. Whitton, & E. Rott (Eds.), Use of algae for monitoring rivers II (pp. 29–45). Innsbruck: Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck.
Nunes, M. L., et al. (2003). Assessment of water quality in the Caima and Mau river basins (Portugal) using geochemical and biological indices. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 149, 227–250.
Prygiel, J., & Coste, M. (1993).The assessment of water quality in the Artois-Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiologia, 269/270, 343–349.
Prygiel, J., & Coste, M. (2000). Guide Méthodologique pour la mise en œuvre de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées, France, NF T 90-354, 134 pp.
Prygiel, J., et al. (1996). A new practical diatom index for the assessment of water quality in monitoring networks. Revue des Sciences de l’Eau, 9, 97–113.
Round, F., et al. (1990). The diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera (p. 747). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silva, J. (1994). Circulação da água na Ria de Aveiro—Contribuição para o estudo da qualidade da água (153 pp.). Ph.D. thesis, University of Aveiro.
Sims, P. (Ed.) (1996). An atlas of British diatoms (601 pp.). Bristol: Biopress.
Smol, J. P., & Cumming, B. F. (2000). Tracking long-term changes in climate using algal indicators in lake sediments. Journal of Phycology, 36, 986–1011.
Soininen, J., & Könönen, K. (2004). Comparative study of monitoring South-Finnish rivers and streams using macroinvertebrates and benthic diatom community structure. Aquatic Ecology, 38, 63–75.
Sonneman, J. A., et al. (2001). Effects of urbanization on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria, Australia. II. Benthic diatom communities. Freshwater Biology, 46, 553–565.
Stoermer, E. F., & Smol, J. P. (Eds.) (1999). The diatoms: Application for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Triest, L., et al. (2001). Comparative monitoring of diatoms, macroinvertebrates and macrophytes in the Woluwe River (Brussels, Belgium). Aquatic Ecology, 35, 9–17.
Van Dam, H., et al. (1994). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 28, 117–133.
Walker, C., & Pan, Y. (2006). Using diatom assemblages to assess urban stream conditions. Hydrobiologia, 561, 179–189.
Whitton, B. A., et al. (Eds.) (1991). Use of algae for monitoring rivers (193 pp.). Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Botanik.
Whitton, B. A., & Rott, E. (Eds.) (1996). Use of algae for monitoring rivers II (196 pp.). Innsbruck: Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Botanik.
Winter, J., & Duthie, H. (2000). Stream epilithic, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms: Habitat fidelity and use in biomonitoring. Aquatic Ecology, 34, 345–353.
Zelinka, V., & Marvan, P. (1961). Zur Prazisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. Archive fur Hydrobiologia, 57, 389–407.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Resende, P.C., Resende, P., Pardal, M. et al. Use of biological indicators to assess water quality of the Ul River (Portugal). Environ Monit Assess 170, 535–544 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1255-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1255-4