Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of storm-based and annual-based indices of hydrologic variability: a case study in Fort Benning, Georgia

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The magnitude, frequency, duration, timing, and rate of change of hydrologic conditions regulate ecological processes in aquatic ecosystems. Conditions are typically characterized using annual-based hydrologic indices derived from daily and/or monthly stream flow data. In this study, we present an alternative approach to identify hydrologic indices based on storm hydrographs. Hydrologic indices derived from long-term daily flow data were compared to those from storm events for two headwater watersheds in Fort Benning, Georgia. Five hydrologic indices derived from daily flow data and storm events shared common features. Storm-based magnitude of mean peak discharge and mean response factor, frequency of bankfull discharge, rate of change in mean slopes of rising, and falling limb of the hydrograph were consistent with the results from long-term daily flow data. The annual flow increases and decreases were well matched by stormflow rising and falling. Both indicators showed one watershed having three times the response rates as compared to the other. Results suggested that select storm-based indices may be used as surrogates to the indices derived from long-term data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, D., & Newson, M. (2002). The use of indices of flow variability in assessing the hydrological and instream habitat impacts of upland afforestation and drainage. Journal of Hydrology, 268, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, S., Jacobs, J. M., Hatfield, K., & Prenger, J. (2006). Relationships between stream water chemistry and military land use in forested watersheds in Fort Benning, Georgia. Ecological Indicators, 6, 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, S., Hatfield, K., Jacobs, J. M., & Graham, W. D. (2007a). Relationships between military land use and storm-based indices of hydrologic variability. Ecological Indicators, 7, 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, S., Hatfield, K., Jacobs, J. M., Lowrance, R., & Williams, R. (2007b). Surface runoff contribution of nitrogen during storm events in a forested watershed. Biogeochemistry, 85, 253–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, B. J. F. (1990). Periphyton communities and their environments in New Zealand rivers. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24, 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, M. L., Bhat, S., & Jacobs, J. M. (2005). Characterization and modeling of throughfall temporal variability for forest communities in the southeastern U.S. Journal of Hydrology, 312, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., & Mays, L. M. (1988). Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, J., McCormick, P. V., & Neiderlehner, B. R. (1993). A proposed framework for developing indicators for ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia, 263, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, B., & Biggs, B. J. F. (1997). Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biology, 38, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, B., & Biggs, B. J. F. (2000). Flow indices for ecological studies in temperate streams: Groupings based on covariance. Journal of Hydrology, 237, 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K. (1974). Predictability, constancy, and contingency of periodic phenomena. Ecology, 55, 1148–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, R. J. (1978). Temporal variability patterns and the distributional patterns of stream fishes. Ecological Monographs, 48, 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, I. G., & Duncan, M. J. (1990). Flow variability in New Zealand rivers and its relationship to in-stream habitat and biota. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24, 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minckley, W. L., & Meffe, G. K. (1987). Differential selection by flooding in stream-fish communities of the arid American Southwest. In W. J. Matthews, & D. C. Heins (Eds.), Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D., Furse, M. T., Wright, J. F., & Armitage, P. D. (1987). The prediction of the macroinvertebrate fauna of unplotted running-water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshwater Biology, 17, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden, J. D., & Poff, N. L. (2003). Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing stream flow regimes. River Research and Application, 19, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, N. E., Froend, R. H., & Davies, P. M. (2001). Identifying the natural flow regime and the relationship with riparian vegetation for two contrasting western Australian rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 17, 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., & Allan, J. D. (1995). Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology, 76, 606–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. (1996). A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale-dependence in some hydrological descriptors. Freshwater Biology, 36, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., et al. (1997). The natural flow regime, a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience, 47, 769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., & Ward, J. V. (1989). Implications of stream flow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: A regional analysis of stream flow patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46, 1805–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., & Ward, J. V. (1991). Drift responses of benthic invertebrates to experimental hydrologic variation in a regulated stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48, 1926–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., & Braun, D. P. (1996). A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology, 10, 1163–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., & Braun, D. P. (1998). A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 14, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewardson, M. J., & Gippel, C. J. (2003). Incorporating flow variability into environmental flow regimes using the flow event method. River Research and Application, 19, 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R., Doledec, S., & Scarsbrook, M. R. (1997). Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: A test of habitat templet theory. Freshwater Biology, 37, 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. J., Agnew, M. D., & Petts, G. E. (2000). Flow variations and macroinvertebrate community responses in a small groundwater-dominated stream in south- east England. Hydrological Processes, 14, 3133–3147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirish Bhat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhat, S., Jacobs, J.M., Hatfield, K. et al. A comparison of storm-based and annual-based indices of hydrologic variability: a case study in Fort Benning, Georgia. Environ Monit Assess 167, 297–307 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1050-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1050-2

Keywords

Navigation