Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of remote sensing change detection techniques for assessing hurricane damage to forests

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compared performance of four change detection algorithms with six vegetation indices derived from pre- and post-Katrina Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery and a composite of the TM bands 4, 5, and 3 in order to select an optimal remote sensing technique for identifying forestlands disturbed by Hurricane Katrina. The algorithms included univariate image differencing (UID), selective principal component analysis (PCA), change vector analysis (CVA), and postclassification comparison (PCC). The indices consisted of near-infrared to red ratios, normalized difference vegetation index, Tasseled Cap index of greenness, brightness, and wetness (TCW), and soil-adjusted vegetation index. In addition to the satellite imagery, the “ground truth” data of forest damage were also collected through field investigation and interpretation of post-Katrina aerial photos. Disturbed forests were identified by classifying the composite and the continuous change imagery with the supervised classification method. Results showed that the change detection techniques exerted apparent influence on detection results with an overall accuracy varying between 51% and 86% and a kappa statistics ranging from 0.02 to 0.72. Detected areas of disturbed forestlands were noticeable in two groups: 180,832–264,617 and 85,861–124,205 ha. The landscape of disturbed forests also displayed two unique patterns, depending upon the area group. The PCC algorithm along with the composite image contributed the highest accuracy and lowest error (0.5%) in estimating areas of disturbed forestlands. Both UID and CVA performed similarly, but caution should be taken when using selective PCA in detecting hurricane disturbance to forests. Among the six indices, TCW outperformed the other indices owing to its maximum sensitivity to forest modification. This study suggested that compared with the detection algorithms, proper selection of vegetation indices was more critical for obtaining satisfactory results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. R., & Kupfer, J. A. (2001). Spectral response and spatial pattern of Fraser fir mortality and regeneration, Great Smoky Mountains, USA. Plant Ecology, 156, 59–74. doi:10.1023/A:1011948906647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala-Silva, T., & Twumasi, Y. A. (2004). Hurricane Georges and vegetation change in Puerto Rico using AVHRR satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 1629–1640. doi:10.1080/01431160310001595037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boose, E. R., Foster, D. R., & Fluet, M. (1994). Hurricane impacts to tropical and temperate forest landscapes. Ecological Monographs, 64, 369–400. doi:10.2307/2937142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruzzone, L., & Prieto, D. F. (2000). Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38, 1171–1182. doi:10.1109/36.843009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, P. S. (1996). Image-based atmospheric corrections revisited and improved. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, 1025–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, P. S., & Kwarteng, A. Y. (1989). Extracting spectral contrast in Landsat Thematic Mapper image data using selective principal component analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55, 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Gong, P., He, C. Y., Pu, R. L., & Shi, P. J. (2003). Land-use/land-cover change detection using improved change-vector analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. B., & Woodcock, C. E. (1996). An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 56, 66–77. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(95)00233-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, W. H., Mixon, W. D., & Wood, G. W. (2005). Maritime forest habitat dynamics on Bulls Island, Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge, SC, following Hurricane Hugo. Forest Ecology and Management, 212, 127–134. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppin, P. R., & Bauer, M. E. (1994). Processing of multitemporal Landsat TM imagery to optimize extraction of forest cover change features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32, 918–927. doi:10.1109/36.298020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., & Lambin, E. (2004). Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 1565–1596. doi:10.1080/0143116031000101675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. P., Laurin, R., & Cicone, R. C. (1986). Vegetation and soils information contained in transformed Thematic Mapper data. Proceedings of International Geosciences and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)’ 86 Symposium. ESA Publications Division, ESA SP-254, European Space Agency, Paris, 1465–70.

  • Foster, D. R., & Boose, E. R. (1992). Patterns of forest damage resulting from catastrophic wind in Central New-England, USA. Journal of Ecology, 80, 79–98. doi:10.2307/2261065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. E., Moskal, L. M., Lavigne, M. B., & Pugh, K. (2000). Interpretation and classification of partially harvested forest stands in the Fundy model forest using multitemporal Landsat TM digital data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, 318–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, T. (1990). An assessment of TM imagery for land-cover change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28, 681–684. doi:10.1109/TGRS.1990.572980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. J., Franklin, S. E., Woudsma, C., & Peterson, M. (2001). Forest structure classification in the North Columbia Mountains using the Landsat TM Tasseled Cap wetness component. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, J. L., Kanemasu, E. T., Asrar, G., Jackson, R. D., Pinter, P. J., Reginato, R. J., et al. (1985). Leaf-area estimates from spectral measurements over various planting dates of wheat. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6, 167–175. doi:10.1080/01431168508948432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarat-Mascle, S. L., Seltz, R., Hubert-Moy, L., Corgne, S., & Stach, N. (2006). Performance of change detection using remotely sensed data and evidential fusion: Comparison of three cases of application. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, 3515–3532. doi:10.1080/01431160500300255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horler, D. N. H., & Ahern, F. J. (1986). Forestry information-content of Thematic Mapper data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7, 405–428. doi:10.1080/01431168608954695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, P. J., & Wickware, G. M. (1981). Procedures for change detection using Landsat digital data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2, 277–291. doi:10.1080/01431168108948362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25, 295–309. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A., Justice, C., & Liu, H. (1994). Development of vegetation and soil indexes for MODIS-EOS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 49, 224–234. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)90018-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A. R., Liu, H., & van Leeuwen, W. J. D. (1997a). The use of vegetation indices in forested regions: Issues of linearity and saturation. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997. IGARSS ‘97. ‘Remote sensing—A scientific vision for sustainable development’, 1997 IEEE International, 1966–1968.

  • Huete, A. R., Liu, H. Q., Batchily, K., & van Leeuwen, W. (1997b). A comparison of vegetation indices global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 59, 440–451. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00112-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbert, D., Labbe, P., & Rousteau, A. (1996). Hurricane damage and forest structure in Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 12, 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, L., & Peters, A. J. (2007). Performance evaluation of spectral vegetation indices using a statistical sensitivity function. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106, 59–65. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. D., & Kasischke, E. S. (1998). Change vector analysis: A technique for the multispectral monitoring of land cover and condition. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 411–426. doi:10.1080/014311698216062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C. F. (1969). Derivation of leaf area index from quality of light on the forest floor. Ecology, 50, 663–666. doi:10.2307/1936256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim, B. D., Faiers, G. E., Muller, R. A., Grymes, J. M., & Rohli, R. V. (1995). Long-term trends of precipitation and runoff in Louisiana, USA. International Journal of Climatology, 15, 531–541. doi:10.1002/joc.3370150505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwarteng, A. Y., & Chavez, P. S. (1998). Change detection study of Kuwait City and environs using multi-temporal Landsat Thematic Mapper data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 1651–1662. doi:10.1080/014311698215162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leininger, T. D., Wilson, A. D., & Lester, D. G. (1997). Hurricane Andrew damage in relation to wood decay fungi and insects in bottomland hardwoods of the Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research, 13, 1290–1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondizio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 2365–2407. doi:10.1080/0143116031000139863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, J. G., Yuan, D., Lunetta, R. S., & Elvidge, C. D. (1998). A change detection experiment using vegetation indices. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64, 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nackaerts, K., Vaesen, K., Muys, B., & Coppin, P. (2005). Comparative performance of a modified change vector analysis in forest change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, 839–852. doi:10.1080/0143116032000160462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peierls, B. L., Christian, R. R., & Paerl, H. W. (2003). Water quality and phytoplankton as indicators of hurricane impacts on a large estuarine ecosystem. Estuaries, 26, 1329–1343. doi:10.1007/BF02803635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Purevdorj, T., Tateishi, R., Ishiyama, T., & Honda, Y. (1998). Relationships between percent vegetation cover and vegetation indices. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 3519–3535. doi:10.1080/014311698213795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, E. W., Chappell, D. K., & Baldwin, D. G. (1997). AVHRR imagery used to identify hurricane damage in a forested wetland of Louisiana. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, E. W., Hodgson, M. E., Sapkota, S. K., & Nelson, G. A. (2001). Forest impact estimated with NOAA AVHRR and Landsat TM data related to an empirical hurricane wind-field distribution. Remote Sensing of Environment, 77, 279–292. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00217-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridd, M. K., & Liu, J. J. (1998). A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 63, 95–100. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00112-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. W., Hass, R. H., Schell, J.A., & Deering, D. W. (1973). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In Proceedings of the Third ERTS Symposium (pp. 309–317). Washington, DC: NASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., Seto, K. C., Lenney, M. P., & Macomber, S. A. (2001). Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment, 75, 230–244. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00169-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucuncuoglu, E., Arli, O., & Eronat, A. H. (2006). Evaluating the impact of coastal land uses on water-clarity conditions from Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery: Candarli Bay, Aegean Sea. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, 3627–3643. doi:10.1080/01431160500500326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2002). Environmental atlas of the Lake Pontchartrain basin. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/of02-206/env-overview/water-quality.html. Accessed 6 September 2006.

  • Van Bloem, S. J., Murphy, P. G., Lugo, A. E., Ostertag, R., Costa, M. R., Bernard, I. R., et al. (2005). The influence of hurricane winds on Caribbean dry forest structure and nutrient pools. Biotropica, 37, 571–583. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00074.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J., & Granzow DeLaCerda, I. (2004). Height dynamics of the thinning canopy of a tropical rain forest: 14 years of succession in a post-hurricane forest in Nicaragua. Forest Ecology and Management, 199, 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Xu, Y. J. (2008). Hurricane Katrina-induced forest damage in relation to ecological factors at landscape scale. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0500-6.

  • Wang, H., & Hall, C. A. S. (2004). Modeling the effects of Hurricane Hugo on spatial and temporal variation in primary productivity and soil carbon and nitrogen in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Plant and Soil, 263, 69–84. doi:10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047719.44971.dd.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wear, D. N., & Greis, J. G. (2002). Southern forest resource assessment—Summary report. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-54.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University, 317A, RNR Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA

    Fugui Wang & Y. Jun Xu

Authors
  1. Fugui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Jun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fugui Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, F., Xu, Y.J. Comparison of remote sensing change detection techniques for assessing hurricane damage to forests. Environ Monit Assess 162, 311–326 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0798-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0798-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation