Skip to main content
Log in

The response of nematode assemblages to intensive mussel farming in coastal sediments (Southern Brazil)

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of mussel farms on the benthic environment was investigated using free-living nematode assemblages as indicators of environmental condition of the Enseada do Brito, a shallow embayment in South Brazil. The studied area is located at the State of Santa Catarina, responsible for 90% of the production of mussel farmed in the country. Samplings were carried out quarterly, from July 2004 to May 2005, below mussel ropes and at control sites located 300 m apart from the longlines. The results suggested that the mussel culture changed ecological functioning of the benthic environment at studied coastal embayment. The intense organic loads due to the biodeposition of the mussel farms, which had been in production for more than 10 years, have turned fine and well-sorted sand bottoms into a muddy deposit with significantly higher total organic content than the control. The number of nematode genera, diversity, dominance and trophic diversity were significantly lower under the mussel farms than at the control sites. The mussel farms biodeposition had also affected the temporal variability of nematode assemblages, which was detected only for samples at the control sites. The low depth and environmental energy, together with the age of the farms, were probably responsible for the observed changes in the nematode assemblages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bongers, T. (1990). The maturity index: An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia, 83, 14–19. doi:10.1007/BF00324627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongers, T., Alkemade, R., & Yeates, G. W. (1991). Interpretation of disturbance-induced maturity decrease in marine nematode assemblages by means of the Maturity Index. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 76, 135–142. doi:10.3354/meps076135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongers, T., de Goede, R. G. M., Korthals, G. W., & Yeates, G. W. (1995). Proposed changes of c-p classification for nematodes. Russian Journal of Nematology, 3, 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, J., Labourg, P. J., Escaravage, V., Auby, I., & Garcia, M. E. (1989). Influence of seagrass beds and oyster parks on the abundance and biomass patterns of meio- and macrobenthos in tidal flats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 28, 71–85. doi:10.1016/0272-7714(89)90042-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, J., Fernandes, T. F., Read, P., Nickell, T. D., & Davies, I. M. (2001). Impacts of biodeposits from suspended mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) culture on the surrounding surficial sediments. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 58, 411–416. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18, 117–143. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R., & Ainsworth, M. (1993). A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 92, 205–219. doi:10.3354/meps092205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R., & Green, R. H. (1988). Statistical design and analysis for a ‘biological effects’ study. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 46, 226–231. doi:10.3354/meps046213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R., & Warwick, R. M. (1994). Changes in marine communities: An approach to statistical analyses and interpretation. Plymouth: Natural Environment Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E. (1982). Does the benthos control phytoplankton biomass in South San Francisco Bay? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 9, 191–202. doi:10.3354/meps009191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, K. G., & Nalesso, R. C. (2006). Effects of mussel farming on macrobenthic community structure in Southeastern Brazil. Aquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 258, 655–663. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.04.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coull, B. C., & Chandler, G. T. (1992). Pollution and Meiofauna: Field, laboratory and mesocosm studies. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 30, 191–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, O. (1998). A Ilha de Santa Catarina e o continente próximo: Um estudo de geomorfologia costeira. Florianópolis: Editora da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlback, B., & Gunnarsson, L. H. (1981). Sedimentation and sulfate reduction under a mussel culture. Marine Biology (Berlin), 63, 269–275. doi:10.1007/BF00395996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danovaro, R., Gambi, C., Dell’nno, A., Corinaldesi, C., Fraschetti, S., Vanreusel, A., et al. (2008). Exponential decline of deep-sea ecosystem functioning linked to benthic biodiversity loss. Current Biology, 18, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.056.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danovaro, R., Gambi, C., Luna, G. M., & Mirto, S. (2004). Sustainable impact of mussel farming in the Adriatic Sea (Mediterranean Sea): Evidence from biochemical, microbial and meiofaunal indicators. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 49, 325–333. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.02.038.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, W. E. (1974). Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: Comparison with other methods. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 44, 242–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinet, A., Sornin, J. M., Sabliere, A., Delmas, D., & Feuillet-Girard, M. (1990). Influence de la biodéposition de bivalves filtreurs sur les peuplements méiobenthiques d’un marais maritime. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 31, 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duplisea, D. E., & Hargrave, B. T. (1996). Response of meiobenthic size-structure, biomass and respiration to sediment organic enrichment. Hydrobiologia, 339, 161–170. doi:10.1007/BF00008924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essink, K., & Keidel, H. (1998). Changes in estuarine nematode communities following a decrease of organic pollution. Aquatic Ecology, 32, 195–202. doi:10.1023/A:1009901207217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2004). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global aquaculture outlook in the next decades: An analysis of national aquaculture production forecasts 2030. Rome: FAO Fisheries Circular No. 1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, T. F., Miller, K. L., & Read, P. A. (2000). Monitoring and regulation of marine aquaculture in Europe. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 16, 138–143. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0426.2000.00267.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, G., & Netto, S. A. (2006). Shallow sublittoral benthic communities of the Laguna Estuarine System, South Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 54, 41–54. doi:10.1590/S1679-87592006000100004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, B., & Creese, R. G. (2006). Benthic impacts of intertidal oyster culture, with consideration of taxonomic sufficiency. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 112, 159–176. doi:10.1007/s10661-006-0359-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallucci, F., & Netto, S. A. (2004). Effects of the passage of cold fronts over a coastal site: An ecosystem approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 281, 79–92. doi:10.3354/meps281079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giere, O. (1993). Meiobenthology. The microscopic fauna in aquatic sediments. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J., Hatcher, A., Scott, D. B., Pocklington, P., Schafer, C. T., & Winter, G. (1995). A multidisciplinary approach to evaluating benthic impacts of shellfish aquaculture. Estuaries, 18, 124–144. doi:10.2307/1352288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guelorget, O., Perthuisot, J. P., Lamy, N., & Lefebre, A. (1994). Structure et organisation de l’etang de Thau d’aprés la fauna benthique (macrofaune, méiofaune) Relations avec le confinement. Oceanologica Acta, 17, 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyedu-Ababio, T. K., Furstenberg, J. P., Baird, D., & Vanreusel, A. (1999). Nematodes as indicators of pollution: A case study from the Swartkops River system, South Africa. Hydrobiologia, 397, 155–169. doi:10.1023/A:1003617825985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave, B. T. (2003). A scientific review of the potential environmental effects of aquaculture in aquatic ecosystems. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2450, 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, A., Grant, J., & Schofield, B. (1994). Effects of suspended mussel culture (Mytilus spp.) on sedimentation, benthic respiration and sediment nutrient dynamics in a coastal bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 115, 219–235. doi:10.3354/meps115219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heip, C., Vincx, M., & Vranken, G. (1985). The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 23, 399–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54, 427–432. doi:10.2307/1934352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockin, D. C. (1983). The effects of organic enrichment upon a community of meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Marine Environmental Research, 10, 45–58. doi:10.1016/0141-1136(83)90016-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. H. (1971). The nonconcept of species diversity: A critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52, 577–586. doi:10.2307/1934145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICEPA (2008). Instituto de Planejamento e Economia Agrícola de Santa Catarina. http://cepa.epagri.sc.gov.br/Publicacoes/sintese_2007/sintese%202007%20pdf.pdf. Acessed 5 June 2008.

  • Jaramillo, E., Bertran, C., & Bravo, A. (1992). Mussel biodeposition in an estuary in southern Chile. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 82, 85–94. doi:10.3354/meps082085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. E. L., Attrill, M. J., Sheehan, E. V., & Somerfield, P. J. (2007). Recovery of meiofauna communities following mudflat disturbance by trampling associated with crab-tiling. Marine Environmental Research, 64, 409–416. doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.03.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marenzi, A. (2002). Influência do cultivo de mexilhões sobre o habitat bentônico da Armação de Itapocoroy. Penha, SC. Doct. Thesis, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil.

  • Mattson, J., & Linden, O. (1983). Benthic macrofauna succession under mussel, Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalve), cultured on hanging long-lines. Sarsia, 68, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, L. J., Parry, G. D., Leporati, S. C., Heislers, S., Werner, G. F., Gason, A. S. H., et al. (2003). The environmental effects of blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) aquaculture in Port Phillip Bay. Fisheries Victoria. Research Report Series, 1, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, E., Martins, R. P., & Franco, D. (1997). Standing wave tide at Florianópolis Bay (Brazil) and its influence on Bay pollution. In Proceedings of Bordomer 97: Coastal environment management and conservation, IFREMER (Vol. 2, pp. 143–151).

  • Mirto, S., La Rosa, T., Danovaro, R., & Mazzola, A. (2000). Microbial and meiofaunal response to intensive mussel-farm biodeposition in coastal sediments of the western Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40, 244–252. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00209-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mirto, S., La Rosa, T., Gambi, C., Danovaro, R., & Mazzola, A. (2002). Nematode community response to fish-farm impact in the western Mediterranean. Environmental Pollution, 116, 203–214. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00140-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nalesso, R. C., Costa, K. G., Paresque, K., Piumbini, P. P., Almeida, L. G., & Nickel, V. M. (2007). Impacto do cultio de bibalves na estrutura da comunidade macrobentônica do sedimento em Achienta, ES. In G. F. Barroso, L. H. S. Poersch, & R. O. Cavalli (Eds.), Sistemas de cultivos aqüícolas na zona costeira do Brasil: Recursos, tecnologias, aspectos ambientais e sócio-econômicos (pp. 225–234). Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netto, S. A., & Valgas, I. (2007). Efeitos do cultivo de mexilhões sobre a estrutura da meiofauna. In G. F. Barroso, L. H. S. Poersch, & R. O. Cavalli (Eds.), Sistemas de cultivos aqüícolas na zona costeira do Brasil: Recursos, tecnologias, aspectos ambientais e sócio-econômicos (pp. 119–128). Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noren, F., Haamer, J., & Lindahl, O. (1999). Changes in the plankton community passing a Mytilus edulis bed. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 19, 187–194. doi:10.3354/meps191187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagliosa, P. R., & Barbosa, F. A. R. (2006). Assessing the environment–benthic fauna coupling in protected and urban areas of southern Brazil. Biological Conservation, 129, 408–417. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, T. K., Boina, C. D., & Vieira, S. D. M. A. (2007). Influência do cultivo de moluscos na comunidade bentônica: Meiobentos. In G. F. Barroso, L. H. S. Poersch, & R. O. Cavalli (Eds.), Sistemas de cultivos aqüícolas na zona costeira do Brasil: Recursos, tecnologias, aspectos ambientais e sócio-econômicos (pp. 235–241). Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, E. N. (1989). Oxygen, sulphide and diffusion: Why thiobiotic meiofauna must be sulphide-insensitive first-order respirers. Journal of Marine Research, 47, 887–932. doi:10.1357/002224089785076082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H. L. (1968). Marine benthic diversity: A comparative study. American Naturalist, 102, 243–282. doi:10.1086/282541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, M. A., & Proença, L. A. O. (2008). Cultivo de moluscos: Monitoramento de algas nocivas e ficotoxinas. Panorama da Aqüiultura, 106, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schratzberger, M., & Warwick, R. M. (1998). Effects of the intensity and frequency of organic enrichment on two estuarine nematode communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 164, 83–94. doi:10.3354/meps164083.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smaal, A. C. (1991). The ecology and cultivation of mussels: New advances. Aquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 94, 245–261. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(91)90121-M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soetaert, K., & Heip, C. (1990). Nematode assemblages of deep-sea and shelf break sites in the North Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 125, 171–183. doi:10.3354/meps125171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1997). Biometry. New York: WH Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerfield, P. J., & Warwick, R. M. (1996). Meiofauna in marine pollution programmes. A laboratory manual. Lowestoft: MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerfield, P. J., Warwick, R. M., & Moens, T. (2005). Meiofauna techniques. In A. Eleftheriou & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Methods for the study of marine benthos, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenton-Dozey, J. M. E., Probyn, T., & Busby, A. (2001). Impact of mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) raft-culture on benthic macrofauna, in situ oxygen uptake, and nutrient fluxes in Saldahna Bay, South Africa. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 1021–1031. doi:10.1139/cjfas-58-5-1021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suguio, K. (1973). Introdução a sedimentologia. São Paulo: Editora Blücher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suplicy, F. M. (2004). Population and ecophysiological modelling of the cultured mussel Perna perna: Towards the development of a carrying capacity model. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tasmania, Australia.

  • Tenore, K. R., Boyer, L. F., Cal, R. M., Corral, J., Garcia-Fernandez, C., Gonzalez, N., et al. (1982). Coastal upwelling in the Rias Bajas, n.w. Spain, contrasting benthic regimes of the Ria de Arosa and de Muros. Journal of Marine Research, 40, 701–772.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R. M., & Price, R. (1979). Ecological and metabolic studies on free-living nematodes from n estuarine mud-flat. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 9, 257–271. doi:10.1016/0302-3524(79)90039-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, M., Weber, A., & Giere, O. (2004). Re-colonization of anoxic/sulfidic sediments by marine nematodes after experimental removal of macroalgal cover. Marine Biology (Berlin), 141, 679–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • WGMASC (2003). Report of the working group on marine shellfish culture. Trondheim: International Council for the exploration of the Sea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieser, W. (1953). Die Beziehung zwishen Mundhölengestalt, Ernährungsweise und Vorkommen bei freilebenden marine Nematoden—eine ökologischmorphologische Studie. Arkiv för Zoologi, 4, 439–483.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sérgio A. Netto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Netto, S.A., Valgas, I. The response of nematode assemblages to intensive mussel farming in coastal sediments (Southern Brazil). Environ Monit Assess 162, 81–93 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0777-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0777-0

Keywords

Navigation