Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preface

Special issue: The Eighth Symposium of the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP)—research and partnerships for accountability

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • H. John Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment (2002). The State of the Nation’s Ecosystems: Measuring the lands, waters, and living resources of the United States. ISBN 0-521-52572-1. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, J. J., Linthurst, R. A., & Overton, W. S. (1991). An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 17(1), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1977). Environmental monitoring (Vol. IV, 153 p.). Washington, DC.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, J. L., Kahl, J. S., Deviney, F. A., DeWalle, D. R., Driscoll, C. T., Herlihy, A. T., et al. (2003). Response of surface water chemistry to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. EPA/620/R-03/001. Corvallis, Oregon: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Science Advisory Board (1988). Appendix C: Strategies for ecological effects research. SAB-EC-88-040C (35 p.). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2001). National coastal condition report. 2001. EPA-620/R-01/005. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2003). Draft report on the environment 2003. EPA 260-R-02-006. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2004). National coastal condition report II. 2004. EPA-620/R-03/002. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2006). Wadeable streams assessment: A collaborative survey of the nation’s streams. EPA 841-B-06-002. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development and Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2008). U.S. EPA’s 2008 report on the environment (final report). EPA/600/R-07/045F. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2009). National coastal condition report III. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office (1981). Better monitoring techniques are needed to assess the quality of rivers and streams, volume 1. CED-81-30. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

    Laura E. Jackson

  2. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA

    Steven G. Paulsen

Authors
  1. Laura E. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven G. Paulsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura E. Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, L.E., Paulsen, S.G. Preface. Environ Monit Assess 150, 1–2 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0667-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0667-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation