Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linking biological and physicochemical water quality

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To define water quality, the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) demands complex assessments through physicochemical, biological, and hydromorphological controls of water bodies. Since the biological assessment became the central focus with hydrochemistry playing a supporting role, an evaluation of the interrelationships within this approach deems necessary. This work identified and tested these relationships to help improve the quality and efficiency of related efforts. Data from the 384 km2 Weisseritz catchment (eastern Erzgebirge, Saxony, Germany and northern Bohemia, Czech Republic) were used as a representative example for central European streams in mountainous areas. The data cover the time frame 1992 to 2003. To implement WFD demands, the analysis was based on accepted German methods and classifications, WFD quality standards, and novel German methods for the biological status assessment. Selected chemical parameters were compared with different versions of the German Saprobic Index, based on macroinvertebrate indicator taxa. Relevant dependencies applicable for integrated stream assessment were statistically tested. Correlation analysis showed significant relationships. The highest scores were found for nutrients (NO2  − , Ninorg, and total N), salinity (Cl − , SO4 2 − , conductivity), and microelements (K + , Na + , Ca2 + , Mg2 + ). The Saprobic Index used in the Integrated Assessment System for the Ecological Quality of Streams and Rivers throughout Europe using Benthic Macro-invertebrates program seems to be the most sensitive indicator to correlate with chemical parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Agences de l’Éau (2000). System for the evaluation of the biological quality of water courses. SEQ Bio (Version 0). General principles. Water Agencies Study No. 77.

  • Alf, A., Braukmann, U., Marten, M., & Vobis, H. (1992). Biologisch-ökologische Gewässeruntersuchung—Arbeitsanleitung. Handbuch Wasser 2, Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz Karlsruhe.

  • AQEM Consortium (2002). Manual for the application of the AQEM method. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.0, February 2002.

  • AQEM Consortium (2005). AQEM European stream assessment program. Version 2.5, Handbook German version; www.aqem.de.

  • Armitage, P. D., Moss, D., Wright, J. F., Furse, M. T. (1983). The performance of the new biological water quality score system based on macro-invertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running water sites. Water Research, 17, 333–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Austrian Standards ÖNORM M 6232 (1997). Guidelines for the ecological survey and evaluation of flowing surface waters (pp. 38). Vienna: Austrian Standards Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabec, K., Zahrádková, S., Nemejcová, D., Paril, P., Kokes, J., & Jarkovský, J. (2004). Assessment of organic pollution effect considering differences between lotic and lentic stream habitats. Hydrobiologia, 516, 331–346. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025274.47757.85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chovanec, A., Jäger, P., Jungwirth, M., Koller-Kreimel, V., Moog, O., Muhar, S., et al. (2000). The Austrian way of assessing the ecological integrity of running waters: A contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia, 422/423, 445–452. doi:10.1023/A:1017079629534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, A., Klima, F., Küttner, R., Mey, W., & Berthold, R. (1995). Verzeichnis der Köcherfliegenarten des Freistaates Sachsen (Insecta, Trichoptera). Mitteilungen Sächsischer Entomologen Nr., 29, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerniawska-Kusza, I. (2005). Comparing modified biological monitoring working party score system and several indices based on macro-invertebrates for water-quality assessment. Limnologica, 35, 169–176. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2005.05.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, J., Johnson, R. K., & Sandin, L. (2004). Detection of organic pollution of streams in southern Sweden using benthic invertebrates. Hydrobiologia, 516, 161–172. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025264.35531.cb.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, N., & Hawkes, H. A. (1993). Biological monitoring of river water quality. In W. J. Walley, & S. Judd (Eds.), River water quality monitoring and control (pp. 87–112). Birmingham: Aston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, N., & Vanhooren, G. (1983). Method for biological water quality assessment of water courses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia, 100, 153–168. doi:10.1007/BF00027428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEV (1992). Biologisch- ökologische Gewässeruntersuchung: Bestimmung des Saprobienindex in Fließgewässern (M2). In Deutsches Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammuntersuchung (pp. 1–13). Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim. (DIN 38410-2:1990-10).

  • DEV (1993). Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammuntersuchung, Gruppe A bis K (German standard methods for the examination of water, wastewater and sludge, group A to K). Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. Beuth Verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEV (2004). Biologisch-ökologische Gewässeruntersuchung: Bestimmung des Saprobienindex in Fließgewässern (M1). In Deutsches Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammuntersuchung. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (pp. 1–80). Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH (DIN 38410-1:2004-10).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, L327, 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, G. (1990). Eine Revision des Saprobiensystems. Wasser-Abwasserforschung, 23, 141–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghetti, P. F. (1997). Indice Biotico Esteso (I.B.E.). I macroinvertebrati nel controllo della qualità degli ambienti di acque correnti. Manuale di applicazione. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Agenzia Provinciale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente, pp. 222.

  • Grimvall, A., Laniewski, K., Borén, H., Jonsson, S., & Kaugare, S. (1994). Organohalogens of natural or unknown origin in surface water and precipitation. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 46, 183–196. doi:10.1080/02772249409358111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, P., Sundermann, A., Hering, D., Korte, T., Meier, C., Böhmer, J., et al. (2004). Anwendung und Erprobung neu entwickelter Verfahren zur Fließgewässerbewertung (Makrozoobenthos). Abschlussbericht, Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, FKZ: O 3.04, 80 p + annex, Dec 2004.

  • Hellawell, J. M. (1986). Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management. London: Elsevier Applied Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hering, D., Buffagni, A., Moog, O., Sandin, L., Sommerhäuser, M., Stubauer, I., et al. (2003). The development of a system to assess the ecological quality of streams based on macro-invertebrates—design of the sampling programme within the AQEM project. International Review of Hydrobiology, 88, 345–361. doi:10.1002/iroh.200390030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hering, D., Moog, O., Sandin, L., & Verdonschot, P. (2004). Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia, 516, 1–20. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025255.70009.a5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, W., Greif, A., Broekaert, J. A. C., Siemens, V., Junge, F. W., van der Veen, A., et al. (2005). A study on arsenic and the heavy metals in the Mulde river system. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 33(5), 475–491. doi:10.1002/aheh.200400592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klima, F. (1998). Rote Liste der Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera). In M. Binot, R. Bless, P. Boye, H. Gruttke, & P. Pretscher, (Eds.), Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere Deutschlands. Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz, (Vol. 55, pp. 113—118).

  • Küttner, R., Braasch, D., & Joost, W. (1995). Verzeichnis (Checkliste) der sächsischen Steinfliegen (Plecoptera). Mitteilungen Sächsischer Entomologen, 29, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWA (1998). Beurteilung der Wasserbeschaffenheit von Fließgewässern in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland—Chemische Gewässergüteklassifikation. Laenderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser. 1. Edition, Kulturbuchverlag Berlin, pp. 69.

  • LAWA (2000). Gewässergüteatlas der Bundesrepublik Deutschland—Biologische Gewässergütekarte 2000. Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser. Hannover 2002. www.lawa.de/pub/thema/leseproben/300514.pdf.

  • LfUG (1999). Rote Liste Steinfliegen. Materialien zu Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege 1999 (12 pp.). Saxon State Office for Environment and Geology. http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/de/wu/umwelt/lfug/lfug-internet/veroeffentlichungen/verzeichnis/Naturschutz/steinfliege.pdf.

  • LfUG (2001). Gewässergütebericht 2000 mit Gewässergütekarte (62 pp). Saxon State Office for Environment and Geology Dresden. http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/de/wu/umwelt/lfug/lfug-internet/veroeffentlichungen/verzeichnis/Wasser/GSÜK-Sachs-Bericht-druck2001.pdf.

  • LfUG (2004). Gewässergütebericht 2003. Biologische Befunde der Gewässergüte sächsischer Fließgewässer mit Gewässergütekarte (60 pp.). Saxon State Office for Environment and Geology Dresden. http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/de/wu/umwelt/lfug/lfug-internet/veroeffentlichungen/verzeichnis/Wasser/Guetebericht%202003%20neu.pdf.

  • Lorenz, A., Hering, D., Feld, C. K., & Rolauffs, P. (2004). A new method for assessing the impact of hydromorphological degradation on the macro-invertebrate fauna in five German stream types. Hydrobiologia, 516, 107–127. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025261.79761.b3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LVA (2005) ATKIS-Digitales Geländemodell 1:25,000. User permission # 2214/05 by Landesvermessungsamt Sachsen.

  • Matschullat, J., Bozau, E., Brumsack, H. J., Fänger, R., Heinrichs, H., Hild, A., et al. (1994). Stoffdispersion Osterzgebirge—Ökosystemforschung in einer alten Kulturlandschaft. In J. Matschullat & G. Müller (Eds.), Geowissenschaften und Umwelt (pp. 227–244). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matschullat, J., Zimmermann, F., Fiebig, J., & Maenhaut, W. (2000). Aerosol and bulk deposition trends in the 1990’s, Eastern Erzgebirge, Central Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 3213–3221. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00516-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, G. B. (2005). Using statistical methods for water quality management. NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, C., Hering, D., Biss, R., Böhmer, J., Rawer-Jost, C., Zenker, A., et al. (2004). Weiterentwicklung und Anpassung des nationalen Bewertungssystems für Makrozoobenthos an neue internationale Vorgaben. Abschlussbericht, (UFOPLAN) 202 24 223, 102 p.+annex

  • Nijboer, R. C., & Schmidt-Kloiber, A. (2004). The effect of excluding taxa with low abundances or taxa with small distribution ranges on ecological assessment. Hydrobiologia, 516, 347–363. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025275.49062.55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pälchen, W., & Greif, A. (1998). Geogener Background im Grundgebirgsgeprägten Einzugsgebieten der Elbe. In Geller, W. (Ed.), Gewässerschutz im Einzugsgebiet der Elbe (pp. 91–94). Tagungsband 8. Magdeburger Gewässerschutzseminar.

  • Peeters, E. T. H. M., Gardeniers, J. J. P., & Tolkamp, H. T. (1994). New methods to assess the ecological status of surface waters in the Netherlands. Part 1: Running waters. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Limnologie, 25, 1914–1916.

  • Pottgiesser, T., & Sommerhäuser, M. (2004). Fließgewässertypologie Deutschlands: Die Gewässertypen und ihre Steckbriefe als Beitrag zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. In C. Steinberg, W. Calamo, R. D. Wilken, & H. Klapper (Eds.), Handbuch der Limnologie. 19. Ergänzte Lieferung 7/04. VII-2.1: 1–16 + annex.

  • Rolauffs, P., Hering, D., Sommerhäuser, M., Jähnig, S., & Rödiger, S. (2003). Leitbildorientierte biologische Fließgewässerbewertung zur Charakterisierung des Sauerstoffhaushaltes. Umweltbundesamt Texte 11/03: 137 pp.

  • Rolauffs, P., Stubauer, I., Zahrádková, S., Brabec, K., & Moog, O. (2004). Integration of the saprobic system to the European Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia, 516, 285–298. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025271.90133.4d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M., & Resh, V. H. (1993). Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In D. M. Rosenberg & V. H. Resh (Eds.), Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates (pp. 488). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandin, L., & Hering, D. (2004). Comparing macro-invertebrate indices to detect organic pollution across Europe: A contribution to the EC Water Framework Directive intercalibration. Hydrobiologia, 516, 55–68. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025258.63416.11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Kloiber, A., & Nijboer, R. C. (2004). The effect of taxonomic resolution on the assessment of ecological water quality classes. Hydrobiologia, 516, 269–283. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025270.10807.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMUL (2004). Verordnung des Sächsischen Staatsministeriums für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft zur weiteren Umsetzung von Richtlinien der Europäischen Gemeinschaft im Bereich der Wasserpolitik. (Sächsische Wasserrahmenrichtlinien-Verordnung vom 7.12.2004).

  • SMUL (2005). Neue Impulse für Sachsen. Kompaktbericht zur Bestandsaufnahme nach WRRL in Sachsen (64 pp.). Saxon State Ministry of Environment and Agriculture. http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/de/wu/umwelt/lfug/lfug-internet/wasser_11745.html.

  • Ulrich, K.-U., Paul, L., & Meybohm, A. (2006). Response of drinking-water reservoir ecosystems to decreased acidic atmospheric deposition in SE Germany: Trends of chemical reversal. Environmental Pollution, 141, 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., & Nijboer, R. C. (2004). Testing the European stream typology of the Water Framework Directive for macro-invertebrates. Hydrobiologia, 516, 35–54. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025257.30311.b7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, A. (2004). Ist-Zustandsanalyse im Hinblick auf den ökologischen Gewässerzustand am Bsp. der Hydromorphologischen Qualitätskomponente. In J. Möltgen, & D. Petry (Eds.), Interdisziplinäre Methoden des Flussgebietsmanagements, Workshopbeiträge Münster 15./16.03.2004, IfGI prints 21: 151–159.

  • Weiß, A. (2005). Integration der Ergebnisse der hydromorphologischen Bestandsaufnahme in ein Gewässermanagement für die Weißeritz—Defizite und deren Konsequenzen. In J. Matschullat (Ed.), Workshop Interdisziplinäres BMBF-Verbundprojekt EMTAL—Einzugsgebietsmanagement von Talsperren in Mittelgebirgen. Workshopbeiträge Freiberg 06./07.10.2005: 157–168.

  • Wright, J. F., Sutcliffe, D. W., & Furse, M. T. (Eds.) (2000). Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters—RIVPACS and other techniques (pp. 373). Ambleside, Cumbria, UK: Freshwater Biological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinka, M., & Marvan, P. (1961). Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fließender Gewässer. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie, 57, 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, F., Matschullat, J., Brüggemann, E., Pleßow, K., & Wienhaus, O. (2006). Temporal and elevation-related variability in precipitation chemistry from 1993 to 2002, Eastern Erzgebirge, Germany. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 170, 123–141. doi:10.1007/s11270-006-2860-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Interdisciplinary Environmental Research Centre (IÖZ, IERC), TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Brennhausgasse 14, 09599, Freiberg, Germany

    Waldemar Bernatowicz, Annett Weiß & Jörg Matschullat

  2. Institute of Geography and Regional Development, University of Wroclaw, Uniwersytecki sq. 1, 50-137, Wroclaw, Poland

    Waldemar Bernatowicz

Authors
  1. Waldemar Bernatowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annett Weiß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jörg Matschullat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Matschullat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernatowicz, W., Weiß, A. & Matschullat, J. Linking biological and physicochemical water quality. Environ Monit Assess 159, 311–330 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0631-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0631-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation