Skip to main content

Global warming mitigation potential of biogas plants in India

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment volume 157, pages 407–418 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Biogas technology, besides supplying energy and manure, provides an excellent opportunity for mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and reducing global warming through substituting firewood for cooking, kerosene for lighting and cooking and chemical fertilizers. A study was undertaken to calculate (1) global warming mitigation potential (GMP) and thereby earning carbon credit of a family size biogas plant in India, (2) GMP of the existing and target biogas plants in the country and (3) atmospheric pollution reduction by a family size biogas plant. The GMP of a family size biogas plant was 9.7 t CO2 equiv. year − 1 and with the current price of US $10 t − 1 CO2 equiv., carbon credit of US $97 year − 1 could be earned from such reduction in greenhouse gas emission under the clean development mechanism (CDM). A family size biogas plant substitutes 316 L of kerosene, 5,535 kg firewood and 4,400 kg cattle dung cake as fuels which will reduce emissions of NOx, SO2, CO and volatile organic compounds to the atmosphere by 16.4, 11.3, 987.0 and 69.7 kg year − 1, respectively. Presently 3.83 million biogas plants are operating in the country, which can mitigate global warming by 37 Mt CO2 equiv. year − 1. Government of India has a target of installing 12.34 million biogas plants by 2010. This target has a GMP of 120 Mt CO2 equiv. year − 1 and US $1,197 million as carbon credit under the CDM. However, if all the collectible cattle dung (225 Mt) produced in the country is used, 51.2 million family size biogas plants can be supported which will have a GMP of 496 Mt of CO2 equiv. year − 1 and can earn US $4,968 million as carbon credit. The reduction in global warming should encourage policy makers to promote biogas technology to combat climate change and integration of carbon revenues will help the farmers to develop biogas as a profitable activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Ball, J. (2007). Cows, climate change and carbon credits. The Wall Street Journal-Online, B1 (June 14, 2007).

  • Bhatia, A., Pathak, H., & Aggarwal, P. K. (2004). Inventory of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils of India and their global warming potential. Current Science, 87(3), 317–324.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, O. P. (1986). Use of other inputs. In Advances in biogas technology (pp. 77). New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPCB. (2006). Waste generation and composition report. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadi, R., Kulshrestha, U. C., Sarkar, A. K., Garg, S. C., & Parashar, D. C. (2003). Emissions of SO2 and NOx from biofuels in India. Tellus. Series B, Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 55, 787–795. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.2003.00065.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. C. (1995). Bulky organic manures and crop residues. In H. L. S. Tandon (Ed.). Fertilizers, organic manures, recyclable wastes and bio-fertilizers: components of integrated plant nutrition. New Delhi: FDCO.

  • Hawn, A. (2006). Subsistence farmers sell ecosystem services in a virtual marketplace. Conservation in Practice, 7, 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, M., & Thistlethwaite, G. (2003). Emission factors programme Task 7, review of residential and small scale commercial combustion sources. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, AEAT/ENV/R/1407/Issue 1.

  • IPCC (1996). Climate change: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change. In R. T. Watson, M. C. Zinyowera, & R. H. Ross (Eds.), Scientific technical report analyses. Contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (p. 880). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • IPCC (2001). Climate change 2001, the scientific basis-contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khendelwal, K. C., & Mahdi, S. S. (1986). In biogas technology: A practical technology (pp. 128). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoiyangbam, R. S., Kumar, S., Jain, M. C., Gupta, N., Kumar, A., & Kumar, V. (2004). Methane emission from fixed dome biogas plants in hilly and plain regions of northern India. Bioresource Technology, 95, 35–39. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2004). Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International, 30, 981–990. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MAC (1998). Agricultural statistics at a glance. Agricultural Statistics Division. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation. Government of India.

  • MAC (2006). Livestock census. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation, Government of India. www.dahd.nic.in.

  • Malla, G., Bhatia, A., Pathak, H., Prasad, S., Jain, N., & Singh, J. (2005). Mitigating nitrous oxide and methane emissions from soil under rice-wheat system with nitrification and urease inhibitors. Chemosphere 58(2), 141–147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MNES (2006). Renewable energy for rural applications. Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources, Govt. of India.

  • Parashar, D. C., Gadi, R., Mandal, T. K., & Mitra, A. P. (2005). Carbonaceous aerosol emissions from India. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 7861–7871. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, H., Kushwaha, J. S., & Jain, M. C. (1992). Evaluation of manurial value of biogas spent slurry composted with dry mango leaves, wheat straw and rock phosphate on wheat crop. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 40, 753–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, H., Singh, R., Bhatia, A., & Jain, N. (2006). Recycling of rice straw to improve crop yield and soil fertility and reduce atmospheric pollution. Paddy Water Environment, 4(2), 111–117. doi:10.1007/s10333-006-0038-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, H., & Wassmann, R. (2007). Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture: I. Generation of technical coefficients. Agricultural Systems, 94, 807–825. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2006.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, W. H. (1999). Carbon sequestration in soils. Science, 284, 2095. doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shekar Reddy, M., & Venkataraman, C. (2000). Atmospheric optical and radiative effects of anthropogenic aerosol constituents from India. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 4511–4523. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00105-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekar Reddy, M., & Venkataraman, C. (2002). Inventory of aerosol and sulphur dioxide emissions from India: I Fossil fuel combustion. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 677–697. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00463-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subrian, P., Annadurai, K., & Palaniappan, S. P. (2000). Agriculture: facts and figures (pp. 133–134). New Delhi: Kalyani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, H. L. S., & Roy, R. N. (2004). In integrated nutrient management — A glossary of terms. New Delhi: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and Fertiliser Development and Consultation Organization.

  • TERI (2001). Tata energy research institute-energy data directory and year book, 2000–01. New Delhi: TERI Press.

  • Venkataraman, C., Habib, G., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Miguel, A. H., & Friedlander, S. K. (2005). Residential bio-fuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous aerosols emissions and climate impacts. Science, 307, 1454–1456. doi:10.1126/science.1104359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Unit of Simulation and Informatics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    H. Pathak

  2. Division of Environmental Sciences, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    N. Jain, A. Bhatia & Navindu Gupta

  3. International Rice Research Institute-India, New Delhi, 110012, India

    H. Pathak & S. Mohanty

Authors
  1. H. Pathak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Bhatia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Mohanty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Navindu Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Pathak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pathak, H., Jain, N., Bhatia, A. et al. Global warming mitigation potential of biogas plants in India. Environ Monit Assess 157, 407–418 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0545-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0545-6

Keywords

  • Atmospheric pollution
  • Biogas plant
  • Carbon trading
  • Cattle dung
  • Firewood
  • Global warming mitigation potential
  • Greenhouse gas
  • India