Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 157, Issue 1–4, pp 407–418 | Cite as

Global warming mitigation potential of biogas plants in India

  • H. PathakEmail author
  • N. Jain
  • A. Bhatia
  • S. Mohanty
  • Navindu Gupta
Article

Abstract

Biogas technology, besides supplying energy and manure, provides an excellent opportunity for mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and reducing global warming through substituting firewood for cooking, kerosene for lighting and cooking and chemical fertilizers. A study was undertaken to calculate (1) global warming mitigation potential (GMP) and thereby earning carbon credit of a family size biogas plant in India, (2) GMP of the existing and target biogas plants in the country and (3) atmospheric pollution reduction by a family size biogas plant. The GMP of a family size biogas plant was 9.7 t CO2 equiv. year − 1 and with the current price of US $10 t − 1 CO2 equiv., carbon credit of US $97 year − 1 could be earned from such reduction in greenhouse gas emission under the clean development mechanism (CDM). A family size biogas plant substitutes 316 L of kerosene, 5,535 kg firewood and 4,400 kg cattle dung cake as fuels which will reduce emissions of NOx, SO2, CO and volatile organic compounds to the atmosphere by 16.4, 11.3, 987.0 and 69.7 kg year − 1, respectively. Presently 3.83 million biogas plants are operating in the country, which can mitigate global warming by 37 Mt CO2 equiv. year − 1. Government of India has a target of installing 12.34 million biogas plants by 2010. This target has a GMP of 120 Mt CO2 equiv. year − 1 and US $1,197 million as carbon credit under the CDM. However, if all the collectible cattle dung (225 Mt) produced in the country is used, 51.2 million family size biogas plants can be supported which will have a GMP of 496 Mt of CO2 equiv. year − 1 and can earn US $4,968 million as carbon credit. The reduction in global warming should encourage policy makers to promote biogas technology to combat climate change and integration of carbon revenues will help the farmers to develop biogas as a profitable activity.

Keywords

Atmospheric pollution Biogas plant Carbon trading Cattle dung Firewood Global warming mitigation potential Greenhouse gas India 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, J. (2007). Cows, climate change and carbon credits. The Wall Street Journal-Online, B1 (June 14, 2007).Google Scholar
  2. Bhatia, A., Pathak, H., & Aggarwal, P. K. (2004). Inventory of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils of India and their global warming potential. Current Science, 87(3), 317–324.Google Scholar
  3. Chawla, O. P. (1986). Use of other inputs. In Advances in biogas technology (pp. 77). New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
  4. CPCB. (2006). Waste generation and composition report. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.Google Scholar
  5. Gadi, R., Kulshrestha, U. C., Sarkar, A. K., Garg, S. C., & Parashar, D. C. (2003). Emissions of SO2 and NOx from biofuels in India. Tellus. Series B, Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 55, 787–795. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.2003.00065.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaur, A. C. (1995). Bulky organic manures and crop residues. In H. L. S. Tandon (Ed.). Fertilizers, organic manures, recyclable wastes and bio-fertilizers: components of integrated plant nutrition. New Delhi: FDCO.Google Scholar
  7. Hawn, A. (2006). Subsistence farmers sell ecosystem services in a virtual marketplace. Conservation in Practice, 7, 38–40.Google Scholar
  8. Hobson, M., & Thistlethwaite, G. (2003). Emission factors programme Task 7, review of residential and small scale commercial combustion sources. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, AEAT/ENV/R/1407/Issue 1.Google Scholar
  9. IPCC (1996). Climate change: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change. In R. T. Watson, M. C. Zinyowera, & R. H. Ross (Eds.), Scientific technical report analyses. Contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (p. 880). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. IPCC (2001). Climate change 2001, the scientific basis-contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Khendelwal, K. C., & Mahdi, S. S. (1986). In biogas technology: A practical technology (pp. 128). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Khoiyangbam, R. S., Kumar, S., Jain, M. C., Gupta, N., Kumar, A., & Kumar, V. (2004). Methane emission from fixed dome biogas plants in hilly and plain regions of northern India. Bioresource Technology, 95, 35–39. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lal, R. (2004). Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International, 30, 981–990. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MAC (1998). Agricultural statistics at a glance. Agricultural Statistics Division. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation. Government of India.Google Scholar
  15. MAC (2006). Livestock census. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation, Government of India. www.dahd.nic.in.
  16. Malla, G., Bhatia, A., Pathak, H., Prasad, S., Jain, N., & Singh, J. (2005). Mitigating nitrous oxide and methane emissions from soil under rice-wheat system with nitrification and urease inhibitors. Chemosphere 58(2), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MNES (2006). Renewable energy for rural applications. Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources, Govt. of India.Google Scholar
  18. Parashar, D. C., Gadi, R., Mandal, T. K., & Mitra, A. P. (2005). Carbonaceous aerosol emissions from India. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 7861–7871. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pathak, H., Kushwaha, J. S., & Jain, M. C. (1992). Evaluation of manurial value of biogas spent slurry composted with dry mango leaves, wheat straw and rock phosphate on wheat crop. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 40, 753–757.Google Scholar
  20. Pathak, H., Singh, R., Bhatia, A., & Jain, N. (2006). Recycling of rice straw to improve crop yield and soil fertility and reduce atmospheric pollution. Paddy Water Environment, 4(2), 111–117. doi:10.1007/s10333-006-0038-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pathak, H., & Wassmann, R. (2007). Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture: I. Generation of technical coefficients. Agricultural Systems, 94, 807–825. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2006.11.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schlesinger, W. H. (1999). Carbon sequestration in soils. Science, 284, 2095. doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shekar Reddy, M., & Venkataraman, C. (2000). Atmospheric optical and radiative effects of anthropogenic aerosol constituents from India. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 4511–4523. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00105-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shekar Reddy, M., & Venkataraman, C. (2002). Inventory of aerosol and sulphur dioxide emissions from India: I Fossil fuel combustion. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 677–697. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00463-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Subrian, P., Annadurai, K., & Palaniappan, S. P. (2000). Agriculture: facts and figures (pp. 133–134). New Delhi: Kalyani.Google Scholar
  26. Tandon, H. L. S., & Roy, R. N. (2004). In integrated nutrient management — A glossary of terms. New Delhi: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and Fertiliser Development and Consultation Organization.Google Scholar
  27. TERI (2001). Tata energy research institute-energy data directory and year book, 2000–01. New Delhi: TERI Press.Google Scholar
  28. Venkataraman, C., Habib, G., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Miguel, A. H., & Friedlander, S. K. (2005). Residential bio-fuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous aerosols emissions and climate impacts. Science, 307, 1454–1456. doi:10.1126/science.1104359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Pathak
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • N. Jain
    • 2
  • A. Bhatia
    • 2
  • S. Mohanty
    • 3
  • Navindu Gupta
    • 2
  1. 1.Unit of Simulation and InformaticsIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Division of Environmental SciencesIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.International Rice Research Institute-IndiaNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations