Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Response of soil invertebrates to disturbance across three resource regions in North Carolina

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the potential of soil microarthropods and enchytraeid worms to be useful as bioindicators of soil condition in forest, wetland, and agricultural ecosystems over a range of ecoregions. Selected mesofauna and soil characteristics in soil and litter in relatively undisturbed and disturbed examples of each of three ecosystems within each of three land resource regions were monitored over two years. Optimal times of year to sample these organisms as indicators of disturbance were April, May, July and September. No single measure reflected disturbance across all three ecosystems. Among forest sites, Simpson’s diversity index, evenness, abundance of ants, and proportion of enchytraeids in the mesofauna differed between soils of different disturbance levels. Among agricultural sites, richness, evenness, abundance of mites, and proportions of collembolans and of enchytraeids in the mesofauna differed between disturbance levels. Among wetland sites, Shannon’s and Simpson’s diversity indices, richness based on the total mesofauna, and abundances of mites, diplurans, ants, and isotomid and onychiurid collembolans differed between disturbance levels. Covariates most frequently associated with abundance and diversity of the measured mesofauna were soil electrical conductivity, available N, organic matter, and pH. Canonical correspondence analysis provided information somewhat different to bivariate analysis. Using both approaches to examine soil and litter taxa that have distinctive responses to disturbance may help to identify candidate groups applicable for use in large-scale environmental monitoring programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baur, B., Joshi, J., Schmid, B., Hanggi, A., Borcard, D., Stary, J., et al. (1996). Variation in species richness of plants and diverse groups of invertebrates in three calcareous grasslands of the Swiss Jura mountains. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 103, 801–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S., Coulson, R. N., & Crossley Jr., D. A. (2000). Impacts of silvicultural practices on soil and litter arthropod diversity in a Texas pine plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 131, 65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briones, M. J. I., Ineson, P., & Piearce, T. G. (1997). Effects of climate change on soil fauna: responses of enchytraeids, Diptera larvae and tardigrades in a transplant experiment. Applied Soil Ecology, 6, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, M., Paré, D., & Hébert, C. (2000). Relationships between soil chemistry, microbial biomass and the collembolan fauna of southern Québec sugar maple stands. Ecoscience, 7, 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, M. C. (1990). Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae. In D. L. Dindal (Ed.), Soil biology guide (pp. 311–340). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didden, W. A. M., Frund, H.-C., & Graefe, U. (1997). Enchytraeids. In G. Benckiser (Ed.), Fauna in soil ecosystems: Recycling processes, nutrient fluxes, and agricultural production (pp. 135–172). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donegan, K. K., Watrud, L. S., Seidler, R. J., Maggard, S. P., Shiroyama, T., Porteous, L. A., et al. (2001). Soil and litter organisms in Pacific Northwest forests under different management practices. Applied Soil Ecology, 18, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, L. A., & Letourneau, D. (2003). Top-down and bottom-up diversity cascades in detrital vs. living food webs. Ecology Letters, 6, 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiscus, D. A., & Neher, D. A. (2002). Distinguishing nematode genera based on relative sensitivity to physical and chemical disturbances. Ecological Applications, 12, 565–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, H., Winter, K., Filser, J., Hantschel, R., & Beese, F. (1993). The influence of soil type and cultivation system on the spatial distributions of the soil fauna and microorganisms and their interactions. Geoderma, 60, 109–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth, D. L., & Ritchie, J. M. (1993). Biodiverity and Biosystematic Priorities: Microorganisms and Invertebrates. Wallingford: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, J. E. (2000). Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management. Applied Soil Ecology, 15, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54, 427–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulugalle, N. R., de Bruyn, L. A. L., & Entwistle, P. (1997). Residual effects of tillage and crop rotation on soil properties, soil invertebrate numbers and nutrient uptake in an irrigated Vertisol sown to cotton. Applied Soil Ecology, 7, 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, H. H. (1999). Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 74, 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlöf, J., & Andrén, O. (1988). Abundance and activity of soil mites (Acari) in four cropping systems. Pedobiologia, 32, 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liiri, M., Setala, H., Haimi, J., Pennanen, T., & Fritze, H (2002). Relationship between soil microarthropod species diversity and plant growth does not change when the system is disturbed. Oikos, 96, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, N., Engtsson, J. B., & Persson, T. (2002). Effects of experimental irrigation and drought on the composition and diversity of soil fauna in a coniferous stand. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 924–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, W. A., Barker, R. J., & Sauer, J. R. (1994). Within-site variability in surveys of wildlife populations. Ecology, 75, 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loranger, G., Bandyopadhyaya, I., Razaka, B., & Ponge, J.-F. (2001). Does soil acidity explain altitudinal sequences in collembolan communities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 33, 381–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J., Olson, A. M., Brubaker, L. B., Carpenter, S. R., Holland, M. M., Hubbell, S. P., et al. (1991). The sustainable biosphere initiative: An ecological research agenda. Ecology, 72, 371–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. A., & Reynolds, J. F. (1988). Statistical ecology: A primer on methods and computing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, K., Tsuji, H., Yamagata, M., Nakano, H., & Nakamoto, T. (2002). The effects of cropping systems and fallow managements on microarthropod populations. Plant Production Science, 5, 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morisita, M. (1959). Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University Series E. Biology, 3, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neher, D. A., Barbercheck, M. E., El-Allaf, S. M., & Anas, O. (2003). Effects of disturbance and ecosystem on decomposition. Applied Soil Ecology, 23, 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neher, D. A., & Campbell, C. L. (1994). Nematode communities and microbial biomass in soils with annual and perennial crops. Applied Soil Ecology, 1, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neher, D. A., Easterling, K. N., Fiscus, D., & Campbell, C. L. (1998). Comparison of nematode communities in agricultural soils of North Carolina and Nebraska. Ecological Applications, 8, 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neher, D. A., Peck, S. L., Rawlings, J. O., & Campbell, C. L. (1995). Measures of nematode community structure and sources of variability among and within fields. Plant Soil, 170, 167–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neher, D. A., Wu, J., Barbercheck, M. E., & Anas, O. (2005). Ecosystem type affects interpretation of soil nematode community measures. Applied Soil Ecology, 30, 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkem, J. N., de Bruyn, L. A. L., Grant, C. D., & Hulugalle, N. R. (2000). The impact of ant bioturbation and foraging activities on surrounding soil properties. Pedobiologia, 44, 609–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, E. (2001). Enchytraeid communities in successional habitats—(from meadow to forest). Pedobiologia, 45, 497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, V., Menta, C., Gardi, C., Jacomini, C., & Mozzanica, E. (2005). Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: a new approach in Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 105, 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, S. L., McQuaid, B., & Campbell, C. L. (1998). Using ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as a biological indicator of agroecosystem condition. Environmental Entomology, 27, 1102–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietikainen, A. S., Haimi, J., & Siitonen, J. (2003). Short-term responses of soil macroarthropod community to clear felling and alternative forest regeneration methods. Forest Ecology and Management, 172, 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebek, E. J., Hogg, D. B., & Young, D. K. (2002). Effect of four cropping systems on the abundance and diversity of epedaphic springtails (Hexapoda: Parainsecta: Collembola) in southern Wisconsin. Environmental Entomology, 31, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, A. A. (1998). Maturity Index for predatory soil mites (Mesostigmata:Gamasina) as an indicator of environmental impacts of pollution on forest soils. Applied Soil Ecology, 9, 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2000). SAS Online Doc, Version 8. SAS Institute: Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaghamersky, J. (2002). The Enchytraeidae of spruce forest plots of different exposure and acid deposition in a German mountain range. European Journal of Soil Biology, 38, 305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., & Smilauer, P. (2002). CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide, Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Wageningen and Ceske Budejovice: Biometris.

    Google Scholar 

  • The H. John Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment (2002). The state of the nation’s ecosystems: Measuring the lands, waters, and living resources of the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I. D. (2006). Monitoring of biodiversity indicators in boreal forests: a need for improved focus. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 121, 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topoliantz, S., Ponge, J. F., & Viaux, P. (2000). Earthworm and enchytraeid activity under different arable farming systems, as exemplified by biogenic structures. Plant Soil, 225, 39–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tshiguvho, T. E., Dean, W. R. J., & Robertson, H. G. (1999). Conservation value of road verges in the semi-arid Karoo, South Africa: ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as bio-indicators. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 1683–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Straalen, N. M., & Verhoef, H. A. (1997). The development of a bioindicator system for soil acidity based on arthropod pH preferences. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet, P. C. J., Beare, M. H., & Coleman, D. C. (1995). Population dynamics and functional roles of Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta) in hardwood forest and agricultural ecosystems. Plant and Soil Science, 63, 237–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, Q. M., & Nguyen, T. T. (2000). Microarthropod community structures (Oribatei and Collembola) in Tam Dao National Park, Vietnam. Journal of Biosciences, 25, 379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. H., 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. BioScience, 107–08.

  • Wander, M. M., & Drinkwater, L. E. (2000). Fostering soil stewardship through soil quality assessment. Applied Soil Ecololgy, 15, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, W. G., van Zee, J., Nash, M. S., Smith, W. E., & Herrick, J. E. (1999). Ants as indicators of exposure to environmental stressors in North American desert grasslands. Environmental Monitoring And Assessment, 54, 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda, H. (1981). Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia, 50, 296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. D. A. Neher & T. R. Weicht

    Present address: Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA

  2. M. E. Barbercheck

    Present address: Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA

    M. E. Barbercheck

  2. Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA

    D. A. Neher, O. Anas & S. M. El-Allaf

Authors
  1. M. E. Barbercheck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. A. Neher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. Anas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. M. El-Allaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. R. Weicht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Barbercheck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbercheck, M.E., Neher, D.A., Anas, O. et al. Response of soil invertebrates to disturbance across three resource regions in North Carolina. Environ Monit Assess 152, 283–298 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0315-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0315-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation