Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applying the grey assessment to the evaluation system of ecological green space on greening projects in Taiwan

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is designed to develop an alternative evaluation method for ecological green space. It offers criteria for identifying ecological green space on building sites. The grey decision-making method is applied to assess the greening project at the first step. The evaluation items are rebuilt by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method at the second step. The range of standard values and the weighting values are also obtained by AHP. Grey classes are identified using the whitening weight function of the grey number. The evaluation system of the ecological green space is framed by grey clusters. We considered the factors of building environment and the scale of building sites in the ecological greenery of green building sites.

This study proposes a new model to solve the problems hard to be quantified. Especially for those ecological benefits are too close to decide. Architects and landscape architects can input the engineering data and the design information into the ecological greenery assessment system. The identification and assessment system of green space is fit for Taiwan area. We will obtain the best greening project by the maximum value of absolute degree of grey incidence (max{ɛ ij }) in grey-decision making. The maximum value of synthetic clustering coefficient (max{σ k}) in grey clustering assessment reflects the quality and variation of green space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber, J. D., & Jordan, W. R. (1985). Restoration ecology: An environmental middle ground. Bioscience, 35(7), 399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. G., & Adams, L. (1999). A guide to urban habitat conservation planning. Lexington: University of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, W. F., & Ng, G. T. L. (1996). An assessment methodology for environmental policy instruments: An illustrative application to solid wastes in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Management, 48(3), 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, S. D., Bolton, S. M., & Fridley, J. L. (1997). Ecological Engineering: Design based on Ecological Principles. 1997 Annual ASAE Meeting, August 10–14, Paper No. 975035.

  • Bradley, G. A. (1995). Urban landscape: Integrating multidisciplinary perspectives. University of Washington Press.

  • Bryan, S., Cutler, D., & Burton, J. A. (Eds.) (2002). Wildlife and roads: The ecological impact. London: Imperial College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, N.-B., Chen, H. W., & Ning, S. K. (2001). Identification of river water quality using the Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 63(3), 293–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, N.-B., & Tseng, C. C. (1999). Optimal evaluation of expansion alternatives for existing air quality monitoring network by grey compromise programming. Journal of Environmental Management, 56(1), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. C., & Lin, S. J. (1999). Grey relation analysis of carbon dioxide emissions from industrial production and energy uses in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 56(4), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-F. (2001). The recording of Taiwan’s vegetation (Vol. 1): Introduction and general description of the vegetation belt. Taipei :Anan Guard Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinvaux, P. A. (1973). Introduction to ecology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J.-L. (1982). The control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters, 1982(5), 288–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J.-L. (1998). Efficacy of grey assessment. Journal of Grey System, 1998(3), 244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J.-L. (2000). Common operation and concept number in grey theory. Journal of Grey System, 2000(2), 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, J. (1996). Green shift: Towards a green sensibility in architecture. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flink, C., & Searns, R. (1993). Greenway: A guide to planning, design, and development. Washington D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. (2002). The missing catalyst: Design and planning with ecology roots. In: B. R. Johnson & K. Hill (Eds.), Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning (pp. 85-109). Washington D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara, K., Hayashi, H., & Miyawaki, A. (1988). Restoration of natural environment by creation of environmental protection forests in urban areas: Growth and development of environmental protection forests on the Yokohama National University campus. Bulletin of the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Yokohama National University, 15(1), 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, G. W. (1995). The urban forest: Comprehensive management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S.-T.(1998). The planning of the road and water ecosystem: The new habitat of animals. Taipei: Country Culture Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, D. R. (1975). The distribution of woodland plant species in some Shropshire hedgerows. Biological Conservation, 7, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersperger, A. M., & Forman, R. T. T. (2003). Adjacency arrangement effects on plant diversity and composition in woodland patches. Oikos, 101, 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M. (1995). Cities and natural process. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. (2000). Hard green: Saving the environment from the environmentalists a conservative manifesto. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ite, K. (1980). The ecology of green space conservation. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ite, K., & Kameyama, A. (1993). The ecology of green space. Tokyo: Asa Kura Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jim, C. Y. (2004). Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities, 21(4), pp. 311–320 August, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W. R., Gilpin, M. E., & Aber, J. D. (1987). Restoration ecology: A synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press.

  • Kuo, C.-M. (2001). Discuss the near-natural engineering from the perspective of Taiwan ecology. 2001 The Conference of Eco-engineering, Taipei: Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, pp. 9–1∼9–14.

  • Lacher, W. (1995). Physiological plant ecology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M.-J., & Hsueh, I.-C. (2001). Tropical and subtropical forest formations in Taiwan. China Forestry Seasonal Journal, 34(3), 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-T. (2003). Green architecture in hot-humid climates. Taipei: Chans Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-T. (2004a). Evaluation manual for green buildings in Taiwan, renewed edition. Taipei: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-T. (2004b). Technical handbook for green building design in Taiwan. Taipei: Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-T., Wang, S.-Y., Chang, S.-T., & Lee, K.-P. (2001). The effect of urban greenery on the efficiency of CO2 fixation. Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry, 34(1), 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L.-W. (2001). An approach to the indicator of ecological greenery on green building from the perspective of ecological engineering. Chung Kuo Institute of Technology Periodical, 23, 235–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L.-W. (2002). A study on the legalization of ecological greenery technique for green building design in Taiwan via restoration ecology approach. Chung Kuo Institute of Technology Periodical, 24, 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L.-W., Cheng, C.-L., & Chen, T.-C. (2004). The revegetation of ecological green space for green building design in Taiwan via restoration ecology approach. The 41st IFLA World Congress Proceeding, International Federation of Landscape Architecture. S4-3, 251–266.

  • Lin, W.-C. (1991). The thoughts and proposing of the forest culture year. Contemporary Forestation, 14(2), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-C. (1993). Forest aesthetics. Taipei: ShuXin Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhzoumi, J., & Pungetti, G. (1999). Ecological landscape design and planning: The mediterranean context. New York: E & FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. (1998). Ecological engineering: The seven-year itch. Ecological Engineering, 10, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J., & Jorgensen, S. E. (2004). Ecological engineering and ecosystem restoration. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyawaki, A. (1998). Restoration of urban green environments based on the theories of vegetation ecology. Ecological Engineering, 11(1–4), 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyawaki, A. (2004). Restoration of living environment based on vegetation ecology: Theory and practice. Ecological Research, 19(1), 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (1999). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki, P., Bennett, G., & Middleton, D. (Eds.) (1996). Perspectives on ecological networks. Tilburg: ECNC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T., Brown, M. T., & Ulgiati, S. (1999). Ecosystems as energetic systems. In: S. E. Jorgensen & F. Muller (Eds.), Handbook of ecosystem theories. New York: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, B. L. (2003). Green plot ratio: An ecological measure for architecture and urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(4), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, D. J., Fenton, M. B., & Carmody, G. R. (1974). The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology, 11, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, S., Pakeman, R. J., & Marrs, R. H. (2000). Describing vegetation succession after bracken control: Evaluation of the REBRA model. Journal of Environmental Management, 59(1), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq, R., & Rodriguez, M. J. (2004). Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of disinfection by-products – A risk-based indexing system. Journal of Environmental Management, 73(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, K. (1988). The outline of the forest scenic textbook. Tokyo: Chiba University, Department of Horticulture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, H.-F., & Chang, D.-E. (1998). The theory and management techniques of wild animal protection. ShangHai: East China Normal University Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, S. (1996). Noah’s garden: Restoring the ecology of our own backyards. New York: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F., & Steiner, F. (Eds.) (1997). Ecological design and planning. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W., & Sorvig, K. (2000). Sustainable landscape construction: A guide to green buildings outdoors. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorén, K. H. (2000). “The green poster” A method to evaluate the sustainability of the urban green structure. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, G.-H., Tsaur, S.-H., Laiw, Y.-D., & Opricovic, S. (2002). Multicriteria analysis of environmental quality in Taipei: public preferences and improvement strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uricchio, V. F., Giordano, R., & Lopez, N. (2004). A fuzzy knowledge-based decision support system for groundwater pollution risk evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 73(3), 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ryn, S. & Cowon, S.(1996). Ecological Design. Washington D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H.-Y. (2002). Assessment and prediction of overall environmental quality of Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 66(3), 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann, D. (1996). Deep design: Pathways to a livable future. Washington D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1997). Signature-base landscape design. In: F. Thompson, & F. Steiner (Eds.), Ecological design and planning (pp. 201–225). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J.-G. (2000). Landscape ecology: Establishment, process, scale and level. Peking: Higher Education Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, R. (1999). Senryaku kankyo keiei eco-design. Tokyo: DMN Eco-design Kenkyukai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeang, K. (1995). Design with nature: The ecological basis for architectural design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zen, H., Phang, S.-L., & Wu, J.-G. (2002). The introduction of restoration ecology. In: J.-G. Wu, & S.-K. Han (Eds.), The contemporary ecology series II (pp. 68–72). Peking: China Technology Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X.-Y., Chen, H.-S., & Sun, C.-Q. (2001). Restoration ecology principles and approaches of ecology restoration. Peking: Chinese Environmental Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsueh-Cherng Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, LW., Chen, CH., Chang, HC. et al. Applying the grey assessment to the evaluation system of ecological green space on greening projects in Taiwan. Environ Monit Assess 136, 129–146 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9670-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9670-x

Keywords