Skip to main content

In-vehicle Measurement of Ultrafine Particles on Compressed Natural Gas, Conventional Diesel, and Oxidation-catalyst Diesel Heavy-duty Transit Buses

Abstract

Many metropolitan transit authorities are considering upgrading transit bus fleets to decrease ambient criteria pollutant levels. Advancements in engine and fuel technology have lead to a generation of lower-emission buses in a variety of fuel types. Dynamometer tests show substantial reductions in particulate mass emissions for younger buses (<10 years) over older models, but particle number reduction has not been verified in the research. Recent studies suggest that particle number is a more important factor than particle mass in determining health effects. In-vehicle particle number concentration measurements on conventional diesel, oxidation-catalyst diesel and compressed natural gas transit buses are compared to estimate relative in-vehicle particulate exposures. Two primary consistencies are observed from the data: the CNG buses have average particle count concentrations near the average concentrations for the oxidation-catalyst diesel buses, and the conventional diesel buses have average particle count concentrations approximately three to four times greater than the CNG buses. Particle number concentrations are also noticeably affected by bus idling behavior and ventilation options, such as, window position and air conditioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adams, H., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., & Colvile, R. (2001). Determinants of fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK. Atmospheric Environment, 35(27), 4557–4566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L., Lau, W., Lee, S., & Chan, C. (2002). Commuter exposure to particulate matter in public transportation modes in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 36(21), 3363–3373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N., Gautam, M., Rapp, B., Lyons, D., Graboski, M., McCormick, R., et al. (1999). Diesel and CNG transit bus emissions characterization by two chassis dynamometer laboratories: Results and Issues. Warrendale, PA: SAE International (SAE# 1999-01-1469).

  • Clark, N., Kern, J., Atkinson, C., & Nine, R. (2002). Factors affecting heavy-duty diesel vehicle emissions. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 52(1), 84–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clean Air Task Force (CATF) (2005). A multi-city investigation of the effectiveness of retrofit emissions controls in reducing exposures to particulate matter in school buses. http://www.catf.us/publications/reports/CATF-Purdue_Multi_City_Bus_Study.pdf.

  • Dye, T., MacDonald, C., & Roberts, P. (1998). Mixing depth structure and evolution as diagnosed from upper-air meteorological data collected during two regional air quality studies. Proceedings of the Air & Waste Management Association’s annual meeting & exhibition, 98-WP76A.04.

  • EPA (2000a). Control of emissions of air pollution from 2004 and later model year heavy-duty highway engines and vehicles. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA420-F-00-026).

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2000b). Heavy-duty engine and vehicle standards and highway diesel fuel sulfur control requirements. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (EPA 420-F-00-057).

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2002). Health assessment document for diesel engine exhaust. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/600/8-90/057F).

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2005). Office of air quality planning and standards’ PM designations homepage. http://www.epa.gov/pmdesignations/index.htm. Accessed October 19, 2005.

  • Health Assessment Document for Diesel Engine Exhaust (2002). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC EPA/600/8-90/057F.

  • Holmen, B., & Ayala, A. (2002). Ultrafine PM emissions from natural gas, oxidation-catalyst diesel, and particle trap diesel heavy-duty transit buses. Environmental Science and Technology, 36(23), 5041–5050.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmen, B., & Qu, Y. (2004). Uncertainty in particle number modal analysis during transient operation of compressed natural gas, diesel, and trap-equipped diesel transit buses. Environmental Science and Technology, 38(8), 2413–2423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, J., Clark, N., & Nine, R. (2000). Factoring terrain effects into vehicle emissions modeling and inventory. Proc., 10th Annual Coordinating Research Council On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, California (March).

  • Lanni, T. (2003). Fine urban and precursor emissions control for diesel urban transit buses. Environmental Pollution, 123(3), 427–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, U., Mohr, M., Schweizer, T., & Rutter, J. (2003). Number size distribution of particulate emissions of heavy-duty engines in real world test cycles. Atmospheric Environment, 37(37), 5247–5259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maricq, M., Chase, R., Xu, N., & Laing, P. (2002). The effects of the catalytic converter and fuel sulfur level on motor vehicle particulate matter emissions: Light duty diesel vehicles. Environmental Science and Technology, 36(2), 283–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (1996). Alternative Fuel Transit Buses: Final Results from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Vehicle Evaluation Program. NREL/TP-425-20513. http://www.ctts.nrel.gov/heavy_vehicle/pdfs/transbus.pdf.

  • Riediker, M., Williams, R., Devlin, R., Griggs, T., & Bromberg, P. (2003). Exposure to particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and other air pollutants inside patrol cars. Environmental Science and Technology, 37(10), 2084–2093.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ristovski, Z., Morawska, L., Hitchins, J., Thomas, S., Greenaway, C., & Gilbert, D. (2000). Particle emissions from compressed natural gas engines. Journal of Aerosol Science, 31(4), 403–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., Mark, D., & Harrison, R.M. (2000). Characterization of particles from a current technology heavy-duty diesel engine. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(5), 748–755.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, S., Graham, J., & Striebich, R. (2001). Semi-volatile and particulate emissions from the combustion of alternative diesel fuels. Chemosphere, 42(5–7), 681–690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G., Campbell, T., Feuer, G. R., Masters, J., Samkian, A., & Paul, K.A. (2001). No breathing in the aisles: Diesel exhaust inside school buses. New York, NY: Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and Coalition for Clean Air, Inc.

  • The American Public Transportation Association’s website: http://www.apta.com

  • TEA-21 (The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century) (1998). U.S. Public Law 105–178, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C.

  • Yanowitz, J., McCormick, R. L., & Graboski, M. S. (2000). In-use emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(5), 729–740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Hinds, W. C., Kim, S., Shen, S., & Sioutas, C., et al. (2002). Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel traffic. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 4323–4335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davyda Hammond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammond, D., Jones, S. & Lalor, M. In-vehicle Measurement of Ultrafine Particles on Compressed Natural Gas, Conventional Diesel, and Oxidation-catalyst Diesel Heavy-duty Transit Buses. Environ Monit Assess 125, 239–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9515-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9515-z

Keywords

  • Particulate matter
  • Transit buses
  • Heavy-duty diesel engines
  • Particle number
  • In-vehicle monitoring