Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Responses to Increasing Levels of Cattle Grazing in Blue Ridge Mountain Streams, Virginia, USA

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and cattle density was assessed from fall 2002 through spring 2004 in five small streams that represented a gradient of cattle grazing intensity. All study stream reaches were in pasture with no woody riparian vegetation, but varied in the intensity of cattle grazing (0 cattle ha−1 at site 1 to 2.85 cattle ha−1 at site 5). Regression analysis indicated highly significant and strong macroinvertebrate metric responses to cattle density during most sampling periods. The majority of metrics responded negatively to increased grazing, while a few (total taxa richness, number of sensitive taxa, and % collector filterers) increased along the gradient before declining at the most heavily grazed sites. Total number of sensitive taxa and % Coleoptera had the strongest relationship with cattle density throughout the study period. During some sampling periods, nearly 80% of the variation in these metrics was explained by cattle density. The elmid beetle, Oulimnius, had a particularly strong negative response to the grazing gradient. Study site groupings based on taxa composition, using detrended correspondence analysis (DCA), indicated that benthic samples collected from the reference site and light rotational grazing site were more similar in macroinvertebrate taxa composition than samples collected from the intermediate grazing and heavy grazing sites. Our findings demonstrate that biological integrity, as measured by benthic macroinvertebrate metrics and assemblage composition, is highly related to cattle density in small streams in the Blue Ridge mountains, Virginia, USA. This suggests that the degree of agricultural intensity should be given consideration in stream assessments, as well as land use planning and regulatory decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Armour, C. L., Duff, D. A., & Elmore, W. (1991). The effects of livestock grazing on riparian and stream ecosystems. Fisheries, 16, 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish (report no. EPA/841/B/98-010). Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Braccia, A., & Voshell, J. R., Jr. (in press). Benthic macroinvertebrate fauna in small streams used by cattle in the Blue Ridge mountains, Virginia. Northeastern Naturalist.

  • Brigham, A. R., Brigham, W. U., & Gnilka, A. (1982). Aquatic insects and Oligochaetes of North and South Carolina. Mahomet, IL: Midwest Aquatic Enterprises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. P. (1987). Biology of riffle beetles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chutter, F. M. (1969). The effects of silt and sand on the macroinvertebrate fauna of streams and rivers. Hydrobiologia, 34, 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. J., Wilcock, R. J., & Meredith, A. S. (1998). Influence of substrate type and physico-chemical conditions on macroinvertebrate faunas and biotic indices of some lowland Waikato, New Zealand, streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 32, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199, 1302–1310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. M. (1993). Biological effects of agriculturally derived surface water pollutants on aquatic systems—A review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 22, 402–408.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordone, A. J., & Kelley, D. W. (1961). The influences of inorganic sediment on the aquatic life of streams. California Fish and Game, 47, 189–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dance, K. W., & Hynes, H. B. N. (1980). Some effects of agricultural land use on stream insect communities. Environmental Pollution, 22, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delong, M. D., & Brusven, M. A. (1998). Macroinvertebrate community structure along the longitudinal gradient of an agriculturally impacted stream. Environmental Management, 22, 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, M. D., Foster, M. A., & Luff, M. L. (2005). Exploring the relationship between land cover and the distribution of water beetle species (Coleoptera) at the regional scale. Hydrobiologia, 533, 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, M. D., Pilkington, J. G., Carr, R., McBlane, R. P., Rushton, S. P., & Foster, G. N. (1993). The running-water beetles (Coleoptera) of a river catchment in northern England. Hydrobiologia, 264, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischner, T. L. (1994). Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western North America. Conservation Biology, 8, 629–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Criado, F., & Fernández-Aláez, M. (2001). Hydraenidae and Elmidae assemblages (Coleoptera) from a Spanish river basin: Good indicators of coal mining pollution? Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 150, 641–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G. (1982). Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. S., Roger, G. Y., Hayes, J. W., Shearer, K. A., & Stark, J. D. (1999). Changes in agricultural intensity and river health along a river continuum. Freshwater Biology, 42, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. L. (1969). The biotic regions of Virginia, the insects of Virginia: No. 1 (research division bulletin 48). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. (1971). The biology of polluted waters. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. B., & Krueger, W. C. (1984). Livestock impacts on riparian ecosystems and streamside management implications–A review. Journal of Range Management, 37, 430–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R. (1984). Agriculture and stream water quality: A biological evaluation of erosion control practices. Environmental Management, 8, 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., Penrose, D. L., & Eagleson, K. W. (1981). Variable effects of sediment addition on stream benthos. Hydrobiologia, 79, 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. F. (1996). Biology of freshwater pollution. Essex, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B., & Mefford, M. J. (1999). Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, Y., & Nakano, S. (2002). Effects of substratum stability on diversity of stream invertebrates during baseflow at two spatial scales. Freshwater Biology, 47, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, L. B., Edwards, W. M., & Van Keuren, R. W. (1996). Sediment losses from a pastured watershed before and after stream fencing. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 51, 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. M., Cooper, A. B., Davies-Colley, R. J., Rutherford, J. C., & Williamson, R. B. (1997). Land use effects on habitat, water quality, periphyton, and benthic invertebrates in Waikato, New Zealand, hill-country streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 31, 579–597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scrimgeour, G., & Kendall, S. (2003). Effects of livestock grazing on benthic macroinvertebrates from a native grassland ecosystem. Freshwater Biology, 48, 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovell, L. A., Vondracek, B., Frost, J. A., & Mumford, K. G. (2000). Impacts of rotational grazing and riparian buffers on physiochemical and biological characteristics of southeastern Minnesota, USA, streams. Environmental Management, 26, 629–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, R. M. (1964). Water quality criteria for elmid beetles with larval and adult keys to the eastern genera. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Stream Pollution Control Board, Tennessee Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M., & Merritt, R. W. (1999). Impacts of livestock grazing activities on stream insect communities and the riverine environment. American Entomologist, 45, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble, S. W., & Mendel, A. C. (1995). The cow as a geomorphic agent–A critical review. Geomorphology, 13, 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Agricultural Statistics Service (2004). Historic census county data for Virginia, 1935–1997 census historical data for major commodities. Retrieved June 2005, from http://www.jass.usda.gov/va.

  • Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (2005). Associations between biological metrics, physical habitat, and water chemistry in Virginia’s montane ecoregions (WqA/2005-001). Richmond, VA: Office of Water Quality and Assessments.

  • Waters, T. F. (1995). Sediments in streams: Sources, biological effects and control. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, N. E., & Carline, R. F. (1996). Relations among riparian grazing, sediment loads, macroinvertebrates, and fishes in three central Pennsylvania streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53, 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. J., & Armitage, P. (1997). Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management, 21, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, A. J., Omernik, J. M., Brown, D. D., & Kilsgaard, C. W. (1996). Level III and IV ecoregions of Pennsylvania and the Blue Ridge Mountains, the Ridge and Valley, and the Central Appalachians of Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland. (EPA/600R-96/077). Corvallis, OR: US Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Braccia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braccia, A., Voshell, J.R. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Responses to Increasing Levels of Cattle Grazing in Blue Ridge Mountain Streams, Virginia, USA. Environ Monit Assess 131, 185–200 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9467-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9467-3

Keywords