Abstract
The Kings Cross/St. Pancras area has been a rail transport hub from Central London to the Midlands and North Eastern England since the middle of the nineteenth century and dust from the Kings Cross railway lands was even described by Charles Dickens.1 The Channel Tunnel high speed Rail Link (CTRL) is being constructed between 2001 and 2007 to connect continental Europe to Central London. The CTRL and associated development will help regenerate an area that is surrounded by deprived high density housing estates. London Borough of Camden has set up an extensive particulate monitoring programme to determine if there are any health impacts on local residents from emissions from the demolition and construction work. This article assesses the results from particulate measurements in 2003–2004 and compares this to baseline conditions before the redevelopment work began. The evidence suggests that although 2003 had higher than average pollution levels in the UK as a whole, even higher levels of particulates in the size range PM10–PM2.5 (defined as PMcoarse) were measured in Kings Cross. Due to the size of these particulates, they tend to be released from construction works rather than transport or secondary particulate sources. Concentrations in 2004 were lower than 2003, but this was primarily due to meteorological conditions. The paper also looks at the health of the local population and discusses whether these elevated levels are creating a problem and legally constitute a statutory nuisance. The Council continues to work with the contractors to try and ensure best practical means to minimise dust emissions and their effect on local residents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AQEG (2005). Particulate matter in the UK. London: Defra.
DETR (2002). The air quality strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Working together for clean air. London: HMSO.
EH40 (2003). Occupational exposure limits. London: UK Health and Safety Executive.
Environmental Protection Act (1990). Environmental Protection Act. London: HMSO (Reprinted with corrections 1998).
Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards (EPAQS) (1995). Particles. London: DOE, HMSO.
European Commission (2003). CAFÉ Working Group second position paper on particulate matter. Stockholm: CAFÉ.
European Commission (2005). Directive on Ambient Air Quality and Clean Air for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Fuller, G. W., & Green, D. (2004). The impact of local fugitive PM10 from building works and road works on the assessment of the European Union Limit Value. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 4993–5002.
Greater London Authority (2002). Cleaning London’s air. London: The Mayor’s Air Quality Strategy.
Greater London Authority/Transport for London (2005). London atmospheric emission inventory (2002 data). London: Greater London Authority/Transport for London.
London Borough of Camden (2002). Further review and assessment of air quality. London: London Borough of Camden.
Tod, A., Given, G., & Scott C. (2002). PM10 concentrations in the London Borough of Camden: Comparisons of sampling techniques. Clean Air, 32, 37–42.
WHO (2003) Health aspects of air pollution with particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. http://www.euro.who.int/document/e79097.pdf.
Wivenhoe Port v Colchester Borough Council (1985). J.P.L396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
1Our Mutual Friend
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haynes, R., Savage, A. Assessment of the Health Impacts of Particulates from the Redevelopment of Kings Cross. Environ Monit Assess 130, 47–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9449-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9449-5