Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Health Impacts of Particulates from the Redevelopment of Kings Cross

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Kings Cross/St. Pancras area has been a rail transport hub from Central London to the Midlands and North Eastern England since the middle of the nineteenth century and dust from the Kings Cross railway lands was even described by Charles Dickens.1 The Channel Tunnel high speed Rail Link (CTRL) is being constructed between 2001 and 2007 to connect continental Europe to Central London. The CTRL and associated development will help regenerate an area that is surrounded by deprived high density housing estates. London Borough of Camden has set up an extensive particulate monitoring programme to determine if there are any health impacts on local residents from emissions from the demolition and construction work. This article assesses the results from particulate measurements in 2003–2004 and compares this to baseline conditions before the redevelopment work began. The evidence suggests that although 2003 had higher than average pollution levels in the UK as a whole, even higher levels of particulates in the size range PM10–PM2.5 (defined as PMcoarse) were measured in Kings Cross. Due to the size of these particulates, they tend to be released from construction works rather than transport or secondary particulate sources. Concentrations in 2004 were lower than 2003, but this was primarily due to meteorological conditions. The paper also looks at the health of the local population and discusses whether these elevated levels are creating a problem and legally constitute a statutory nuisance. The Council continues to work with the contractors to try and ensure best practical means to minimise dust emissions and their effect on local residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AQEG (2005). Particulate matter in the UK. London: Defra.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR (2002). The air quality strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Working together for clean air. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • EH40 (2003). Occupational exposure limits. London: UK Health and Safety Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Act (1990). Environmental Protection Act. London: HMSO (Reprinted with corrections 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards (EPAQS) (1995). Particles. London: DOE, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003). CAFÉ Working Group second position paper on particulate matter. Stockholm: CAFÉ.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005). Directive on Ambient Air Quality and Clean Air for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, G. W., & Green, D. (2004). The impact of local fugitive PM10 from building works and road works on the assessment of the European Union Limit Value. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 4993–5002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greater London Authority (2002). Cleaning London’s air. London: The Mayor’s Air Quality Strategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greater London Authority/Transport for London (2005). London atmospheric emission inventory (2002 data). London: Greater London Authority/Transport for London.

    Google Scholar 

  • London Borough of Camden (2002). Further review and assessment of air quality. London: London Borough of Camden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tod, A., Given, G., & Scott C. (2002). PM10 concentrations in the London Borough of Camden: Comparisons of sampling techniques. Clean Air, 32, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2003) Health aspects of air pollution with particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. http://www.euro.who.int/document/e79097.pdf.

  • Wivenhoe Port v Colchester Borough Council (1985). J.P.L396.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Haynes.

Additional information

1Our Mutual Friend

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haynes, R., Savage, A. Assessment of the Health Impacts of Particulates from the Redevelopment of Kings Cross. Environ Monit Assess 130, 47–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9449-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9449-5

Keywords

Navigation