Quantification of the Impact of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in Pingbian County, China

Abstract

Pingbian Miao Autonomous County is one of the poorest rural areas in China. Land-use changes, mainly driven by agricultural expansion and deforestation, may significantly impact ecosystem services and functions, but such effects are difficult to quantify. In the present study, Landsat image data were combined with the published coefficients about the world and China ecosystem to quantify land-use and ecosystem service changes in the mountainous area. A sensitivity analysis was employed to determine the effect of manipulating these coefficients on the estimated values. Our results show that during the past decades (from 1973 to 2004) forests and grasslands were converted into shrubland and cropland, respectively, resulting in a continuous decrease in ecosystem service (from 124.5 US$ × 106 in 1973 to 100.4 US$ × 106 in 2004). We found that the decrease of mixed forest in the study area was the largest contributor (i.e., 25.4 US$ × 106) to the decline of the ecosystem service. Therefore we propose that future land-use policy should pay more attention to the crucial ecosystem functions of these forests (including tropical forest), and that it is necessary to balance the relationship between the livelihood of local farmers and environmental protection in order to maintain a healthy and stable ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Chen, Z. X., & Zhang, X. S. (2000). The value of ecosystem services in China. Science in China (Series D), 45, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Daily, G. C. (1997). Introduction: What are ecosystem services. In G. C. Daily (Ed.), Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems (pp. 1–10). Washington, District of Columbia: Island.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faminow, M. D. (1998). Cattle, deforestation, and development in the Amazon: An economic, agronomic, and environmental perspective (p. 253). New York: Cab International.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fearnside, P. M. (1997). Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia. Ecological Economics, 20, 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo, Z., Xiao, X., Gan, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2001). Ecosystem functions, services and their values—A case study in Xingshan County of China. Ecological Economics, 38, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, Z. W., Xiao, X. M., & Li, D. M. (2000). An assessment of ecosystem services: Water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecological Applications, 10(3), 925–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kremen, C. (2005). Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters, 8, 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kreuter, U. P., Harris, H. G., Matlock, M. D., & Lacey, R. E. (2001). Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics, 39, 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laurance, W. F. (1999). Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation, 91, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, J. Y., Liu, M. L., Zhuang, D. F., Zhang, Z. X., & Deng, X. Z. (2002). Spatial pattern analysis of the recent land-cover change in China. Science in China (Series D), 32, 1031–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, J. Y., Tian, H. Q., Liu, M. L., Zhuang, D. F., Melillo, J. M., & Zhang, Z. X. (2005). China’s changing landscape during the 1990s: Large-scale land transformations estimated with satellite data. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L02405, doi:10.1029/2004GL021649.

  13. Mansfield, E. (1985). Microeconomics: Theory and applications, 5th ed. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pearce, D., & Moran, D. (1994). The economic value of biodiversity. Cambridge: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peters, C. M., Gentry, A. H., & Mendelsohn, R. O. (1989). Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature, 339, 655–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Portela, R., & Rademacher, I. (2001). A dynamic model of patterns of deforestation and their effect on the ability of the Brazilian Amazonia to provide ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 143, 2115–2146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rees, W. G., & Williams, M. (1997). Monitoring changes in land cover induced by atmospheric pollution in the Kola Peninsula, Russia, using Landsat-MSS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 1703–1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sutton, P. C., & Costanza, R. (2002). Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics, 41, 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tømmervik, H., Høgd, A. K., & Inger, S. I. (2003). Monitoring vegetation changes in Pasvik (Norway) and Pechenga in Kola Peninsula (Russia) using multitemporal Landsat MSS/TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 85, 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tong, C. I., Charles, A. S., & Wang, H. Q. (2003). Land use change in rice, wheat and maize production in China (1961–1998). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95, 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Verstraete, M. M., Pinty, B., & Myneni, R. B. (1996). Potential and limitations of information extraction on the terrestrial biosphere from satellite remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494–499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. White, P. C., Gregory, K. W., Lindsey, P. J., & Richards, G. (1997). Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: A case study of the Otter (Lutra lutra) and the water vole Arvicola terrestris. Biological Conservation, 82, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson, M. A., & Carpenter, S. (1999). Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecological Applications, 9(3), 772–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, B., Kreuter, U., Li, B., Ma, Z. J., Chen, J. K., & Nakagoshi, N. (2004). An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy, 21, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Ming He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, RQ., Dong, M., Cui, JY. et al. Quantification of the Impact of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in Pingbian County, China. Environ Monit Assess 128, 503–510 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9344-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Agricultural expansion
  • Deforestation
  • Ecosystem services
  • Pingbian County
  • Remote sensing