Abstract
Considerable attention has been devoted to selecting bioindicator species as part of monitoring programs for exposure and effects from contaminants in the environment. Yet the rationale for selection of bioindicators is often literature-based, rather than developed with a firm site-specific base of data on contaminant levels in a diverse range of organisms at different trophic levels in the same ecosystem. We suggest that this latter step is an important phase in the environmental assessment process that is often missing. In this paper we address the problem of how to select a wide range of species representing different trophic levels that serve as a basis for selecting a few species suitable as bioindicators. We illustrate this with our assessment of radionuclides on Amchitka Island, Alaska. We propose a multi-stage process for arriving at the list of available species that includes review of literature, review by experts experienced in the area, review by interested and affected parties, selection of trophic levels or groups for analysis, arraying of possible species, and selection of species within each trophic level group for sample collection. We first had to identify all likely species, then narrow our focus to those we could collect and analyze. In all cases, review includes suggestions for possible target species with justifications. While this method increases the up-front costs of developing bioindicators for an ecosystem, it has the advantage of providing information for selection of species that will be most informative in the long run, including those that are the best bioaccumulators, thus providing the earliest warning of any potential environmental consequences. Further, the recognition that a range of stakeholder's needs and interests should be included increases the utility for public-policy makers, and the potential for continued usage to establish long-term trends.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burger, J.: 1999, ‘Environmental monitoring on department of energy lands: The need for a holistic plan’, Strategic Environ. Manage. 1, 351–367.
Burger, J.: 2000, ‘Integrating environmental restoration and ecological restoration: Long-term stewardship at the department of energy’, J. Environ. Manage. 26, 469–478.
Burger, J.: 2006, ‘Bioindicators: Types, development, and use in ecological assessment and research’, Environ. Bioindic. 11–18
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M.: 2001a, ‘On developing bioindicators for human and ecological health’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 66, 23–46.
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M.: 2001b, ‘Effects of chemicals and pollution on seabirds’, in E. A. Schreiber and J. Burger, eds. Biology of Marine Birds CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp. 485–525.
Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M.: 2004, ‘Bioindicators for assessing human and ecological health’, in G. B. Wiersma, ed. Environmental Monitoring CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 541–566.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D, Powers, C. W., Friedlander, B., Eichelberger, J., Barnes, D., Duffy, L. C., Jewett, S. J. and Volz, C. D.: 2005, ‘Science, policy, and stakeholders: Developing a consensus science plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska’, Environ. Manage. 35, 557–568.
Burger, J., Mayer, J. J., Greenberg, M., Powers, C. W., Volz, C. D. and Gochfeld, M.: 2006, ‘Conceptual site models as a tool in evaluating ecological health: The case of the Department of Energy's Amchitka Island nuclear test shot’, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health69: 1–22.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Powers, C. W., Kosson, D., Duffy, L., Halverson, J., Morkill, A., Patrick, R. and Sanders, P. ms. ‘Scientific research, stakeholders, and policy: Continuing dialogue during research on radionuclides on Amchitka Island’, Environ. Manage.
Cairns, J. Jr.: 1990, ‘The genesis of biomonitoring in aquatic ecosystems’, Environ. Profess. 12, 169–176.
Carignan, V. and Villard, M. A.: 2001, ‘Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: A review’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 78, 45–61.
Cifuentes, J. M., Becker, P. H., Sommer, H., Pacheco, P. and Schlatter, R.: 2003, ‘Seabird eggs as bioindicators of chemical contamination in Chili’, Environ. Poll. 126, 123–137.
Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP): 2002, Proceedings of the Amchitka Long-Term Stewardship Workshop, CRESP/University of Alaska. Fairbanks, AK (held 12–14 February 2002).
Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP): 2003, Amchitka Independent Assessment Science Plan, CRESP, Piscataway, NJ. http:/www.cresp.org.
Dasher, D., Hanson, W., Read, S., Faller, S., Farmer, D., Efurd, W., Kelley, J. J. and Patrick, R.: 2002, ‘An assessment of the reported leakage of anthropogenic radionuclides from the underground nuclear test sites at Amchitka Island, Alaska, USA to the surface environment’, J. Environ. Radioactivity 60, 165–187.
Department of Energy (DOE): 2000, United States Nuclear Tests July 1945 through September 1992, Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, Nevada (DOE/NV-209).
Department of Energy (DOE): 2002a, Modeling Groundwater Flow and Transport of Radionuclides at Amchitka Island's Underground Nuclear Tests: Milrow, Long Shot, and Cannikan, Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, Nevada (DOE/NV-11508-51).
Department of Energy (DOE): 2002b, Screening Risk Assessment for Possible Radionuclides in the Amchitka Marine Environment, Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, Nevada (DOE/NV-857).
Eichelberger, J. C., Freymueller, J., Hill, G. and Patrick, M.: 2002, ‘Nuclear stewardship: Lessons from a not-so-remote island’, Geotimes 47, 20–23.
Faller, S. H. and Farmer, D. E.: 1998, Long-term Hydrological Monitoring Program: Amchitka, Alaska, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C. (EPA-402-R-98-002).
Fox, G. (ed.): 1994, Bioindicators as a Measure of Success for Virtual Elimination of Persistence Toxic Substances, International Joint Comm., Hull, Quebec, Canada.
Greenpeace: 1996, Nuclear Flashback: The Return to Amchitka, Greenpeace, USA.
Hunsaker, C., Carpenter, D. and Messer, J.: 1990, ‘Ecological indicators for regional monitoring’, Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 71, 165–172.
Jacob, K.: 1984, ‘Estimates of long-term probabilities for future great earthquakes in the Aleutians’, Goephys. Res. Lett. 11, 295–298.
Jewett, S. C.: 2002, ‘Radionuclide contamination in nearshore habitats around Amchitka Island, Alaska’, In Proceedings of the Amchitka Long-term Stewardship Workshop, CRESP/University of Alaska. Fairbanks, AK (held 12–14 February 2002).
Kohlhoff, D. W.: 2002, ‘Amchitka and the Bomb: Nuclear Testing in Alaska’, University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.
Linthurst, R. A., Bourdeau, P. and Tardiff, R. G.: 1995, Methods to Assess the Effects of Chemicals on Ecosystems, Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
Merritt, M. L. and Fuller R. G. (eds.): 1977, The Environment of Amchitka Island, Alaska, U.S., Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington D.C. (Report NVO–79).
National Research Council (NRC): 1983, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
National Research Council: 1993, Issues in Risk Assessment, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
National Research Council (NRC): 1996, The Bering Sea Ecosystem, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
Norris, R. S. and Arkin, W. M.: 1998, ‘NRDC nuclear notebook known nuclear tests worldwide, 1945–98’, Bull. Atomic Sci. November/December 1998.
O'Connor, J. S. and Dewling, R. T.: 1986, ‘Indices of marine degradation: Their utility’, Environ. Manage. 10, 335–343.
O'Neill, D. T.: 1994, The Firecracker Boys, St. Martin's Press, New York.
Page, R. A., Biswas, N. N., Lahr, J.C. and Pulpan, H.: 1991, ‘Seismicity of continental Alaska’, in: D. B. Slemmons, E. R. Engldahl, M. D. Zoback, and D. D. Blackwell, (eds.), Neotectonics of North America Geologicl Society of America, Boulder, Colorado. pp. 47–68.
Patrick, R.: 2002, ‘How local Alaska native communities view the Amchitka issue’, In ‘Proceedings of the Amchitka Long-Term Stewardship Workshop,. CRESP/University of Alaska. Fairbanks, AK (held 12–14 February 2002).
Peakall, D.: 1992, Animal Biomarkers as Pollution Indicators, Chapman and Hall, London.
Piotrowski, J. K.: 1985, ‘Individual exposure and biological monitoring’, in V. B. Vouk, G. C. Butler, D. G. Hoel, and D. B Peakall, eds.). Methods for Estimating Risk of Chemical Injury: Human and Non-human Biota and Ecosystems, Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. pp.123–135.
Powers, C. W., Burger, J., Kosson, D., Gochfeld, M. and Barnes, D. (eds): 2005, Amchitka Independent Assessment: Biological and Geophysical Aspects of Potential Radionuclide Exposure in the Amchitka Marine Environment, Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP), Piscataway, NJ. http:/www.cresp.org.
President's Commission (PCCRAM): 1997, Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Robbins, A., Makhijani, A. and Yih, K.: 1991, Radioactive Heaven and Earth–The Health and Environmental Effects of Nuclear Weapon Testing in, on and above the Earth', Apex Press, New York.
Seymour, A. H. and Nelson, V. A.: 1977, ‘Radionuclides in air, water, and biota’, in M. L. Merritt and R. G. Fuller, eds.). The Environment of Amchitka Island, Alaska Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. pp. 579–613 (Report TID- 26712).
Stout, B. B.: 1993, ‘The good, the bad and the ugly of monitoring programs: Defining questions and establishing objectives’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 26, 91–98.
Suter, G. W. II.: 1990, ‘Endpoints for regional ecological risk assessment’, Environ. Manage. 14, 9–23.
Thompson, D. R., Furness, R. W. and Monteiro, L. R.: 1998, ‘Seabirds as biomonitors of mercury inputs to epipelagic and mesopelagic marine food chains’, Sci. Total Environ. 213, 299–305.
Valdez, R. A., Helm, W. T. and Neuhold, J. M. 1977, ‘Aquatic ecology’, in M. L. Merritt and R. G. Fuller, (eds.), The Environment of Amchitka Island, Alaska Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. pp. 287–314. (Report TID–26712).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M. & Jewett, S. Selecting Species for Marine Assessment of Radionuclides Around Amchitka: Planning for Diverse Goals and Interests. Environ Monit Assess 123, 371–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9203-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9203-z