Skip to main content

Evaluation of Noise Pollution in Urban Parks

Abstract

The present study provides an evaluation of noise pollution in six Urban Parks located in the city of Curitiba, Brazil. Equivalent noise levels (L eq) were measured in 303 points (each point measured during 3 min) spread throughout the Parks. Measured values were confronted with local legislation (Law 10625) allowed limits, and the Parks were thus classified as “acoustically polluted or unpolluted”. Measured values were also evaluated according to international legislation: Decree no. 12 of the City Council of Rome, DIN 18005 for German cities, the World Health Organization, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Urban parks in the downtown area of Curitiba, surrounded by roads of heavy traffic and in the midst of intense commercial activities, do not satisfy any of the standards used. The most noise-polluted parks in Curitiba were the Public Walk Park and the Botanical Garden Park, with measured L eq of 64.8 dB(A) and 67 dB(A).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Abdel-Raziq, I. R., Zeid, Q. and Seh, M.: 2000, ‘Noise measurements in the community of Nablus in Palestine’, Acustica 86, 578–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arana, M. and Garcia, A. A.: 1998, ‘A social survey on the effects on environmental noise on the residents of Pamplona, Spain’, Appl. Acoust. 53, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L.: 1994, ‘Exposure of the Australian population to road traffic noise’, Appl. Acoust. 43, 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. and Lam, K. C.: 1987, ‘Urban noise surveys’, Appl. Acoust. 20, 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, Report for 2000, Brasília, D.F. Brazil.

  • Brambilla, G.: 2004, ‘Noise and soundscape in Rome’, in: 147th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, New York: Acoust. Soc. Am. 1, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüel and Kjaer: 2004, Technical Documentation 2238 and 2260 Integrating and Logging Sound Level Meter, Naerum — Denmark.

  • Cannelli, G. B., Glück, K. and Santoboni, S.: 1983, ‘Traffic noise pollution in Rome’, Appl. Acoust. 7, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D., Santra, S. C., Mukherjee, A., Roy, B. and Das, P.: 1997, ‘Status of road traffic noise in Calcuta metropolis, India’, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 943–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DECREE no.12 of the City Council of Rome 2004.

  • DIN 18005 Teil 1: 1987, Schallschutz im Städtebau — Berechnungsverfahren. Berlin, Beuth Verlag (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diniz, F. B. and Zannin, P. H. T.: 2005, ‘Calculation of noise maps around electrical energy substations’, Appl. Acoust. 66, 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency, Curitiba: 1995, Lei Municipal 8583 (in Portuguese).

  • Environmental Protection Agency, Curitiba: 2002, Lei Municipal 10625 (in Portuguese).

  • Khilman, T.: 2004, ‘Noise pollution in cities, Curitiba and Göteborg as examples’, in: Proceedings of the Seminar — Environmental Aspects of Urbanization — Seminar in Honor of Dr. Mostafa Kamal Tolba, Gothenburg, Sweden, in CD.

  • Korfali, S. I. and Massoud, M.: 2003, ‘Assessment of community noise problem in greater Beirut area, Lebanon’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 84, 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, F. J.: 1976, ‘Noise nuisance caused by road traffic in residential areas: Part I’, J. Sound Vibration, 47(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonĉa, M. N.: 1992, Curitiba sem mestre, Fundaĉáo Cultural, Curitiba, pp. 123 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morillas, J. M. B., Escobar, V. G., Sierra, J. A. M., Gómez, R. V. and Carmona, J. T.: 2002, ‘An environmental noise study in the city of Cáceres, Spain’, Appl. Acoust. 63, 1061–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, G. H.: 2001, ‘Urban noise — a need for acoustic planning’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 67, 379–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Recuero, M., Gil, C. and Grundman, J.: 1987, ‘Effects of traffic noise within the Madrid region’, in: Fifth International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Ramalingeswara-Rao, P. and Seshagiri-Rao, M. G.: 1992, ‘Community reactions to road traffic noise’, Appl. Acoust. 37, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadan, A. A., Ayorinde, E. O. and Ogisi, F. O.: 1998, ‘Road traffic noise survey and analysis of source major urban centers in Nigeria’, Noise Contr. Eng. J. 46, 146–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency): 1974, ‘Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety’, EPA/ONAC 550/9-74-004.

  • WHO (World Health Organization): 1999, ‘Guidelines for Community Noise’, in: WHO-Expert Task Force Meeting, Held in London, April, UK.

  • Zannin, P. H. T. and Diniz, F. B.: 2002, ‘Environmental noise pollution in the city of Curitiba, Brazil’, Appl. Acoust. 63, 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zannin, P. H. T. and Szeremetta, B.: 2003, ‘Evaluation of noise pollution in the Botanical Garden in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil’, Public Health Rep. 19(2), 683–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zannin, P. H. T., Diniz, F. B., Ferreira, J. A. and Schuhli, R. B.: 2002, ‘Incômodo causado pelo Ruído Urbano á populaĉáo de Curitiba’, J. Public Health 36(4), 521–524.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Henrique Trombetta Zannin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zannin, P.H.T., Ferreira, A.M.C. & Szeremetta, B. Evaluation of Noise Pollution in Urban Parks. Environ Monit Assess 118, 423–433 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-1506-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-1506-6

Keywords

  • environmental noise
  • health
  • noise
  • noise pollution
  • open public spaces
  • public urban parks
  • US EPA
  • WHO